lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 5:08 am

This would be a theoretical or hypothetical political question.

Had we realized that in the future that we were part of a universal atmosphere of different planets and systems having similar political problems as we have been having here on Earth, would us not knowing about them prevent one of them from justifing a forced habitation and ruling an area on Earth that would otherwise be soverign with respect to us?

In otherwords, if their law states that a planet is soverign when it is "ruled by one", i.e. monoarchy, then the UN wouldn't even qualify as there are other nations not in the UN. So are we screwed, is Earth just a region of warlords, per se (don't get testy on my choice of words), compared to the universal community?

Like say there was a conflict between 3 systems and all of them noticed us all of a sudden within their expanding borders, could we on Earth represent ourselves without getting 'taken' as one of them? Is it their responsibility to consider diplomacy an option or would we see a war unlike we've ever seen?

We do not have yet to worry about a political interplanetary invasion or negotiation of our planet, but I think this is worth dicussing.
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
Guest

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 5:54 am

Is this your topic ?


 
LHMark
Posts: 7048
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 2:18 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:18 am

Ummm....right.


If this intergalactic society were revealed to us, it would probably change an awful lot of things here on Earth.
"Sympathy is something that shouldn't be bestowed on the Yankees. Apparently it angers them." - Bob Feller
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:21 am

Well....yeah, but are we soverign? Now, for example?

And, let me qualify, this is a serious inquiry to me. If it is not to you (Go4EVA) why respond at all?  Insane
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
ArmitageShanks
Posts: 3737
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 5:30 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:30 am

The only way we would have to be considered soverign is if some other group was there to challenge us and we had the ability to control our actions as one. Is that right?
 
Guest

RE: Is Earth Sovereign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 8:10 am

And, let me qualify, this is a serious inquiry to me. If it is not to you (Go4EVA) why respond at all?

I apologize. My bad...  Sad

Sometimes people put out threads similar to this but are attempting comedy. I guess that's what I did: "attempt".

Sorry.

- Jeff

My take on an answer, if I understand your premise correctly, would be that occupation seems like an implementation of a law whose consequence is loss of some sovereignty.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 8:14 am

The idea of "sovereignty" is a consensus-based convention. It doesn´t exist by itself.

So it would depend on the "universally" established consensus in that case... We could only hope to be lucky...  Wink/being sarcastic
 
rockyracoon
Posts: 1008
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 3:58 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 8:52 am

The aliens will have to send Gort to control us  Smile Gotta love The Day the Earth Stood Still
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13401
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sat Mar 06, 2004 9:52 am

No, but it IS sovereign.  Big grin
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
air2gxs
Posts: 1443
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2001 1:29 pm

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Sun Mar 07, 2004 11:45 pm

You can declare your-self sovereign all you want, unless you are recognized as sovereign by outsiders, it doesn't mean a thing.

To answer your question; I don't think that we would be considered sovereign at this point because we do not speak with one voice.
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:46 am

Go4EVA, you are forgiven with open arms.  Smile

If so, and Earth is not sovereign, does that mean any outside force has a right to invade? Maybe that is asked wrong, more like: Other than their morals, what is stopping them from acting however they want in their best interests?
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

Lehpron

Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:53 am

Nothing.

(Unless we´re hoping for bureaucracy, their own ineptitude or insufficient funding...  Wink/being sarcastic)
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:22 am

We assume there is no threat of invasion of any type just because we have not found intelligent beings such as us (at least news made publically known), shouldn't we prepare? I've heard all the fantasy senarios of alien invasions and whatnot that we'd see them from afar first, they wouldn't just materialize from nowhere, or would they? We also assme our science is the lastest and most advanced there is**. Would we have enough times if they found us?

We certainly can't tell them to go away, or given them the finger (like they'd understand), or tell them to "put 'em up bitch".

I agree, it does seems like a national security non-issue...now  Smile



**BTW, one of the things that have always gotten my goat is when our scientists claim aliens on Earth couldn't have been here just because our science proves they can't get here (by orders of magitude). Is this a joke? They do not live on our science, they have their own. How can we expect their technology to be limited by our known science? Is that not kind of ignorant/arrogant? The world does not revolve around us, metaphorically.
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
Banco
Posts: 14343
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2001 11:56 pm

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:36 am

The usual argument against fear of invasion is that any species capable of interstellar travel would have had to pass through a nuclear age first. Thus, any inherently warlike species would have wiped themselves out beforehand.

Secondly, the lack of discernible radio transmissions suggests that there aren't any advanced planets that near to us.

It could all be proved wrong in a twinkling, of course.
She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
 
LV-ARG
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2001 11:32 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Tue Mar 09, 2004 4:06 am

All will be part of the irken empire
I AM ZIM!
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Tue Mar 09, 2004 4:10 am

The question of invasion - or even of peaceful visits - is not nearly as simple as science fiction makes it out to be for obvious dramatic reasons.

The first thing that would happen would be an all-out war between the respective micro-fauna and -flora of the invaders/visitors and our own.
The major problems Australia and New Zealand are having with foreign species are a picnic against what both sides would have to face in case of direct contact.

So even if the problem of interstellar travel would have been solved, an invasion would almost certainly bring a lot more risks than potential benefits.

They could see us as a threat and simply try to destroy us, but that´s a different matter.

Anyway, we´re very probably far away from any capability to defend against an advanced attacker. Very little we could do. So let´s hope it will remain theoretical.  Wink/being sarcastic
 
L.1011
Posts: 2163
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2001 7:46 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Tue Mar 09, 2004 4:40 am

You have to remember that as intelligent life (be it people or otherwise) adapts to its specific environment, its science and invention develops differently. Undoubtably, we will have things the aliens would want, and they would have things that we want. These "war of the worlds" scenerios are fun for movies but the reality would probably be a peaceful and productive exchange of goods and ideas, because if they kill us, how will they know how to use our stuff. For someone that has never seen a cockpit before, its operation is not immedietely self-evident. Any relations would likely be peaceful. And, to address the question, I feel that Earth is not soverign, the United Nations is also a lousy representative. It seems that NATO would be an OK idea, but any delegation would have to be led by the United States, as we are the only nation that has the facilities to handle an alien landing. Also, don't forget, America is a nation consisting of every people and culture on the planet. We have embassies or consulates from almost every nation, so any reasonable person sees that we would be a great inital representative.
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:49 am

"These "war of the worlds" scenerios are fun for movies but the reality would probably be a peaceful and productive exchange of goods and ideas, because if they kill us, how will they know how to use our stuff"

Banco mentioned that "...usual argument against fear of invasion is that any species capable of interstellar travel would have had to pass through a nuclear age first..." and considering what you mentioned "...as intelligent life (be it people or otherwise) adapts to its specific environment, its science and invention develops differently...".

What are the chances that they, apart from developing differently, have discovered shortcuts to invention and thus would not have a need for our technology? Obviously if they have spaceships they may have airships of some kind, they will be facinated but not truly interested in what products we have to offer. They will, on the other hand, have a great need for our resources and since some areas of our planet have abundunt resources they may have the idea of uncrowding Earth for economical or even territorial concerns. It I ran into a lesser species (like mideast terror - no offence) that had something I wanted (WMD's), if I did not know anything about them before; I would want to perform a recon, establish a base and grab a few locals to see what they are like and ask questions (innocent of course, for diplomatic reasons); all in their region before it would be safe to take them out.

IMO, they will kill us provided they out numbered us technologically as opposed to individually. That is one reason why those poachers (black-eyed gray aliens) I read about are not about to take over the world, we outnumber them or they do not send enough of them here often enough. As if they are on a f*ckin expedition...  Insane
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:37 pm

Why risk being exposed to our hazardous biosphere when there are thousands of lifeless planets with similar resources? I just don´t buy the theory that aliens would go to all the trouble for just a few natural resources most of which would probably be easier accessible in space anyway (easier transportation).
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Is Earth Soverign?

Fri Mar 12, 2004 5:25 am

"Why risk being exposed to our hazardous biosphere when there are thousands of lifeless planets with similar resources?"

Really, I wanna know how you know that, what were your sources?

Besides, like I said, they could be just interested in us as a resource. 60 years ago, we basically told the nearby universe we are here -- with Trinity, the first atomic bomb. Granted it's energy magnitude must have been tiny when compared to, psh, everything in the universe; fission is not natural. Everything in space is fusion. The light from a fission reaction would show up differently to a detector. We assume our technology when figuring the sensitivity of this alien detector, let's say it was sensitve enough. None of the other planet are giving off this oh-so-faint unusual signal. Would it not be worth exploring, like if our Mars rovers dug around Mars and found a partial skeleton...
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

Lehpron

Fri Mar 12, 2004 7:32 am

a) Even the biggest hydrogen bomb (based on fission/fusion, by the way) would hardly register on even the best detectors from a larger distance against the background of our giant resident nuclear reactor in the center of our system.

b) Nuclear technology is still decidedly low-tech compared with what you´d need for interstellar travel. Just that some of us think it´s the greatest thing since the big bang doesn´t mean anybody else does.  Wink/being sarcastic

c) Basically the only resources on earth that can´t be found on lifeless planets would be the different kinds of fossil fuels. Not a big incentive for a civilization that can travel in space and could easily synthesize that stuff at a fraction of the energy it would take to import it from earth...

d) Apart from some understandable scientific curiosity, still: Why invade?

I just think the case against an invasion is a lot better than the one for it.
Not that I believe it mattered what I thought.  Wink/being sarcastic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 37 guests