Guest

World Airways Considering C-17's!

Thu Aug 23, 2001 12:31 pm

I dont know why I am posting this, you all are going to think I am out of my mind... Its true. I just read in World Airline Fleets News that World Airways is considering buying the C-17, under a civil reserve scheme.It calls for the Air Force to provide an upfront sum of money and annual payments to the buyer of the planes in exchange for access to the aircraft in times of need. Initial studies show that the USAF would pay $US30 Million as a first payment,only 20% of the roughly $US152 Million it costs for each C-17. Further payments would be made if the aircraft is pulled to perform official military service. This arrangement could save the USAF $US6 Billion over the life of the 10 aircraft expected to be involved in the pans first phase. Now, because the aircraft is a military vehicle, it has to be worked out with the State Dept. to grant some sort of broad liscense to whatever private company plans to use the planes. Without that aggreement in place, federal officials would have to sign off on EVERY trip he aircraft makes outside the US.


Now, this has possibilities. Its got to go through a lot. My question to you, will this work? Will the C-17 look any better?

 Big thumbs up
 
Guest

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Thu Aug 23, 2001 12:41 pm

Just did a little searching. Heres what I came up with.

http://www.aviationnow.com/content/publication/awst/20010219/aw49.htm

 
ryu2
Posts: 1546
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 8:18 am

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Thu Aug 23, 2001 2:16 pm

in exchange for access to the aircraft in times of need

I thought that the US government had the authority to utilize any US airline's fleet for service in the event of war or national emergency. During the gulf war, you saw UAL, etc transporting the troops to/from the Gulf.

What's up with this new scheme, then?
 
FlyBoeing
Posts: 835
Joined: Fri May 05, 2000 2:08 am

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Thu Aug 23, 2001 2:28 pm

Well, $30 million per aircraft is probably a compensation payment by the government because the C-17 is kind of a fuel-inefficient aircraft from what I've heard. That extra cash covers some of the marginal costs involved in operating a military aircraft in a nonmilitary environment.

It's different with the government financing the purchase of 747s; those aircraft aren't as well suited to military operations as the C-17 is. So the government doesn't need to entice anybody to buy 747s.

Just my thoughs, though...
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Thu Aug 23, 2001 4:38 pm

I does make quite of bit of sense, considering that World is one of the primary Air Mobility Command contractors. Boeing is already marketing the C-17 for civilian use, so why not have World Airways be the launch customer for the (B)C-17? Although I would like to see it painted in a livery a little bit better than the drab all-white that is so commonly used for World's a/c. And look of the benefits, World could handle oversized cargo that a current civilian freighter aircraft can't handle unless severely modified (Airbus' A300 Beluga family; Aerospace Lines Guppy). That would put extra money into World's coffers.
 
aviasian
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2001 8:11 am

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Thu Aug 23, 2001 4:42 pm

The C-17 is an awesome aircraft . . . great looks from almost any angle. I've had many opportunities to see and photograph it landing at Singapore Changi Airport, and love its great looks. And it is about time that some civil operators see the benefit of this beautiful gentle giant . . .

Personally, I hope that this opens the floodgates to other freight movers . . .

KC Sim
Bangkok
 
Guest

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Fri Aug 24, 2001 4:24 am

The C-17 would be a great aircraft for this use. Looks, thats another story, but, it doesnt mean much, its what works that counts. This is going to be a drawn out process. I am sure there are going to be big studies, and more money spent doing it, even though we can all see that its a good idea.

You know how it goes.
 
SSTjumbo
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 3:29 am

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Fri Aug 24, 2001 4:36 am

Do you really mean the C-17 or the unordered civil MD-17? Sorry if I sound ignorant. I only read part of the post.
I don't know, so this is my signature.
 
Guest

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Fri Aug 24, 2001 4:38 am

You should have read the whole post. Its the C-17, thats what it says in WAFN anyhow.
If the USAF ever needs it, its got to be the same as the rest.


 
L.1011
Posts: 2163
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2001 7:46 am

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Fri Aug 24, 2001 4:54 am




I dont mean to sound like a know-it-all, but civil C-17s are called MD-17s.
 
Guest

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Fri Aug 24, 2001 4:55 am

Not according to WAFN. So your saying they will be MD-17s when used for an airline, then when the USAF needs them, they change it to C-17?

 
777236ER
Posts: 12213
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2001 7:10 am

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Fri Aug 24, 2001 5:03 am

Maybe WAFN won't get a fully-civil MD/B-17, but this interest from the commercial market may prompt Boeing to produce the MD/B-17

ps. I've just realised, they can't really call it the B-17, can they?  Smile
Your bone's got a little machine
 
Guest

RE: *HOT* World Airways Considering C-17's! *HOT*

Fri Aug 24, 2001 5:10 am

B-17... Lucky I know you mean C-17.

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy
 
Greg
Posts: 5539
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 1:11 am

RE: World Airways Considering C-17's!

Fri Aug 24, 2001 5:53 am

They use B for bombers
C for cargo/transports
F for fighters
V for helicopers/veritcal take off
I'm not sure what the KC is for..but they appear to be for refueling aircraft.
 
N863DA
Posts: 1140
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:36 am

RE: World Airways Considering C-17's!

Fri Aug 24, 2001 6:25 am

You miss understood what 777236ER said...

Instead of being the MD-17, (for McDonnell Douglas) they could change it (the CIVILIAN version) to B-17 (for Boeing). But of course the B-17 is the Flying Fortress... and you could never taint the name of such a piece of wonder with a run-of-the-mill military cargo-lifter.

And it's a simple question. If World Airways gets these, will they be MD-17s or C-17s... will they be civilian aircraft, drawn for military use when needed, or military aircraft in use with a civilian operator?

FLY DELTA JETS and sail UNITED STATES LINES



N 8 6 3 D A
 
Archie Bunker
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2000 3:22 am

RE: World Airways Considering C-17's!

Fri Aug 24, 2001 6:30 am

I think the designation is BC-17.

Who is online