AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:59 am

Prominent Bush Administration critic Jack Murtha is under attack for his statements relating to the Abscam scandal that resulted in the imprisonment of a number of Congressmen and Senators more than a quarter of a century ago.

According to one critic, Rep. Murtha has admitted that he was offered a bribe, despite denying it in the wake of the investigation. Despite failing to take the money, Murtha is said to have acted as if the bribe had been accepted.

For more on this developing story, please see:

http://www.bootmurtha.com/MurthaUpdates/OCT2006/10-01-06.htm
What's fair is fair.
 
Mir
Posts: 19092
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:05 am

Is there an actual article to back this up, apart from this piece on a website with an obvious agenda?

Members of Congress who take bribes need to be dealt with harshly, regardless of their positions. But I'll need a lot more than some "boot Murtha" website publishing a press release by Murtha's opponent to make me believe that there is (or was, as the case may be) some kind of foul play afoot.

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
stlgph
Posts: 8927
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:19 pm

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:10 am

Quoting Mir (Reply 1):
Is there an actual article to back this up, apart from this piece on a website with an obvious agenda?

You mean you are asking Aerospace fan to provide something with depth?

Mir, dearest, are you delusional?
if assumptions could fly, airliners.net would be the world's busiest airport
 
Falcon84
Posts: 13775
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:52 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:11 am

AF, no one gives a shit about a quarter century ago. They give a shit about NOW, and now is the fact your hero Bush has got us tied us in a war that Mr. Murtha opposes. So this is just a tactic to try and take pressure off the Administration. And you're simply adding to the attack.

Sorry, no one really cares.
Work Right, Fly Hard
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:15 am

Quoting Mir (Reply 1):
Is there an actual article to back this up, apart from this piece on a website with an obvious agenda?

Please see:

http://www.tribune-democrat.com/loca...001701.html?keyword=secondarystory
What's fair is fair.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:20 am

Here is more information on Jack Murtha:

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060620-083859-8753r.htm
What's fair is fair.
 
ltbewr
Posts: 12360
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 1:24 pm

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:22 am

A greater and more current issue of ethics as to Rep. Murtha is that his brother is lobbist for military contractors and may have approached his Congressmember brother, although Rep. Murtha denies any improper contacts. To bring up something he was cleared of 26 years ago smacks of despiration. Most of those caught in the Abscam scandal were Republicans if I am correct. Rep. Murtha has been one of the most outspoken Democrat against the Bush policy in Iraq and thus a major target for any kind of attack, true or not.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:23 am

Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 6):
Most of those caught in the Abscam scandal were Republicans if I am correct.

Democrats, actually, judging from the conviction count.

Six Democrats, one Republican.

See:

http://www.answers.com/topic/abscam

[Edited 2006-10-02 03:25:06]
What's fair is fair.
 
AirCop
Posts: 5553
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:39 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:24 am

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 4):
http://www.tribune-democrat.com/loca...001701.html?keyword=secondarystory

Worthless link..no counterpoint.
[quote=STLGph,reply=2]You mean you are asking Aerospace fan to provide something with depth?

Well maybe sometime in this century.
 
andessmf
Posts: 5689
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:53 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:25 am

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 3):
AF, no one gives a shit about a quarter century ago

Depends on what...you know that in politics, what happened years ago can easily come back to haunt, or at least dredged up again. By your own admission, the Bush National Guard story need not come up. And neither did all the stories of the indiscretions that Clinton committed.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:26 am

Quoting AirCop (Reply 8):
Worthless link..no counterpoint.

Show me a liberal news story cited in the last week here in this Forum where there was a counterpoint that was also presented at the same time.
What's fair is fair.
 
TedTAce
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:31 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:34 am

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 10):
Show me a

sign that you care about something other then being a pro Republican schill.
This space intentionally left blank
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:37 am

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 11):
[Show me a] sign that you care about something other then being a pro Republican schill.

Ask and ye shall receive:

Democrats Denounce Chavez Insult Against President (by AerospaceFan Sep 22 2006 in Non Aviation)#ID1378175

And also,

Praise For Democratic Congressman's Campaign (by AerospaceFan Sep 17 2006 in Non Aviation)#ID1372648

I'm also the one who criticized President Bush for being borderline incompetent as a result of his illegal immigration policy and other matters of concern. Right here on these Boards, folks. Step right up and see.

[Edited 2006-10-02 03:45:56]
What's fair is fair.
 
Confuscius
Posts: 3568
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 12:29 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:56 am

"Democrats Denounce Chavez Insult Against President (by AerospaceFan Sep 22 2006 in Non Aviation)"


When did Linda Chavez insult the president? ...or was it Cesar?

 




BTW, I believe the statute of limitations on crimes commited stemming from Abscam have long expired.

[Edited 2006-10-02 03:59:02]
Ain't I a stinker?
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:59 am

Quoting Confuscius (Reply 13):
When did Linda Chavez insult the president? ...or was it Cesar?

Linda Chavez, who must have been quite a babe in her time, would never insult the President. She's much too classy.  Smile

And Cesar Chavez has long since departed for the Great Beyond.

P.S.: I know you were kidding.  Wink
What's fair is fair.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:02 am

Quoting Confuscius (Reply 13):
BTW, I believe the statute of limitations on crimes commited stemming from Abscam have long expired.

That may be true. However, I believe that there could be exceptions in cases of willful concealment, although I'd have to check on that.

In any event, whether he is subject to prosecution is not really the point. The point is whether he's a man of sufficient character given recent allegations which, if proved to be true, may cast doubt on that issue.

[EDIT:] A two-minute search came up with at least one reference to the tolling of an applicable statute of limitations, in an unrelated context, by virtue of willful concealment.

See:

http://www.metnews.com/articles/2005/acos050305.htm

[Edited 2006-10-02 04:05:18]
What's fair is fair.
 
Mir
Posts: 19092
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:53 pm

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 4):
Please see:

http://www.tribune-democrat.com/loca...story



Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 5):
Here is more information on Jack Murtha:

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060...r.htm

Ok, so what he have here is another article about how Murtha's opponent says that crimes were committed (though she admits that she has no idea if the evidence is legit or not), and then an editorial about him. I already knew from your original "article" that Murtha's opponent is making some sofar-baseless accusations, and while an editorial would be great if I wanted an opinion about Murtha, I'm afraid I'm more interested in facts about Murtha.

Quoting STLGph (Reply 2):
Mir, dearest, are you delusional?

Probably. I knew there was a side-effect to those pain medications....

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
N174UA
Posts: 860
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:17 pm

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:16 pm

I knew I recognized that Abscam name from somewhere...for those of you saw "Donnie Brasco" starring Johnny Depp and Al Pacino, there was a reference to this scandal, when they rented a yacht for a mob sit down/party in Florida.

Anyway...I've seen way too many movies.  Yeah sure

It's all referenced here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abscam
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:59 pm

It's funny how the media never jumps on Murtha for any of his actual or potential scandals.

It's funny how CNN is covering the Foley scandal to the max, and has never once has mentioned Studds.

It's funny how some liberals deny that there is a bias against Republicans and conservatives in the mainstream media.

In fact, it's so funny, I sometimes think we all must be living on a farm, and that not long ago, though we've forgotten it, they were coming to take us away.

That sad part -- and here is the saving grace -- is that some of us don't buy the spin the media puts on the news. Pity, since at least we'd be unified as a country, if only in an illusion of objectivity and good feeling.
What's fair is fair.
 
jaysit
Posts: 10186
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2000 11:50 pm

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 5):
Here is more information on Jack Murtha:

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060...r.htm

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL.

The Washington Times, i.e., the Mooney Times is so full of sh*t, you can't even wipe your ass with it.

The mouthpiece for the far right fringe of the GOP is after Murtha because he has half the Pentagon behind him, and because he's shown the idiot President and his cheerleaders, for the thugs they are.

If you want to provide more information on Murtha, don't cut and paste from a "news" source that NO one reads.
Atheism is Myth Understood.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:10 pm

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 19):
The Washington Times, i.e., the Mooney Times is so full of sh*t, you can't even wipe your ass with it.

Two words: "Arthur Sulzberger". Prominent Bush critic. Owner of the New York Times.
What's fair is fair.
 
halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:11 pm

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
It's funny how CNN is covering the Foley scandal to the max, and has never once has mentioned Studds.

Good point. I would alter the issue in this fashion. Since we have many Anet posters who have been quick to indict the the entire GOP for the misdeeds of this one pervert, are they going to hold the democrats to the same standard?

Just wondering. After all, should we assume that every democratic representative has wads of illicit cash in THEIR freezer just because one does?
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
Mir
Posts: 19092
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:45 pm

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
It's funny how the media never jumps on Murtha for any of his actual or potential scandals.

Fox hasn't picked up the Murtha story either (as of this post). This isn't even a potential scandal yet - it's an accusation whose basis is pretty damn shaky.

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
It's funny how CNN is covering the Foley scandal to the max, and has never once has mentioned Studds.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/30/foley.quits/index.html

From the article: "The page program, which brings young people from around the country to work on Capitol Hill, came under intense scrutiny in 1983, after two lawmakers -- Rep. Gerry Studds, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Rep. Dan Crane, an Illinois Republican -- were censured following their admission they had consensual sexual relationships with 17-year-old pages.

Neither lawmaker resigned, but Crane was defeated for re-election in 1984. Studds survived the scandal and continued to serve in the House until retiring in 1996."


That search took about five seconds. Oh, and by the way - FOX's top story is also about Foley.

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
It's funny how some liberals deny that there is a bias against Republicans and conservatives in the mainstream media.

It's funny how some conservatives love to say that they're under attack from the "liberal media". You have control over the House, the Senate and the White House, and an increasing influence on the Supreme Court, and you're getting all worked up about a "liberal media"? If the Democrats controlled all three branches of government, I'd wouldn't give a crap about a "conservative bias" in the media. I'd trade control of the government for Karl Rove getting to run all the major news networks in a second. Quit whining.

That said, there really isn't that much bias. Ever consider that the media naturally trends against the people in power? And who's in power now? In Congress, that would be the GOP. In the White House, the GOP again. Supreme Court - can't really say controlled by the GOP, but it has become more conservative during Bush's presidency. So I would think it's pretty clear who would be the main media target. Oh, and if this Murtha thing ever did develop into something more substantial, it would get coverage on all the major networks.

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
jaysit
Posts: 10186
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2000 11:50 pm

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:54 pm

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/02/wa...614c4d7bf&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Interesting article on how Murtha has delivered Democrat votes for GOP bills.

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 21):
Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
It's funny how CNN is covering the Foley scandal to the max, and has never once has mentioned Studds.

Good point. I would alter the issue in this fashion. Since we have many Anet posters who have been quick to indict the the entire GOP for the misdeeds of this one pervert, are they going to hold the democrats to the same standard?

You can't be serious, right?

The Gerry Studds scandal occurred back in 1983, 23 years ago, a scandal which incidentally occurred in tandem with the Dane Crane scandal. Crane was an Illinois Republican who in 1983 was accused of having sex with an underage female page (Studds, contrast, had sex with a male page).

The Studds scandal made the front pages of the news when it occurred for over a year. Back in 1983, having the gay factor made it more lurid than the Crane case, but both scandals were in the constant glare of media attention.

So, I ask you, why oh why should CNN cover the Studds scandal today? 23 years after the fact? And if you - AerospaceFan - are now baying for coverage of the Studds scandal, are you also baying for coverage of the Crane scandal? And judging by your laugheable demand, I suppose that press coverage of the Vietnam war in 1974 was biased because it should have included news on the 1961 Bay of Pigs disaster?

Thoughts before fingers hitting the keyboard. Always a good idea!

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
That sad part -- and here is the saving grace -- is that some of us don't buy the spin the media puts on the news.

Actually the sad part (if it also weren't so funny) is just how funny your comments are. Reading your posts is a bit like watching the coyote's antics on the Road Runner's cartoons.

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 10):
Show me a liberal news story cited in the last week here in this Forum where there was a counterpoint that was also presented at the same time.

What is a liberal news story versus a conservative news story?

Are these liberal or conservative?

Rumsfeld says he has Bush's Confidence http://www.wtop.com/?nid=116&sid=589950
Al Qaeda fugitive killed in Yemen http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5396862.stm

What about this?
George Michael had drugs in car http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Musi.../02/people.michael.reut/index.html

If its news, and it its topical and correct, then its neither liberal nor conservative. Your concepts are muddied.
Atheism is Myth Understood.
 
halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:23 pm

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 23):
Quoting Halls120 (Reply 21):
Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
It's funny how CNN is covering the Foley scandal to the max, and has never once has mentioned Studds.

Good point. I would alter the issue in this fashion. Since we have many Anet posters who have been quick to indict the the entire GOP for the misdeeds of this one pervert, are they going to hold the democrats to the same standard?

You can't be serious, right?

Yes, I am. I'm not suggesting we drag up the Studds allegations. Which you would have understood had you bothered to read my entire post. I'm simply asking if we should assume that every democratic representative has tens of thousands of dollars in allegedly illegal cash in their freezer because one did.
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:32 am

Quoting Mir (Reply 22):
"The page program, which brings young people from around the country to work on Capitol Hill, came under intense scrutiny in 1983, after two lawmakers -- Rep. Gerry Studds, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Rep. Dan Crane, an Illinois Republican -- were censured following their admission they had consensual sexual relationships with 17-year-old pages.

I was watching CNN and at approximately 5:34 a.m., Pacific Time, 8:34 a.m. Eastern, CNN mentioned the scandal without ever mentioning Studds. In fact, the report briefly showed two Congressmen without identifying them either verbally or by caption. Nor did CNN mention the party affiliation of either of the two men.

The report was lengthy and presented clips of interviews with two former pages -- one male, and one female. The male page had served with Rep. Cynthia McKinney, who failed in the primaries in the run-up during this current election. Thus, it wasn't as if there were time constraints.

Prior to that, I'd been watching CNN for almost two hours. No mention of Studds.

I wasn't referring to CNN.com. I was referring to CNN cable television. There's a difference. However, I thank you for the opportunity to clarify what I meant: CNN, not CNN.com.

[Edited 2006-10-02 17:51:54]
What's fair is fair.
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:34 am

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 23):
So, I ask you, why oh why should CNN cover the Studds scandal today? 23 years after the fact? And if you - AerospaceFan - are now baying for coverage of the Studds scandal, are you also baying for coverage of the Crane scandal?

Because history matters. As someone else said, didn't someone just mention the National Guard service of President George W. Bush, of which much was made only two years ago? And when did that occur?

I believe it was Andes who made the apt reference.
What's fair is fair.
 
Mir
Posts: 19092
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:21 am

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 26):
As someone else said, didn't someone just mention the National Guard service of President George W. Bush, of which much was made only two years ago? And when did that occur?

There is a difference between the past actions of the person under investigation and someone who committed the same act in the past. Had Foley had a history of relations with pages twenty years ago, that would be highly relevant. I don't see how Stubbs is particularly relevant to the Foley case, except as a tool to show that Republicans are not the only ones who can't keep it in their pants. And you don't have to go back twenty years to prove that fact.

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 25):
I wasn't referring to CNN.com. I was referring to CNN cable television. There's a difference.

There is indeed a difference. Your mistake is trying to get quality news from a televised version that has to cater to an audience with the attention span of an unusually hyperactive shrew. That's great for quick updates on what's happening. The print version is far more comprehensive and reliable.

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
AirCop
Posts: 5553
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:39 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:57 am

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 25):
I was watching CNN and at approximately 5:34 a.m., Pacific Time, 8:34 a.m. Eastern,



Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 25):
Prior to that, I'd been watching CNN for almost two hours

Somebody really needs to get a life.  spin 
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:43 pm

Quoting Mir (Reply 27):
The print version is far more comprehensive and reliable.

It may be, but even in this day and age, not everyone is online, and CNN exists as a cable news operation first, and an online operation second.

I think there are a substantial number of people who view CNN with no intention of checking its Website.
What's fair is fair.
 
Superfly
Posts: 37735
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:13 pm

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 14):
Linda Chavez, who must have been quite a babe in her time,

Yep, back when she was a Democrat.  Smile

Quoting AirCop (Reply 28):
Somebody really needs to get a life.

 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 


Awh AerospaceFan is a little sad that a few of his precious Republicans are in trouble. So he digs up a link from a biased news source and another story from 23 years ago to try to divert attention from what's going on today in Washington.
AerospaceFan, I think it's time for you to turn off your TV and go to bed.  Smile
Bring back the Concorde
 
Gilligan
Posts: 1993
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 12:15 pm

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:03 pm

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 3):
AF, no one gives a shit about a quarter century ago.



Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 6):
To bring up something he was cleared of 26 years ago smacks of despiration.



Quoting AndesSMF (Reply 9):
By your own admission, the Bush National Guard story need not come up. And neither did all the stories of the indiscretions that Clinton committed.

Thanks for beating me to it, I've been pretty busy these past few days.

Quoting AndesSMF (Reply 9):
And neither did all the stories of the indiscretions that Clinton committed.

Unfortunately in his case, the past indiscretions went to show pattern as it involved President Clinton. But I would agree that his military service, or lack thereof, did not in any way disqualify him from being Commander in Chief.

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 18):
That sad part -- and here is the saving grace -- is that some of us don't buy the spin the media puts on the news. Pity, since at least we'd be unified as a country, if only in an illusion of objectivity and good feeling.

 checkmark 

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 19):
The Washington Times

But when that same paper calls for the resignation of the Speaker, without any evidence to back up any claim that he did anything wrong, they are the bastion of correctness right?

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 21):
Since we have many Anet posters who have been quick to indict the the entire GOP for the misdeeds of this one pervert, are they going to hold the democrats to the same standard?

Of course not.

Quoting Mir (Reply 22):
I'd wouldn't give a crap about a "conservative bias" in the media.

Yet liberals here on A.net whine about Fox News and people like Rush Limbaugh all the time.

Quoting Mir (Reply 27):
I don't see how Stubbs is particularly relevant to the Foley case,

Were there calls for Tip Oneill's resignation when not just one, but two Congressmen were found to be having extracurricular activity with pages?

What Murtha may or may have not done in the Abscam affair is pretty far gone now. Have to agree that binging it up now is really something that an opponent might do in a race against him hoping against hope it will get some traction and change a few votes.
Warm winds blowing, heating blue skies, and a road that goes forever, I'm going to Texas!
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Tue Oct 03, 2006 11:39 pm

Excellent points, Gilligan! I commend you for bringing them forth to our attention.
What's fair is fair.
 
Superfly
Posts: 37735
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:17 am

Quoting Gilligan (Reply 31):
Quoting Jaysit (Reply 19):
The Washington Times

But when that same paper calls for the resignation of the Speaker, without any evidence to back up any claim that he did anything wrong, they are the bastion of correctness right?

 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 

Man you are cracking me up!
The Washington Times is a right-wing news rag!
Perhaps you are mixing them up with the Washington Post which is the serious newpaper in the DC metro area.
Did you not know that?
Then you have AerospaceFan backing you up. That's not a good thing.  no 

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 32):
Gilligan! I commend you for bringing them forth to our attention.

Keep up the good work in commending Gilligan's false information. We are getting a kick out of this! Big grin
Bring back the Concorde
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:37 am

Quoting Superfly (Reply 33):
The Washington Times is a right-wing news rag!

Once again, you've only engaging in finger-pointing. Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., has publicly called for political opposition to President Bush, and yet the newspaper he owns, The New York Times, is said by liberals to be "objective". Based on what Sulzberger said, however, his paper could also be described as "left wing". And yet it isn't. A modicum of balance is called for, here.
What's fair is fair.
 
Gilligan
Posts: 1993
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 12:15 pm

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:02 am

Quoting Superfly (Reply 33):
Did you not know that?



Quoting Jaysit (Reply 19):
The Washington Times, i.e., the Mooney Times is so full of sh*t, you can't even wipe your ass with it.

The mouthpiece for the far right fringe of the GOP is after Murtha because he has half the Pentagon behind him, and because he's shown the idiot President and his cheerleaders, for the thugs they are.



Quoting Gilligan (Reply 31):
But when that same paper calls for the resignation of the Speaker, without any evidence to back up any claim that he did anything wrong, they are the bastion of correctness right?

Superfly why don't you quit huffing for a while and read the entire post that the quote came from before posting. You are starting to look pretty foolish shooting from the hip. The gold paint also does not match your skin tone.
Warm winds blowing, heating blue skies, and a road that goes forever, I'm going to Texas!
 
Superfly
Posts: 37735
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:51 am

Gilligan:
You are the one "huffing". I am just laughing at your post.

Quoting Gilligan (Reply 35):
The gold paint also does not match your skin tone.

What is that supposed to mean?
Bring back the Concorde
 
Confuscius
Posts: 3568
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 12:29 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:20 am

This thread might be moot. Victory is imminent. Mission Accomplished. Time to stock up on champagne!  Wink


War plans: Congress OKs $20 mil for victory parties

POSTED: 1:52 p.m. EDT, October 4, 2006

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The military's top generals have warned Iraq is on the cusp of a civil war and that U.S. troops must remain in large numbers until at least next spring. But if the winds suddenly blow a different direction, Congress is ready to celebrate with a $20 million victory party.

more...
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/04/congress.iraq.ap/index.html
Ain't I a stinker?
 
AerospaceFan
Topic Author
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:43 am

RE: Bush Critic Jack Murtha Under Attack

Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:27 pm

Whether Murtha is right or not about Iraq shouldn't really have much bearing on whether the scandal allegations against him should torpedo his chances for re-election, in my view.
What's fair is fair.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: WIederling and 20 guests