AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:11 pm

CBS Paramount Domestic Television has announced that a re-edited version of the original Star Trek television series will be released for syndication.

According to an article posted on StarTrek.com, this new edition features computer-generated scenes that replace 1960's-vintage portrayals of the fictional U.S.S. Enterprise and other starships, background visuals, and planetary vistas. Depictions of space vessels will reflect their current configuration.

Viewers will also notice new musical arrangements for the revised series.

The order in which the episodes will be syndicated has yet to be determined.

See:

http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/article/23775.html

[Edited 2006-09-03 06:39:30]
What's fair is fair.
 
Newark777
Posts: 8284
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:23 am

RE: Classic Star Trek To Receive 2006 Facelift

Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:13 pm

William Shatner will also be dubbed over by a real actor.  Wink

Harry
Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek To Receive 2006 Facelift

Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:14 pm

The opening credits will now be three-dimensional.

[Insert Shatner joke here.]

 Big grin
What's fair is fair.
 
UH60FtRucker
Posts: 3252
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:15 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:33 pm

That's cool!

One of my favorite DS9 episodes was "Trials and Tribble-ations" Seeing the original Enterprise but now as a computer generated model was incredible! I'd love to watch the original series the way it appeared in Gene Roddenberry's mind, and no longer limited to tight bugets and 60s technology.

-UH60
Your men have to follow your orders. They don't have to go to your funeral.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:41 pm

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 3):
One of my favorite DS9 episodes was "Trials and Tribble-ations" Seeing the original Enterprise but now as a computer generated model was incredible! I'd love to watch the original series the way it appeared in Gene Roddenberry's mind, and no longer limited to tight bugets and 60s technology.

That's one of my favorites, too! Both the story and the special effects were seamlessly integrated.

This latest edition will feature not only a new look, but also revised music. It's almost as though the series will be remade, in parts, up to 2006 standards.

I can hardly wait to see it.

[Edited 2006-09-03 06:41:45]
What's fair is fair.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:49 pm

By the way, I met Mike Okuda, mentioned in the article, and his wife, Denise, while we were shopping at a bookstore in Encino. They're a great couple and consummate "Treksperts". I'm glad he's still associated with the Star Trek franchise.

The Okudas collaborated on The Star Trek Encyclopedia, a well-written, richly illustrated and annotated authorized book full of official and semi-official references about the entire Trek universe, right up to the most current movie at the time of publication. They both held creative, supervisory, technical, or consultant positions in the art department at Paramount's Trek division during the run of the last four series.

[Edited 2006-09-03 07:13:16]
What's fair is fair.
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:44 pm

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 3):
I'd love to watch the original series the way it appeared in Gene Roddenberry's mind, and no longer limited to tight bugets and 60s technology.

Me too, though I still don't mind the toy-ish animations from the 60's.

I'm eager to see how it will turn out. Though I'm in Costa Rica, I can get the ABC, CBS and NBC afiliates of Denver, Colorado (one of the good things that came with the package of my cable provider Big grin ), and I hope one of those will show this digitally remastered TOS. It's going to be a bit difficult to digitally re-master the aliens to current Star Trek standards, like the Klingons, Vulcans or Romulans, because they looked very human in TOS.

I wonder if they'll also re-master the very first pilot, with Christopher Pike and the full Talos IV story, though I'm sure they'll also show the episode where Spock is court-martialed for the capital crime of going to Talos IV with the crippled Pike.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:59 pm

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 6):
I wonder if they'll also re-master the very first pilot, with Christopher Pike and the full Talos IV story, though I'm sure they'll also show the episode where Spock is court-martialed for the capital crime of going to Talos IV with the crippled Pike.

I don't know the answer that question, and it's a very good one.

The first batch we'll see, the article says, will consist of some fan favorites. Personally, I like the original pilot a great deal.

As many fans will know, it was remade into a two-part episode of the original run after the series was recast with William Shatner replacing Jeffrey Hunter.
What's fair is fair.
 
cfalk
Posts: 10221
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2000 6:38 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:01 pm

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 6):
Me too, though I still don't mind the toy-ish animations from the 60's.

At first, I had my doubts.

The campy, old-fashioned special effects are part of the charm of watching these old shows. Remember that those effects were pretty damned good for the late 60's, and absolutely unheard of for television. Seeing it "as-was" keeps you in context. Of course I love to see better shots of the Enterprise and other ships. I drooled over the long beauty-shots of the Enterprise when the first Motion Picture came out in 1979. But I like the original.

What changed my mind however is the news near the bottom of the article that mentions that the TOS shows will all be remastered in HDTV format. Wow! That'll be wonderful to see. Remember that TOS was filmed on 35mm film, and there is more than enough detail to make spectacularly good transfers (except for the bridge shots, which I recall reading about them being forced to use 16mm because of space limitations on the set or something like that)
The only thing you should feel when shooting a terrorist: Recoil.
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:23 pm

This will be interesting.

I have my concerns though . . . as with all things "Hollywood remade", sometimes it's overdone and the result is a mess.

But, it's Trek. It'll do well because of people like me that have every episode, book, blueprint, etc. Nooo I don't have a set of ears for Halloween. I do have an "Enterprise" telephone that when set properly rings with the red alert klazon. Scare the hell outta you if you're not expecting it.
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:00 pm

Quoting Newark777 (Reply 1):
William Shatner will also be dubbed over by a real actor.

 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:52 pm

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 3):
That's cool!

One of my favorite DS9 episodes was "Trials and Tribble-ations" Seeing the original Enterprise but now as a computer generated model was incredible! I'd love to watch the original series the way it appeared in Gene Roddenberry's mind, and no longer limited to tight bugets and 60s technology.

The use of cgi to replace original scenes has been abused in the past (think Lucas and Spielberg...Han fired first and the cops weren't waving radios) but the way that Trials and Tribble-ations came out was a perfect example of how to do it without screwing up the canon.

If this really happens I hope they take their cues from that example. Roddenberry will come to haunt them if they screw this up.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
Klaus
Posts: 20649
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:14 pm

I'm highly sceptical, but if done well it could be a real treat to watch the old shows as they should have been. I always cringed a bit at the cheesy special effects, even during my first viewings in the 1970s. So let's wait and see...! Big grin

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 6):
It's going to be a bit difficult to digitally re-master the aliens to current Star Trek standards, like the Klingons, Vulcans or Romulans, because they looked very human in TOS.

At least the Klingons' "re-makeup" has been explained quite cleverly in Enterprise... they wouldn't need to fuss around with that...!

They just managed to "revert" to their presumable "original" appearance between TOS and the first movie according to that explanation... Big grin
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:28 pm

Thanks for your great comments, everyone!

Some excellent points have been made.

I, too, have trepidations about revising the Classic Series. However, I think that DS9's revision of a Classic episode, mentioned above, bodes well for the integration of the new special effects. I've always admired the sheer technical competence of the Trek division at Paramount. They've always treated the franchise with the reverence it deserves.

I'm encouraged by information that the appearance of the CGI Enterprise was determined by reference to the physical television filming model currently at the Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. I remember seeing that model while I worked in D.C. back in the 1980's. By the way, the model was is in very good condition then, and I feel certain it continues to be in great shape today.

There remains burgeoning interest in Trek in all its forms, including a growing universe of fan-made films, some of which are made with the cooperation of the Classic Series actors.

With the onset of NASA's new Orion program (whose logo, by the way, was reportedly designed by same Mike Okuda mentioned above), I hope that I am correct that there is renewed interest in space exploration which, incidentally, will reinforce interest in Trek -- and vice versa. I've always been impressed by how Trek has had an effect on those who have ultimately decided to pursue careers in space exploration, and, indeed, at the Vegas convention I mentioned in another thread, one of the investigators for one of NASA's space probes was present at an information booth promoting the space studies program at Arizona State University. He was also a leader in a Trek club in his local area. Naturally, I made a donation to the cause.

Space is truly the final frontier, and it's no coincidence that Trek and space exploration have been like two peas in a pod. I've always believed that mankind's future is in the universe all around us -- that the fulfillment of our destiny is nowhere else, but among the stars.

We are all on Spaceship Earth; if we, ourselves, cannot reach the stars, then at least we can be inspired by our reach toward it -- and inspire our children and grandchildren to develop themselves, and humanity, so that we may live beyond Earth, in our cosmic home.

As the great Tsiolkovsky once said, Earth is our cradle, but mankind, like all infants, must eventually leave it.

There is no place like Earth -- the most magnificent place there is in the known universe. But there remains a greater universe out there, waiting for us to explore. If we are alone in the universe, then it is only ours to see. If we are not, then there are others we must know.

Either way, in this sense, our fate is in the stars.

[Edited 2006-09-03 16:43:42]
What's fair is fair.
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:18 am

Quoting Klaus (Reply 12):
At least the Klingons' "re-makeup" has been explained quite cleverly in Enterprise

Which episode was that? I'm curious. I can catch it during the re-runs of Enterprise they're showing here on cable.

Quoting DL021 (Reply 11):
Roddenberry will come to haunt them if they screw this up.

That's too true.  rotfl 
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:24 am

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 14):
Which episode was that? I'm curious. I can catch it during the re-runs of Enterprise they're showing here on cable.

I recall Worf saying that "We do not speak of that", or words to that effect, on DS9 -- in the very episode mentioned by UH60FtRucker. Not on Star Trek: Enterprise, though, but it may be that I'm simply misremembering or haven't seen the episode of Enterprise in question.
What's fair is fair.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20649
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:35 am

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 14):
Which episode was that? I'm curious. I can catch it during the re-runs of Enterprise they're showing here on cable.

These two:

Season 4, Episode 15: Affliction
Season 4, Episode 16: Divergence

I think it was a nifty idea to plug a gaping continuity hole in the canon universe - and it's quite consistent with Worf's assertion that "We don't like to talk about it!" in DS9 trials and tribbulations...! Big grin
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:35 am

It was first discussed openly in that episode of DS-9 but it was further explained in Enterprise.

THere are multitudinous websites explaining this.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
searpqx
Posts: 4173
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2000 10:36 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:46 am

Quoting DL021 (Reply 17):
multitudinous

Says Ian, in his best Spock/Tuvok/T'Pal/ voice Big grin
"The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity"
 
JGPH1A
Posts: 15080
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:36 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:53 am

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 9):
But, it's Trek. It'll do well because of people like me that have every episode, book, blueprint, etc. Nooo I don't have a set of ears for Halloween. I do have an "Enterprise" telephone that when set properly rings with the red alert klazon. Scare the hell outta you if you're not expecting it.

 rotfl  rotfl  rotfl 

So you ARE human, after all - I suspected as much all along. And I bet you DO have halloween ears.
Young and beautiful and thin and gorgeous AND BANNED ! Cya at airspaceonline.com, losers
 
CastleIsland
Posts: 3212
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:40 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:41 am

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 19):
So you ARE human, after all - I suspected as much all along. And I bet you DO have halloween ears.

He hides them under that damn baseball cap.

This reminds me, when we do LAS again next March, I gotta get some Romulan Ale in my belly.
"People don't do what they believe in, they just do what's most convenient, then they repent." - Dylan
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:29 am

Quoting Klaus (Reply 16):
These two:

Season 4, Episode 15: Affliction
Season 4, Episode 16: Divergence

I think it was a nifty idea to plug a gaping continuity hole in the canon universe - and it's quite consistent with Worf's assertion that "We don't like to talk about it!" in DS9 trials and tribbulations...!

Thanks. Though now I'm curious as to how the Klingons eventually got that fixed. Big grin Genetic mutation can only help in the very long term.  Wink

The question of the Romulans still remains though, because they looked exactly like Vulcans in TOS and eventually got a bit different throughout all series.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:48 am

Quoting DL021 (Reply 17):
It was first discussed openly in that episode of DS-9 but it was further explained in Enterprise.

THere are multitudinous websites explaining this.

Fascinating!  Smile

Thanks for that information.
What's fair is fair.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20649
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:00 am

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 21):
Though now I'm curious as to how the Klingons eventually got that fixed.

And all within the few years between the TOS and 1st movie time scale, on top of that...!

Well, that's still to be explored, I guess. Although it's certainly not the most exciting part of the whole embarrassing affair.
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:16 am

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 19):
Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 9):
But, it's Trek. It'll do well because of people like me that have every episode, book, blueprint, etc. Nooo I don't have a set of ears for Halloween. I do have an "Enterprise" telephone that when set properly rings with the red alert klazon. Scare the hell outta you if you're not expecting it.

I want one! Where did you get it?

Quoting CastleIsland (Reply 20):
This reminds me, when we do LAS again next March, I gotta get some Romulan Ale in my belly.

It may be the last time for that....Paramount is looking to sell the operation off, or kill it. That'd suck.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 am

Quoting Klaus (Reply 23):
And all within the few years between the TOS and 1st movie time scale, on top of that...!

You know, you just might be on to something. How about making a movie or a show that is based in the time between TOS and The Motion Picture. Doesn't have to do with Kirk, Spock or the others, but maybe something that can officially serve as the immediate canon gapfiller between TOS and The Motion Picture.

Quoting CastleIsland (Reply 20):
I gotta get some Romulan Ale in my belly.

How does that taste? And is it available outside of a convention? Big grin
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:31 am

Quoting CastleIsland (Reply 20):
This reminds me, when we do LAS again next March, I gotta get some Romulan Ale in my belly.

It's a lager that Paramount has brewed for them by Cerveceria La Costancia in El Salvador and blue food coloring is added to it.

http://ratebeer.com/Ratings/Beer/Beer-Ratings.asp?BeerID=3372
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:42 am

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 19):
And I bet you DO have halloween ears.

 no  BUT, I used to have a CPT Kirk uniform . .  silly 

I still hvae a phaser - makes cool sounds. All the Christmas Ornaments that light up (might come in handy if I ever put up another Christmas tree). Various and sundry miniature starship models . . . etc.  wink  biggrin 

As to the variations in the Klingon anatomy - the boney forehead - that isn't a secret. And although explained in an episode or so of DS9, said information about the Klingons in ST-TOS vice ST-TMP vice ST-TNG/DS9/V, etc is explained away as various factions of Klingons that have been in power over the ages . . . it's not been a secret in years.

In fact, it was necessary to explain it immediately upon release of Star Trek - The Motion Picture -we all remember the first scenes of the Imperial Klingon Cruiser Aa'Mar attacking V'Ger and our first view of the Klingon Commander with the quite visible 'boney forehead'. Well, hell, that couldn't go unexplained for real Trekkers for very long. Look back into some of your literature and you'll find it - about twenty years ago. I'm not home at the moment or I'd look up ther reference and publish it for you.
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
Klaus
Posts: 20649
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:52 am

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 27):
As to the variations in the Klingon anatomy - the boney forehead - that isn't a secret. And although explained in an episode or so of DS9, said information about the Klingons in ST-TOS vice ST-TMP vice ST-TNG/DS9/V, etc is explained away as various factions of Klingons that have been in power over the ages . . . it's not been a secret in years.

I like the new explanation much better: Klingons incompetently tampering with a human genetic experiment for the creation of enhanced "super soldiers" and in the process catching a bad and contagious case of actually becoming more human than they bargained for...!  bigthumbsup 

What else could be as embarrassing as that?  mischievous 
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:00 pm

Quoting Klaus (Reply 28):
What else could be as embarrassing as that?

Especially for a Klingon!  laughing 
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
Klaus
Posts: 20649
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:02 pm

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 29):
Especially for a Klingon!

Exactly! Big grin
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:21 pm

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 27):
BUT, I used to have a CPT Kirk uniform . .

Insert William Shatner Fat Joke Here.....  duck 
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:25 pm

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 29):
Quoting Klaus (Reply 28):
What else could be as embarrassing as that?

Especially for a Klingon!

a Vulcan with human emotions? Spock on poppydust........
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
Kieron747
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:17 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:44 pm

I'd be interested to see this revamped series. I did enjoy the DS9 episode with the old Enterprise, also the episodes of 'Enterprise' when they were in the Mirror Mirror style parallel universe.

I say I'd be interested, biut would I approve? Tough call that one. BBC2 is screening TOS Saturday afternoons, I watched 'What are Little Girls Made Of' this weekend and really enjoyed it, Andrea the android is HOT!

I was thinking about the shots of the Enterprise, and you know, they aren't that bad, the slightly cheap and cheesy aspects are all part of the feel of the show. It may in my opinion be a mistake to meddle with them. Sure, initially it'll be novel to see them, but I bet after a while we'll all be reverting to our original copies for nostalgia's sake.

Kieron747
Airliners.Net - The Jam Rag Of The Web.
 
hawaiian717
Posts: 3139
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:46 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 6:09 am

Quoting DL021 (Reply 32):
a Vulcan with human emotions?

Star Trek V

Quoting DL021 (Reply 32):
Spock on poppydust........

This Side of Paradise
 
searpqx
Posts: 4173
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2000 10:36 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 6:16 am

Quoting Kieron747 (Reply 33):
the slightly cheap and cheesy aspects are all part of the feel of the show.

You've got to remember, that in the mid 60s, even though they worked on a very tight budget, those were excellent special effects for TV, even better than some of what you saw on the big screen, and heads and shoulders above anything done prior. Even in the early 70s I can remember being totally mesmerized as a kid watching the reruns.
"The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity"
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:13 am

Quoting Hawaiian717 (Reply 34):
Quoting DL021 (Reply 32):
a Vulcan with human emotions?

Star Trek V

Quoting DL021 (Reply 32):
Spock on poppydust........

This Side of Paradise

It's only subtle and winkable if all of us who know those references smile inwardly and mumble the words "uh-hunh!" to ourselves while feeling quietly superior......  Wink


The SFX for that show were the best yet on television for a regular show. Lucille Ball had zero idea why they were so expensive to make, and the execs were not scifi fans so it was a problem, but they still looked great in the 70s on re-runs. 2001:A Space Odyssey was the only film that exceeded it (and it was a film without too much farflung tech like transporters, etc.)

It wasn't until Star Wars came out that I saw better effects. Star Trek: The Movie was the first time Roddenberry had access to enough budget and technology to come with great SFX. He was an innovator from the getgo and pretty much set up the entire genre of space scifi television as we know it today.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:21 am

Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:41 am

Quoting DL021 (Reply 36):
It wasn't until Star Wars came out that I saw better effects. Star Trek: The Movie was the first time Roddenberry had access to enough budget and technology to come with great SFX. He was an innovator from the getgo and pretty much set up the entire genre of space scifi television as we know it today.

Eventually through a creation of George Lucas and Star Wars (ILM, Industrial Light and Magic to be exact), special effects in Star Trek pictures became more and more sophisticated over time.  Wink
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:12 am

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 38):
Eventually through a creation of George Lucas and Star Wars (ILM, Industrial Light and Magic to be exact), special effects in Star Trek pictures became more and more sophisticated over time

Except Star Trek 5 . . . I know they (Paramount) couldn't get ILM, and used some offbeat outfit, and the graphics and animation and special effects suffered . . . it was painfully obvious that the folks at ILM didn't get the job.

Quoting Searpqx (Reply 35):
You've got to remember, that in the mid 60s, even though they worked on a very tight budget,

And Star Trek-TOS was THE most expensive series in production during it's three year run.
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
Cadet985
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 6:45 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:27 am

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 9):
I do have an "Enterprise" telephone that when set properly rings with the red alert klazon. Scare the hell outta you if you're not expecting it.

I have that phone....not hooked up anymore....nor is the TNG shuttlecraft that either rings red alert, phasers, or photons. Needless to say, both used to jolt me from sleep when they rang.

Marc
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:31 am

Speaking of Trek-related objects, I have a small collection of Hallmark ornaments based on the Trek theme. They come complete with light and sound. I'm looking forward to this year's.

Last year, I think, was one of Kirk and Spock leaping through the Guardian of Forever. It's one of my favorites.
What's fair is fair.
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:33 pm

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 39):
Except Star Trek 5

I didn't know that. Now I got tempted to get all the Star Trek movie DVDs sometime soon, from TMP to First Contact (I have Nemesis, but can gladly skip Insurrection, Insurrection sucked; they should have done Nemesis from the beginning and not Insurrection).

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 39):
I know they (Paramount) couldn't get ILM, and used some offbeat outfit, and the graphics and animation and special effects suffered

How come ILM didn't get the job? Budget cuts at Paramount?
 
Kieron747
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:17 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:12 pm

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 42):
How come ILM didn't get the job?

Not sure exactly why, but it is obvious that the effects in Final Frontier are inferior. In many scenes the Enterprise looks 2-dimensional which is a shame.

I know everyone slates Star Trek V, but I quite like it, it's good to get another film centered around the Enterprise, it's always good to see a little more of the ship. Of course, Star trek VI wins on that count.

Kieron747
Airliners.Net - The Jam Rag Of The Web.
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:19 pm

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 42):
How come ILM didn't get the job? Budget cuts at Paramount?

ILM was unavailable because they were working on some other big project that consumed all their resources. I can't remember which other big project. And Paramount screwed around too long deciding whether to make ST-V and when, so ILM took the other job . . .
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
aaflt1871
Posts: 2166
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 7:29 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Tue Sep 05, 2006 6:35 pm

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 9):
But, it's Trek. It'll do well because of people like me that have every episode, book, blueprint, etc. Nooo I don't have a set of ears for Halloween.

Because they could not fit over the old cap now could they.  wink 


I understand that instead of Scotty beaming the crew on board in the updated reruns, to help cover the cost of fixing the episodes, Shatner will instead call Priceline to get the lowest fares to get back on board.
Where did everybody go?
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:22 am

You can watch the newly remastered and re-edited episodes beginning this weekend.

For a list of television affiliates, please see:

http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/article/25835.html?page=1

For the order of episodes to be aired, please see:

http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/article/25835.html?page=0

I intend to watch "Balance of Terror" on KNBC at 12:05 a.m., in the early morning of Monday, September 18, 2006.

According to the above Webpages, there will be a second episode aired this weekend, "Miri", following "Balance of Terror".

[Edited 2006-09-17 19:38:35]
What's fair is fair.
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:03 am

RHAAAAAAAAAA! It's on the WB, and I don't receive KWGN down here, only the three majors!  Angry
 
JGPH1A
Posts: 15080
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:36 pm

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:06 am

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 47):
RHAAAAAAAAAA! It's on the WB, and I don't receive KWGN down here, only the three majors!

Do you live in the last 5 square meters of the US that doesn't have 9000 channels of cable ?
Young and beautiful and thin and gorgeous AND BANNED ! Cya at airspaceonline.com, losers
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13091
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: Classic Star Trek Receives 2006 Revision

Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:20 am

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 48):
Do you live in the last 5 square meters of the US that doesn't have 9000 channels of cable ?

No, but my cable provider in Costa Rica shows ABC, CBS and NBC afiliates from Denver.  Wink

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], ogre727, seahawk, Zaf and 27 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos