I don't think I twisted your words around.
Well you did. Repeatedly. And knowingly.
You said the ways you think we should deal with terrorism and I responded to that.
...by putting words in my mouth that I never said, and thus building your 'case' against me on false 'accusations'.
I DON'T HAVE TO TAKE SOME EURO chap teling me that we should be change US policy rather than deal directly with the terrorists.
Hit a nerve there, didn't I? Good, that was the idea. Now you know how I feel after reading any of your posts directed at me, when they YET
AGAIN state the same bullshit ASSumptions. Even in the sentence I just quoted.
that we should be change US policy rather than deal directly with the terrorists.
I don't know where you keep getting this crap, but I would like to settle this once and for all. Here's the deal:
-you tell me where exactly it is that I said that I would NOT want to deal directly with the terrorists by bringing them to justice. You made this claim that that is what I want, you provide the proof to back it up. If you do that, I will not bother you again, and will stop accusing you of twisting my words.
-now, if you DON'T manage to do that, I want YOU to stop making this claim that I want to be all 'fuzzy' with the terrorists.
-of course, when I say 'prove it' I'm talking QUOTES. Not your twisted 'interpretation' of what I said, but the actual quotes. Right here for all to see.
There, sounds like a fair deal, doesn't it? I intend fully to stick to my part of the deal should you be able to prove your accusations (which I won't have to anyway, since I'm confident you won't be able to provide a single shred of proof). I can only hope the same from you.