User avatar
OA260
Topic Author
Posts: 21040
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:50 pm

Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:52 am

The man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing has revealed fresh evidence which he believes proves his innocence.

They say they include information that could have been used to undermine the shopkeeper's credibility in court, such as:
:: That just before picking out Megrahi in an ID parade, the shopkeeper had seen a press photo of the Libyan. The defence team did not know the shopkeeper had also compared Megrahi's photo with one of convicted terrorist Abu Talb, who they think was the real bomber.
:: That there were inconsistencies surrounding the date the clothes were bought.
The shopkeeper said it was before the Christmas lights were put up in his home town.But a local MP who performed the switching on ceremony said he had flicked the switch the day before the purchase. Also, at one stage Mr Gauci told Crown prosecutors that the date of purchase was actually November 29, a fortnight before Megrahi was said to have bought the clothes.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-..._New_Evidence_Proves_His_Innocence

----------

Like I said before I was never convinced he was the man and if he is not then who was it??
 
evomutant
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:47 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:16 pm

According to the Guardian report today, the shopkeeper was also paid $2m, and his brother $1m by the US authorities. That from the SCCRC.

It is reassuring to know that "justice" has a price tag like everything else.
 
afterburner
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:38 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:33 pm

For some people, there are two facts that convince them that Al Megrahi was guilty:
1. He's a Libyan. (Libya is a country they think is a supporter of terrorism.)
2. He's a Muslim. (Islam is a religion they think is a supporter of terrorism.)

For them, any other fact is irrelevant.

Proving that Al Megrahi was innocent might be way easier than proving that O.J. Simpson was.
 
futurepilot16
Posts: 1756
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:20 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:42 pm

He played a part. He was a part of their gov't during the planning. Their gov't planned it, the admitted to it, therefor he was a part of it. Even if he didn't plant the bomb himself

Quoting Evomutant (Reply 1):
According to the Guardian report today, the shopkeeper was also paid $2m, and his brother $1m by the US authorities. That from the SCCRC.

It's never a surprise that everyone jumps to blame the U.S. for everything.
"The brave don't live forever, but the cautious don't live at all."
 
L-188
Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:57 pm



Quoting Afterburner (Reply 2):
For some people, there are two facts that convince them that Al Megrahi was guilty:
1. He's a Libyan. (Libya is a country they think is a supporter of terrorism.)
2. He's a Muslim. (Islam is a religion they think is a supporter of terrorism.)

Both of those statements are pretty much true, Historically Libya is a state sponsor of terrorism, and in this day and age most terrorism has roots in islamic fundalmentalism

Quoting FuturePilot16 (Reply 3):
It's never a surprise that everyone jumps to blame the U.S. for everything.

Very true, frankly I think it is a sign of envy on the worlds part.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
 
afterburner
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:38 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:10 am



Quoting FuturePilot16 (Reply 3):
He played a part. He was a part of their gov't during the planning.

Can you show us the proof?

Quoting FuturePilot16 (Reply 3):
Their gov't planned it, the admitted to it, therefor he was a part of it. Even if he didn't plant the bomb himself

Does this mean every Libyan is guilty?
 
User avatar
WarRI1
Posts: 8626
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:51 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:27 am



Quoting Afterburner (Reply 5):
Can you show us the proof?



Quoting Afterburner (Reply 5):
Does this mean every Libyan is guilty?

They showed the proof to the jury, he was convicted.

Certainly not, but some were and probably still are.
It is better to die on your feet, than live on your knees.
 
afterburner
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:38 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:50 am

Quoting WarRI1 (Reply 6):
They showed the proof to the jury

In this thread we are discussing whether the evidences presented to the jury were valid.

edit: grammar

[Edited 2009-10-03 20:11:59]
 
User avatar
WarRI1
Posts: 8626
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:51 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:15 am



Quoting Afterburner (Reply 7):
In this thread we are discussing whether the evidences presented to the jury was valid.


[quote=Afterburner,reply=5]Quoting FuturePilot16 (Reply 3):
He played a part. He was a part of their gov't during the planning.

Can you show us the proof?

Yes, it is about the evidence, being valid, my point is the jury thought so. Was he guilty? The evidence according to the jury is valid, so he was found guilty. Off topic??
It is better to die on your feet, than live on your knees.
 
afterburner
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:38 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:25 am

Quoting WarRI1 (Reply 8):
Yes, it is about the evidence, being valid, my point is the jury thought so. Was he guilty? The evidence according to the jury is valid, so he was found guilty. Off topic??

The OP opened this thread because there are new evidences that contradict the evidences showed to the jury. Al Megrahi deserves a retrial.

[Edited 2009-10-03 20:25:32]
 
evomutant
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:47 am

RE: Lockerbie Bomber: 'New Evidence Clears Me'

Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:39 pm



Quoting FuturePilot16 (Reply 3):
Quoting Evomutant (Reply 1):
According to the Guardian report today, the shopkeeper was also paid $2m, and his brother $1m by the US authorities. That from the SCCRC.

It's never a surprise that everyone jumps to blame the U.S. for everything.

Not at all. But it smells bad when huge amounts of money are necessary to get someone to talk. And presumably, talk as he is told to talk. Like i said, that was from the SCCRC, who presumably don't have an axe to grind.

As for envy, please. What a childish statement.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 727LOVER, coolian2, reality and 14 guests