rjpieces
Posts: 6849
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 8:58 am

Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 2:47 pm

If Spain's new government does go ahead and remove their troops from Iraq, it will give terrorists a new weapon to use and a new battleground to use it on.

Here is an excellent article by one of the few truly balanced MidEast reporters. The 2nd to last paragraph says it best and I can only hope that comes true.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/25/opinion/25FRIE.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists

OP-ED COLUMNIST
No Vote for Al Qaeda
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Published: March 25, 2004

There is nothing more important for the future of Western democracies than the question of whether, in the wake of the Madrid bombings, the new Spanish government will go ahead with its plan to withdraw Spanish forces from Iraq — unless the U.N. assumes control of the occupation forces there by June 30. If Spain goes ahead, every terrorist in the world will celebrate, and every democracy will be a little more endangered. I so hope Spain's incoming prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, reconsiders this decision.

Why? To answer that question I need to draw an analogy with a different era of Spanish history: the Spanish Civil War from 1936 to 1939, where all the big powers of that day tested out the weapons they would employ in World War II.

So here's my analogy: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is to the war on terrorism what the Spanish Civil War was to World War II. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is where airline hijacking, suicide bombing and assassinations with helicopter-mounted guided missiles were all perfected and made ready for export.

But it's not only types of violence that were perfected there. It was also there where Palestinian terrorists regularly attempted to hijack democratic elections on the eve of the vote. Liberal Labor Party candidates in Israel, throughout the 1980's and 1990's, always had to hold their breath that there would not be a big terrorist attack on the eve of an election. Because if there was, swing voters would usually move to the right and the Likud candidate would benefit. The Palestinian terrorists always "voted" Likud, not Labor. They wanted hard-liners at the helm in Israel because they would build more settlements and further radicalize and destabilize the situation.

In 1996, shortly after the murder of Yitzhak Rabin, Shimon Peres was leading Bibi Netanyahu by 20 points in opinion polls. Then Islamic terrorists unleashed bus bombings, killing 59 Israelis. Mr. Peres saw his lead wiped out, and then lost the election by a tiny margin. Suicide bombing totally undermined Labor's Ehud Barak and helped elect Ariel Sharon in 2001. So terrorists have been voting in Israel's elections for a long time.

What the Madrid bombings, just before the Spanish elections, represent is the Islamist terrorists' first attempt to hijack a democratic election in Western Europe.

Yes, yes, I know all the fine print. People say that the reason the ruling conservative party lost to the Socialists in Spain was because the conservatives tried to mislead the Spanish people by suggesting that the bombings were the work of Basque separatists, not Al Qaeda sympathizers unhappy with Spain's role in Iraq. And therefore, in voting for the Socialists, who were running on a pledge to withdraw Spanish forces from Iraq, the Spanish people were voting for truth in government — not to appease the Islamists by voting in the party that would pull out of Iraq.

Maybe that's true. Personally, I believe it's naïve to think that truth-in-government was the only thing motivating anguished Spanish swing voters after the bombings, and that there was not a twitch of appeasement in the air. But here's what I know for sure: Al Qaeda doesn't do exit polling. Al Qaeda does big picture.

If Mr. Zapatero goes through with his troop withdrawal from Iraq, Islamist terrorists will attribute it to the Madrid bombing. This big picture will absolutely encourage them to try this tactic, perfected in Israel and now imported to Spain, in other European or U.S. elections — to tilt the vote one way or another.

"The Spanish Civil War tested only weapons," said the Israeli political theorist Yaron Ezrahi. "The terrorism we have seen in Israel, and may soon see more of in Europe, is testing the fabric of democratic societies. What is being tested in Spain is this question: Does it pay for terrorists to try to hijack democratic elections? We have a clear-cut challenge here, and it must be met with an equally clear-cut response. Are leaders of Western nations going to reward the terrorists in their attempt to hijack democratic elections in a major European state or make them fail?"

If the European Union was thinking long-term, it would hold an emergency meeting and announce that each E.U. country would be sending 100 men to stand alongside the 1,300 Spanish soldiers in Iraq to help protect the Iraqi people as they try to organize their first democratic election — free of intimidation by terrorists.

That is a big picture that would make Al Qaeda weep.
"Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon"
 
Andreas
Posts: 5880
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 7:56 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 5:30 pm

Indeed if Spain does withdraw its troops now, that would be a political desaster, giving Al-Qaida a big win. But as I understand it, they want a UN mandate to keep on.
I know it's only VfB but I like it!
 
cfalk
Posts: 10221
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2000 6:38 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 7:17 pm

It may indeed be true that the Spanish were far more pissed off about the lies around the investigation rather than the Iraq war. I would say it probably is. The lies were stupid, and were bound to be revealed anyway eventually, leading to a government crisis and possible impeachment proceedings after the election - and this would have been the BEST case. So the Spanish were entirely correct in throwing out the bastards who tried to pull such a stupid stunt.

At the same time, the Socialists should really rethink about the decision to pull their troops out. There is no doubt that Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups found great encouragement in the Spanish elections. To them, they will see a clear example that terrorism works, and you can overthrow governments and make the new governments bow to your demands. Whether they are correct in that conclusion is beside the point. The important thing is that terrorism has been validated in their eyes, and they will thus increase their use of it in order to get other governments to do what they want.

If the new government decides to keep the troops in Iraq, even if only medics and logistics personnel, that would be enough to dispell the terrorists' idea that terrorism worked, by making it absolutely clear that the Spanish elections were won/lost on the basis of the politics of Spain, not because of the fear of terrorist strikes. It will be back to square one for them, and while it won't convince them to abandon terrorism, it won't encourage them either - especially if the new government reverses its previously stated policy in order to make a point absolutely clear - that they will not bow to terrorism.

Charles

[Edited 2004-03-25 11:19:19]
The only thing you should feel when shooting a terrorist: Recoil.
 
donder10
Posts: 6944
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 5:29 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 7:39 pm

There is nothing more important for the future of Western democracies than the question of whether, in the wake of the Madrid bombings, the new Spanish government will go ahead with its plan to withdraw Spanish forces from Iraq — unless the U.N. assumes control of the occupation forces there by June 30

Won't control have been handed over to the interim Iraqi government by then?
 
IndianGuy
Posts: 3126
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 3:14 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 7:47 pm

Spain will do whatever is in its best national interests. Period.

And what difference does it make even if Spain withdraws its troops? Spain is just a small, inconsequential little country in Europes backwaters (that part can also be declared as old Europe) and a decision to withdraw should not affect American presence in Iraq. After America is the most powerful "democracy on earth, too powerful tro be affected by old-Europes shenanigans, right?

America doesnt need the world as much as the World needs America.

 
keesje
Posts: 8864
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 10:11 pm

The (then) Spanish opposition promised the population they would withdraw from Iraq months before the bomb attack.

90% of the population was against them going into Iraq to start ....

So withdrawing basicly has nothing to do with the bomb

"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
QIguy24
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 1:13 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 10:17 pm

They have to withdraw their troops. If they don't do that there will be many spaniards that will be very pissed. Because that was a promise they made to the people. It was also one of the reasons they won the election.
It will be a big defeat for the socialists if they let the troops stay..
 
zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 10:35 pm

spains troop withdrawal will exactly be the opposite: a severe loss for terrorists.
why?
because it shows that democracy has won, that the spanish people did have determination to make their will heard and not break under the attacks in madrid. that the attempts to get the population into a state of fear by the government have failed and that the spanish people are determined to make their voice heard and their will done by their government.

spain does indeed only want one thing:
the u.n. to take over iraq to end the imperialism there and to allow the international community to take over. because what the terrorists want is a polarization in the region to give them more recruits. bushs imperialism only helps there. spains move is a blow to any terrorism efforts, because it assures moderate people that not all of the west has become a playball of u..s imperial doctrine, preventing them from supporting extremists.

in the short run some terrorists might think that this was a success. but far more important is the long term effect and signal of this move: that europe will not participate in imperialism and there are elements in the west that will not support such movements but rather support equality and prosperity for everyone. not only those "with us". you do not fight terrorism with military, you fight it with politics that root out the cause. spain has just done that.
10=2
 
Alpha 1
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 10:41 pm

I'm forced to agree wtih Indianguy-Spain will do what's best for Spain.

And isn't democracy, when it works best, the PEOPLE telling the goverment what they want as policy? Spain's people were NEVER for the war in Iraq, and all it got them was grief, didn't it? So if Spain's people don't want their young men and woman in Iraq, then their government should heed their people, is that not correct?

If you think Spain is going to withdraw from helping with the War on Terror, I think most of you are mistaken. But Spain's people never wanted any part of a dubious war in Iraq, and they have spoken.
 
User avatar
sebolino
Posts: 3495
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 11:26 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:02 pm

There's no links, not even a beginning of doubt between Iraq and Al-Quaida.

AND, it was already decided by the Spanish socialists to withdraw if they won, before the Madrid attacks.
So it's NOT a point made by Al-Quaida, it's just some common sense.

Iraq was just the wrong target to fight terrorism, and that's not new.
 
Schoenorama
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 5:15 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:19 pm

Mr Friedman, as many other 'respected' op-ed writers, parts from the assumption the U.N. will not obtain the control of the occupation forces, which will then lead to the withdrawal of Spanish Troops, as Mr Zapatero had promised throughout his campaign, before the Madrid bombings.

The issue here isn't what Spain might or might not do, the real issue should be that Spain, and 90% of its population, does not believe the current situation in Iraq is an adequate strategy in the War on Terror. In the same way that Spain did not believe Saddam formed a direct threat or Saddam had direct links with Al Qaeda before the war started, Spain does not believe neither the reconstruction of Iraq nor the War on Terror can be conducted successfully with the unilateral approach of the actual 'Coalition' with its simple 'You're With Me Or Against Me' theory.


Terrorism can't be fought successfully by just a minority of countries. If terrorism really is the Number One issue, even the most powerfull nation on earth cannot fight it alone. It will always need a broad international assistance, either now in Iraq, tomorrow in Afghanistan, and perhaps next year in Pakistan or wherever. One cannot 'intimidate' these important international partners by ignoring their worries, their theories, their democracies for the sake of a single nation's Foreign Policy.

Cfalk:

"At the same time, the Socialists should really rethink about the decision to pull their troops out. There is no doubt that Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups found great encouragement in the Spanish elections."

Over the past few months we both have engaged in different discussions on the legality of this war and the 'real' reason of it. First the 'pro-war' people argued the WMD's was reason enough to invade Iraq. We all know what happened to that argument. Then it was Saddam alleged ties with Al Qaeda and also this argument has disappaered. With the war well underway, all we could hear is how great it was to Liberate the Iraqi people from that terrible dictaror Saddam, not a word about WMD's, not a word about alleged Al Qaeda links.

What I, and many with me, still would like to know is where Iraq exactly fits in in this 'War on Terror'. With both the accusations of WMD's and Al Qaeda links proven 'shaky' to say the least, the latter already widely known before the war, many non-Coalition countries before the war warned overthrowing Saddam, no matter how bad a dictator he was, would give Al Qaeda and similar groups much more support and a reason to increase their activities, not only in the ME region but also outside.

Before the war, Al Qaeda was limited to only a few areas in the ME. After the start of the war, Iraq has attracted many non-iraqis willing to fight for either Al Qaeda's cause or that of any other group opposing the invasion. Before the invasion, Al Qaeda had no links whatsoever with Saddam's regime. After the war, former Baathist party officials and Al Qaeda terrorist are actively working together attacking Coalition Forces and Iraqis working with/for the Coalition.

Before blaming Spain's conditional withdrawal could be seen as a victory for Al Qaeda, please bare in mind the above. In my opinion, had the Coalition stuck with the real War on Terror and not invaded Iraq the way it did 1 year ago, not only had the Coalition been much broader, the War on Terror itself would have been much more successfull. Regretfully, Al Qaeda now is much more powerfull than before the Iraq invasion. It's support is much broader and, as we know, they still have mass-murdering capabilities. With that, Al Qaeda has shown it is winning the War on Terror, not because of Spain's conditional withdrawal, but because of the Coalition's unwillingness to change its methods.

The people of Spain have stood up and have told the Coalition, as they already did one year ago, that the Coalition's War on Terrorism is not only not working, it is creating terrorism rather than fighting it. Slowly cracks begin to appear in this 'Coalition of the Willing'...
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
 
Sabena 690
Posts: 6065
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2002 12:48 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:14 am

It may indeed be true that the Spanish were far more pissed off about the lies around the investigation rather than the Iraq war.

That's how most people actually think... Also Poland (only people like B757300 don't believe this)

Frederic
 
User avatar
TS-IOR
Posts: 3505
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 9:44 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:38 am


Spanish troops should,and they will hopefully,withdraw from Iraq,and so will do the other troops,the British too hopefully,and at that time we will see how the Pentagon and Paul BREMER would manage to secure their "unlawful" presence in the Iraqi territories.Will they send the whole U.S.troops there ?

The U.S.A.should assume the responsibility of the war on Iraq for itself,because it's "only" for its own benefits.
Next flight TUN-YUL Tunisair A330-243.
 
Marco
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2000 3:41 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:41 am

Spanish troops should,and they will hopefully,withdraw from Iraq,and so will do the other troops,the British too hopefully,and at that time we will see how the Pentagon and Paul BREMER would manage to secure their "unlawful" presence in the Iraqi territories.Will they send the whole U.S.troops there ?

So Saddam was more lawful? Of course you never had family there and never suffered at all, so you wouldn't know what you're talking about. Is blind hatred for the west this rampant in Tunisia?

The U.S.A.should assume the responsibility of the war on Iraq for itself,because it's "only" for its own benefits.

Give it time. The USA was responsible for Japan and Germany and look at them today.



Proud to be an Assyrian!
 
Alpha 1
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:49 am

Give it time. The USA was responsible for Japan and Germany and look at them today.

Several big difference between Germany/Japan of the 1940's, post WWII, and Iraq post-occupation:

1. Germany and Japan had industrial bases. They were not completely destroyed, even by 6 years of war, but almost. That industrial base was rebuilt, and they became prosperous. Iraq has no such base or diversity to fall back on, with the exception of oil.

2. Japan and Germany didn't have ethnic hatreds like exist in Iraq between Sunni and Shi'a, between Kurds and the rest of the nation, etc. As with Yugoslavia, when a strong central authority leaves the area, as when the communists collapsed there, all those divisions come out in the open. The same will happen, I'm convinced, with Iraq.

Those differences don't make Germany and Japan good comparisons for Iraq.
 
User avatar
TS-IOR
Posts: 3505
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 9:44 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:05 am


MARCO,i've never been in the side of Saddam you know !!! And make sure that in Tunisia,and in every Muslim and Arab country,we DO NOT hate the West blindly.
Next flight TUN-YUL Tunisair A330-243.
 
Alpha 1
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:07 am

..we DO NOT hate the West blindly...

No, you just pick and choose your hatred.
 
Marco
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2000 3:41 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:32 am

MARCO,i've never been in the side of Saddam you know !!! And make sure that in Tunisia,and in every Muslim and Arab country,we DO NOT hate the West blindly.

So then please answer the question if the Americans' occupation is unlawful, then was Saddam's regime lawful?

Alpha 1,

Actually Iraq has lots of industries besides oil. That's a common misconception. Iraq is a very diversified country (and had the largest middle class in the whole Arab world) until Saddam took over and plunged the country into twenty years of multiple (useless) wars.
Proud to be an Assyrian!
 
User avatar
TS-IOR
Posts: 3505
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 9:44 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:35 am

...i personally hate those who hate me.I never hate someone for free.Only a handful number of persons i hate and i'm not really proud to say it but it's a humane feeling which goes beyond us sometimes.

I do not HATE you Alpha 1,make sure...and none A.net user...
Next flight TUN-YUL Tunisair A330-243.
 
N79969
Posts: 6605
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 1:43 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:14 pm

I am so glad that someone post this excellent op-ed. The Spanish people need to be clear on one thing: if their troops withdraw from Iraq, you will hand al-Qaeda a big, big win.

I understand the principled opposition of the Spanish people. But to retroactively vote against the war in Iraq by withdrawing troops will not change history and will send only one message to al-Qaeda and others: terrorisms pays. It won't be 'democracy is nice' or the 'Spanish are our friends.'

Zak,

"spains troop withdrawal will exactly be the opposite: a severe loss for terrorists.
why?
because it shows that democracy has won, that the spanish people did have determination to make their will heard and not break under the attacks in madrid. that the attempts to get the population into a state of fear by the government have failed and that the spanish people are determined to make their voice heard and their will done by their government."

You make no sense whatsoever. Perhaps frostbite has dulled your senses.
 
L-188
Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:25 pm

Well when Roy makes such broad statements Alpha 1 it is hard not to.

Spain will do what is best for Spain, however I hope that the current government sees past the small picture and sticks around. Otherwise, Al-quinto gets exactly what they wanted.

Not say the bombings where the reasons, but why not take out a little insurance, say 200 foreign devils lives to make sure you get the result you wanted.

That is exactly what happened on 3/11, Al-crackers bought that insurance with 200 lives, none of them their own.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
 
rjpieces
Posts: 6849
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 8:58 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 2:16 pm

I'm gonna have to agree with N79969. Even though many Spaniards were/are against the war, the bombing changed things. If the Spanish DO pull out their troops (no matter what the reason), the terrorists will see it and think that they could control elections and world policy at that. What will be next for them, Italy, Poland?

If Spain/the EU wanted to send a clear message, they would send troops to Iraq to show solidarity and send the message that terrorism will have no political effect, in whatever form it comes in. IMO, Europe has a huge problem with Muslim fanatics living in their borders and it will just get worse. The Western World is in this fight together and we should show them that we are together.
"Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon"
 
Sabena 690
Posts: 6065
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2002 12:48 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 7:26 pm

@N79969

But to retroactively vote against the war in Iraq by withdrawing troops will not change history and will send only one message to al-Qaeda and others: terrorisms pays.

I have to agree on this one. The war in Iraq happened, and to avoid further hatress towards the Western World, we have to make life for the Iraqis as good as possible.

We can't go back in time anymore...

That's why EU troops have to assist in Iraq asap.

Withdrawing now will only create more problems. A civil war in Iraq is predicted, and this must be avoided at all cost.

Bush clearly had a strong plann for the invasion in Iraq, but unfortunately no plann for Iraq after the war...
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 7:40 pm

I´m in favour of sending European troops to clear up the mess, but please with a different command, not the US government, which caused the mess in first place.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
L-188
Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 7:41 pm

Funny,

I could have sworn that it was Saddam Hussain that started that mess.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 8:56 pm

Going into another country without having a plan what to do once you´re there?

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
L-188
Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 9:02 pm

Yup....Kuwait 1990!


filler....filler....filler
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
 
Schoenorama
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 5:15 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Fri Mar 26, 2004 11:09 pm

N79969:

"But to retroactively vote against the war in Iraq by withdrawing troops..."

The Spanish people did not 'retroactively' vote against the war in Iraq, they actively voted against Aznar's Government, in the same way as 90% of its people actively opposed against the war one year ago. Unfortunately, Aznar simply ignored them.

"..if their troops withdraw from Iraq, you will hand al-Qaeda a big, big win."

The eventual withdrawal of Spanish troops depends on the Coalition's willingness to change their "War on Terrorism" strategy which clearly has not worked in Iraq.


Rjpieces:

"I'm gonna have to agree with N79969. Even though many Spaniards were/are against the war, the bombing changed things. If the Spanish DO pull out their troops (no matter what the reason), the terrorists will see it and think that they could control elections and world policy at that. What will be next for them, Italy, Poland?

If Spain/the EU wanted to send a clear message, they would send troops to Iraq to show solidarity and send the message that terrorism will have no political effect, ...
"

Could you perhaps explain to me what Iraq has to do exactly in the War on Terrorism? There were no links between Al Qaeda and Iraq before the war. There was no threat of Saddam giving his hard-to-find WMD's to terrorists before the war. Al Qaeda is still strong, it is still capable of conducting terrorists attacks, and the possibility its cells are preparing terrorists attacks on US soil right now is still very likely. In this regard, the war in Iraq has only strengthened Al Qaeda and its supporters. The war in Iraq is a huge step back in the War on Terror. Instead of going after OBL and his network, finding Saddam was suddenly more important to Mr Bush, probably because his ratings were decreasing.

We all agree terrorism needs to be dealt with. We disagree strongly, and Spain sure has pointed this out, on how it should be dealt with. Invading a country based on lies certainly is not a good way to fight terrorism. Removing a terrible dictator from power is a good thing, but don't try selling it as a part on the War on Terror, because it isn't.
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
 
N79969
Posts: 6605
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 1:43 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Sat Mar 27, 2004 7:35 am

Schoenorama,

My point remains. It does not matter who is leading Spain with respect to the matter of troop withdrawal. Al-Qaeda and other like minded groups will feel that their methods in Madrid were vindicated if the Spanish leave. The true intentions and motives behind the withdrawal will not be relevant in this context.


*************

After Spain finishes its investigation, I would not be surprised if not a single Iraqi is implicated in the Madrid bombing. The attack probably was not revenge by Iraqis who are bitter at the US, Spain, UK, and Italy for invading their country. (Although some surely are bitter such as the privileged Sunni elite)

The attack on Madrid was conducted by ultra-violent Islamic fascists who want to impose their new brand of totalitarianism over Iraq at any cost. These are the people who killed 200+ Iraqi Shiite a couple of weeks ago in the hopes of inducing a civil war. They absolutely do not want democracy and freedom to take hold in Iraq and terrorize their co-religionists. They also seek to instill fear in the US and its allies. Civilized human beings cannot show weakness to these terrorists. I believe that Spain's continued presence in Iraq, especially after the 3/11 Madrid atrocity, is indispensable to fighting terror in the long term. I really hope they stay for the long haul.


******************

I agree with those who say that the Bush Administration did not plan for post-war Iraq. Even at 150,000 US troops, our presence is inadequate for the job that needs to be done.

 
donder10
Posts: 6944
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 5:29 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Sat Mar 27, 2004 7:49 am

I agree with those who say that the Bush Administration did not plan for post-war Iraq. Even at 150,000 US troops, our presence is inadequate for the job that needs to be done.

Too true.This is the one area that the US has really fu*ked up in.Rummy and others in the Pentagon were talking about some outrageously low number of troops being involved in both the war and post-war stages(60,000 springs to mind but might be wrong).This is partly due to the Pentagon overiding the State Department on issues of post-war reconstruction and the gradual move to more mobile forms of war fighting.Wolfowitz and friends certainly didn't seem to have Iraqi security at their front of their minds.
 
Schoenorama
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 5:15 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Mon Mar 29, 2004 10:39 pm

N79969:

"It does not matter who is leading Spain with respect to the matter of troop withdrawal. Al-Qaeda and other like minded groups will feel that their methods in Madrid were vindicated if the Spanish leave. The true intentions and motives behind the withdrawal will not be relevant in this context."

Of course Al Qaeda will explain this as a victory, the point is whether it really is. In this respect, the true intentions and the motives behind an eventual withdrawal are essential, otherwise you are just giving Al Qaeda 'the benefit of the doubt' in the withdrawal issue.

With that same logic, one might also say Al Qaeda will 'benefit' greatly if Bush is re-elected next November.

"I believe that Spain's continued presence in Iraq, especially after the 3/11 Madrid atrocity, is indispensable to fighting terror in the long term."

This is exactly where you and I differ. Although military troops are needed in the reconstructing of Iraq, history has learned that fighting terrorism with military troops is impossible and completely counterproductive. The fact that the existence or terrorism in Iraq has only occured after the liberation, is a good indication of how a broad foreign military presence only attracts terrorists rather than fight them.
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
 
777236ER
Posts: 12213
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2001 7:10 am

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Mon Mar 29, 2004 10:44 pm

At the same time, the Socialists should really rethink about the decision to pull their troops out.

Ah, but the troops are SPAIN'S troops, not the government's troops. The government is the servant of the people, and they were elected on a pledge of withdrawing troops. Democracy in action.
Your bone's got a little machine
 
zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

RE: Hoping Spain Doesn't Withdraw Their Troops...

Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:05 pm

"Ah, but the troops are SPAIN'S troops, not the government's troops. The government is the servant of the people, and they were elected on a pledge of withdrawing troops. Democracy in action"

777236ER, dont you remember, democracy is only good as token justification for the neocon schedule. as soon as real democracy is in action(usually something not in line with neocon goals) it becomes a socialist plot! (i still fail to see how "socialist" is a negative term but thats another story)
10=2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aerlingus747, Google [Bot], meecrob and 12 guests