Bryan
Topic Author
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:59 am

ATR 42/72 vs. F.friendship/50

Tue Dec 01, 1998 9:59 am

Which series of regional airliners do you like the best overall? The ATR 42/72 series or the Fokker Freindship/F.50?
Personally I like the Fokker Friendship/F.50 series, in fact the F.50 is my favourite AIRCRAFT of any type.
I like the Fokker planes because off their great quality and durability.
What's your oppinion?

Bryan
 
AA727
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 10:00 am

RE: ATR 42/72 vs. F.friendship/50

Tue Dec 01, 1998 10:10 am

I also prefer the Fokker 50 over the ATR. I have the same opinion.
 
n4khgirl
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat May 22, 1999 11:46 am

RE: ATR 42/72 vs. F.friendship/50

Tue Dec 01, 1998 10:38 am

I like the F 50 because I just think that it looks a lot better and it is a more comfortable plane to fly in.
 
Guest

RE: ATR 42/72 vs. F.friendship/50

Tue Dec 01, 1998 10:41 am

I like the ATR more as in the window seat under the wing you can tell the flap position. And it looks really neat. I like them in AE colors the most. But I think it would look great in Virgin colors.
Iain
 
drew
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:16 am

RE: ATR 42/72 vs. F.friendship/50

Tue Dec 01, 1998 11:33 am

I like the F-50 too. Its a little sad though that the company got dissolved. However Rekkof is starting the program again and I wonder if there going to sell the F50 again.
 
Rachel
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 2:35 am

RE: ATR 42/72 vs. F.friendship/50

Tue Dec 01, 1998 11:52 am

Dear Bryan,
I really like the F-27 but I don't like the look of it as much as the ATR-42. I know that the F-27 is tried and true but it look's kinda like you could snap off the landing gear. Where as the ATR-42 looks more stable to me but I guess I won't know until I take a test flight.

Later,
Rachel!
 
Guest

RE: ATR 42/72 vs. F.friendship/50

Tue Dec 01, 1998 2:51 pm

The Fokker 50 is an excellent plane. It is based on a tried and tested airframe, the F-27, stretched to accommodate more passengers and modernized with newer engines and advanced avionics. I like the advanced engine controls which allow the pilots to set takeoff, flex, climb and cruise power by pushing on a few buttons in the center of the instrument panel.

The pilots who fly the plane for a living have nothing but praises for it. Passengers also feel it is a comfortable plane. So why did the ATRs outsell the Fokkers by a wide margin? That's because the ATR has a very lightweight airframe. The Fokker is built like a tank, yes, but the airlines have to pay higher takeoff and landing fees which are always based on gross weight. I guess a lot goes to the long gear legs of the F-50. The ATR has shorter, lighter gear which rest inside sponsons along the fuselage sides.

In the end, airlines felt that they could make more money on the lower operating costs of the ATRs.