So he'll block the execution of criminals, but enable the support of sanctuary policies that result in murder.
Well, that is quite simply a lie, the best you can do is showing that sanctuary cities have zero effect on crime, if you do a meta study you'd find that it likely reduces crime.
Hence your ranting against sanctuary cities is a call for increased crime....https://sociology.unc.edu/files/2018/01 ... -Crime.pdf
Makes perfect sense. Liberalism is a mental disorder.
What's the ICD code? Rejecting overwhelming evidence, as you do, does have one....
Congrats on being wrong.
Your link dies in no way show I am wrong, just that you don't know how statistics work.
That a single murderer did have a chance to commit murder because of sanctuary laws does in no way, shape of form mean that the total of muders is increased by sanctuary laws. Facts i provided show that is not the case, and you are still wrong. But thanks for playing.
I would also be suspicious of the sources quality if it has headlines like "EXCLUSIVE: Fox News Negotiated With A Terrorist Organization That Wants Judge Jeanine Pirro Fired", since no terrorist organisation ever had such demand, the meat of the story is correct. However, he isn't convicted yet, and since you don't consider Trump guilty of being a Russian spy, considering this guy as a murderer before conviction only shows that your bias is talking, facts don't matter.
Since you didn't provide an ICD code for being liberal I assume you retract that incorrect statement by failing to address it.
This Singature is a safe space......