Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
jmattner wrote:I wouldn't pay for only removing the ads, but only for removing the watermarks. This was no problem for photographers regarding the old site.
DDR wrote:jmattner wrote:The watermark literally ruins a pic no matter how good the pic would have been.
DDR wrote:jmattner wrote:I wouldn't pay for only removing the ads, but only for removing the watermarks. This was no problem for photographers regarding the old site.
I agree. 99% of us just want the watermarks removed so we can use a pic for wallpaper. The watermark literally ruins a pic no matter how good the pic would have been.
jmattner wrote:No, i think you can always edit the Picture and crop it to your needs.
So it's easy to get rid of the copyright-bar.