There is something different about 9-11:
Let me start with the example of Titanic: why was it a success? because we wanted to imagine what that people felt there; how that ship would look Ã±like when sinking, how could be the iceberg.
Earthquake: we wanted to know how would look those buildings falling due to an earthquake, or the village destroyed after the collapse of the dam.
Armageddon: We wanted to know how would look a big asteroid approaching to Earth; imagine how would it be destroyed.
Day after tomorrow: what would happen of another glacier age would come? How would Liberty Statue look frozen?
BUT! We don't need to imagine how would look/feel if the WTC collapse after a terrorist attack: WE
ALREADY WATCHED AND
Why to pay for watching an imaginary scenario of what already happened and was well recorded?
We've seen thousand of different shots of 9.11, taken from different angles. In this case, we don't need the movies to show us how would it look or how did it look, because in this particular case we know!
Titanic, Earthquake, Armageddon, etc... We have to use our imagination, then we have the movie
9.11: we don't. We are even so tired of the same image again.
A movie of 9.11 should be based on stories, on drama, not in special effects as the examples posted.
in order: 721,146,732,763,722,343,733,320,772,319,752,321,88,83,744,332,100,738, 333, 318, 77W, 78, 773, 380, 73G, 788, 789, 346