User avatar
OA260
Topic Author
Posts: 20981
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:50 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:33 pm

McDonald's loses McCurry battle

A small curry shop in Malaysia has won an eight-year battle against global fast-food giant McDonalds over the name of its restaurant.

The court ruling on Tuesday in favour of the McCurry restaurant, based in Malaysia's largest city, Kuala Lumpur, effectively ends McDonald's legal bid to retain exclusive use of the "Mc" prefix in Malaysia.

The ruling by Malaysia's highest court denied McDonald's request to appeal against another court's verdict that allowed McCurry to use the prefix.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/as...fic/2009/09/20099853733530827.html


A victory for the small boys and a slap in the face to the greedy multi nationals??
 
windy95
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:11 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:43 pm

I have to agree with you on this one. The amount of lawsuits that they have launcehd ovr the years is incredible. I believe it was a year or two ago they one a case in the UK against a family that had the name of McDonald. The fact that they went after this one family restaurant made me not want to eat there again. This is one area where a corporation has gone out of control
 
User avatar
OA260
Topic Author
Posts: 20981
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:50 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:53 pm



Quoting Windy95 (Reply 1):
I have to agree with you on this one

OA260 faints and gets back up  Wink  Big grin

-------

The thing that makes me not want to eat in my local McDonalds is the staff with dirty finger nails sliding around on the greasy floors lol...

Mind you this Mc Curry place showed their dishes on the video report I saw and there were chopped off heads of things  Wow!
 
photopilot
Posts: 3061
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:16 am

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:53 pm

Gee, what a shame. No Happy Meal for the McLawyers!  Big grin

Great to hear the little guy can still win.
 
BAViscount
Posts: 1975
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 8:01 am

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:57 pm



Quoting OA260 (Thread starter):
The court ruling on Tuesday in favour of the McCurry restaurant, based in Malaysia's largest city, Kuala Lumpur, effectively ends McDonald's legal bid to retain exclusive use of the "Mc" prefix in Malaysia.

I think the Scots have more of a claim over the "Mc" prefix than Ronald does!!
Ladies & gentlemen this is Captain Tobias Wilcock welcoming you aboard Coconut Airways flight 372 to Bridgetown Barb
 
CPH-R
Posts: 6058
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 5:19 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:05 am

Not the first time this has happened. Back in 1995, the owner of a Danish "Pølsevogn" (look it up, might take a while to explain this Danish cultural phenomenon Big grin) named his small business McAllan, from the nickname his friends had given him (I can't remember why they gave him that, I think it was due to an interest in Scotland or Scottish Whiskey).

McDonald's promtly sued him and eventually the case made it all the way to the Danish Supreme Court, which ruled that he was free to name his business whatever he wanted, as long as it didn't infrige trademarks or the like. In the process the owner had even changed his name to Mac Allan Pedersen (adding the Mac), completely free of charge as the Danish assembly of Bishops decided that the name change would be on them Big grin

Sadly he had to give up his Pølsevogn in 1996, as the warehouse he was leasing his small stand space from, terminated the contract.
 
kiwiandrew

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:15 am

good job - many years ago when I lived in Scotland there was a family butcher in Pitlochry who had been trading under the name McDonalds ( their family name ) for something like 150 years and these upstart wankers tried to sue them and shut them down - I am pleased to say that the lawsuit was thrown out and costs were awarded against mcdonalds corporation for their frivolous lawsuit - personally I would love to see every person whose name really is McDonald sue the arse off of mcdonalds corporation for the damage that has been done to their name since these people started peddling their McCrap.
 
User avatar
MillwallSean
Posts: 859
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:07 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:31 am

McDonalds have tried to stop many competitors.
When I was living in Sweden they were not happy with a popular chain called Max.
http://www.max.se/en/

However they tend to loose a lot of the cases outside the US, the prefix Mc isnt seen as something that can be trademarked since its more of a Scottish heritagething than trademark. This makes it very difficult for Roland and his mates to claim the Mc prefix outside the states. They have a gap of at least 800 years to explain in front of a judge and that isnt done easily...

In NZ they wanted a family named McDonald to stop using the name on their family business. That business wasn't even food related, it was thrown out of court after the family produced documents showing that their name had been with the family for over 400 years and compared that to the company McDonald.
I remember the judged stating that he thought it would be interesting if the family sued McDonalds, that judgement would be a more difficult one he said.

However regarding this case in Malaysia.
Of course they copied from McDonalds. Its even in red and white. This is an Indian couple serving Indian food in an Indian fastfood restaurant. The version about Mc standing for Malaysian Chicken is rather far fetched, especially since they use capital M and a small c...

But the Malaysian court rightly pointed out that the prefix Mc is not in any way related to McDonalds and McDonalds cant lay claim to it.
Mc is Scottish.
Malaysian law is based upon UK law by the way.
No One Likes Us - We Dont Care.
 
Birdwatching
Posts: 3573
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 10:48 am

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:49 am

I can't believe how many people in this thread sympathize with so called McCurry.Once you start that "stand up for the small guy" crap people will go blind and forget reality.

This is NOT about who has the right to use that name. This is about a small restaurant trying to boost sales by looking like a large restaurant who has spent millions on advertising, building a corporate ID and an image. I mean look at the photo in reply 7! The letters and the colors! People will eat at this restaurant because they will think of the reputation McDonalds has built over years. If this was only about the name they feel they are entitled to use, then why do they do every effort to make their store sign LOOK like a genuine McDonald's?

Really nothing different than the blatant Chinese imitations of western products and brands.
How can a person in their right mind say something like:

Quoting Photopilot (Reply 3):
Great to hear the little guy can still win.



Quoting BA (Reply 7):
Glad to see the small guys won this battle.



Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 11):
good job

I guess you all would love it if others were stealing from you.

Soren  santahat 
All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
 
kiwiandrew

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:28 am



Quoting Birdwatching (Reply 13):
The letters and the colors!

yes Soren , I have looked at the colours , or rather colour , ie red rather than red and yellow as used by McD everywhere in the world . While I have no high opinion of people who are gullible enough to eat McDonalds 'food' I dont really think that they are stupid enough to think that this is a McDonalds - apparently you do .

Quoting Birdwatching (Reply 13):
People will eat at this restaurant because they will think of the reputation McDonalds has built over years

I would have thought that in itself would be enough to keep people away from this restaurant

Quoting Birdwatching (Reply 13):
I guess you all would love it if others were stealing from you.

Do you the same way that McDonalds stole the name from people who have been using it for hundreds of years

Quoting MillwallSean (Reply 12):

In NZ they wanted a family named McDonald to stop using the name on their family business. That business wasn't even food related, it was thrown out of court after the family produced documents showing that their name had been with the family for over 400 years and compared that to the company McDonald.
I remember the judged stating that he thought it would be interesting if the family sued McDonalds, that judgement would be a more difficult one he said.

 
User avatar
OA260
Topic Author
Posts: 20981
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:50 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:16 am



Quoting Aeri28 (Reply 14):
m sure MacDo realizes they always have a chance at losing their suits, but it behooves them to press on potentially in the hopes that the other party will give up due to financial concerns

Exactly they took a lawsuit against a small take away firm in Scotland and totally abused them and bullied them in the hope they would be intimidated and put out of business.

This is a victory for morality in the business world.  thumbsup   thumbsup 
 
Maverick623
Posts: 4632
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:13 am

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:59 am



Quoting Aeri28 (Reply 12):
Im sure MacDo realizes they always have a chance at losing their suits, but it behooves them to press on potentially in the hopes that the other party will give up due to financial concerns, or just plain tiredness.

And, under US trademark law, if they don't enforce said trademarks, they eventually lose their exclusive rights.
"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
 
sudden
Posts: 3934
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2001 5:20 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:42 pm



Quoting OA260 (Thread starter):
and a slap in the face to the greedy multi nationals??

I can serve them my homemade menu instead, Mc Fist!  box 

If I feel like eating burger, I go to Burger King anyway.

Aim for the sky!
Sudden
When in doubt, flat out!
 
User avatar
2707200X
Posts: 4752
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:31 am

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:00 pm

The site of another red fast food sign with yellow letters sure made McDonald's "Grimace", thats one McLawsuit that does not end with a happymeal, what clowns.
"And all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by." John Masefield Sea-Fever
 
User avatar
OA260
Topic Author
Posts: 20981
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:50 pm

McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:12 pm



Quoting 2707200X (Reply 17):
thats one McLawsuit that does not end with a happymeal, what clowns.

Good one  rotfl   rotfl  There are some jokes going around on Facebook also.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:40 am

So will we see Mcvadapav here soon.It will def out sell a burger.  Smile
regds
MEL.
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
Carlisle
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:53 pm

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:41 pm

There is a restaurant currently still open in Brooklyn, which years ago, Mickey Ds filed a lawsuit against their original name. The restaurant eventually had to change their name. I am definitely glad that McDonald's, a disgusting food chain to begin with, lost big time on this one. I guess they can't have the monopoly on life this turn.

Cheers,
Carlisle
"CLEAN PLANES AND DIRTY MARTINIS" (Delta)
 
kiwiandrew

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:51 pm

maybe someone called McDonald should start a lawsuit to reclaim their name from the corporation and seek punitive damages for having their name dragged through the mud for the last 50 odd years - fair is fair  Smile
 
CXB77L
Posts: 2599
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:18 pm

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:51 pm



Quoting Birdwatching (Reply 8):
This is NOT about who has the right to use that name. This is about a small restaurant trying to boost sales by looking like a large restaurant who has spent millions on advertising, building a corporate ID and an image. I mean look at the photo in reply 7! The letters and the colors! People will eat at this restaurant because they will think of the reputation McDonalds has built over years. If this was only about the name they feel they are entitled to use, then why do they do every effort to make their store sign LOOK like a genuine McDonald's?

I agree. Trademark isn't just about the usage of the name, it's also gaining from another company's reputation. While using the prefix Mc alone isn't technically a breach of trademark, the similarity of the letters and the colours make it very suspiciously a copy of the McDonald's font.

Whatever people may think of McDonald's food is irrelevant, the fact is that their advertising which they spent lots of money on has been successful in getting customers into their stores. They quite rightly wanted to protect their interests in not having another company take the benefit from McDonald's advertising.

Again, whether people approve or disapprove of McDonald's tactics, they have every right to try to defend their intellectual property, and to vigourously pursue those that the company deems to have breached it. Fair enough, they lost this case. Without reading the full judgment I guess I can't comment on why, but perhaps it was ruled that no 'reasonable' person would confuse McCurry would McDonald's, or maybe a curry chicken store is of a significantly different business activity than a fast food burger joint. But that doesn't mean that they have been wrong to pursue it, nor does it mean that they should stop pursuing the 'little guys' in future if McDonald's feel that there has been any breach of trademark laws.
Boeing 777 fanboy
 
User avatar
RJAF
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:00 am

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:55 pm

Great news...I'm starting my own McFalafel soon  Wink
Chance favors the prepared mind
 
Pellegrine
Posts: 1766
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:19 am

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:12 pm



Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 11):
And, under US trademark law, if they don't enforce said trademarks, they eventually lose their exclusive rights.

The business owner is only required to maintain the trademark in the use of lawful trade and it is valid. The owner of the trademark is not required to defend it against all infringement if that infringement is "minor and inconsequential".

The test under US law is basically, "does the consumer confuse the identity or source of origin of goods?" In this case, that would be, "is McCurry related to McDonald's in the consumer's eyes?" Although in this case the colors and use of Mc (I do not buy the abbreviation, because it should be M C Curry or M.C. Curry) seem like an infringement, I do not see anyone becoming confused about this being related to McDonald's. I speculate though if this were in the US, McCurry's owners would have lost.
oh boy!!!
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:03 am

At times it looks like a Popular company going overboard with a remotely suspected threat to their products.  Smile
regds
MEL.
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
N1120A
Posts: 26467
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:45 am



Quoting CXB77L (Reply 18):

Again, whether people approve or disapprove of McDonald's tactics, they have every right to try to defend their intellectual property

A relatively common last name isn't exactly the strongest kind of intellectual property.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
CXB77L
Posts: 2599
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:18 pm

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:04 pm



Quoting N1120A (Reply 22):
A relatively common last name isn't exactly the strongest kind of intellectual property.

It's not just the name, it's the colours, the font, the logo etc that forms the trademark, and trading in a related field of business using the same or similar trademark is a violation of trademark laws. Besides, while it may be a common name, McDonald's has established a worldwide reputation with that name. If Mc Curry weren't trying to use McDonald's trademark as a way to gain some sort of free advertising, then why did their colour and font have to be the same as that of the fast food giant? If it really is meant to stand for Malaysian Chicken curry, why can't they call it M.C. Curry?
Boeing 777 fanboy
 
kiwiandrew

RE: McDonalds Looses Legal Battle Over McCurry

Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:30 pm



Quoting CXB77L (Reply 23):
McDonald's has established a worldwide reputation with that name

They certainly have a 'reputation' but I cant imagine how anyone who sells food would think that their business would benefit from being associated with it - you might as well call your restaurant 'Typhoid Marys'.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], seb146, vikkyvik, WarRI1 and 20 guests