Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Kiwirob wrote:When you see how the Brazilians have treated the venues so soon after the games you have to wonder if it worth it.
http://gizmodo.com/rios-olympic-venues- ... 1792294386
slider wrote:LA will win it as they should. They're the only city that truly has the infrastructure and capability to host it.
GrahamHill wrote:slider wrote:LA will win it as they should. They're the only city that truly has the infrastructure and capability to host it.
And Paris doesn't?
Airstud wrote:I thought Beijing already scored the Winter games...
Kiwirob wrote:GrahamHill wrote:slider wrote:LA will win it as they should. They're the only city that truly has the infrastructure and capability to host it.
And Paris doesn't?
Americans aye Graham?
As far as I can see Paris isn't lacking for facilities and has one massive advantage over LA, public transport is light years better.
mham001 wrote:I think you are confused.LA is said to have made a profit, after Mitt Romney came in and saved them.
WarRI1 wrote:I was glad when Boston pulled out.
slider wrote:LA will win it as they should. They're the only city that truly has the infrastructure and capability to host it. Pretty much all the venues already exist and the few they do have to build are all able to be reutilized afterwards. It's a slam dunk.
AirbusMDCFAN wrote:Airstud wrote:I thought Beijing already scored the Winter games...
Los Angeles has hosted before, and has found ways of making their current infrastructure work for the Olympians
moo wrote:Paris has a second huge advantage over LA - it has no possibility of Trump being in power in France.
cledaybuck wrote:mham001 wrote:I think you are confused.LA is said to have made a profit, after Mitt Romney came in and saved them.