zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:38 pm

looking at the current situation in iraq and afghanistan, one has to wonder if you can fail more than the current u.s. administration.

they have failed to win both wars in every aspect imaginable.
lets take a look at the snafu in afghanistan before analyzing the iraq fubar:

- a unprecedented coalition of the worldwide coalition on terror is built with great momentum

- the taleban get to disperse into the villages and countries because there is hardly any foreign presence of ground troops, bought locals have proven to be unreliable

- after the overthrowing of the taleban regime, afghanistan is back to the medieval control of warlords, pretty similar to the situation where the taleban were in power apart from the public religious supressin

- the lack of commitment of ground forces on a large scale to hold a firm grip on every large city render karzais government to the government of kabulistan since the rest of the country is not under his control

the afghanistan situation is pretty bad, not unrecoverable though when ignoring the situation in iraq. if there had been determination to rebuild the country with an international coalition, had the u.s. used the troops bush needed for the oil war to bring stability to afghanistan, had the u.s. admininstration not burnt bridges with ever western country except italy and the uk, there would have been a realistic chance to give a future without anarchy and ak-47 justice to afghanis.
this was all turned into an impossible illusion when the bush admin figured that they did enough in afghanistan to make the u.s. public happy, propaganda started demonizing iraq in the months during the afghanistan campaign already, clearly showing where the real interests lay.

iraq: worse then vietnam:

- vietnam saw decent support for the u.s., especially in the south. in iraq, there is fringe support at best

- the already low number of supporters will further decline when the u.s. keeps up the counter insurgency bombing of iraqi cities

- bombing civillian areas, as done now, does not win the hearts of the iraqis

- the sunni were mostly pro saddam and have supported the insurgency from the start

- the shiites will want a DEMOCRATIC election, factually giving them full power over iraq. certainly not in the interest of the us. occupation, since that would spawn a iraq similar to iran that will certainly kick out the u.s. troops and might lead to civil war amongst the populations

- if the elections held will not be democratic, the shiites will join the insurgency. current prolbems with al-sadr, who is merely a fringe player, will look like childs play compared to a true shiite uprising

-rumsfeld has hinted that the elections will not be democratic with his statement that problem areas might be left out, to anyone sceptic this sounds like "we will allow elections where the result will be favourable to our interests and use this token democracy to claim that our new iraqi dictator would have been democratically elected"

- if the shiites make their gods state, the kurds will proclaim independence and the turks will invade northern iraq with their "robust" style of not caring about collateral damage and own casualties

so what are the options?

i think there are no good options anymore, only lesser evils.

- the u.s. could "turn iraq into a parking lot" and see unprecedented hostility in the world and possibly dozens of terror attacks(of course the evil muslims would yet again be to blame since the u.s. is always innocent) and no credibility whatsoever left in the world

- the u.s. could pull out, making itself look like a fool and weak and vulnerable, boosting enemys morale in any future conflict

- the u.s. could allow truly democratic elections and accept the fact that there will be a not so pro u..s state in the area instead the beacon of freedom

- the u..s could try to keep the current scheme up, slowly escalating the insurgency since counter insurgency operations only raise the will to resist in the iraqi population, the u.s. west bank would be born

under any case, the bush administration has to admit total defeat.
no flowers for the soliders, no beacon of democracy, only a beacon of failed imperialism and carnage, the al quaeda dream come true: a bunch of new arguments for al quaeda recruiters, a live fire bootcamp the size of france and a truckload of propaganda to choose from with the daily pictures of dead women and children from u.s. counter insurgency operations.

good job dubya, looking forward to "4 more years"
10=2
 
airplay
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 1:58 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:48 pm

Make you wonder what it really means to be a "superpower"....
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:56 pm

I think you both miss the point.

The US has some wonderful hospitals but they can't keep you alive if you keep firing bullets into your own head.

We did not take these people to raise as our own children. We removed the Taliban cancer and we removed the Saddam cancer but they've got to rebuild themselves.

Who is being beheaded in Iraq? It is the people who are rebuilding, not the soldiers. And the good citizens on the street are buying DVDs of the beheadings. You cant "save" people so barbaric as to spend what little money they have on "entertainment" like that.

If the situation is lost lay the blame where it belongs, on the primitive, barbaric savagery of the population there. They kill people because they are in love with pain, suffering, blood and death. Those perversions will keep civilization from spreading to that part of the world a thousand years after you and I are dead.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
sulman
Posts: 1963
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:09 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:01 pm

I have my own opinions on the current situation on Iraq, but saying it is worse than Vietnam? Please - that's not remotely accurate.

Don't forget Iraq is largely a secular country, and even within Islamic circles there are many, many different groups and interests. None of the geo-physical situation is analagous to Vietnam, which was literally split down the middle, with Uncle Ho in the North wanting to re-unify the country.

" vietnam saw decent support for the u.s., especially in the south. in iraq, there is fringe support at best".

I think any scholar of history or veteran of Southeast Asia would find that statement both sad and hilarious in equal measure.

Iraq is a mess, but it's a mess we have made, and we'll have to just ride the storm.
It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
 
zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:03 pm

@slamclick

you my friend, show the typical "we cant be the bad guys" phenomenom the u.s. seem to have. the insurgents do indeed show signs of being barbaric savages. this is however not genuine to "them arabs", "muslims" et cetera, but normal modus operandi for insurgents. the french resistance and every other insurgency has also been cruel to the occupation forces and ANYONE associated with them, including the own people cooperating.
you totally isolate the "savages" from the invasion. nothing bad about bombing peoples houses i guess.

face the truth, the iraqi governing council is as legitimate as putains vichy france, the attacks on u.s. troops in iraq are as legitimate as the attacks on nazis in paris, the u.s. soliders are the cancer, not the iraqis.
10=2
 
qr332
Posts: 2592
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 11:16 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:09 pm

We did not take these people to raise as our own children. We removed the Taliban cancer and we removed the Saddam cancer but they've got to rebuild themselves.

Really? I thought you guys went in to build a "better Iraq". Removing a leader/government completley destablilizes a country, it does not just mean the bad person is gone. And anyway, you guys said you were gonna rebuild the country.

Who is being beheaded in Iraq?

Which people are dying everyday and are the majority of dead? Americans or Iraqis?

It is the people who are rebuilding, not the soldiers. And the good citizens on the street are buying DVDs of the beheadings.

The good people of the US are supporting this bloody war where tens of thousands of civilians have lost their lives. If you lost a kid or your wife, you'd probably lose your mind and become desperate too. And even if you didn't, seeing your country being torn up while it did not do anything to provoke the US is bad enough.

You cant "save" people so barbaric as to spend what little money they have on "entertainment" like that.

Who ever said they buy DVDs of it?!

If the situation is lost lay the blame where it belongs, on the primitive, barbaric savagery of the population there.

OK, I'll blame it where it belongs.
I blame it on the US administration, who went in and destabilized the country, who hit many different civilian areas, who have managed to kill tens of thousands of civilians in Iraq, who do not know how to deal with the people, and who have killed the Iraqis.

They kill people because they are in love with pain, suffering, blood and death.

No, they kill them out of desperation, not love for pain. And you guys kill for oil and greed, I see why it is much better now!  Insane
"The greatest threat to knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:33 pm

zak.....perhaps you remember the cartoon character that ran around moaning that "we're all doomed!" in a low tone. Or Chicken Little, who though the sky was falling. Think about that for a second.

I'd like you to go read a few blogs from soldiers in the field in Iraq to get an assessment from the ground. Try this one.
http://wordsfromiraq.blogspot.com/2004/08/there-is-still-hope-here.html
Anyone who wishes to say that Iraqis don't want us there should read this. It is not written by a soldier who is blind to reality or a drone of any puppetmaster looking to spread propaganda, look at the other stuff to decide for yourself.

If you missed the prime minister of Iraq's press conference the other day, he interrupted the president and a reporter to explain a couple of things that he said our press tends to ignore. He said that Iraq has 18 provinces and of those at least 14 are pretty damn safe. Some violence overflows from the 3 or 4 that are under attack from terrorists and insurgents, but the rest display a remarkable change from just 18 months ago. You seek to compare him to Vichy France to discredit him, when there is no comparison. Germany invaded France for conquest and control. We have no such desires. We want them to have freedom and most Iraqis want us there.

You wish to call Iraq a failure and remind people of Vietnam because it suits your poltical desires. You wish to insult our allies and work to prevent them from standing with us against terrorists end their supporters because it suits your political desires. You seem to be making this claim as part of your platform stating why the current political leadership should go.

What you refuse to see is that every time someone comes out and publicly decries what we are doing and says lets bring our kids back home, and to hell with the middle east, we are lending aid and comfort to the enemy. I guess this is the price we pay for freedom, and I am willing to pay it. I do wonder about those who have to pay in terms of blood, though.

Having someone like you come up with a litany of reasons to avoid doing what is hard but necessary just so that you can try to discredit your political enemies, but I wonder how the Iraqis who watch a free (and I mean unrestricted in terms of western content) news service (BBC, CNN, Fox, etc) and see all this and not lose hope that we will finish helping them get through this. I wonder how the terrorists and their supporters can watch the same stuff and not take encouragement that they are making headway and they should continue in their efforts.

I know this to be the price of freedom, to give people like you the right to tear down that which we are fighting for, and I am willing to pay the price.....I just wonder if the Iraqis enjoy paying that price as well. I wonder how our soldiers who are fighting the encouraged terrorists and insurgents feel about your lack of restraint. You say there is no good option, and I must say that any option that involves casualties is not a good option, but then again more than a couple of those fighting are friends of mine so I am biased. I completely disagree with what it seems your main premise is....WE ARE MAKING HEADWAY. The average Iraqi wants an end to the violence and support for the insurgents is nil outside of their tribal and religious sect stongholds. We must continue with our assistance to the people of Iraq. We do this and win and we will have started the region down a path of freedom and democracy that will be unstoppable.

BTW Think seriously about it prior to ever calling the US military a "cancer". It is the force that saved the free world three times in the 20th century, and has taken the lead in the fight against terrorists. If we do not take the war to them, they will bring it to us. Thinking anything else is wishful idiocy that will make them stronger and us more endangered.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
Falcon84
Posts: 13775
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:52 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:08 am

If the situation is lost lay the blame where it belongs, on the primitive, barbaric savagery of the population there.

Wrong, it belongs to George W. Bush and his advisors, for opening up this unwinnable Pandora's Box in the first place. THAT is where the blame lies.
Work Right, Fly Hard
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 1:19 am

Still looking to lay blame....you assume the blame for the war originates one place and others see it elsewhere.

I think you have made your point here, why don't you do something more constructive? Why don't you offer a solution to this issue that will work faster and cost fewer lives and less damage than the one being pursued by the administration.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
Schoenorama
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 5:15 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversabl

Mon Sep 27, 2004 1:29 am

Dl021:

"If you missed the prime minister of Iraq's press conference the other day, he interrupted the president and a reporter to explain a couple of things that he said our press tends to ignore. He said that Iraq has 18 provinces and of those at least 14 are pretty damn safe."

It's a pitty Mr Allawi didn't say which 14 provinces were "pretty damn safe", but I bet he refers to the one's with the least people (and the biggest deserts). Of a total population of some 26 milion, the province (governate) of Baghdad (unsafe) has 5,605,000, Nineveh / Ninawa where Mosul is 1,739,000, Basrah 1,337,000 and An-Najaf (Najaf) 563,000. Add those up, and you have 35% of the entire population. Nice try, Allawi!

"You wish to call Iraq a failure and remind people of Vietnam because it suits your poltical desires."

His 'whish to call Iraq a failure' is an observation; it is your desire his intentions are political.

"You wish to insult our allies and work to prevent them from standing with us against terrorists end their supporters because it suits your political desires."

Which 'allies' are those? Angola? Azerbaijan? Dominican Republic? Eritrea? Ethiopia? Iceland? Latvia? Palau (total polulation: 20,016. Imagine their annual defense budget!)? Rwanda? Solomon Islands? Uganda?

"What you refuse to see is that every time someone comes out and publicly decries what we are doing and says lets bring our kids back home, and to hell with the middle east, we are lending aid and comfort to the enemy. I guess this is the price we pay for freedom, and I am willing to pay it."

-----> https://usmilitary.com/secure/RecruitSignup.asp

"I do wonder about those who have to pay in terms of blood, though."

-----> http://www.immigration.ca/ ?

"but I wonder how the Iraqis who watch a free (and I mean unrestricted in terms of western content) news service (BBC, CNN, Fox, etc) and see all this and not lose hope that we will finish helping them get through this. "

To be able to view those "free and unrestricted news-services", they'll first need electricity!

"I know this to be the price of freedom, to give people like you the right to tear down that which we are fighting for, and I am willing to pay the price...."

Iraqis now have the freedom to say they don't like the US occupying their country and to say they don't like Mr Allawi as their interim president. But as nobody seems to be listening to all those things they are able to complain freely about now, what's the bloody point of their regained freedom?

"The average Iraqi wants an end to the violence and support for the insurgents is nil outside of their tribal and religious sect stongholds."

Facts please.

"52 percent said those attacks [on U.S. Forces] could be justified some or all of the time.", CNN, April 28 Poll (http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/28/iraq.poll/)

"We do this and win and we will have started the region down a path of freedom and democracy that will be unstoppable."

There must be something seriously wrong in your approach when only 2% of the Iraqis view the US as Liberators and 97% as occupiers (http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=7752&fcategory_desc=Under%20Reported)

"It is the force that saved the free world three times in the 20th century, and has taken the lead in the fight against terrorists. "

It is also the Nation that created and trained Osama bin Laden. Think about that...

"Thinking anything else is wishful idiocy that will make them stronger and us more endangered."

So now even by thinking one is helping the enemy? Wow dude, Hitler would have been proud of you!
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 1:32 am

So, as I see it, Zak, QR332 and Falcon84 define "stability" as being under the domination of the Taliban or Saddam Hussein. You accuse us of "destabilizing" the region by taking them out. I'd say the region is unstable by virtue of the nature, the character of the people living there.

This war may have been about oil prices. Neither you nor I know that. But what is the beheaders' war about? What will the country be like if they prevail? Anyone here planning on buying a time-share there?

If you think that grabbing a truck driver or an electrician and sawing his head off with a pocket knife is a natural and predictable response to insupportable grief then you are a savage, a barbarian.

The sale of the beheading DVDs was shown on the evening news here on or about the 22nd of September.


Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 1:35 am

why does every thread about the iraq war have the usual bipartisan crap in them?

i have posted various reasons why the situation is, apart from the body count, more severe than the vietnam scenario without even taking the larger scenario in the middle east into account.

i have laid out various scenarios that describe why there is no exit strategy and why under EVERY option possible, the u.s. engagement will be a failure.

so please avg joe bush apologist, instead of posting random "it will work" propaganda gibberish, do everyone a favour and give us a "why the u.s. enagement in iraq will not be a defeat" roadmap that the conservatives all seem to vigirously defend on every occasion.
i have yet to see a convincing "roadmap to success in iraq". all the pro war bunch is able to come up with are bumper sticker lines that just state that the war was good and saddam is gone. they lack the following:

- STRATEGY TO WIN THE WAR, its not over yet as the casualty numbers are steadily on the rise, both civillain and allied military

- POSTWAR SCENARIO AND STRATEGY THAT TURNS IRAQ INTO A PROPSPEROUS COUNTRY something the u.s. administration never had

i know that none of the pro war bush apologists will be able to supply the curious public with such strategies, but i invite you to try.
(something like "lets turn iraq into a parking lot and let god sort them out, its their fault that they didnt appreciate that we got rid of saddam so who cares if they die" is not a strategy to win the war )
10=2
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:03 am

Zak I've known guys like you all my life. You (rather like the people of the Middle East) delight in discord, disharmony. You pretend to be opposed to this war, but in fact it gives you most of your reason for living - or at least for posting.

I've never had much respect for the cheapshot artist and that is all I see here. Of course it is a quagmire. I'll agree it had more to do with Halliburton's profits than with humanitarianism. In another administration it would have been the same thing - different corporate players.

Remember the "Ron Brown crash" in the former Yugoslavia? He, and those traveling with him were not on a "humanitarian mission" as was reported. They were going over to make their company bids on the rebuilding. It was about profits for their companies. That was under Clinton. It is not partisan, if it is anything it is about multinational conglomerate profits.

What would be a good outcome? For starters, the sewers, schools, electrical grid, hospitals roads, bridges, irrigation systems and, yes, oil production facilities would be up and running. People could go to work and shop and go to school or mosque (and church and synagogue) without fear of being kidnapped and beheaded OR a smart bomb landing on them. When differeces arise they would be taken up in the next election. That would be a good exit trigger.

Ain't gonna happen.

Why?

Not so much to do with the US military liking it over there. More to do with the default mode of the people of that culture. If you don't like someone or some thing - kill somebody. Sorry to be so blunt and so non-PC but it is the absolute truth.

The westerner who probably understood the Arab better than perhaps any other was T. E. Lawrence. He said of them: "They are comfortable only in extremes. They inhabit superlatives by choice."

Friendly discourse is just not in their nature yet. It needs to be the preferred method for their own internal quarrels before there will be "peace" whatever the hell that really means, in the region.

One last thing. Don't think that because I am not on your side that you can guess my politics, religion or anything else. I do my own thinking, thank you very much.


Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
anxebla
Posts: 1696
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 8:31 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:30 am

I just will say that Bush's Administration is, the fact, the worst US-administration in many many years.
The book "The Bush and the Saud" by Craig Unger promise be very interesting...
AIRBUS 320 The world's most advanced single-aisle aircraft
 
zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:44 am

@slamclick

i applaud your skill at totally ignoring the issue, instead you chose to attack me and whatever you assume who and what i might be.
i guess when you cant attack the arguments, attack the guy that made them, a striking similarity to u.s. election campaigns to an alert observer.
10=2
 
commander_rabb
Posts: 723
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2000 6:59 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:52 am

In today's "everything has to be now fast food society" people expect things to happen NOW. Well, in war and battle, that just does not happen. Things like this are not going to be finished with the snap of a finger. How unrealistic of you!

You mentioned Afghanistan and how the situation is and I quote "pretty bad". What the hell are you talking about? Have you been there? I can personally tell you the successes are huge considering what was going on there 3 years ago. Gains are being made. You make it sound like a resounding failure.

Chicken little is alive and well. It's you zak. I hope you feel that's a good title because you deserve it with that hopeless rant of despair and gloom. I would be so embarrassed with that post.

Sheeesh!
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:53 am

Schoenarama To answer your points in line. You can go straight to the bottom to see my response to your last line.
"If you missed the prime minister of Iraq's press conference the other day, he interrupted the president and a reporter to explain a couple of things that he said our press tends to ignore. He said that Iraq has 18 provinces and of those at least 14 are pretty damn safe."

It's a pitty Mr Allawi didn't say which 14 provinces were "pretty damn safe", but I bet he refers to the one's with the least people (and the biggest deserts). Of a total population of some 26 milion, the province (governate) of Baghdad (unsafe) has 5,605,000, Nineveh / Ninawa where Mosul is 1,739,000, Basrah 1,337,000 and An-Najaf (Najaf) 563,000. Add those up, and you have 35% of the entire population. Nice try, Allawi!


Does that mean that 65% of the country is safe? Is your glass always half empty? Is it not possible that the 35% not so safe to dangerous is made so by a small minority who is taking courage by your reaction to their tactics?

"You wish to call Iraq a failure and remind people of Vietnam because it suits your poltical desires."

His 'whish to call Iraq a failure' is an observation; it is your desire his intentions are political.


His written conclusion is a politically motivated diatribe, an observation draws no conclusions.

"You wish to insult our allies and work to prevent them from standing with us against terrorists end their supporters because it suits your political desires."

Which 'allies' are those? Angola? Azerbaijan? Dominican Republic? Eritrea? Ethiopia? Iceland? Latvia? Palau (total polulation: 20,016. Imagine their annual defense budget!)? Rwanda? Solomon Islands? Uganda?


Not that I am ignoring the contributions of our smaller allies, such as those you have mentioned...who not incidently have a deep understanding of the difference between freedom and dictatorship..(you must have forgotten the principle that the smallest of friends can be the greatest of allies)..but I was more referring the the UK, Australia, Denmark, The Netherlands, Italy, The Ukraine and other countries of more than small size you chose to ignore in an attempt to discredit my point by mockery of our allies.

"What you refuse to see is that every time someone comes out and publicly decries what we are doing and says lets bring our kids back home, and to hell with the middle east, we are lending aid and comfort to the enemy. I guess this is the price we pay for freedom, and I am willing to pay it."

-----> https://usmilitary.com/secure/RecruitSignup.asp


3 yrs C/307EN ABN 82d ABN, 2 yrs H/122 IN (LRS)(ABN) I did my share, and if called upon, even in my present aged and decrepit condition would do so again. In the meanwhile I will continue to run my company here and shore up the economic homefront.

"I do wonder about those who have to pay in terms of blood, though."

-----> http://www.immigration.ca/ ?


My mother the immigrant has no idea what Canada has to do with the point I was making. I was referring to the people who have to face the terrorists every day in their own back yards. THe Canadians are relatively isolated, and have been protected by us for the last hundred years or so from any type of invasion. They have certainly played their role in their defence, as well as been great allies when we needed them (Vimy Ridge, Dieppe, Normandy, NORAD, Iranian hostage smuggling, and PPLI infantry support in Afghanistan just to name a few). I am just wondering how you think they impact the point I was making.

"but I wonder how the Iraqis who watch a free (and I mean unrestricted in terms of western content) news service (BBC, CNN, Fox, etc) and see all this and not lose hope that we will finish helping them get through this. "

To be able to view those "free and unrestricted news-services", they'll first need electricity!


More people in Iraq have electricity than when Saddaam was in charge. THe local economies are growing, and they even have a stock exchange in Baghdad that is growing at the rate of 5 IPO's per week.

"I know this to be the price of freedom, to give people like you the right to tear down that which we are fighting for, and I am willing to pay the price...."

Iraqis now have the freedom to say they don't like the US occupying their country and to say they don't like Mr Allawi as their interim president. But as nobody seems to be listening to all those things they are able to complain freely about now, what's the bloody point of their regained freedom?


The average Iraqi, when asked by a real, non-partisan pollster will say that while they do not want any foreign troops in Iraq, but wants us to stay until the job of transformation is finished. They are growing very tired of the car bombs and terrorist acts. They want to live without fear of saying the worng thing about a cleric or govt official and ending up as fertilizer under a palace or flotsam in the Shatt-al-Arab.

"The average Iraqi wants an end to the violence and support for the insurgents is nil outside of their tribal and religious sect stongholds."

Facts please.


Refer to the latest press conference from Bush and Allawi. I realize you are dismissive of them, but Allawi is there, and was not Bush's 1st choice for the position. He was elected by the Iraqi members of the transitional authority and is the best source of information we have. But, if you want better facts, I encourage you to interview people who are there now. Go to the bloggers who are posting from there. Go ask the soldiers returning and see what the majority of them are saying. I tell you what, go to Iraq and see for yourself. It seems that you are inclined to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you so perhaps you should lay your own eyes and ears on the subject.

"52 percent said those attacks [on U.S. Forces] could be justified some or all of the time.", CNN, April 28 Poll (http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/28/iraq.poll/)

"We do this and win and we will have started the region down a path of freedom and democracy that will be unstoppable."

There must be something seriously wrong in your approach when only 2% of the Iraqis view the US as Liberators and 97% as occupiers (http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=7752&fcategory_desc=Under%20Reported)
.

Pick and choose quotes and polls that suit you. Look at the overall picture and suggest a better means to proactively combat terrorism and its supporters. I already addressed the issue of polling and pollsters. You can frame every answer with the question and the way it is phrased. I'll bet the Germans (your country?) looked at us as occupiers too. We sure brought them real democracy such as they had never known. It seemed to have a good effect on the surrounding nations.

"It is the force that saved the free world three times in the 20th century, and has taken the lead in the fight against terrorists. "

It is also the Nation that created and trained Osama bin Laden. Think about that...


We did not create Osama, we used him certainly, but his training came at the hands of the Madrassas and his start came from his family who gave him the time and money to use in any way he wished to fight the great enemies of islam. Most Islamics looked at the Godless invader of Afghanistan as an enemy of God. We simply gave him the tools to fight a mutual enemy. Yes he did turn against us as well, but hindsight is definitely 20/20 there.

"Thinking anything else is wishful idiocy that will make them stronger and us more endangered
So now even by thinking one is helping the enemy? Wow dude, Hitler would have been proud of you!


Not suggesting that thoughts be moderated or controlled. I am simply pointing out where your thinking is leading and what the reactions others will have is.

BTW Comparing me to Hitler is a personal attack of the most despicable kind that you are using to attempt to distract people away from the merits of my points. You have adopted the ways of Hitler by throwing outrageous accusations hoping that others who are sympathetic to you will paint me with the same brush. My family has personal experience with being attacked by that genocidal maniac and his minions, and some of them are still in German camps as part of the landscape. They were attacked and slaughtered by Germans who really knew how to do the job, and your attempt to link what I said to that behaviour is beyond my ability to verbally excoriate properly. I encourage you to find another way of expressing yourself. I would respond in a manner that would make me feel better, but I would not like the ensuing banning and you would not have the personal courage to physically stand up for your words anyway.

[Edited 2004-09-26 19:58:47]
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
solarix
Posts: 839
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 11:56 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:02 am

If there's any reason I'm voting for George Bush, it will be just so I can piss off people like you.

Do you have anything else better to do than to surf the Airliners.net forums all day posting anti-US topics. Every single thread you start is in some way attacking my country.

If you hate the US so much why don't you do the world a favor and board the next flight from Vostok Station to Baghdad to fight the evil Americans. Go and see how your luck is against the so called "cancer" in Iraq.

By the way Zak, have you EVER heard of the SHIFT KEY???
Bong Hits 4 Jesus
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:03 am

Zak...To answer your question in re strategy and course.

First I disagree with your premise that things are totally beyond salvage. I think things are getting better for most of the country and can point out news reports that back that up. We have increasing levels of violence in the three provinces that are home to the most violent actors, but the only thing to do is to defeat them and continue to provide hope and service to the average joe Iraqi, who will see that the better way is the path of self-determination and freedom, as the other way leads to terror and subjugation. There is no easy way, and while I see SLamClicks point, I do not think it is all about corporate profits.

BTW SLam Click...Libertarian?
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:43 am

Zak, attacking the guy who made the arguments may be a fair and wise tactic. Your character imbues the very fabric of your arguments. Everything you say and the words you use come from your position. You filter everything through your obvious hate, anger and defiance. I mean really, refusing to use proper capitalization and punctuation as a political statement is pretty weenie!

But if you will think about it, I did attack your arguments too - deeming them to be without merit because they were based in an assumption that the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan are the fault of the USA. How many centuries from now will it still be our fault? Are those people ever going to take some personal responsibility for the way THEY ARE BEHAVING?

So you see, your statements, which you call arguments are not that at all, they are merely a rant. You, sir, are a cheap shot artist. That is all you are and I dismiss you.

To everyone else, I say this. There is little that the USA or the UN can do for Iraq or Afghanistan that can protect them from the barbarism of a substantial number of their own countrymen. They, not the USA, they need to be less violent. If a relative of mine was a beheader-for-a-cause, I would turn him in to the authorities because that kind of action will not ever make things better.

We in the US have made efforts, such as they are, to eliminate privately owned assault weapons. In those two countries they are formal wear. They bring them to weddings. What does the world expect? Group hugs? They are, by nature an angry and violent people. The first thing the entire Middle East needs to do, all the countries, is to stop massing in big crowds and shouting slogans and firing rifles into the air everytime something bad happens. It breeds hate out of nothing but thin air. There is a start.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
donder10
Posts: 6944
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 5:29 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:15 am

- the lack of commitment of ground forces on a large scale to hold a firm grip on every large city render karzais government to the government of kabulistan since the rest of the country is not under his control


Blaming the US for this is wrong considering many European troops have restrictions regarding their fighting use eg Germany.


- if the shiites make their gods state, the kurds will proclaim independence and the turks will invade northern iraq with their "robust" style of not caring about collateral damage and own casualties

Once a plausible prediction but given Turkey's current political direction(even taking in account last week's diplomatic fun)there is 0 chance of this occuring.
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:26 am

Slamclick

The only thing that will change this behavior pattern is a consistent growth in freedom and economic development. If the people in the violent areas see the people in the peaceful areas getting ahead they will modify their behavior.

That or attack the people doing better than they are so equality will prevail. Kind of like some liberal democrats in the US.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:57 am

Yeah DIO21 chaos is the great equalizer. As a matter of historical fact, it has always been easier to create than to destroy.

Oops, that was a quote from Mr. Spock regarding the "genesis device."

Maybe I'll come up with something original on the next thread.


Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:01 am

Live Long and Prosper

Remember!

ok Star Trek geeks like me will get that, everyone else will assume I'm a couple bricks short of a wall.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
Schoenorama
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 5:15 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversabl

Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:27 am

Dl021:


"Does that mean that 65% of the country is safe?"

No, it means that 35% of the Iraqi population life in those 4 unstable provinces.

"Is your glass always half empty? Is it not possible that the 35% not so safe to dangerous is made so by a small minority..."

Oh, that certainly is possible, but that's not what Mr Allawi said. What he said was misleading as he did not mention that those 4 unstable provinces are the most dense populated, a tiny 'detail' which is important in the whole discussion. It's like comparing NY state crime-rates with those of Alaska to someone who assumes both states have the same amount of inhabitants.

"...who is taking courage by your reaction to their tactics?"

Excuse me, but I can't bury my head in the sand. When I see something, I call it by it's name. You might be used to that under the current Administration, but I am not and I am not planning to change that little "habit" of mine.

"His written conclusion is a politically motivated diatribe, an observation draws no conclusions."

An observation calls no conclusions as long as the 'operation' is still ongoing. However, we've already seen several 'Iraqi chapters' being closed without a clear Bush Administration success (search for WMD's, 'Iraqis greeting the US liberators enthusiastically', Saddam's links with al-Qaeda, ...). I'd say that the posters' observations that Iraq is a failure so far is much closer to reality than your observations, so far.

"Not that I am ignoring the contributions of our smaller allies, such as those you have mentioned"

Your smaller allies, like the ones I mentioned, contributed very little: Azerbaijan: 151 troops, Latvia: 122, Tonga, 45 (1). They are theoretical allies. They're only there the make the Allies List longer. Your 'real' allies are just a handfull: the UK, Australia, Italy, Poland, Ukraine and the Netherlands. The Whitehouse might gloat about the list of allies ("The Coalition includes nations from every continent on the globe." (2)), the reality is that most of these allies contribute very little if anything at all. It's a bit like Allawi stating 14 out of 18 Iraqi provinces 'are pretty damn safe' Smile/happy/getting dizzy.

"...who not incidently have a deep understanding of the difference between freedom and dictatorship..."

Then how come the "Coalition of the Willing" includes countries known because of their Human Rights abuses by your own State Department's annual assessments (Albania, Azerbaijan, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Georgia and Uzbekistan, to name just of few of your 'allies')?

Don't you think its a bit ironic that some of your allies 'fighting to remove Saddam who tortured and killed his own people' are doing exactly the same in their own countries?
Applying Mr Allawi's statistical logic, one can assess that 39% of the "Coalition of the Willing" tortures their population is the same way as Saddam did. And you complain about the press not informing 14 out of 18 Iraqi provinces are 'pretty damn safe'!(3)

"...(you must have forgotten the principle that the smallest of friends can be the greatest of allies)..."

...specially when the smallest can gain from being/becoming/remaining a friend, like those that want to become a member of NATO (Albania, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Romania, and Slovakia)!

"...but I was more referring the the UK, Australia, Denmark, The Netherlands, Italy, The Ukraine and other countries of more than small size you chose to ignore in an attempt to discredit my point by mockery of our allies."

I am not ignoring these countries, I was rather pointing out that your little 'Coalition of the Willing' is not as large or 'peaceful' as you seem to believe, given their track-records on Human Rights, Democracy and total troops send to Iraq. What's the point in stating, over and over again, that Kazakhstan is an ally of the "Coalition of the Willing", when they only have 29 (TWENTY-NINE) troops in Iraq?

"3 yrs C/307EN ABN 82d ABN, 2 yrs H/122 IN (LRS)(ABN)"

I fail to see how working 3 years for a Dutch bank equals to serving for your country  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

"More people in Iraq have electricity than when Saddaam was in charge."

That doesn't mean a thing. US/UK warplanes have been bombing electricity plants and similar in the US/UK imposed no-fly zones for more than a decade. When comparing, then please do so with 1990s levels.

"THe local economies are growing, and they even have a stock exchange in Baghdad that is growing at the rate of 5 IPO's per week."

Which is another empty statement. It doesn't say a thing as long as you don't compare it with a realistic pre-war, pre-bombing, pre-sanctions situation.

"The average Iraqi, when asked by a real, non-partisan pollster will say that while they do not want any foreign troops in Iraq, but wants us to stay until the job of transformation is finished."

How do you know? Are you a real, non-partisan pollster?

"They are growing very tired of the car bombs and terrorist acts."

You've forgotten about the insurgents...

"They want to live without fear of saying the worng thing about a cleric or govt official and ending up as fertilizer under a palace or flotsam in the Shatt-al-Arab."

Don't you think that they'd also like to be listened to? To be able to rule their own country the way they want without any foreign intervention?

"Refer to the latest press conference from Bush and Allawi. I realize you are dismissive of them, but Allawi is there, and was not Bush's 1st choice for the position."

No, Mr Ahmed Chalabi was the first choice, which says enough about the second choice!

"He was elected by the Iraqi members of the transitional authority and is the best source of information we have."

Best source of information as in Allawi saying: "Well, I assure you if Saddam was still there, terrorists will be hitting there again at Washington and New York, as they did in the murderous attack in September; they'll be hitting also on other places in Europe and the Middle East"??? Allawi is still linking Saddam with 9/11, an accusation even the Bush Government has dropped time ago. (4)

"But, if you want better facts, I encourage you to interview people who are there now. Go to the bloggers who are posting from there. Go ask the soldiers returning and see what the majority of them are saying. I tell you what, go to Iraq and see for yourself."

Why should I read what soldiers tell when I can read polls of Iraqi people, when I can watch the BBC and other media? I gave you the results of a poll and all you do is 'shoot the messenger'. You know something, you won't see those poll results in the pro-Bush/pro-War media because it simply doesn't suit their political agenda. They, and you, prefer to ignore reality and stick your heads in the sands of the Iraqi desert deeper and deeper.

"I tell you what, go to Iraq and see for yourself. It seems that you are inclined to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you so perhaps you should lay your own eyes and ears on the subject."

So I can't have an honest and good opinion because I haven't been there? Then what about you?

"Pick and choose quotes and polls that suit you."

Those polls and quotes don't suit me! I'm merely reading them, finding out about them. Rather then those quotes and polls suiting me, they don't suit you! You and your Bush Administration prefer to stick your heads in the sand and ignore those 'highly unsuitable quotes and polls'.

"Look at the overall picture and suggest a better means to proactively combat terrorism and its supporters."

Openly admitting that the War on Iraq for the reasons given (terrorism, WMD's) was an error might be a good start. Look, I am not a pro-terrorist as you probably believe. All I think, and many with me, is that the invasion of Iraq for the reasons given, the actual situation in Iraq right now and the current stance of the Bush Administration regarding its long time allies, is not helpfull at all and even completely counterproductive in the War on Terrorism. Terrorism needs to be fought, but not by invading a nation which had absolutely nothing to do with terrorism nor 9/11!!! Saddam was a terrible dictator who needed to be removed but not because of the reasons given by Bush. It is very good Saddam is gone, but the false reasons given has enraged many people in the region. That's not something you want when fighting terrorism! In fact, it's the worst thing that could happen when fighting terrorism.

"I already addressed the issue of polling and pollsters. You can frame every answer with the question and the way it is phrased."

If you think that happened with the poll(s) I mentioned, then please indicate exactly where and in which question. I get the impression you not only tend to 'shoot the messenger' when the info doesn't suit you, you also question the pollsters' professionalism when the outcome is negative. By the way, the poll which stated that only 2% of Iraqis see the US as "Liberators" was requested by the Coalition Provisional Authority (5)

"I'll bet the Germans (your country?) looked at us as occupiers too. We sure brought them real democracy such as they had never known. It seemed to have a good effect on the surrounding nations."

Like East-Germany, Poland ...? Your little 'domino-effect' theory is complete madness! The US, together with other real allies sure liberated Europe allright, but don't make me believe 'democracy suddenly poored into the region' after the liberation because it didn't. Asssuming this will happen in the Middle East is nothing more than wishfull thinking, another form of sticking your head in the sand.

"We did not create Osama, we used him certainly, but his training came at the hands of the Madrassas..."

Osama fought the Soviets in Afghanistan through his group the MAK (Maktab al-Khidamar) which received extensive aide from the Pakistan security services (ISI) which, in return, 'was the CIA’s primary conduit for conducting the covert war against Moscow’s occupation' as MSNBC's International Editor Michael Moran wrote. (6)

"Most Islamics looked at the Godless invader of Afghanistan as an enemy of God. "

Most Afghans simply didn't like their country invaded by Soviets, regardless of their religion.

"Not suggesting that thoughts be moderated or controlled."

Yes you where, even in your reply # 17 you did it.

Again, I cannot stop myself from thinking the things I think. It comes natural. It's something by which Human Beings differentiate themselves from animals (like ostriches).

"BTW Comparing me to Hitler is a personal attack of the most despicable kind that you are using to attempt to distract people away from the merits of my points."

You were saying that having a "different opinion" is not only wishful idiocy, but "also makes the enemy more stronger and us more endangered." You do not want me nor anyone else to have a different opinion than yours. You don't want people to dissent. In that, you are comparable to Hitler, whether you like it or not!

"You have adopted the ways of Hitler by throwing outrageous accusations...

I wasn't accusing you of being a Nazi, dude. I was stating Hitler would have been proud of you given your opposition to other peoples opinions, particularly when these are different than yours.

"... hoping that others who are sympathetic to you will paint me with the same brush."

I don't give a sh!t what others, sympathetic to me or not, paint you with. I do care however that others can express their opinions freely, something you want to undermine.

"I encourage you to find another way of expressing yourself. I would respond in a manner that would make me feel better, but I would not like the ensuing banning and you would not have the personal courage to physically stand up for your words anyway. "

How can I find another way to express myself when everytime I say something you don't like, you state I encourage the enemy? My family died too during WWII and one of the greatest lessons that my generation has learned from that terrible episode is that any form of radicalism starts with people's opinions being addressed as dissent.

"They also knew that open dissent was impossible in Nazi Germany, especially after the start of World War II. Most Germans took the traditional position, that once war breaks out, it is the duty of the citizen to support the troops by supporting the government. But Hans and Sophie Scholl believed differently. They believed that it was the duty of a citizen, even in times of war, to stand up against an evil regime, especially when it is sending hundreds of thousands of its citizens to their deaths." The White Rose: A Lesson in Dissent by Jacob G. Hornberger (7)

You were, and still are, stating that my opinions encourage the enemy. You want to limit or stop my dissent, in the same way as Hitler, Saddam Hussein and Idi Amin did.


Sources: (1) http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq_orbat_coalition.htm
(2) http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030321-4.html
(3) http://www.ips-dc.org/iraq/COERCED2.pdf
(4) http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec04/allawi_9-23.html
(5) http://www.showmenews.com/2004/Jun/20040617News029.asp
(6) http://www.propagandamatrix.com/bin_laden_comes_home_to_roost.html
(7) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/rose.html
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
 
solarix
Posts: 839
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 11:56 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:46 am

...a nation which had absolutely nothing to do with terrorism...

So funding Hamas militants to blow up little children is not supporting terrorism?
Bong Hits 4 Jesus
 
Northwest717
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:47 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 1:06 pm

Personally, I think the war in Iraq sucks. People who support it say that we "had" to do it because no one else would. They said the UN wasn't working. If that was so, well get off your lazy asses and try to make a difference. Elect people that will try to make a difference in the UN. Don't just run off and begin bombing a country because you "think" they might have weapons. That is totally not the American way. The American way is to make things better, not kill several thousand innocent civilians. Try to solve these things diplomatically, not violently. I suport our troops, but I do not support what our government is making them do. They should not have to take people's lives because our government doesn't know what the hell they were doing. Is this not the most screwed up war you have ever heard of (besides Vietnam)? You might come up with the broken-record excuse that Saddam was torturing all of his countrymen. That may be so, but is it better for us to destabalize their government, damage their way of living, make them live in fear that they might be blown to powder any minute by one of our bombs, or possibly erupt them into a bloody civil war? I do not think so. Why can't people get along? Why can't people just listen to reason and try to settle things diplomatically rather than killing? What is wrong with this nation? This war is for everything we stand against: invading a country, killing its people, and living off the fruit that we reap from that country (i.e. petrolium products). And this, the warring, corrupt, unjust nation is what our children and grandchildren get to look forward to. Is this what you want to leave your offspring with?

-Tim

~~~****PEACE****~~~
Dubai: Center of the 21st Century
 
Boeing7E7
Posts: 5512
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:35 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:31 pm

Zak, Falcon and the like. Thanks for going to war college for all of us.

What a joke.

BTW... Kerry didn't go to war college during his four month stint either so if you think he knows what to do, you have another thing coming.
 
zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:49 pm

Zak, attacking the guy who made the arguments may be a fair and wise tactic. Your character imbues the very fabric of your arguments. Everything you say and the words you use come from your position. You filter everything through your obvious hate, anger and defiance.


lets break this torrent of wit down into its fragments:

- you only need to attack the messenger when you have nothing up the sleeve against the message itself. when you think about it, by attacking the messenger you imply that you admit defeat to the message he brought upon you

- where have i claimed to be speaking for anyone but my position?

- hate, anger and defiance? sure the guy giving arguments on why killing and suffering must be ended(or shouldnt have started in the first place) is the person full of hate according to those who promote the dawn of war, talk about a PETAesque isolation




But if you will think about it, I did attack your arguments too - deeming them to be without merit because they were based in an assumption that the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan are the fault of the USA. How many centuries from now will it still be our fault? Are those people ever going to take some personal responsibility for the way THEY ARE BEHAVING?


i guess you are right. how could i not understand that the people of iraq should learn to behave when getting invaded, after all when the united states of america invade you, you have to behave and greet them with flowers. you should be grateful for getting invaded by gods gift to mankind, at least thats what you are according to your wise and bold leader. i rest my case and admit defeat.


So you see, your statements, which you call arguments are not that at all, they are merely a rant. You, sir, are a cheap shot artist. That is all you are and I dismiss you.

it is good to see that you, while being a bit misled thanks to the propaganda you seem to be influenced of, still recognize who your superiors are and adress them properly.
10=2
 
Schoenorama
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 5:15 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversabl

Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:12 pm

Solarix:

"So funding Hamas militants to blow up little children is not supporting terrorism?"

He didn't fund Hamas militants, he paid money to the families of Hamas members killed in action. If your father would be a KKK member, would that automatically mean you, your mother, your brothers and sisters would also be KKK?




Northwest717:


"They said the UN wasn't working. If that was so, well get off your lazy asses and try to make a difference. Elect people that will try to make a difference in the UN. Don't just run off and begin bombing a country because you "think" they might have weapons."

Finally, I statement I fully agree with.




Boeing7E7:

"Zak, Falcon and the like. Thanks for going to war college for all of us."

The whole issue here is that War in Iraq is not helping the War on Terrorism. One doesn't need to go to War College to know that. All one needs is some 'common sense', a virtue this Bush Administration completely lacks!

"...Kerry didn't go to war college during his four month stint either so if you think he knows what to do, you have another thing coming."

It sure can't be worse than Bush and his buddies, offending long time allies they might not need in Iraq, but certainly will need in the War on Terrorism.
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
 
Northwest717
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:47 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:30 pm

Schoenorama: Finally, I statement I fully agree with.

Thank you. Glad to know somebody agrees with me.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

-Tim  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Dubai: Center of the 21st Century
 
slider
Posts: 6806
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 11:42 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 5:37 am

SlamClick- Great posts...appreciate your reason.

Zak- Look out! The sky is falling! The sky is falling!!! Woe is you!

BWAHAHAA!!  Wink/being sarcastic
 
jaysit
Posts: 10186
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2000 11:50 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 6:09 am

"We removed the Taliban cancer and we removed the Saddam cancer but they've got to rebuild themselves."

You did? Really?

The Taliban is still running amock in Afghanistan. And so is its best friend -OBL. Remember him?

As far as removing the Saddam cancer...well, remember who fed that cancer for many years.

And as far as bringing civilization to Iraq goes, I think that the Baghdadis for centuries right up to the 1980s were cosmopolitan, urbane, civilized folk who could teach much of Mall World, USA what being civilized is all about. Lets see how civilized Nevada or Texas would be if they were bludgeoned by foreign rulers for decades, ruled at gunpoint by a lunatic dictator, subject to 2 wars, merciless destruction by yet another foreign power, and now turned into a battlefield.
Atheism is Myth Understood.
 
mrniji
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:51 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 6:24 am

Jay,

why wasting your time here.. no way that these people will ever learn and think beyond the media analysis and hence public opinion in the US...
"The earth provides enough resources for everyone's need, but not for some people's greed." (Gandhi)
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13438
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 6:44 am

Assume for a moment that the 22nd Amendment never existed, and in 2000 President Bill Clinton ran for and won a third term in office.

Now let's assume that everything that has taken place over the past few years has occurred under his Administration. September 11th. Afghanistan. Iraq. Abu-Ghraib. EVERYTHING.

Would you still have the same beliefs about these aforementioned things if they happened or were still happening under Clinton? Or if Gore were president?
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
Klaus
Posts: 20594
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

EA CO AS

Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:17 am

EA CO AS: Assume for a moment that the 22nd Amendment never existed, and in 2000 President Bill Clinton ran for and won a third term in office.

Now let's assume that everything that has taken place over the past few years has occurred under his Administration. September 11th. Afghanistan. Iraq. Abu-Ghraib. EVERYTHING.


That is the whole point: With Clinton still in office, it is practically certain that the whole Iraq detour from the fight against terror would never have happened!

Iraq was a personal obsession of the people at the top of the Bush administration; There simply was no objectifiable necessity that would have been there under any other administration.

We might still have to look at the mistreatment of afghan prisoners; But even there evidence suggests that there was at least tacit approval if not outright encouragement coming from the very top of the political leadership in the Pentagon and the White House.

Still, even with that it would be a whole different world. In almost every respect. The global coalition would still be intact, the Taleban would be defeated instead of resurgent and the real threats like North Korea and Iran could be addressed from a much better position.

Wasted opportunities, all around!!  Pissed
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13438
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:29 am

That is the whole point: With Clinton still in office, it is practically certain that the whole Iraq detour from the fight against terror would never have happened!


With all due respect, you've sidestepped my question. Assuming EVERYTHING - 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Abu-Ghraib, etc. - has taken place under Clinton, would you still have the same beliefs about Clinton as you do about Bush?
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
Schoenorama
Posts: 2305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 5:15 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversabl

Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:03 am

EA CO AS:

"With all due respect, you've sidestepped my question. Assuming EVERYTHING - 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Abu-Ghraib, etc. - has taken place under Clinton, would you still have the same beliefs about Clinton as you do about Bush?"

I fully agree with Klaus. Your description of events ("Afghanistan, Iraq, etc., have taken place suggests that after 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Abu-Ghraib were a logical turn of events. I don't agree with that. Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. In turn, Abu-Ghraib has nothing to do with 9/11 either but everything with the invasion of Iraq.

I sincerely believe that any non-Republican President would have focussed more on terrorism and those that really perpetrated 9/11. It's a well known fact that many Senior Republicans already planned invading Iraq long before 9/11 happened. It is the current Administration which has complete f@cked-up the overwhelming international support after 9/11 and well into the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, as soon as it shifted it's attention from Osama to Saddam. Not only did the Bush Adminstration put the whole international effort against Terrorism in jeopardy (and he still does) by shifting the attention to Saddam, they also created loads of new reasons for the terrorists to exist and hate us.

Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13438
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:21 am

Gentlemen, you're both altering the conditions of my question in an attempt to avoid answering it.
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
ScarletHarlot
Posts: 4251
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:15 pm

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:44 am

Northwest717 - wow. Thanks dude.
But that was when I ruled the world
 
Klaus
Posts: 20594
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

EA CO AS

Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:55 am

EA CO AS: With all due respect, you've sidestepped my question.

Since your question is completely pointless, I have no qualms about sidestepping it whatsoeverBig grin


EA CO AS: Assuming EVERYTHING - 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Abu-Ghraib, etc. - has taken place under Clinton, would you still have the same beliefs about Clinton as you do about Bush?

Pretty much - only with Clinton´s record of being rather intelligent and constructive it would add the question of "how could he suddenly go crazy and invade Iraq without reason?" instead of "now why does that moron just have to take that detour to Iraq on top of everything he´s wrecked already!?".

Different accent, same verdict.
 
prebennorholm
Posts: 6418
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2000 6:25 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:02 am

Hey, it took fifteen years to rebuild Germany, or the 75% in the west (Marchal Plan etc.) and de-nazifization still lags slightly after 59 years (recent elections in Brandenburg and Sachsen-Anhalt).

Still it was worth the effort.

There will still be problems in Iraq in 59 years from now, but the Iraqi people will have learned to take care of their own problems many decades before that.

And Kuwait won't be conquered, no Scud missiles will be fired on Saudi Arabia and Israel, no Iraqi villages will be gassed during the next 59 years. In spite of a few Saddam lovers still present in 2063.

Danish military, civil servant educators and police teachers working in the Basra region tell me that things are moving forward. Their story doesn't sell papers or TV adverts in France and Germany, but what does that matter?

It would of course be nice if Germans and Frenchmen would give a helping hand, whatever small it might be, instead of just shouting foul all the time. But that won't happen, and we will just have to live with that.
Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs
 
Klaus
Posts: 20594
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

Prebennorholm

Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:11 am

Prebennorholm: Hey, it took fifteen years to rebuild Germany, or the 75% in the west (Marchal Plan etc.) and de-nazifization still lags slightly after 59 years (recent elections in Brandenburg and Sachsen-Anhalt).

I´d tread a little more lightly, if I were you. With an openly xenophobic party in your national government and many nazi groups residing in Denmark who don´t dare show their faces in Germany you´re not in a particularly strong position in that matter.  Wink/being sarcastic

Prebennorholm: Still it was worth the effort.

You don´t say.


Prebennorholm: There will still be problems in Iraq in 59 years from now, but the Iraqi people will have learned to take care of their own problems many decades before that.

Those who happen to survive this botched mess of an occupation, that is.


Prebennorholm: And Kuwait won't be conquered, no Scud missiles will be fired on Saudi Arabia and Israel, no Iraqi villages will be gassed during the next 59 years. In spite of a few Saddam lovers still present in 2063.

Bold predictions.


Prebennorholm: Danish military, civil servant educators and police teachers working in the Basra region tell me that things are moving forward. Their story doesn't sell papers or TV adverts in France and Germany, but what does that matter?

Not much when international journalists have to flee the country for fear of their lives!


Prebennorholm: It would of course be nice if Germans and Frenchmen would give a helping hand, whatever small it might be, instead of just shouting foul all the time. But that won't happen, and we will just have to live with that.

Of course not. We´re "just evil"!  Insane
 
Northwest717
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:47 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:08 am

ScarletHarlot,

No problem. I'm just excited that nobody is screaming at me yet for being "un-American". I am glad there are those like you that share my opinions.  Smile

-Tim  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Dubai: Center of the 21st Century
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: The U.s. Have Lost The War In Iraq Irreversably

Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:17 am

Hey Northwest717 there are a lot of us out here who agree with you. That war sucks and I'm glad my son is not over there. I wished, at the time that I'd had a piece of the '91 Gulf War, but not this time. I think Saddam is burning up oxygen he no longer deserves, but that is not a reason to go to war. It is a sideshow of a sideshow.

Or is it? We are being criticized for not intervening in Africa where the principal sport seems to involve machetes. If we intervene it will become a war and there is no way around that. What do we do?

Kerry certainly does not have the answer. Neither do George W. or Hillary.

I really only bothered to respond here because Zak's cheapshot, obvious, pointless threads are a minor annoyance, like athlete's foot and sometimes I give in to the urge to scratch between my toes, so to speak.

And Zak my post was 389 words. Only 39 of them were about you. The rest were specifically about the topic. It is a perfect demonstration of the weakness of your thinking, reading and analyitical skills. You reeled off response number 16 about "attacking the messenger" but you can't hide behind such drivel.

You are not the messenger, you are the author of this thread and of your opinions. I shall say it again. Your character defines the message. Your strident views skew all that you take in, as well as that which you spew.

P.S. "sir" can be used as sarcasm.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
sccutler
Posts: 5567
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2000 12:16 pm

The U.S. Has Brought Hope And Honor To Iraq

Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:13 pm

SlamClick:

Nicely dealt!

===

We can never know if what was done was right or not. History is full of military interventions which went poorly, and other which went well, and many of each by every nation of any consequence, including the homelands of each of the most vocal detractors here today.

We do know that there are real benefits conferred on Iraq. If you have the interest to read more than the routine mainstream press (if, indeed, you read at all...), you could dig deeper. Look, for example, at Engineering News Record, which has chronicled the infrastructure build up since the invasion. By virtually every objective measure, Iraq's infrastructure is now ahead of where it was before the invasion and, tellingly, the buildback has particularly benefited the outlying provinces, as opposed to the predominant focus on a few major cities as under Mr. Hussein.

Maybe it was the time, maybe not... but all Mr. Hussein had to do was honor the deal he made to end the last war (which those of you who were old enough to read when it happened will recall, was precipitated by HUssein's Iraq invading Kuwait).

The soldiers I know in-theatre speak (or write, as the case may be) of the improvements in conditions, of the stories of atrocities now ended, of genuine hope for the future for their children, of their respect for the strength and dignity of the vast majority of Iraqi citizens.

Terrorists hide their faces, kill in shadows, have done for years. They should lose, likely will lose, but if they win, it will not be for a lack of effort to stymie them.

"Tough choices" are not so-named because they are easy, and they are not always right. But some wrong choices are better than none at all.
...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BCal Dc10, MaverickM11, Redd and 8 guests