halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:22 pm

Looks like I've finally convinced the SO that we need  Smile to upgrade the TV from a tube set to a modern widescreen. I'm thinking a 37"-40" LCD, but would be interested in any advice Anetters could give as to whether I should opt for plasma instead. (Yes, I did a search for old threads discussing the question, but they are somewhat dated.)

Also, which brands/models to avoid, based on lack of reliability. Thanks.
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:27 pm

I'm currently looking as well, as the convergence on my widescreen set is starting to hiccup. A friend just bought the new Sony LCD projection TV, and while it's big and expensive, it's the most stunning picture I've seen out there yet.
International Homo of Mystery
 
comorin
Posts: 3857
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:52 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:34 pm

I cannot say enough about my Pioneer 43" plasma. It's just amazing watching it, and along with my Santoku knife , one of my better purchases...
 
Go3Team
Posts: 3156
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 1:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:35 pm

LCD or DLP projection. Plasmas have been known to have burn in problems. The TV I'm looking at is the Sony Bravia XBR 40" LCD - excellent reviews.
Yay Pudding!
 
futurecaptain
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:54 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:44 pm

Go with the LCD if your only choices are that and plasma. Both types will get pretty warm with continous use, but the LCD seems IMO to be a bit better in the heating department. With some plasmas I know you could turn off the heater in the house and run the TV and it will keep the house warm.

Stay away from brands such as Olevia and Philips. I have heard stories of rebates taking nearly a year to be recieved and overall IMO the picture quality just isn't up there.

Go with a Magnavox, Sony, Sharp, or some other brand you know. The major name brands, while they cost a bit more, offer a better warranty and quality of the product IMO.

Shopping tip: Go late in the day to shop for a TV. Most businesses will leave the TV's on all day and turn them off at night because of how much heat they produce. If you go late in the day you can really feel how warm the TV will get and see the picture quality when everything inside is good and warm from being on all day.

If you can get the extended warranty I'd say go for it if you have kids. These TV's are light and fragile, light enough for a young kid to accidentally bump off wherever it is sitting. A little extra protection can go a long way. Many businesses have warranties which allow you to get a brand new TV if something like this happens for 1 or 2 years after the purchase.

All TV''s have their own quirks. Check them out for awhile before you buy. Look for pixels that just arn't being colored right. Dull colors. Picture sharpness, ect.
AirSO. ASpaceO. ASOnline. ASO.com ASO. ASO. ASO. ASO. ASO.
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:50 pm

Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 4):
Magnavox

Magnavox is Philips.  Wink
International Homo of Mystery
 
jutes85
Posts: 1854
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 12:50 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Quoting Go3Team (Reply 3):
LCD or DLP projection. Plasmas have been known to have burn in problems. The TV I'm looking at is the Sony Bravia XBR 40" LCD - excellent reviews.

+1

My dad just bought the 46" Bravia and the picture is amazing, 100x better than any Plasma that I've seen.
nothing
 
Go3Team
Posts: 3156
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 1:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 12:54 pm

Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 4):
Stay away from brands such as Olevia and Philips

The Philips that doubles as my computer monitor has been doing great over the past year. No dead pixels, quick response time when playing high fps computer games, etc. The only thing it lacks is an HDMI port.
Yay Pudding!
 
andrewuber
Posts: 2142
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 1:07 pm

I have the Panasonic PT-60LCX64 60" LCD HD Projection TV, and it is fantastic. Had it since 2004, and the only problem we had was the bulb went out once - and the extended warranty covered it. They came out with a new bulb (which they had in stock), and changed it in about a minute. Nice little access door in the front meant we didn't even have to pull it away from the wall.

It is capable of 720p and 1080i, but not 1080p - which is kindof a bummer since I want a Blu-Ray player soon. But I've seen it in 720p and it's still damn impressive.

The main reason we chose Panasonic was the viewing angle. This TV is remarkably clear from just about any angle. We also have friends with the same TV, and they have never had any problems with theirs either.

I am considering a 42" plasma for the bedroom, possibly sometime late this year. As expected, the prices have come down by about half, and I look forward to seeing what kind of deals I can get when the time comes.

Plasmas are great (although I too have heard about burn-in and tube life being somewhat short), but don't think for one second that LCD's are bad.

Drew  wave 
I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
 
jutes85
Posts: 1854
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 12:50 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 1:54 pm

BTW.

Sony > Everything else.
nothing
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 2:10 pm

If everything else is the same... LCD, they have a longer life, are cooler, and weigh less. Less susceptible to burn in, but they can have burn in.

Clarity, thats becoming hard and just depends. LCD's used to be less clear but thats no longer the case. Plasmas used to have a short life, but not so much any more....

If you go to a brick and mortar and check them out, go into the menu and reset the settings then compare. Personally I'm practically blind to high def and cant tell the difference between rgbhv and hdmi...so go figure.

If you plan on mounting the thing to your wall, residential construction usually will handle both but commercial does not. Your wall has to support 5X the weight of both the display and mounting equipment and with Plasmas that really becomes a factor.

Personally I like Samsung, but I only have commercial experience (best commercial warranty and availability on the market). My only advice is, make sure you have all the inputs you need and make sure the audio (if you have speakers) will follow the video as you need.

DLP is usually referring to projection systems. DLP is very hot, and bulbs have a short life in comparison to lcd's...but when referring to lcd projectors, dlp is far Superior in clarity.

[Edited 2007-05-28 07:25:46]
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
QANTAS077
Posts: 5176
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 5:08 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 2:28 pm

Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 6):
My dad just bought the 46" Bravia and the picture is amazing, 100x better than any Plasma that I've seen.

wait til you watch sport on it...TV man told me last week straight out that LCD is fine for movies and that's about it, Plasma has come a long way and is a much better product all round.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 3:18 pm

Plasma looks great but the LCD def has a longer life.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
Twistedwhisper
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 11:52 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 5:10 pm

Plasma if you're only watching TV, LCD if your planning to run computer stuff on it as well

Why? Well, as meantioned above, the plasma is more sensitive when it comes to "burning", although this is more true on older screens.
Plasma as general is a bit quicker, i.e. the image does not get "blurry" when the pixels are changing colours.
Plasma also has "a blacker black" and higher contrast: better colours.

LCD is less fragile. And is the better option if your room has a lot of windows, because it's less sensitive for sunlight not that Plasma will be destroyed by sunlight, but it's hard to see the screen due to the plasma technique as such.

My advise is that you go to your nearest dealer and start comparing. Stand at the same distance from the screen that you plan to do at home. Look at the sharpness on moving objects and the colour saturation.
Only you can decide what you think looks best. Be critical.

I have a 50" Sony plasma and a 32" Samsung LCD. I bought the 50" when I had a very good financial situation two years ago, but now I've moved to a smaller place, so it's a bit big. When sitting at the correct distance from the screen, I think that the 50" has a smoother image than the 32".

Also, do NOT be fooled by the fact that the dealer might use HD on their display units. You need a blueray DVD to watch a movie in HD, they're not widely accessable, and it is NOT the same as "aired HD" (which is interlaced HD, not progressive)

And of course, price is a factor as well.

Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 6):
100x better than any Plasma that I've seen.

Wow! One hundred times better!!!!!!!!!
I feel tempted to ask on what crtierias you based that statment, but I won't since I'm quite sure that you just exaggerated a bit.  Wink
Read between the lines.
 
L410Turbolet
Posts: 5438
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 9:12 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 7:18 pm

Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 9):
Sony > Everything else.

That was true maybe 15-20 years ago.
 
melpax
Posts: 1728
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:13 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 7:24 pm

We've had a plasma at home for the past 18 months or so, a Conia 106cm, paid just a tad under $2000 for it, fantastic picture, it's perfromed well so far with no dramas. The place where we bought it had other plasmas from the usual 'established' brands such as Panasonic, Samsung, Sony, some of them were cost twice as much or more & the picture quality on some was not as good as our 'budget' model. Our neighbours paid 8 grand for theirs as a 'demo/display' model not long after plasmas started becoming widely available, picture quality is not as good, goes to show how they're advancing.
Essendon - Whatever it takes......
 
futurecaptain
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:54 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 8:58 pm

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 5):
Magnavox is Philips.

Ugh, too late for me to be typing. I meant Haier, not Philips. Haier is a crappy TV and they need to just go back to making refridgerators IMO.
AirSO. ASpaceO. ASOnline. ASO.com ASO. ASO. ASO. ASO. ASO.
 
User avatar
KaiGywer
Crew
Posts: 11182
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 9:59 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 9:08 pm

I just bought myself a 22" LCD monitor for my computer  Smile I would like a nice, big HDTV though, but that'll come later  Smile
“Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, an
 
halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 10:08 pm

thanks to everyone for your advice.
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
User avatar
yowza
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:01 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Mon May 28, 2007 10:58 pm

IF you're going to be putting it in a bright spot get and LCD for sure, if not it will boil down to what you need, eg PC input HDMI/DVI etc etc. I ahve an LG 37" LCD which has been a cracker since I got it. Amazing stuff at a good price.

YOWza
 
jutes85
Posts: 1854
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 12:50 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 3:04 am

Quoting L410Turbolet (Reply 14):
That was true maybe 15-20 years ago.

As far as current TV's go. Sony's Bravia line outperforms anything else on the market. Go to an electronics store and take a look for yourself.
nothing
 
AC773
Posts: 1700
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:03 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 5:05 am

Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 20):
As far as current TV's go. Sony's Bravia line outperforms anything else on the market.

Uh..umm..emm....no.

Editors' top televisions: best HDTVs overall (CNET)
Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 5:09 am

Opinions are like elbows...most folks have a couple.

I own a Philips 50" Ambi-light and it's been excellent so far. My friend owns a Pioneer 60" and it's really really really good.

I gotta say that you should buy the one that looks the best to you. LCD is going to be more expensive the bigger you go, but for the smaller screens I know it's pretty good. My mother has one of the 26" Aquos HD screens and it's pretty impressive.

As far as quality....we all know that electronics are built to varying standards in terms of innards and the like based on who's ordering it. If Sams club or Costco is ordering televisions they may order the cheaper ones...if you go to Magnolia or Hi Fi Buys they are ordering the more expensive components.

One thing....pay them to come install it at your house and get the insurance.

Quoting Comorin (Reply 2):
I cannot say enough about my Pioneer 43" plasma.

The one I see alot of is terrific....and expensive.

Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 4):
Stay away from brands such as Olevia and Philips.

Based on what? You have some long term results to back that opinion up?

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 5):
Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 4):
Magnavox

Magnavox is Philips.

Something like that. And I forget who but Fujitsu makes screens for several brand names, and Sony makes their own glass.

Go to the following web sites for some info to help you decide

http://www.plasmatvscience.org/
http://www.plasmatvbuyingguide.com/

go here too for alternatives
http://www.dlp.com/Default.aspx?ct=6...cb212e-c97e-412f-94b0-dc3ae4ac98b4
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 6:28 am

Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 20):
As far as current TV's go. Sony's Bravia line outperforms anything else on the market. Go to an electronics store and take a look for yourself.

Well, we took the plunge. Our local Circuit City has a dynamite Memorial Day sale going on, and after much comparison, we chose a Sony Bravia 40" LCD.

Thanks again to everyone for their advice.
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
lincoln
Posts: 3133
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:22 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 9:05 am

Quoting Go3Team (Reply 3):
Plasmas have been known to have burn in problems.

While this is still a concern on the current generation plasmas, the newer ones aren't nearly as succeptable as the plasmas of even just two years ago.

Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 9):
Sony > Everything else.

Not necessarially. Especially when you start factoring cost in. Sony, Panasonic, and LG are the three brands I would I would look at. IMHO, Panasonic makes some kick-ass plasmas and LCDs -- I have a TH42PHD8UK (from their broadcast group) and the picture quality rocks and its quite price compteitive (and it doesn't have all of that extra crap that keeps getting bolted on to TVs these days). Sharp also has some respectable LCDs, and some very picky people I know have been satisfied by Westinghouse.

As far as the LCD vs. Plasma question goes possibly one of the biggest questions to ask is "How many hours per day are you going to use it?".

Plasmas tend to have sharper images with better black levels and slightly better motion response, but they are also speced with a shorter lifespan (in hours) than LCDs, so if you're the type of person who watches 20 hours a day of TV this might start to become a consideration.

Plasmas also tend to have more "glossy" screens than LCDs (though there are some 'flat' plasmas starting to show up on the market which can be a concern in some lighting scenerios.

As far as size goes, remember that plasmas and LCDs are (virtually all of them, at least) 16:9 vs the conventional 4:3 aspect ratio, so if you are looking at 4:3 SD content in its native aspect ratio a 37" 16:9 plasma will have a smaller image than a 37" 4:3 conventional TV. (For reference, my 42" plasma provides just about the same height image as my 27" conventional TV)

I have a plasma in my living room, and love it -- I thought about the Panasonic TH37PH9UK for my bedroom, and if it weren't for how often that one is on it would be my hands-down choice. Given, though, that longevity is more of a concern than image quality for my bedroom, I'm going to be going with an LCD.

Lincoln
(One of my current projects has over 100 plasmas and another 50 or so LCDs throughout the facility... I love my job)
CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 9:09 am

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 23):
Thanks again to everyone for their advice.

I'm sure you will love it. Are you going to wall or ceiling mount it? That is one nice feature about lcd/plasmas and furring out the wall does make for a nice clean look. But nonetheless congrats and tell us how it turns out.
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 9:19 am

Oh one last thing, you may want to invest in a decent receiver.

One of the mods here got this one and he seems to like it. The thing I liked about it is it scales every common input up to HDMI. Just optional though but helps with the theater experience, especially when you start putting in speakers.

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-j6lzW0t.../ProdView.asp?g=10420&I=580TXS804B


Send pics when you have it up and running!
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
Derico
Posts: 4209
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 1999 9:14 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 9:22 am

Quoting L410Turbolet (Reply 14):
That was true maybe 15-20 years ago.

Yes, and in many product ranges were Sony dominated years ago they have now been overtaken by other brands, even in the TV department. So I do agree generally.

BUT, the Sony Bravia XBR2 is top class. It happens to be Sony, but it's among the best rated across publication lines as well as in customer reviews.
My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
 
User avatar
solnabo
Posts: 5019
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:53 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 9:29 am

Just got my Philips 32PF5331 LCD

All I can say is "Woooow whatta crystal clear picture"

No wonder every Hollywood star are scared sheiz that every wrinkle/wart/zit will be seen at close-up... *lol*

Micke// Big grin
Airbus SAS - Love them both
 
halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 9:41 am

Quoting RichPhitzwell (Reply 25):
Quoting Halls120 (Reply 23):Thanks again to everyone for their advice.
I'm sure you will love it. Are you going to wall or ceiling mount it? That is one nice feature about lcd/plasmas and furring out the wall does make for a nice clean look. But nonetheless congrats and tell us how it turns out.

Actually, we're buying a new piece of furniture to place it on top of. We have an alcove of sorts in the family room where it will sit.

The only bad thing is that I have to wait for awhile to watch it. I can't take delivery in the short term, because of business obligations.

Quoting RichPhitzwell (Reply 26):
Oh one last thing, you may want to invest in a decent receiver.

Already have a Sony Digital Audio/Video Control Center I bought last year, in anticipation of upgrading the TV this year.

The surprising thing today was not the cost of the TV, but the cost of the HDMI cable - damn pricey.....
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 10:02 am

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 29):
cable

Cables make the points. tv's may get 3 - 5 points while any cable you walk out with will very well be around 50 points. Hence the reason you can find cheep same brand cables online.

Anyways, let us know how it turns out when you get it.
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
yegmaster
Posts: 932
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 6:58 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 12:24 pm

None of the above. I have a 50" Akai rear projection and with my HD hook up the picture is spectactular.
I have spoken to several proffesional home theatre installers and they said the quality of RP is by far better then LCD or Plasma because of bla bla (a bunch of technical lingo). But they say that most customers want LCD or Plasma because it is flat, looks slick and you can hang it on the wall.
Eventhough RP is less then have the price, people want the looks.
Fine by me.
 
ShannoninAMA
Posts: 1211
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 1:37 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 12:26 pm

We just picked up a 42 inch LCD and it is definitely getting the job done  Wink
Shipwreck alert. Head on over to Airspaceonline.com.
 
halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 12:26 pm

Quoting Yegmaster (Reply 31):
I have spoken to several proffesional home theatre installers and they said the quality of RP is by far better then LCD or Plasma because of bla bla (a bunch of technical lingo). But they say that most customers want LCD or Plasma because it is flat, looks slick and you can hang it on the wall.Eventhough RP is less then have the price, people want the looks.Fine by me.

Projection TV is indeed excellent, as long as you are sitting squarely in front of the screen. Move an distance off center, and the picture isn't so hot. At least that's what it seemed like to me.
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 12:29 pm

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 33):
Projection TV is indeed excellent, as long as you are sitting squarely in front of the screen. Move an distance off center, and the picture isn't so hot. At least that's what it seemed like to me.

Thats dependant on the screen itself. You would be amazed at the technology in each screen and screen type.
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
MCOflyer
Posts: 7071
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:51 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 12:30 pm

I want to get a plasma but they're so darn expensive.

Hunter
Never be afraid to stand up for who you are.
 
yegmaster
Posts: 932
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 6:58 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 12:54 pm

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 33):
Projection TV is indeed excellent, as long as you are sitting squarely in front of the screen

I forgot to mention. The picture is the same great quality from every angle.
Cheers
 
SJCRRPAX
Posts: 961
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:29 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 1:25 pm

Quoting RichPhitzwell (Reply 26):
Oh one last thing, you may want to invest in a decent receiver.

One of the mods here got this one and he seems to like it. The thing I liked about it is it scales every common input up to HDMI. Just optional though but helps with the theater experience, especially when you start putting in speakers.

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-j6lzW0t...S804B

I think what you mean is it converts the analog standard definition video to digital HDMI. There is no need to upscale any resolution for it to be HDMI as HDMI covers all resolutions from SD up to 1080P, and 1440P for HDMI 1.3. HDMI is almost identical to DVI but also has audio. YOu can buy a DVI to HDMI cable and connect your computer to your TV if you have a DVI output on your computer and an HDMI input on your TV.
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 2:26 pm

Quoting SJCRRPAX (Reply 37):
I think what you mean is it converts the analog standard

Well we can get into an argument over what scaling is and does, but the one listed will convert different standards from composite to s-video to component and bring it to hdmi. Older receivers did not have this ability to change video format from single video (composite) up to a split video stream (s-vid, component, rgbhv, dvi, hdmi, etc). Its more than just being able to receive a lower definition signal.
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
SJCRRPAX
Posts: 961
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:29 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 4:03 pm

Quoting RichPhitzwell (Reply 38):
Well we can get into an argument over what scaling is and does, but the one listed will convert different standards from composite to s-video to component and bring it to hdmi. Older receivers did not have this ability to change video format from single video (composite) up to a split video stream (s-vid, component, rgbhv, dvi, hdmi, etc). Its more than just being able to receive a lower definition signal.

Sure if you like. Scaling is the process of making something bigger or smaller, e.g. in video it means changing the digital resolution of the picture size. Standard Definition analog NTSC signal when sampled at 27 mhz is 720 pixels x 480 lines, where as 1080i is 1920x1080. IF I wanted to convert 1080i to 480i I would scale down from 1920x1080 to 720x480 and that would be done in the digital domain.

S-Video, means the Luma and Chroma are on two seperate lines, Composite means the Luma and the Chroma are on one line, (broadcast PAL and NTSC are Composite Signals), Component means RGB or (Y Cb Cr) are all seperate. S-Video, Component, and composite are all analog signals. A decoder is used to convert an analog signal to a digital signal and the processes is call digitizing not scaling. HDMI and DVI are digital cables, that handle multiple resolutions.
 
User avatar
KaiGywer
Crew
Posts: 11182
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 9:59 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 9:43 pm

Watched Top Gun yesterday on my new monitor. I love that thing  Smile
“Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, an
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 10:38 pm

Quoting KaiGywer (Reply 40):
Watched Top Gun yesterday on my new monitor. I love that thing

Was that at work  wink 
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
User avatar
RayChuang
Posts: 8007
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2000 7:43 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Tue May 29, 2007 11:27 pm

Plasma TV's offer a bright picture, but watch out for these downsides:

1. They use a LOT of power.

2. Screen image burn-in can be an issue.

3. 1080p plasma displays are still rare and expensive.

With the latest LCD panels, you use far less power than convention 27-32" CRT's, suffer no screen image burn-in issues, and 1080p resolution is widely available and relatively cheap. Also, today's LCD's have far wider angle of view, too.
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Wed May 30, 2007 12:56 am

Quoting SJCRRPAX (Reply 39):
Sure if you like

Not really, I really didn't care =) Its also a name that marketing likes to throw out and make something sound cooler. But I agree with what you said not what marketing calls the things.
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
User avatar
KaiGywer
Crew
Posts: 11182
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 9:59 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Wed May 30, 2007 2:27 am

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 41):

Was that at work

Haha, no at home  Smile
“Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, an
 
ac888yow
Posts: 394
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:29 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Wed May 30, 2007 3:14 am

Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 4):
Stay away from brands such as Olevia and Philips. I have heard stories of rebates taking nearly a year to be recieved and overall IMO the picture quality just isn't up there.

Go with a Magnavox, Sony, Sharp, or some other brand you know. The major name brands, while they cost a bit more, offer a better warranty and quality of the product IMO.

You do realize that Magnavox is the same as Philips right? Magnavox is a subsidiary of Philips and they share parts/technology/etc.

I can't speak for this "Olevia" brand (never heard of it so I'd stay away from it) but Philips is right up there with the other top brands in terms of picture, features, warranty, and reliability. Plus, Philips is the only brand to offer the pretty sweet feature called Ambilight.

Back to the topic, I like plasma over lcd and specifically suggest the Panasonic and Philips (honorable mention to Pioneer) brands.
 
David L
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:26 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Wed May 30, 2007 4:32 am

Quoting AC888YOW (Reply 45):
You do realize that Magnavox is the same as Philips right?

I believe so...

Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 4):
Stay away from brands such as Olevia and Philips.



Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 5):
Magnavox is Philips.



Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 16):
Ugh, too late for me to be typing. I meant Haier, not Philips.

 Smile
 
futurecaptain
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:54 am

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Wed May 30, 2007 4:38 am

Quoting David L (Reply 46):

Thankyou. Too many brands of TV's floating around in my head from work. Hard to keep everything straight 100% of the time.
AirSO. ASpaceO. ASOnline. ASO.com ASO. ASO. ASO. ASO. ASO.
 
ac888yow
Posts: 394
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:29 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Wed May 30, 2007 5:48 am

Quoting Futurecaptain (Reply 47):

Apologies. Didn't read every reply when I came across your first post.
 
EK20
Posts: 869
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:31 pm

RE: LCD Or Plasma?

Wed May 30, 2007 7:11 am

LCD for me.  Smile

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 727LOVER, Hillis, JJJ, PacificBeach88 and 17 guests