|Quoting AirNZ (Reply 1):|
Ah yes, including the memorable post from a member who claimed he was only a harmless little kid, doesn't pose any sort of threat and could easily just be stopped by merely stepping on him if he ever got out of hand.......and was aghast that others should be concerned about his ability to very easily evade airport security lol!!!
|Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 2):
But, of course, you know that you, as an adult, could not do such a thing, and that I am correct in my analysis that an UNARMED 10 year old poses NO THREAT to airport security, aircraft, etc. no matter if he is able to sneak through or not, nor does the fact a ten year old can sneak through security mean that ANYONE can just as easily do so. It's a logical fallacy to make the leap from unarmed child to dangerous terrorist. Just one more person believing in the false theory of the "slippery slope."
|Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 3):
95th percentile 10 year old is under 5' tall and 100 pounds (1.4m and 32kg).
|Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 2):|
Whatever. You want to talk about someone, you address them.
|Quoting Flighty (Reply 8):|
Let's put him in Afghanistan so he can find Bin Laden's secret lair
|Quoting JCS17 (Reply 13):|
This is the exact reason why we need guardian responsibility laws in the US. This li'l thug's momma clearly cannot effectively parent a child, and thus should be in jail for the continuous crimes of her son. Additionally, her other children should be placed in foster care.
|Quoting MattRB (Reply 14):|
So, you'd punish innocent parties for the crimes of others?
|Quoting MillwallSean (Reply 15):|
Seriously, this kids mum doesnt give him his ADHD medicine provided.
|Quoting JCS17 (Reply 16):|
I don't exactly think the mother is innocent in this case. She's guilty of raising a real piece of crap and shouldn't be allowed to have contact with her other children. She was his guardian! Therefore, she should also assume some blame of his actions!