FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 7:24 am

As I have already personally stated, the upcoming Obama budget deficits show how reckless and irresponsible this administration is. In fact, they are so reckless that I think history will judge this administration as one of the worst of our lifetimes, if not the very worst. While that may sound hyperbolic at this time, it's only because this administration's deficits don't come until later. And the bond markets don't seem to think the US government will be able to pay back its debts:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...59dgLTTziX4p9X9MRBRpWZGdQD981KVDG4

"Weak demand at a Treasury bond auction touched off worries in the stock market Thursday about the government's ability to raise funds to fight the recession.

The government had to pay greater interest than expected in a sale of 30-year Treasurys. That is worrisome to traders because it could signal that it will become harder for Washington to finance its ambitious economic recovery plans. The higher interest rates also could push up costs for borrowing in areas like mortgages."



So the government will be paying more than initially projected to finance its deficits, which in turn will cause even higher deficits and more debt, which in turn will drive interest rates up more, which will cost the government even more to service that debt, and on and on. We are becoming a giant Ponzi scheme.

And this administration is entirely responsible for that with their reckless upcoming budgets.

Big version: Width: 400 Height: 330 File size: 25kb


I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. And bragging about finding $100 million dollars in budget cuts shows how much of a laughingstock this administration is. Pathetic.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 8:02 am

You're offering just a projection yourself, and no constructive alternative for how to repair the damage to the economy.
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 1:39 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 1):
You're offering just a projection yourself, and no constructive alternative for how to repair the damage to the economy

How about we rescind the Porkulus plan and pass a balanced budget. Imagine that

Quoting FreequentFlier (Thread starter):
"Weak demand at a Treasury bond auction touched off worries in the stock market Thursday about the government's ability to raise funds to fight the recession.

The next auction will be in about 17 more days. It will tell us alot. See how oil responded tothe auction troubles this week. Look out for massive inflation next year.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 1:45 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 2):
How about we rescind the Porkulus plan and pass a balanced budget. Imagine that

Sure. Recall the fire brigade and hope your home will somehow stop burning on its own.

Well, it will – eventually!
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 1:57 pm

Republicans Deride Obama's $17B Proposed Cut in Federal Spending

Obama's $17 billion proposed cut represents a roster of 121 budget cuts and equals about one-half of 1 percent of the $3.4 trillion budget Congress has approved for next year.

Obama said the cuts appear small only in Washington

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...-obama-cut-programs-save-b-budget/

But look he saved us 17 Billion. So instead of a 1.75 trillion deficit we will only have a 1.70 trillion deficit.  laughing   laughing   laughing 

Quoting Klaus (Reply 3):
Sure. Recall the fire brigade and hope your home will somehow stop burning on its own

So deficit spending and too much credit put us in this mess and more deficit spending will get us out???? I would take the balanced budget and a longer recovery anyday.
 
User avatar
Dreadnought
Posts: 9800
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:31 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 2:12 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 3):
Sure. Recall the fire brigade and hope your home will somehow stop burning on its own.

We consider the government to be the arsonist, not the fire brigade.
Forget dogs and cats - Spay and neuter your liberals.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Proje

Sat May 09, 2009 2:12 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 4):
So deficit spending and too much credit put us in this mess and more deficit spending will get us out????

What got you into this mess was excessive speculation with ignorance of the risks.

If you can explain how businesses and employees are supposed to survive in a self-reinfocring spiral of contracting spending, gallopping bankruptcies and job losses, maybe there's an alternative to a short-term state intervention. But where is it?

Quoting Windy95 (Reply 4):
I would take the balanced budget and a longer recovery anyday.

Sure. Everybody would. But the time for that being the supreme priority would have been when the economy at least appeared to be doing well, not in the middle of an acute existential crisis.

Of course consolidation will have to follow as soon as the economy has regained sufficient resilience; But it would have been a mistake to simply let it fall free and just look on while the obvious chain reactions made the damage irrecoverable.

There are no easy choices any more at this point.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Proje

Sat May 09, 2009 2:23 pm



Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 5):
We consider the government to be the arsonist, not the fire brigade.

"We" being the minority of remaining Republicans, or who?  mischievous 

The arsonists in this case have primarily been the investment banks which used the lack of regulation in the derivatives market and erected a gigantic pyramid scheme very much like Bernie Madoff, just on a much larger scale.

We're looking at the burning wreckage of reaganomics which had been boosted to full throttle by the removal of regulations at the end of the Clinton era.

It was a wild ride for a few and a long, exhausting and increasingly painful stretch for most, with a bitter and expensive end for almost everyone.
 
User avatar
Dreadnought
Posts: 9800
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:31 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 2:52 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 7):
investment banks which used the lack of regulation in the derivatives market

Just because this mantra keeps getting repeated again and again and again does not mean it's true.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 7):
erected a gigantic pyramid scheme very much like Bernie Madoff, just on a much larger scale.

You want to raise the issue of Ponzi schemes? Really? Who runs the world's biggest Ponzi schemes in the world, Like Medicare or Social Security? Those make Madoff look like a babe in arms, and nobody seems to mind those.
Forget dogs and cats - Spay and neuter your liberals.
 
seb146
Posts: 13756
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:19 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 3:15 pm



Quoting FreequentFlier (Thread starter):
And the bond markets don't seem to think the US government will be able to pay back its debts:

And, who ran up all those debts? When was the debt ceiling raised? Under Obama? Obama ran up trillions in debt? Let's blame the current administration for paying back for wreckless spending of the previous administration. I guess it would be better for Obama to just spend, spend, spend and not give a thought as to how or when to pay it back. As long as there is spending, everything is fine. Let's not have any conscience about the future generations all the while telling America that we love them. That worked well, didn't it?

This is just another "righties hate Obama" thread. *yawn* Been there, done that. You all just need to start a "I hate Obama" thread. You know, if you hate the president so much, you must hate America. You HAVE to respect the president. If you don't, you hate America and you are a terrorist. They have open space, now, at Guantanimo for all you new terrorists.

Don't get on my case. As pointed out many, many, many, many times, this is EXACTLY the cr*p we were fed for the past 8 years under Bush. Don't like it? Tough. It was said. Worse, it was believed.
Life in the wall is a drag.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Proje

Sat May 09, 2009 3:34 pm



Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 8):
Just because this mantra keeps getting repeated again and again and again does not mean it's true.

No. But there's a reason why it's being repeated: It is a fact.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 8):
Who runs the world's biggest Ponzi schemes in the world, Like Medicare or Social Security? Those make Madoff look like a babe in arms, and nobody seems to mind those.

You don't seem to understand what a Ponzi/Pyramid scheme actually is if that is what pops into your mind.

That it's substantial, that it has problems and that you don't like it for ideological reasons doesn't automatically make it a Ponzi scheme. Especially since it does in fact fulfill its designed purpose, if just marginally.
 
User avatar
Dreadnought
Posts: 9800
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:31 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 3:54 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 10):
No. But there's a reason why it's being repeated: It is a fact.

It is a politically motivated mantra unsupported by fact. The financial markets have for many years been regulated to such a high extent that the regulation itself has created new market dynamics counter to purely market forces. The sub-prime mortgage based securities is a perfect example of a market that would never have existed without government regulation.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 10):
You don't seem to understand what a Ponzi/Pyramid scheme actually is if that is what pops into your mind.

Social Security and Medicare are paid out of the current account. It counts on people paying into it now to immediately pay promised services/payments to people who paid in far less in the past, on an ever-increasing scale. That is a Ponzi scheme. It only works if you have more and more current payers (or more precisely higher revenues from the current payers). The day that current revenues stagnate or fall while commitments continue to grow, the structure collapses. Medicare alone has over 30 trillion in unfunded commitments.
Forget dogs and cats - Spay and neuter your liberals.
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 4:19 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 1):
You're offering just a projection yourself, and no constructive alternative for how to repair the damage to the economy.

No more bailouts for auto companies or banks. It's sink or swim time. Rescind at least half of the stimulus package - the parts that essentially undid welfare reform and weren't directed towards infrastructure. Eliminate food stamps. Eliminate all farm subsidies. Means test Social Security and Medicare. Pull ALL US troops out of Europe and Asia. Reduce defense spending on outdated programs. Eliminate the useless Department of Education.

And last but not least, rip up the Obama budget and burn it so it is never seen again.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 5):
We consider the government to be the arsonist, not the fire brigade.

 checkmark 

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 9):
And, who ran up all those debts? When was the debt ceiling raised? Under Obama? Obama ran up trillions in debt? Let's blame the current administration for paying back for wreckless spending of the previous administration. I guess it would be better for Obama to just spend, spend, spend and not give a thought as to how or when to pay it back. As long as there is spending, everything is fine. Let's not have any conscience about the future generations all the while telling America that we love them. That worked well, didn't it?

 redflag   redflag   redflag   talktothehand   talktothehand   talktothehand 

Honestly, stop with this argument.

The Obama budget assumes the Bush tax cuts expire and we pull completely out of Iraq, so the deficits I have attributed to Obama I have done so accurately. You will have to defend the merits of the President's budget deficits based on their....merits (what a concept). Again, as I have said repeatedly, the Obama budget essentially eliminates all Bush era budget priorities. So the deficits are not Bush's responsibility. They belong entirely to this President. Perhaps you can place some blame on Bush for 2009's deficit, but the trillion dollar + deficit in 2019?

You're beclowning yourself.
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 4:39 pm



Quoting Seb146 (Reply 9):
This is just another "righties hate Obama" thread. *yawn* Been there, done that. You all just need to start a "I hate Obama" thread. You know, if you hate the president so much, you must hate America. You HAVE to respect the president. If you don't, you hate America and you are a terrorist. They have open space, now, at Guantanimo for all you new terrorists.

Don't get on my case. As pointed out many, many, many, many times, this is EXACTLY the cr*p we were fed for the past 8 years under Bush. Don't like it? Tough. It was said. Worse, it was believed.

You do get the sense that the Obama apologists just wish we would just shut up, don't you? "Please stop bringing up inconvenient facts! We never hear the media criticize him! Our hero is fixing things now! Everything is fine, nothing to see here!"

Except everything is not fine. Unemployment jumped to about half a percent to 8.9 percent despite this President telling us his "stimulus" package would turn things around. And this during a time of mammoth and historic budget deficits. Deficits so high that Treasury bond holders are ALREADY insisting on higher interest rates in order to hold them because they don't think this administration is serious about getting the deficit under control.

I think voters are getting a taste of why you should NEVER elect someone who has never run ANYTHING as the head of a multi-trillion dollar enterprise known as the United States of America. It's what happens when you let a cult of personality ("We are the ones we've been waiting for!, Hope!, Change!", etc) substitute for rationality and logic. It's funny how the Obama apologists here keep claiming I'm a right-winger far outside the mainstream, yet my position on the deficits remains exactly the same as it was months ago, and Obama keeps moving right to where I am ("See look, we cut 17 billion! We're getting the deficit under control". He's still got a long way to go, but he'll keep moving to me, and not the other way around. Just like I said would happen.

I don't hate this President, I just hate what he is doing to my country.
 
Biscayne505
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 3:27 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 4:45 pm

The facts... They are such pesky things. The budget office has said the Obama budget figures are higher than what is being circulated by the Administration.

But for more facts, Obama has said he won't hire lobbyists...

Obama has said he would posts all spending bills on the internet...
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Proje

Sat May 09, 2009 4:51 pm

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
It is a politically motivated mantra unsupported by fact. The financial markets have for many years been regulated to such a high extent that the regulation itself has created new market dynamics counter to purely market forces. The sub-prime mortgage based securities is a perfect example of a market that would never have existed without government regulation.

Without Lehman Brothers, AIG and accomplices fraudulently promising to "remove" the risks from the original lenders there would never be a major amount of sub-prime mortgages because the lenders would have had to back these mortgages themselves which would have hit a wall quite early. In a properly regulated and overseen system there would not have been a major problem.

Only the deregulation of the derivatives market in conjunction with the SEC conveniently asleep at the wheel made this an existential crisis for the worldwide economy by letting corporate players run amok.

You know, every time when the "free market" screws up royally as it just did the die-hard ideologues will without fail try to find a way why not too little but too much public oversight somehow "forced" the private actors to act recklessly and greedily.

I personally recommend this page for meditation about this subject.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Social Security and Medicare are paid out of the current account. It counts on people paying into it now to immediately pay promised services/payments to people who paid in far less in the past, on an ever-increasing scale. That is a Ponzi scheme.

No, it is not.

A Ponzi/pyramid scheme is a mechanism created with fraudulent intent, duping investors out of their money exploiting their greed with the system designed to crash down when too few new investors can be found or the authorities find out what's going on. Payouts are only made to investors to lure in other ones. Other than that, the scheme only serves the greed of its creators.

Social Security and Medicare are explicitly designed to fund specific purposes, which they actually do. They are not designed as profitable investments, they are designed as a kind of insurance.

And they can't go bankrupt because they are backed by the state.

Failing to conduct necessary reforms and failure to provide them with sufficient funds due to ideological reasons (remember Ronald Reagan, anyone?) has led both systems into a very similar situation as much of the rest of US infrastructure: A rising risk of major failures due to decades of neglect and damaging lobby pressure.

Many countries have had or still have problems with these two areas since the post-war boom years created unrealistic expectations of infinitely growing economies and between political and corporate lobbies and convenient promotion of short-term consumption the sustainability of the health and social systems were neglected.

The simple fact is that some of the funds spent on consumption in recent decades will have to fill in the gaps left after cleaining up inefficiencies and exploiting other savings potentials.

But then, we could of course just let poor and sick people die in the streets. Serves them right if they're not wealthy, right?

[Edited 2009-05-09 09:56:48]
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 5:04 pm



Quoting Biscayne505 (Reply 14):
The facts... They are such pesky things. The budget office has said the Obama budget figures are higher than what is being circulated by the Administration.

But for more facts, Obama has said he won't hire lobbyists...

Obama has said he would posts all spending bills on the internet...

Another interesting one: The President and a beauty pageant contestant both oppose gay marriage. The Left hysterically attacks the beauty pageant contestant but remains silent about the President. When confronted, several admit it's because they believe the President is lying to the public about his position. Lying consistently and continuously to the public is now an admirable trait for the Left I guess. (cue but Boooooosh was bad! retorts, please save them)

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
Social Security and Medicare can't go bankrupt because they are backed by the state.

 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl   rotfl   rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 

Klaus, no wonder you're a liberal. You actually believe this! God bless you Klaus.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Proje

Sat May 09, 2009 5:10 pm



Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 12):
No more bailouts for auto companies or banks. It's sink or swim time.

That sounds so fabulously righteous, and it has that intoxicating air of ideological purity! Wonderful!  silly 

The trouble is just that it might have worked in a world which had prevented extreme corporate consolidation and which had taken care through meticulous oversight that massive pyramid schemes like the one built by the derivatives hawkers would not have been possible.

If you had pushed for such a market situation, you might have the right to make such a proposal. But after many years of heavy lobbying by the free-market fanatics towards the crash that sounds more than just a bit hollow to me.

The problem is that after decades of deregulation and intentional weakening of public oversight the situation is now so heavily distorted that this theoretically nice recipe would really lead to a chain-reaction of self-accelerating collapses of much if not most of the US and the global economy.

Good job – just next time remember to take the car keys away before the next joyride of the "free market" has already ended in a burning wreck!
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 5:17 pm



Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 16):
Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
Social Security and Medicare can't go bankrupt because they are backed by the state.

Klaus, no wonder you're a liberal. You actually believe this! God bless you Klaus.

In case of severe underfunding a collapse of both systems would be prevented by the state. That is pretty obvious.

Would it be pretty? Hell, no!
But would it happen? Definitely!

It may warm your heart to imagine a total collapse of both systems with the state simply shrugging it off, but that's extremely unlikely. The consequences would be too severe on too many levels.

What we'll see will be probably slow, arduous and often painful and contentious reforms, but there is simply no viable alternative to a decently functioning social and health system in a modern society.
 
Arrow
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:44 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 5:42 pm



Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Social Security and Medicare are paid out of the current account. It counts on people paying into it now to immediately pay promised services/payments to people who paid in far less in the past, on an ever-increasing scale. That is a Ponzi scheme.

That's because you did it wrong, and you let your politicians borrow from the fund that people paid into. That has nothing to do with a ponzi scheme, but everything to do with a bunch of politicians who were (and still are) far more interested in short term pork barrel spending with borrowed money than planning for the future. Not everyone set things up this way, and those countries that did learned their lesson decades ago.

You want Social Security to work, with adequate funding of future liabilities? Take away Congress's right to use it as a cash reserve. Unfortunately for you, it's probably too late now.

Much as I appreciate what Obama is trying to do to pull the US chestnuts out of the fire -- he can't do it any more than KIng Canute could stop the tide from coming in. You will now pay the ultimate price for the last decade of uncontrolled spending by government combined with a largely unregulated financial regime that got its start under Reagan.

There's no question that Obama is piling that debt ever higher, but I'm not sure what Plan B would have been, given the abysmal state of the economy. The only thing keeping the US dollar afloat and US interest rates in check is China's continued willingness to buy US bonds -- and we are now seeing the beginning of the end of that, too. If Congress gets its protectionist mantra fully in gear, watch for China to act to preserve its own economy. Right now, that US market is crucially important to them, but if it is taken away by a bunch of Lou Dobbs in Congress, watch out.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 5:48 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 18):

It may warm your heart to imagine a total collapse of both systems with the state simply shrugging it off, but that's extremely unlikely. The consequences would be too severe on too many levels.

What we'll see will be probably slow, arduous and often painful and contentious reforms, but there is simply no viable alternative to a decently functioning social and health system in a modern society.

Actually, no, I happen to like Social Security as a system. I don't think all government programs are bad, but I think pretending that the funding for them is secure when it clearly isn't, is insincere of Democratic politicians. And people who rely entirely on Social Security for their retirement savings are fools.
 
sv7887
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:31 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sat May 09, 2009 6:02 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
Without Lehman Brothers, AIG and accomplices fraudulently promising to "remove" the risks from the original lenders there would never be a major amount of sub-prime mortgages because the lenders would have had to back these mortgages themselves which would have hit a wall quite early. In a properly regulated and overseen system there would not have been a major problem.

Boy are you leaving out some important facts:

You conveniently leave out the passage of the Community Reinvestment Act in the 1990s that started this little subprime brigade. Banks were sued and the Federal Reserve actually rewrote the lending standards to encourage these loans to so called minorities. Social Engineering gone bad.

Without this this the loans would NEVER have been made to begin with.

Sources: http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-...help-cause-the-housing-crisis.html

http://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/30/us...its.html?sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all


And it's still happening: The FDIC just gave a Boston area bank a negative rating for not making enough "risky" loans..That's right:

http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2009/03/16/story3.html

"The FDIC slapped East Bridgewater Savings with a rare “needs to improve” rating after evaluating the bank under the Community Reinvestment Act.

There are no apparent financial or legal impediments that would limit the bank’s ability to help meet the credit needs of its assessment area,” the FDIC said in its CRA evaluation."


You don't seem to get it. Wall St was the SECONDARY market for these mortgages. Collaterized Debt Obligations are only pieces of mortgages that were already made...You seem to make the argument that derivatives are bad without understanding how they work. You also ignore that the cause of the crisis wasn't the derivatives themselves but the defaulting of the loans that created them..

And you also leave out the most important fact. Fannie Mae securitized those mortgages at the behest of the government. What happens when you give mortgages to people they can't afford them? And then what happens when the government keeps buying up these mortgages to encourage the process on?

Add the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates low, and you've got the origins of what happened.

Blaming Investment Banks for political gain is just plain dishonest.

As for Obama its his spending that's going to run trillion dollar deficits for the next decade. The Obama lovers are glossing over this very important fact. You don't spend your way out of debt, and it's no wonder the Chinese aren't buying our Treasuries anymore.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 17):
The trouble is just that it might have worked in a world which had prevented extreme corporate consolidation and which had taken care through meticulous oversight that massive pyramid schemes like the one built by the derivatives hawkers would not have been possible.

Umm that consolidation helped save Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns....You can blame all the "Derivatives Hawkers" all you want, but you're just being ignorant.

It's like blaming for stock broker for the fall in GM's stock price....

You can keep blaming Reagan but he set us up for 25 years of prosperity and added $4,000 of GDP/capita during his term alone....It's no magic that China and India are following a similar blueprint of deregulation, trade, and open markets. Look at the prosperity that it's brought them.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 13):
Except everything is not fine. Unemployment jumped to about half a percent to 8.9 percent despite this President telling us his "stimulus" package would turn things around. And this during a time of mammoth and historic budget deficits. Deficits so high that Treasury bond holders are ALREADY insisting on higher interest rates in order to hold them because they don't think this administration is serious about getting the deficit under control.

Actually it would have been worse not for the temporary increase in employment due to the stimulus bill. The Chinese already curtailed their Treasury purchases, so what's he going to do next, print the money?

He bet on the Iraq War ending, but at the same time is building up in Afghanistan..Then there's the Taliban in Pakistan...The economy contracted faster than his assumptions last quarter, so his numbers are already bunk..You can't spend your way out of debt, and seeing that he's never run a business it's so surprise he's screwing it up..Look at the near bankruptcy of California right now or Massachusetts' massive billion dollar deficit for examples of this.

Anyone remember Ed Acker and Pan Am? If the business model isn't solvent, borrowing isn't going to help you....
 
seb146
Posts: 13756
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:19 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sun May 10, 2009 3:13 am



Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 13):
Except everything is not fine. Unemployment jumped to about half a percent to 8.9 percent despite this President telling us his "stimulus" package would turn things around.

Two things about this:

1. EVERYONE is screaming and crying that this won't kick in for a year or better. At the same time, EVERYONE is screaming and crying that no one read any of this stimulus package because it was too long. So, now, it is Obama's fault because NO ONE in the legislative check over the executive branch did their homework? *NO ONE* Not Republicans, not Democrats. NO ONE. So, it is Obama's fault. Huh?

2. When the economy started to tank, who was president? Obama? IIRC, the fears of recession and slower economy started under Bush. What EXACTLY did he do? What EXACTLY did Bush do to curtail the deficit? He had 8 years. Read that again. Bush had EIGHT YEARS to do something about deficits and to be fiscally responsible. Yet, millions on the right are so happy to just sit there and bob their heads and tell everyone that Obama is the single person to blame for where the United States economy sits. I don't buy it.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 13):
I think voters are getting a taste of why you should NEVER elect someone who has never run ANYTHING as the head of a multi-trillion dollar enterprise

Well, that is your problem: The United States of America is not a corporation. It is not in the business of making money for the stock holders. It is a beacon of freedom and justice for the world. Or so we were told for years and years.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 13):
I don't hate this President, I just hate what he is doing to my country.

And I hated Bush for what he did to MY country, too, and I am ashamed for my countrymen who jumped on the bandwagon and started calling people like me, that protested the war in Iraq, the deficit spending, the torture, the secrecy for the past 8 years, that we are terrorists and need to be sent to Guantanimo. Ashamed that all the peace and goodwill that was talked about for decades as what America is all about was simply abandoned in the name of security and freedom and democracy. I never voted for violence and war. I never voted for torture. I never voted for deficit spending. Yet, for eight years, that is EXACTLY what we got. Now, to blame Obama for all of it is just..... I don't have the words.... I would do better to beat my head against a brick wall, for all the good it will do.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 12):
Perhaps you can place some blame on Bush for 2009's deficit, but the trillion dollar + deficit in 2019?

My e-mail is listed in my profile if you want to send me the next 4 weeks of winning lottery numbers. You seem to have a completely secure and reliable crystal ball. I'll be waiting for those lotto numbers!

And, actually, we can blame Bush COMPLETELY for the trillions of dollars in deficit for 2009. He was completely in power when he came up with that budget and the emergency spending for the wars and military that he just couldn't live without. So, yes, I will blame him.

Care to comment on Bush running up a debt larger than ALL presidents before him COMBINED? How is that Obama's fault? I know there is a "reasonable" and "rational" explination for it. When in doubt, blame the other guy.
Life in the wall is a drag.
 
Yellowstone
Posts: 2821
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:32 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sun May 10, 2009 5:05 am



Quoting Sv7887 (Reply 21):
You conveniently leave out the passage of the Community Reinvestment Act in the 1990s that started this little subprime brigade. Banks were sued and the Federal Reserve actually rewrote the lending standards to encourage these loans to so called minorities. Social Engineering gone bad.

Correction - the CRA was passed in the 1970s under Carter. Some important facts about the legislation:
- CRA-governed mortgages defaulted at rates roughly equal to those of non-CRA-governed mortages.
- The legislation specifically instructs banks to follow sound lending principles.
- CRA-governed mortgages were less likely to be resold as mortgage-backed securities.
- Half of all subprime mortgages out there have been issued by non-CRA-governed institutions.
- The Bush administration enforced the CRA less strictly than the Clinton administration, yet it was under Bush that the subprime market imploded.

I don't deny that government policy regarding Fannie and Freddie Mac bought into the same blindness toward risk that struck the rest of the market, but blaming that on the CRA is way off base.

Quoting Sv7887 (Reply 21):
You don't seem to get it. Wall St was the SECONDARY market for these mortgages. Collaterized Debt Obligations are only pieces of mortgages that were already made...You seem to make the argument that derivatives are bad without understanding how they work. You also ignore that the cause of the crisis wasn't the derivatives themselves but the defaulting of the loans that created them..

Umm...no. The mortgage-backed securities (a subclass of CDO's) were only part of the problem. And labeling them "only pieces of mortgages" is misleading; it ignores the fact that by combining and redividing thousands of mortgages (spamifying them, if you will), the bad mortgages were spread throughout the economy.

The other part of the problem, that you seem to be ignoring, was another derivative, the credit default swap. This blog post explains it about as well as any source I've seen:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/11/16/1002/9542/629/660423
To summarize, the CDS was initially a sort of loan insurance. If Bank A was nervous that Person B wouldn't pay off the loan they took out, they could pay Firm C a regular fee in exchange for the promise that, if Mr. B defaulted, Firm C would pay off the loan. Bank A reduces their risk (and doesn't have to hold as much cash in reserve, allowing them to make more loans). Firm C earns some income. Everyone is happy. Then along come some Republican lawmakers championing deregulation (primarily Phil "Nation of Whiners" Gramm), who prohibit the SEC from regulating CDSs.

First result - now no one is checking to see if Firm C actually has the resources to pay off the loan in case it fails. But hey, housing values are only going up! It's not like we'll ever have to pay off a CDS, right?

Second result - Bank A looks at all Firms C (and D, E, F, etc.) all wanting to sell it swaps. Bank A starts making riskier loans--after all, if they don't work out, all those CDS's will cover it.

Third result - Someone realizes that nothing says CDS's have to be on your own loans. Firm C sells CDS to Firms G, H, and I that will pay off if Mr. B's loan fails, even though those firms have nothing to do with the initial loan. Money for everyone! Million dollar bonuses at the end of the year! How could this possibly go wrong?

Then the housing market slows down, and Mr. B calls up Bank A and says he can't afford the loan anymore. Bank A calls up Firm C and requests the payout on its CDS. So do firms G, H, and I. Firm C doesn't have the cash to pay out all these, but never fear! It took out CDSs against this scenario. They call up Firm J--as do all the other people Firm J sold CDSs to. Firm J can't afford to pay all these out, so they call up the guys they bought CDSs from. This happens a few more times, and before long Firm C gets a call from Firm Z asking for the payout on the CDS they bought. Oops.

And that, my friend, is how unregulated derivatives shelled the financial industry.

By the way, the total value of CDS trades in 2007? 70 trillion dollars. That's more than the GDP of the entire planet.
Hydrogen is an odorless, colorless gas which, given enough time, turns into people.
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sun May 10, 2009 5:06 am



Quoting Seb146 (Reply 22):
1. EVERYONE is screaming and crying that this won't kick in for a year or better. At the same time, EVERYONE is screaming and crying that no one read any of this stimulus package because it was too long. So, now, it is Obama's fault because NO ONE in the legislative check over the executive branch did their homework? *NO ONE* Not Republicans, not Democrats. NO ONE. So, it is Obama's fault. Huh?

Honestly, you're making this too easy for me. Republicans DID exercise their check over the executive branch on the Obama budget. Which is why EVERY SINGLE one of them voted against Obama's budget. (this is why I'm considering bucking the supposed general trend and registering as a Republican, changing from Libertarian for the first time) The ladies from Maine - Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins - even voted against it. ALL of them voted against it, as did 20+ Democrats. Face it, your party owns the deficits now. Remember, you keep telling us we're irrelevant?  Yeah sure Well that means you're entirely responsible for the damage you're causing to my country. Can't have it both ways.

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 22):
My e-mail is listed in my profile if you want to send me the next 4 weeks of winning lottery numbers. You seem to have a completely secure and reliable crystal ball. I'll be waiting for those lotto numbers!

Again, these are the government's OWN projected budget deficits. I didn't pull them out of a hat. And it's already clear they were extremely unrealistic and the deficits will be much higher since the GDP numbers for this quarter were way below projections, and the government just had a "terrible" Treasury auction, meaning interest rates (and thus financing the Obama deficits) will be much more costly than originally projected by the government.

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/08/...n-exposes-hole-in-obama-econ-plan/

As expected, this is already starting to cause "crowding out" of private investment, and an increase in other interest rates, such as mortgage rates. In other words, everything that critics of this administration said would happen is happening and everything the government said would happen has proven to be false.

You don't need to apologize for voting for these incompetent fools. But I do expect you'll correct your mistake and vote accordingly next time.
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sun May 10, 2009 12:45 pm



Quoting Seb146 (Reply 22):
And, actually, we can blame Bush COMPLETELY for the trillions of dollars in deficit for 2009. He was completely in power when he came up with that budget and the emergency spending for the wars and military that he just couldn't live without. So, yes, I will blame him.

Care to comment on Bush running up a debt larger than ALL presidents before him COMBINED? How is that Obama's fault? I know there is a "reasonable" and "rational" explination for it. When in doubt, blame the other guy

Actually since congress controls spending most of that deficit came under a Dem controlled congress in which the Messiah was a member. I will never defend Bush and his lack of Vetoing any major spending bill but nothing he did is a outrageous as the new Obama plan.
 
Falcon84
Posts: 13775
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:52 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sun May 10, 2009 2:37 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 1):
You're offering just a projection yourself, and no constructive alternative for how to repair the damage to the economy.

Ooooh! Ooooh! (Raising my hand in the back of the class) I know what the answer is! Aaaahem.....


"Lower texs and let the economy fix itself!"

That's the only answer the right EVER has.

Quoting Windy95 (Reply 2):
How about we rescind the Porkulus plan and pass a balanced budget.

You mean, like Mr. Clinton did back in the 1990's? I'm sure you never demanded this of President Bush, by the way.
Work Right, Fly Hard
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sun May 10, 2009 3:21 pm



Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 26):
You mean, like Mr. Clinton did back in the 1990's? I'm sure you never demanded this of President Bush, by the way.

Yes Mr Clinton with the Republcan congress at the time did a pretty good job. No argument from me on that. As for Bush you would be wrong. I was not a Bush man. He disapointed me more than you can believe. You also assume that since I would attack the messiah that I would be totally against Slick Willy and Pro Bush but you are wrong. Sorry but deficits where bad under Bush but Obamas plan takes it to a whole new level.
 
seb146
Posts: 13756
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:19 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Sun May 10, 2009 3:28 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 25):
Actually since congress controls spending most of that deficit came under a Dem controlled congress in which the Messiah was a member.

First off, I have noticed it is only those that hate Democrats call Obama "Messiah." I also find it laughable that you people call Obama "Messiah" when you yourselves have singlehandedly appointed St Ronnie "Deficit spending and cut taxes is the best for the economy" Reagan as the standard bearer for the party. Any and all who do not live up to your Messiah's expectations are not Republicans and need to be purged from the party.

Also, how many times did Congress deny Bush all of his spending? How many times did the Republican controlled Congress raise taxes on Americans holding off-shore accounts?

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 24):
Again, these are the government's OWN projected budget deficits. I didn't pull them out of a hat.

Yes, and we all know how wonderful and accurate the government is. Why are you relying so heavily on the current administration if you hate them so much?

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 24):
Republicans DID exercise their check over the executive branch on the Obama budget. Which is why EVERY SINGLE one of them voted against Obama's budget.

But (let me say this again) NOT ONE OF THEM read the bill before voting on it. NOT ONE. They even admitted it! That means, they voted on it simply because it was put forth by Obama. In other words, party before country. They had NO solid argument as to why this was a cr*p piece of legislation, in their opinions. Simply that Obama put it out there, Obama is a Democrat, therfore, Republicans should just be obstructionist and shoot this thing down simply because it was not their guy that put it out there. That is what it looks like to me.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 24):
Remember, you keep telling us we're irrelevant?

Really? When? Because anyone disagreeing with Republicans are told that every single day? And, now, some of us that disagree with Republicans are finally turning the same argument we have been given since Clinton was in office, WE are the bad guys? C'mon. That's not right. You know it.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 24):
But I do expect you'll correct your mistake and vote accordingly next time.

Hmmmm.... deficit spending and low taxes or be responsible and pay back loans even though it will hurt. Seems like a no-brainer to me. We know where low taxes and deficit spending gets us. Look around you. Is this really what you want? There were lower taxes and the markets did control their own destiny. When the reality of all that happened, credit started to fail. Housing markets started to fail. Banks started to fail. Businesses started to fail. People lost their jobs in droves. Like most people seem to do, I will not suffer from amnesia when the next election comes around. I will remind everyone what exactly happens when taxes are low and the market takes it's own path. People, like you and I, lose homes, lose jobs, and lose everything. Yes, I will vote accrodingly next time.
Life in the wall is a drag.
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Mon May 11, 2009 5:28 pm

New Projections Show $1.8T Deficit for 2009
The newly projected deficit is now $1.8 trillion, four times last year's deficit and higher than originally estimated.

Annual deficits would never dip below $500 billion and would total $7.1 trillion over 2010-2019. Even those dismal figures rely on economic projections that are significantly more optimistic than those forecast by private sector economists and the Congressional Budget Office. They rely on a 1.2 percent decline in GDP this year and a 3.2 percent growth rate for 2010

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...11/new-projections-bigger-deficit/


I sure hope the Rich can cover this.
 
Arrow
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:44 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Mon May 11, 2009 6:12 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 29):
I sure hope the Rich can cover this.

You're all going to paying for it through substantially increased taxes for a decade or more. The days when an economy could "grow" its way out of this kind of mess are long gone. And for the US it will be particularly troublesome because Asian economies will be calling more and more of the shots.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Mon May 11, 2009 11:02 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 27):
Yes Mr Clinton with the Republcan congress at the time did a pretty good job. No argument from me on that. As for Bush you would be wrong. I was not a Bush man. He disapointed me more than you can believe. You also assume that since I would attack the messiah that I would be totally against Slick Willy and Pro Bush but you are wrong. Sorry but deficits where bad under Bush but Obamas plan takes it to a whole new level.

 checkmark   checkmark 

The Obama apologists assume just because I oppose their hero that I disliked Clinton. Clinton balanced budgets, passed welfare reform and the economy was going gangbusters. Clinton also had executive experience.

Obama had no executive experience and is bankrupting the nation. I hide nothing in showing my contempt for this incompetent administration and I'm watching history bear me out.

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 28):
Yes, and we all know how wonderful and accurate the government is. Why are you relying so heavily on the current administration if you hate them so much?

Because one would think if they're assuming deficit numbers that high, they would try to reduce them. But this is an incompetent administration and they're spending more instead and accelerating the deficits.

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 28):

But (let me say this again) NOT ONE OF THEM read the bill before voting on it. NOT ONE. They even admitted it! That means, they voted on it simply because it was put forth by Obama. In other words, party before country.

Honesty, stop with this nonsense. Your party just voted to put the nation on a course towards bankruptcy. That's your legacy, not mine. You can get off the Obama train whenever you want and join me as a critic, or you can be an apologist for it.

Your choice.

Choose.
 
seb146
Posts: 13756
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:19 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 1:16 am



Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 31):
Your party just voted to put the nation on a course towards bankruptcy. That's your legacy, not mine.



Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 31):
they're spending more instead and accelerating the deficits.

Yet not one of you Bush cheerleaders said one word about Bush and the Republicans bankrupting this country for six years. Not one person on the right. You all just bobbed your heads in unison saying "It is for the good of the country." Now, it really is for the good of the country, and everyone on the right hates it. Sorry, that is your legacy, not mine. We were not swimming in cash when Obama was sworn in. All those hundreds of billions of dollars of defense spending on the war added up over time. All those loans from other countries added up over time. Sorry to break it to you, but those are loans. You want everyone citizen of this nation to be responsible and pay back loans, but, more importantly, never ever borrow more than you can afford. Yet, when your guy does it, that is acceptable and for the good of the nation. Yeah, right. Sorry, your stand just does not fly with me. Hate a president for starting a war he had no business starting, but do not hate a president for trying to point out how fiscally irresponsible this country's leaders have been and trying to correct it.
Life in the wall is a drag.
 
User avatar
Dreadnought
Posts: 9800
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:31 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 3:52 am



Quoting Seb146 (Reply 32):
Yet not one of you Bush cheerleaders said one word about Bush and the Republicans bankrupting this country for six years. Not one person on the right.

Where the hell have you been for years? Conservatives have been bitching about deficits for years. But don't try to (again) compare the Bush deficits, which were bad enough, with Obama's, who has quadrupled the previous record in his first 100 days.

And don't give me that BS about the spending being required. If I need a new car to replace my old one, you think I am justified in raiding my kids' college fund? You don't have the money, you don't spend it. Period.
Forget dogs and cats - Spay and neuter your liberals.
 
FlyPNS1
Posts: 5258
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:12 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 4:03 am



Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 33):
Conservatives have been bitching about deficits for years.

Maybe they have been bitching, but they haven't actually DONE anything to fix it. How many conservatives turned down the stimulus spending? A few turned down the unemployment insurance money, but everything else they sucked down like pigs at a trough.

Most conservatives only complain about deficits when they don't have control of the White House. If John McCain had won, we'd still have massive deficits, but the conservatives wouldn't be complaining. They'd just blame it on the economy.

I'll agree that the deficits are bad and must be gotten under control. However, I'm not going to hold my breath and wait for the so-called "conservative" Republicans in government to do it. The Republicans have no plan to balance the budget and only complain about the budget deficit because it's the only thing they can hold against Obama.
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 4:48 am



Quoting Seb146 (Reply 32):
Yet not one of you Bush cheerleaders said one word about Bush and the Republicans bankrupting this country for six years. Not one person on the right. You all just bobbed your heads in unison saying "It is for the good of the country." Now, it really is for the good of the country, and everyone on the right hates it. Sorry, that is your legacy, not mine. We were not swimming in cash when Obama was sworn in. All those hundreds of billions of dollars of defense spending on the war added up over time. All those loans from other countries added up over time. Sorry to break it to you, but those are loans. You want everyone citizen of this nation to be responsible and pay back loans, but, more importantly, never ever borrow more than you can afford. Yet, when your guy does it, that is acceptable and for the good of the nation. Yeah, right. Sorry, your stand just does not fly with me. Hate a president for starting a war he had no business starting, but do not hate a president for trying to point out how fiscally irresponsible this country's leaders have been and trying to correct it.

 talktothehand   talktothehand   talktothehand   redflag   redflag   redflag 

Stop with these liberal arguments you can't back up. Just because you were busy reading the Daily Kos or other left-wing blogs doesn't mean conservatives didn't protest deficits under the Bush administration.

Big version: Width: 400 Height: 330 File size: 25kb


And if you look at the file above, you'll notice that the deficits WERE being reduced (unacceptably slowly) under the Bush administration, but reduced nonetheless. Under Obama's own projections, the deficits shrink and then increase again to one TRILLION dollars in 2019. The deficit for this year has already been corrected to reflect the fact that it will be larger than originally projected and will be nearly 5 times higher than the highest deficit under Bush.

You are simply defending what is essentially the bankrupting of America. If you want that to be your legacy, then you can defend it to voters in 2010.
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 1:01 pm



Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 35):
the deficits shrink and then increase again to one TRILLION dollars in 2019. The deficit for this year has already been corrected to reflect the fact that it will be larger than originally projected and will be nearly 5 times higher than the highest deficit under Bush.

And these White House projections include the adding of Cap and Trade. If the people of this country continue to fight the Glbal warning and Carbon cap then Obamas Deficit will be nuch higher.

Quote:
White House economists didn't revise their expectation that the economy would be growing by 3.5% by the end of this year, despite the fact that some private economists have been lowering their forecasts.



Quote:
Beginning in 2012, the White House budget had counted on the sale of greenhouse-gas emissions permits to bring in $77 billion to $79 billion a year through 2019



Quote:
"At least half the revenue that the administration is expecting is just not going to materialize," said Daniel J. Weiss, director of Climate Strategy at the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank closely allied with the Obama White House.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124204820923806673.html

Things do not look so good for O's budget. But I am sure somehow it will be the fault of Bush.

Quote:
Seeking to bolster public support for climate legislation, the Obama administration is consulting pollsters who advocate avoiding phrases such as "cap-and-trade" and "global warming." On Monday, the White House Council on Environmental Quality was scheduled to meet with Robert Perkowitz, president of ecoAmerica, a Washington-based nonprofit that uses "psychographic research" to "shift personal and civic choices of environmentally agnostic Americans," according to its Web site.



Quote:
"We're trying to give them phrases that work," Mr. Perkowitz said in an interview. He said that in a survey of some 2,000 Americans conducted by his group in March and April, less than half of the respondents said they would support a "cap-and-trade" policy, and that only 24% said they knew what the phrase means. "If you call it 'clean energy dividend'...almost anything other than 'cap and trade,' you'll get people responding a lot more favorably," he said.

What I love about the above quotes from the same article is that they admit that they have to find a better lie to put the sham of global warming past the Americans. This administration has showed so far that it will stop at nothing to pass it ideological agenda.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 1:22 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 36):
What I love about the above quotes from the same article is that they admit that they have to find a better lie to put the sham of global warming past the Americans. This administration has showed so far that it will stop at nothing to pass it ideological agenda.

Well, at least climate change is backed by evidence-based scientific research; Creating cynical euphemisms for the unprovoked Iraq invasion to sell it to the US public was quite a bit more sinister by comparison.

If you can remember that far back, in any case...!
 
IgneousRocks
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 3:06 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 1:39 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 37):
Well, at least climate change is backed by evidence-based scientific research

Well, you are all set should ever wish to have second career as a stand up comedian.  Smile
I can take your igneous rocks or leave 'em. I relate primarily to micas, quartz, feldspar.
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 1:42 pm



Quoting IgneousRocks (Reply 38):
Well, you are all set should ever wish to have second career as a stand up comedian.

You can choose to laugh about scientific research, but that doesn't alter the results. Only more research might do that, and only if the facts warrant it.
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 1:42 pm



Quoting Klaus (Reply 37):
Well, at least climate change is backed by evidence-based scientific research

If you say so  Yeah sure
 
Klaus
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 1:52 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 40):
If you say so

Whether I say so or not doesn't change the results either.
 
seb146
Posts: 13756
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:19 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 3:04 pm



Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 35):
Just because you were busy reading the Daily Kos or other left-wing blogs doesn't mean conservatives didn't protest deficits under the Bush administration.

No. I was just paying attention to regular media. I don't read blogs. Thanks for assuming things about me, though.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 33):
Conservatives have been bitching about deficits for years.

Yeah. I remember all those budgets and all that spending that was rejected by Congress.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 33):
And don't give me that BS about the spending being required.

I think what you are looking at when you post the same old tired graph is this: ALL those years of war under Bush that he borrowed hundreds of billions of dollars a year, and, also, projecting that unemployment will be high (unemployed people do not pay taxes) and the rich will be storing their money in off-shore accounts and will not be taxed. So, you are assuming (as is the White House) that unemployment will be high as well.

Explain to me, also, how you can trust only one graph from the White House but complain and hate everything else coming from the White House?

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 35):
WERE being reduced (unacceptably slowly) under the Bush administration,

Uh-huh. From '07 to '08. I also notice you don't say anything about '00 to '04, which dropped like a rock. Spend, spend, spend out of a surplus. Snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory. And no one on the right complained at all. Until this year. "Tea Parties" IIRC.
Life in the wall is a drag.
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Tue May 12, 2009 3:08 pm



Quoting Seb146 (Reply 42):
I also notice you don't say anything about '00 to '04, which dropped like a rock

Clinton recession, tech Bubble burst and 9/11. Does that explain it enough?
 
seb146
Posts: 13756
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:19 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Wed May 13, 2009 3:00 am



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 43):
Clinton recession, tech Bubble burst and 9/11. Does that explain it enough?

Typical: Democrat's fault. 5 minutes into the Obama presidency, the recession is his and his alone. However, Bush was never ever responsible for any of the recession at the beginning of the century. Typical "blame the other guy because it's not my fault" Republican politics. Stick with what you know, I guess.
Life in the wall is a drag.
 
FlyDeltaJets87
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:51 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Wed May 13, 2009 3:24 am

Quoting Windy95 (Reply 4):
But look he saved us 17 Billion. So instead of a 1.75 trillion deficit we will only have a 1.70 trillion deficit.

Saving $17 billion out of $1.75 trillion leaves $1.733 trillion.  silly 

Quoting FreequentFlier (Thread starter):

I think what amuses me the most about that for 8 years while under Bush we heard about "wreckless spending" from the left and how "We had surpluses under Clinton" (which they generally will not conceed that those were in no small part due to a Republican led Congress that actually acted Republican, once upon a time), but now creating a defecit that is over four times any of the defecits under Bush, that argument seems to die out (unless the topic is about Bush).

I'm also amused (but certainly not the least bit shocked) that the left made the defecits and spending a part of their campaign, then they go and blow the Bush defecits out of the water.

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 22):
At the same time, EVERYONE is screaming and crying that no one read any of this stimulus package because it was too long. So, now, it is Obama's fault because NO ONE in the legislative check over the executive branch did their homework? *NO ONE* Not Republicans, not Democrats. NO ONE. So, it is Obama's fault. Huh?

Hey, we put up with the same crap when the PATRIOT ACT was passed, and all the blame for that went to Bush. I see no difference now.

[Edited 2009-05-12 20:26:14]
"Let's Roll"- Todd Beamer, United Airlines Flight 93, Sept. 11, 2001
 
FreequentFlier
Topic Author
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Wed May 13, 2009 3:34 am



Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 45):

I think what amuses me the most about that for 8 years while under Bush we heard about "wreckless spending" from the left and how "We had surpluses under Clinton" (which they generally will not conceed that those were in no small part due to a Republican led Congress that actually acted Republican, once upon a time), but now creating a defecit that is over four times any of the defecits under Bush, that argument seems to die out (unless the topic is about Bush).

I'm also amused (but certainly not the least bit shocked) that the left made the defecits and spending a part of their campaign, then they go and blow the Bush defecits out of the water.

You would think the Obama supporters would spend a little less time arguing with their critics and a little more time criticizing Obama to get the deficits under control.

Hyperinflation, rising interest rates and god forbid, a federal government debt default are not good for anyone, particularly the poor.

But hey, I'm irrelevant right?  Yeah sure Spend away!
 
seb146
Posts: 13756
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:19 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Wed May 13, 2009 6:51 am



Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 45):
we put up with the same crap when the PATRIOT ACT was passed, and all the blame for that went to Bush. I see no difference now

Actually, there were a lot of members of Congress that voiced their opposition to the Patriot Act. They read parts of the Patriot Act, or even the whole thing, and thought it was the wrong thing to do. Some of them were even told they hated America. There is a huge difference. Bush was so willing to allow people suspected of having any ties to terror, including those that attend Mosques, to be tracked. Are you frekin' kidding me?

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 46):
Hyperinflation, rising interest rates

I thought Republicans wanted the markets to be left alone. That is one very certain possiblity of what you get when you leave the markets unchecked. When the government is completely out of the markets and the "regulate" themselves, there very well could be high interest rates and large inflation rates. That's what happened for years. The Bush's and Reagan all took a hands-off approach to the markets for the most part. Did interest rates and inflation stay low?
Life in the wall is a drag.
 
FlyDeltaJets87
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:51 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Wed May 13, 2009 3:50 pm

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 47):
Bush was so willing to allow people suspected of having any ties to terror, including those that attend Mosques, to be tracked. Are you frekin' kidding me?

Sounds about as good as taking money from companies that are actually able to turn a profit and giving it those that can't.


Quoting Seb146 (Reply 47):
Actually, there were a lot of members of Congress that voiced their opposition to the Patriot Act. They read parts of the Patriot Act, or even the whole thing, and thought it was the wrong thing to do. Some of them were even told they hated America.

There were a GREATER number of people in Congress who opposed the Stimulus package, including every single Republican in the House and 11 Democrats in the House. In the Senate, the vote barely cleared the filibuster line. So don't sit here and tell me Republicans just let this one slide through.   
Compare that to the PATRIOT Act - Only one Senator voted against the PATRIOT Act - Russ Feingold. 98 Senators voted for it. The Vote in the House was 357 to 66. Maybe YOU should do your homework before you state such things in your post
.........................Yea.......Nay
Republican.........211.........3
Democratic.........145........62
Independent.........1...........1

[Edited 2009-05-13 09:15:05]
"Let's Roll"- Todd Beamer, United Airlines Flight 93, Sept. 11, 2001
 
User avatar
DocLightning
Posts: 19593
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:51 am

RE: Obama Budget Deficit Will Be Larger Than Projected

Wed May 13, 2009 4:29 pm



Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 48):

There were a GREATER number of people in Congress who opposed the Stimulus package, including every single Republican in the House and 11 Democrats in the House. In the Senate, the vote barely cleared the filibuster line. So don't sit here and tell me Republicans just let this one slide through.
Compare that to the PATRIOT Act - Only one Senator voted against the PATRIOT Act - Russ Feingold. 98 Senators voted for it. The Vote in the House was 357 to 66. Maybe YOU should do your homework before you state such things in your post

I don't think you can really compare the two. An economic crisis is not the same as a terrorist attack. It doesn't have the same shock value.

The Patriot Act was a very poor reaction to a single event. At that point, the GOP was basically browbeating everyone with a McCarthy-style rhetoric of "if you don't vote for this, you are one of them."

The Stimulus Bill was more of a difference in political philosophy. The GOP felt that it would deepen deficits and not help the economy. The DNC felt that it would deepen deficits, but that the resultant economic growth would balance that out. The DNC said that results would not be visible for at least a year. It's only been 4 months.

I would much rather see the GOP opposing the stimulus bill than see the DNC supporting the Patriot Act. The former signifies that our government is working (more or less) as it should. The latter was a very dark day in our history that saw us trading our liberties for perceived security (and coming out with neither).
-Doc Lightning-

"The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars."
-Carl Sagan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: akiss20, Gemuser and 19 guests