ghost77
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 2:07 pm

Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 7:50 am

What do you think... could this be possible one of this days?...

They were saying the that the B717-200 series were not that succesfull as they were specting.. but I was thinking in a larger version.

We can say that the B717-2 its quite similar to the MD87... so the B717-3 could be closer to a MD´s all series (80/82/83/88/90).

So I would like to read your opions.

Rich  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15689
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 7:57 am

Hey Rich, I agree completely.  Smile

Airlines like to buy families of airliners. Witness the 737NG or A320 ranges.

The current 717-200 (as good as it may be) is a bit of an orphan. A 717-100 and/or a -300 would offer the family concept to prospective customers. It would also indicate Boeing's continued commitment to the 717.

I see Air Tran and AA (assuming they end up being happy w the ex-TWA 717s) as being logical/possible 717-300 customers.

Regards
Neil/Toronto
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
jmhLUV2fly
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 1999 4:15 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 7:59 am

I suppose I am the first to reply, so here is what I think; from what I was told from a former pilot who is current in the industry, Boeing was never really excited about actually marketing the MD-95 (717) it was extra baggage from the MD merger. However they couldnt just cancel production of the type as there were too many orders from AirTran, TWA and others.
Boeing, I am sure would like to focus its time and attention on "there" products, ie. 737's NG, as they are I feel, Boeings true pried & joy. To answer your question, I dont look to see any further series of the 717 of course that could change.
JMH
 
CPDC10-30
Posts: 4681
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2000 4:30 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 8:00 am

It would only make sense if Boeing ditches the slow-selling 737-600. But the trend is toward mainline aircraft of about 120-140 seats (737, A320) and regional jets (under 70 seats).
 
flying_higher
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 1999 5:43 am

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 8:00 am

I'm sure a 717-300 on MD-90 size would compete with the 737 NG but will be more competitive in fuel consumption, so I really hope with you that boieng will produce that...with the MD-90 frame it won't even cost a lot. (Maybe the wings should be redesigned!)
I don't really think that the 737 will forever compete with the A320!! So the smarter 717 will do the Job!  Big grin

What is really imperative to ensure the success of the 717, is that there is a family program covering the most current sizes of planes (from A318 to 320 at least) !
 
coboeing777
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2001 10:21 am

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 8:05 am

I doubt Boeing would try to sell a stretched verion of the 717. It would be too late. A lot of airlines have already bought 737-800s to replace their MD-80s. Continental did. Also, the reason why the 737-600 is "slow selling" is because it is basically a 737-500 with the glass cokpit and other NG features. Most 737-500s in service are not very old so there is no need for airlines to replace them. Give it some time and airlines who need to relace their 500s, that is of course if they still need a plane of that capacity.
 
TWA717_200
Posts: 1410
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 1999 3:51 am

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 8:08 am

I still think that WN should buy 'em.
 
Guest

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 8:37 am

I believe, from what I heard, that if the 717-300 were built, it would be about the size of the DC-9-50 or somewhere between that and the MD-80, but I really do not think it will be made. I sure would love to see it though.
 
scaredflyer21
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2000 6:52 am

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 10:00 am

I have seen, on boeing's website, that they are developing a 717-100 and a 717-300. They are also working on longer-range varients of the 757-200/300 and the 767 models.
 
Guest

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 10:12 am

I doubt that we will see a 717-300, as it would compete with the 737-700. I would like to see a boeing narrow body line up like
717-200 100 pax
717-300 120 pax
737-700 130 pax
737-800 150 pax
737-900 170 pax (I personally dislike this aircraft but it seems to me that it was created to compete with the A321 to some degree in order to keep the crew training costs down.)
757-200 185 pax
757-300 220 pax

But unless NW orders the 717-200, which I belive they will order the 318
or AA orders the 717-200 to replace the F100, which is pretty doubtful in the current situation I think we could see the end of the 717 lieup in a couple years unless they get a large order.

I think NW will be a big factor in this as they will have to order a DC9-30 replacement in the next 12-24 months or so to start replacing these planes so they will have delivery slots lined up.
 
Guest

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 10:53 am

I wonder if Boeing will offer the P&W 6000 series as an option on these new 717 models to get P&W customers like NW and others who operate the DC-9 and MD-80 to order it.
 
highliner2
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2000 1:26 pm

Unsuccessful? Quiztime

Fri Oct 12, 2001 11:13 am

Here ya go.....
Which one of these planes was successful at this point in their developement?

A:737
B:757
C:MD80

Actually, it's none of the above. So why don't we relax and wait....
Go Cubs!
 
AM744
Posts: 1434
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 11:05 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 1:05 pm

I honestly don't think the 717 will get any further developements. Which is too sad because I think that planes with rear mounted engines are the way to go on the 100-150 seat range. It's not a smart move to squeeze fairly big engines under a very low wing: noisy and ugly.
 
ghost77
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 2:07 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 1:29 pm

Scaredflyer21:

Could you please put the link of Boeing 717-100 and 717-300 project.

Thanks,

Rich  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
 
highliner2
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2000 1:26 pm

RE: AM744

Fri Oct 12, 2001 1:32 pm

The same was said of the aforementioned programs....the 737 wasn't even supposed to go into production, it did'nt have a enough firm orders to launch the project! Just wait and see, when this recession ends there's going to a surge in aircraft buying and I think the 717 program will get a big boost.
Go Cubs!
 
scaredflyer21
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2000 6:52 am

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 1:37 pm

 
ghost77
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 2:07 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 1:43 pm

Scaredflyer21:

WOWOW thanks for the link!! The 100 series seems like it´s going to be the replace of DC9-30 and the 300 as I said before will be the replace of all MD´s Series.

Rich  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
 
AM
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 1999 8:49 am

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 1:46 pm

I think a 717 family can be very successful. American has had great results with an enormous fleet of MD-80s, so why not with 717s? I only see 1 advantage that 737NGs and A320s would have over the 717-300: Range.

Like many of you, I'm hoping for a 717 order boom.
"... for there you have been and there you will long to return."
 
FBU 4EVER!
Posts: 980
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 6:53 am

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 7:29 pm

The 717 has basically the old DC-9 wing.This means that developing the 717 into larger versions will mean facing the same problems that McD had when stretching the DC-9 beyond the -50.
A new,larger,wing had to be designed for the DC-9-80 (MD-80) and the main gear legs were also made taller to allow the plane to rotate without the aft fuselage striking the ground.This also allowed shortened runway lenght requirements.The longer the fuselage aft of the main gears,the less nose-up pitch available for rotation,more airspeed is needed before lifting off.This is a problem with the 737-800/900.
Boeing might as well "re-invent" the MD-80 if they want to develop the 717 further.
"Luck and superstition wins all the time"!
 
Guest

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 9:52 pm

I found on Boeing's website a while back that boeing plans on stretching the 717 into a -300, but before that thy'll shrink it to a -100 to really get into the regional jet market.

So, I think you'll have 717RJ's here soon competing with Bombardier CRJ-900s! Tht's where the 717 will find it's niche,, adding more pax to the 717 only makes it compete with the 737-7/800.

Aloha 737-200!!  Wink/being sarcastic
 
travatl
Posts: 1943
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2001 4:57 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Fri Oct 12, 2001 10:13 pm

FBU4EVER -

You hit the nail right on the head.

The 717 is based on the design of the DC9. The 717-300 may have a longer fueselage, but would still have the DC9 wing. When Boeing approached AirTran last year about launching the 717-300, AirTran wasn't interested due to lack of increased range of the -300 over the -200 (due to same wings as the -200).

In turn Boeing wasn't interested in studying a longer range 717 because it would entail reinventing the MD80 program (granted it may be called the 717-400, but would be as different as a DC9-30 and an MD80).

AirTran is kind of stuck as far as range capabilities with this aircraft if they want to maintain fleet commonality for costs. That is unless Boeing gets pressure from other carriers to a "Douglas Division Product" replacement for the MD80. (HIGHLY UNLIKELY). Time will tell - but I don't look to see ANY derivitives of the 717.

Travis
 
ghost77
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 2:07 pm

RE: Boeing 717-300?

Sat Oct 13, 2001 5:12 am

Aloha 737-200,

You got a good point here saying that B 717-100 could be a the ones Competing with Bombardier CRJ-900s... also I could say that it would be good the 100 series to substitute some other acfts like here in Mex, Aeromar fly with the ATR42-500, I guess It would be much better to fly in a B717-100. And faster too.

Rich  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!