User avatar
nighthawk
Posts: 4766
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2001 2:33 am

Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:44 am

Im considering upgrading my home server, which is currently running Mandrake 10.1. I upgraded the laptop a few months back, which was also running 10.1. I chose Ubuntu after falling out with the Madriva site, which did not seem to offer a free download.

So what would anyone recommend? Its going to be used as a server, with samba, apache, mysql and SSH, ftp and vncservers all running also.

Im leaning towards Fedora or slackware at the moment, mandriva have been dropped, and ubuntu seem to be too much of a desktop OS, the install doesnt offer enough customisation options for my liking.

So, whats everyone running and what would you recommend?
 
MYT332
Posts: 7283
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 7:31 pm

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:49 am

Quoting Nighthawk (Thread starter):
what would you recommend?

I'd recommend the England add on pack. It's far superior.
One Life, Live it.
 
gordonsmall
Posts: 2106
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 1:52 am

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:53 am

Slackware - all the way!

For servers it's totally unbeatable IMHO.

I have one server running Slackware that has been through about a dozen kernel upgrades, god knows how many versions/upgrades of Apache/Samba/Bind/Postfix/MySQL etc and has never missed a beat.

Currently been running for nearly 3 years without a reboot - and would have been nearly 4 if it wasn't for a power failure in the data room a few years ago.

Slackware is proper Linux - not as user-friendly as some, but as 'pure' and unmolested as you can get.  Smile
Statistically, people who have had the most birthdays tend to live the longest.
 
User avatar
ManuCH
Crew
Posts: 2677
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:33 am

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:11 am

I recommend Redhat Enterprise. But you have to pay for that ... so the "free clone" called CentOS (www.centos.org) is perfect. For server work it's my favorite distribution.
Never trust a statistic you didn't fake yourself
 
User avatar
nighthawk
Posts: 4766
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2001 2:33 am

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:21 am

gordon, thats why im considering slackware.
manuCH: Ill have a look at CentOS, but will probably stick to Fedora, the red hat backed project.
 
MigFan
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:50 am

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:39 am

I would recommend Ubuntu. It rocks, easy setup and great support. One does not have to be a Linux guru to run it. Most recent distros have a live-CD version that allows a user to test drive that version without any commitment. LiveCDs are for also testing hardware compatibility as well.

SuSE 10.0, Ubuntu 5.10, and Mandriva 2006 all offer live-CDs with the full install product.

Try'em http://www.distrowatch.com

/M
UH-60's suck!!!
 
wukka
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:09 am

I'm partial to Fedora, mainly since I've been running flavors of RedHat all the way back to .99 Alpha, and have just kinda' grown with it.

The only thing that pisses me off about it is that each new rev comes with some new "neat" utility packages that do nothing but bulk the system up. I prefer to edit just about every config in their respective textfiles, or script it across machines. I don't want a few gig default installation, but that's what I've been getting of late. I think that kinda' sucks.

Slackware is a close second for me, but it seems that Slackware systems require just a bit more attention and tweak-time, which can become an issue when you're running farms of bunches of servers on mixed hardware. Fedora seems to play more uniformly across the board from quad Xeon procs to old PIIs. Just my personal observation.

When it's all mostly GNU based, it just becomes a matter of preference... Sort of like Windows, and do you like the newer XP start menu / desktop, or do you do what I do and instantly switch to "classic view".

I've heard that Ubuntu is pretty cool, but I haven't had the time to install it on anything. You also have your SuSE fanclubs, etc.

So all in all, no real recommendations, just a few comments on my experiences. The best recommendation is to go with what you're comfortable with and is stable enough for what you want it to do. Gee, I'm really helpful.  Smile
We can agree to disagree.
 
hawaiian717
Posts: 3139
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:46 am

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:25 am

I personally find I haven't been all that impressed with Fedora. I find it a bit restrictive, and the RPM package management system is a joke. If the package you want is in one of the standard repositories you're probably ok with yum, otherwise it's hit or miss whether it will work.

My preference is for Gentoo. The basic installation has almost nothing, so you can put on just what you want/need with no extra junk. Plus, you can find almost anything you want in the Portage tree. If you run into problems, there are a lot of people in the Gentoo forums that are genuinely interested in helping.
 
CaptainJon
Posts: 546
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 3:21 am

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:44 pm

Debian. You can install Woody without much difficulty if you know about your computer. You don't need to install X and once its installed correctly (the hardest part), apt-get is your best friend forever!
 
wukka
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: Linux Distro Reccomendations?

Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:08 pm

Quoting Hawaiian717 (Reply 7):
My preference is for Gentoo. The basic installation has almost nothing, so you can put on just what you want/need with no extra junk.

That's exactly what I liked about way-old RedHat (anything pre 4.2).

The problem with Gentoo in its current state is that you pretty much have to customize every installation. That's great if you're building a server or two, but when you're dealing with high 10's to hundreds of installations, it gets a bit tiring when this client needs this, and this other client needs that, and most of your day is spent compiling things that are already default in other distros.

I'm fine with building my personal server from scratch, but if I had to do that for every client machine, sleep would be a rare thing. I have plenty of co-los that run Gentoo, but each client only has a couple of machines that have a couple of guys working a full work week babysitting them (don't look at me, I didn't hire these dolts). I don't have that option.

It's sacrificing extraneous garbage for a more restricted and personalized install. I can see both sides of it.
We can agree to disagree.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jpetekyxmd80, lewis, N867DA and 23 guests