skyservice_330
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 6:50 am

No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:39 am

So, it has been established that Sponge Bob is apparently gay and allowing kids to watch him spreads the "evil gay doctrine" ... well atleast according to our friends on the right. Seems though the next evil homo spreading agenda is 'No-Name Calling Week' which supposedly spreads homosexuality as well.
______________
“No Name-calling Week” takes aim at insults of all kinds — whether based on a child’s appearance, background or behavior. But a handful of conservative critics have zeroed in on the references to harassment based on sexual orientation.

“I hope schools will realize it’s less an exercise in tolerance than a platform for liberal groups to promote their pan-sexual agenda,” said Robert Knight, director of Concerned Women for America’s Culture and Family Institute.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6858602/
_______________

I am not ignorant to the fact that this is only a small portion of the political right (thank goodness) but these crusades against gays are just getting laughable anymore.

Love or Hate, Please comment.

Regards.

Edited for a typo.



[Edited 2005-01-24 22:43:26]
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15325
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:07 am

What on earth is the "pan sexual agenda"? If all of those people in the Republican party that whine about a "gay agenda" could be separated from the party and marooned on an island, I'd register as a Republican in an instant. But until then I'll just have to continue to secretly convert kindergarteners to homosexuality...
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
jaysit
Posts: 10186
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2000 11:50 pm

RE: No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:14 am

You see, social conservatives of the James Dobson type believe that calling people Fag, dyke, kyke, wog, chink, jap, towelhead, spic and using the dreaded N-word is their birthright.

Erego, sponges who promote being nice are really evil people who are undermining Dobson and gang's First Amendment rights to be absolute assholes and bigots.
Atheism is Myth Understood.
 
ConcordeBoy
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:26 am

I'd register as a Republican in an instant

...I thought you were?




You see, social conservatives of the James Dobson

Don't even get me started on that quack..

..and what's so sickening is that the bile-spewwing hatemonger knows damn well how to post this kindly grandfather-next-door such that no one sees him for what he truly is.

"I have nothing against homosexuals, I love them as my brothers and sisters just like God commanded".... yet somehow, he always manages to omit the remainder of his agenda (YES, agenda), being: I just don't want them to have social relationships, sexual relationships, committed partnerships, recognition by any form of media or congreggation, and sure as hell not any interaction with children.  Yeah sure
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15325
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:30 am

"...I thought you were?"

Shhhh don't tell anyone  Wink/being sarcastic. Actually I'm not registered as anything yet; there are just a few points of contention before I make the plunge.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
CPH-R
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 5:19 pm

RE: No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Being the part-time conservative that I am, I must object to the sexual abuse of pans. Especially frying pans seems to a target these days.
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:45 am

Do any regular folk see through this...uh...to me it appears to be an insecurity on behalf of those with such conviction that not only do they not regard themselves as extremists or fundamentalists, but that they would probably claim to be have been the choosen ones as they claim they are the only one's speaking up about it. Cuz see only those really in the shit can see the shit, so to speak.

I'm speechless; obviously with our current voting population, we cannot remove the hyperconservatives unless we are willing to take in a hyperliberal.

Cuz see minority rules 'n stuff...pick your poison.

OY!  Insane
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
Matt D
Posts: 8907
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 1999 6:00 am

RE: No Name Calling Week = Liberal Sexual Agenda!?

Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:19 am

So he's gay. Big deal. I grew up watching Bugs Bunny kissing Elmer Fudd, both of whom spent numerous episodes dressed in drag. I didn't think anything of it. I didn't turn out gay. I enjoyed those cartoons as a kid, and I still enjoy them as a 31 year old adult. Why, in some 50 or 60 years on the air, has anyone complained about those cartoons?

BFD.

Even I know that there should be bigger fish to fry.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blueflyer and 8 guests