D-AIFB
Topic Author
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2001 6:35 am

LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 1:57 am

LH is currently updating the different CRS and their Infoflyway (www.lufthansa.de, timetable section) with the first version of the new summer timetable 2002. Actually it´s no real surprise, they cut slightly capacity in different markets (USA, GRU, SIN) and add some flights to other destinations (NRT, HKG, PVG).

The shorthaul schedule has also been updated. But LH usually makes another major adjustment in January or February each year for the summer schedule. So it´s too early to say sth. about this topic.

Here are some changes (only on longhaul flights) i noticed. Of course, there´s no official statement yet. Expect some more changes within the next months, depending on the improvement or not-improvement of the pre-booking situation. But the following longhaul network should be the framework for next summer.


LH LONGHAUL FLIGHTS SUMMER 2002
changes compared with last year in ()

Berlin TXL
no longhaul service anymore; as expected the 6 weekly A343 IAD flights won´t resume in summer.


Duesseldorf DUS
no longhaul service anymore; daily A343 EWR serivce won´t resume; that´s probably the main reason, why UA moved their ORD flight to IAD, in order to keep at least one flight to the east coast. Perhaps they´ll get another LH-flight, but i highly doubt this.


Munich MUC
slightly reduced capacity, probably no 744 anymore next summer, EWR service will move to JFK, LAX will move to FRA again, new PVG and NRT service, no signs of BOS and MIA so far, GRU and SIN remain suspended

JFK 343 15:20 daily (last summer to EWR)
ORD 343 11:15 daily
SFO 343 15:30 daily (last summer 744)
HKG 343 20:50 daily (last summer only 3 weekly)
PVG 343 20:50 daily ex Mo,Th *NEW*starts March 15th
NRT 343 15:30 daily ex We *New*starts April 18th
TLV 343 15:05 3 weekly
(JNB 343 20:40 3werkly only until mid April, expected resume in fall)
LAX moved as 2nd daily to FRA again
GRU suspended (3 weekly)
SIN suspended (3 weekly)
MIA? - i still hope for it
BOS? - i don´t expect it this summer, my bet is on 2003

AC will return in April with a daily service YYZ. UA will upgrade its IAD run with B777.

By the way, the new 343 MUC-JNB service is a bestseller for LH. In only 2 weeks (!) Lufthansa was able to sell the three weekly flights for 2 months! Therefore additional three weekly flights will be added as of this weekend until end of March, so MUC-JNB will be served six times a week.

A reason for the LAX flight moving back to FRA, might be slot securing there in order to prevent other airlines from grabbing unused slots in FRA, as LH has cancelled some flights throughout the day. I expect the LAX service to be back in MUC in 2003 (then perhaps as an additional third daily A343 service).

MUC could be happy with the above schedule. I guess the next major expansion phase (to both, longhaul and shorthaul destinations) will take place in spring 2003, when the new Star Alliance Terminal 2 will open.


Frankfurt FRA
America
EWR 744 13:20 daily (last summer: 742)
JFK 343 10:45 daily (last summer: 742)
JFK 343 14:10 daily (last summer: 19:30 departure)
JFK 744 17:15 daily (last summer:742)
BOS 343 11:10 daily (742)
BOS 343 17:40 daily
IAD 343 10:45 daily (from 5 weekly last summer)
IAD 744 13:10 daily
PHL 343 13:45 daily
ORD 744 10:05 daily (742)
ORD 343 17:10 daily
MIA 744 10:10 daily (742)
ATL 342 10:50 daily (343)
DEN 343 13:05 daily
DFW 343 09:50 daily
LAX 744 10:15 daily
LAX 744 13:30 daily (last summer ex MUC)
IAH 343 10:55 daily
PHX 343 10:25 Mo, We, Sa (daily last summer)
SFO 744 10:00 daily
DTW 343 13:20 daily (744)
YYZ 744 17:10 daily
YVR 343 13:05 daily (742)
MEX 744 13:40 daily
GRU 343 22:30 daily
CCS 343 13:05 three weekly
EZE-SCL 744 22:20 daily (6 weekly)
GIG cancelled (343; 3 weekly)
BOG cancelled (343; 3 weekly)
LIM cancelled (343; 3 weekly)

Asia
NRT 744 13:45 daily
NRT 3 weekly LH714 moved to MUC now with 6 weekly flights
KIX 343 13:25 daily (744)
NGO 343 13:55 3 weekly (down from 5 weekly)
SEL 744 17:55 daily
HKG 744 17:40 daily
PVG 744 17:35 daily (6 weekly)
PEK 744 17:25 daily
DEL 744 13:50 daily
BOM 744 13:35 daily (5 weekly; 742)
MAA 744 10:40 3 weekly
BLR 343 11:15 3 weekly (inaugurated last September)
SIN-CGK 744 22:10 daily
BKK-MNL 744 22:20 daily
BKK 744 22:30 1 weekly
BKK-SGN 744 22:30 2 weekly
(last year: 5 weekly nonstop MNL, daily nonstop BKK with continuing service 2 weekly to SGN and 2 weekly to MNL)

Africa/Near East/other destinations
JNB-CPT 744 22:20 daily
ABJ cancelled (342, 2 weekly)
LOS-ACC 744 11:40 4 weekly (343)
CAI-ADD 343 10:20 4 weekly
CAI-KRT 343 10:20 3 weekly
CAI-ASM 342 14:20 6 weekly (5 weekly)
CAI 342 14:20 1 weekly
TLV 343 10:15 daily
TLV 343 22:55 daily
SAH cancelled (343; continuing service from CAI, 3 weekly)
THR 343 20:30 daily (5 weekly)
TAS cancelled (343; 3 weekly)
BAK-ASB 342 11:15 3 weekly
ALA 342 ~11:00 5 weekly
RUH-JED 744 13:10 3 weekly (each with 343 3 weekly nonstop service)
KWI-DMM 342 13:05 3 weekly (DMM via RUH)
DXB-MCT 342 13:30 3 weekly (MCT via KWI)
DXB-AUH 342 13:30 4 weekly (daily)



Short summary
LH will slightly cut (longhaul)capacity next summer:
TXL and, as it looks like at the moment, also DUS will be without LH-longhaul service next year.
MUC will get 42 weekly 343-only longhauls (TLV included), compared with 40 last summer (but with 14 744). In available longhaul seats, MUC will be down about 10-12%. If MUC would receive another daily 343 service (perhaps the long awaited MIA flight), we would be back to last summers capacity.
FRA will also lose some capacity mainly due to the retirement of 8 B742 (about 6-8% decrease in longhaul seats).


Please note, the above information is subject to change, of course. And it is not based on an official statment of LH. Please don´t claim this to be a complete list, i might have forgotten some (longhaul)destinations. As we all know LH very well, some more changes during the coming months are very likely - still more than three months to go til the new summer schedule starts.
 
LH738
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2000 6:03 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 2:36 am

D-AIFB, great job. Thanks for sharing the info.
 
CX747
Posts: 5566
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:54 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 2:58 am

It is nice to see that us EWR based individuals will be able to see a LH 747-400. Although I am not an Airbus fan, I kinda liked it when LH's 2 A340-300s and 1 747-200 were all on the ground together here in EWR.
"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
 
Guest

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 3:01 am


Reall great job you did there. Thanks !
Very glad to see LH's MUC-JNB service to be going so well.

So unfortunately again we can say Berlin-USA service failed terribly !

B737-700
 
D-AIFB
Topic Author
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2001 6:35 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 10:11 pm

Thanks a lot!

It´s a pleasure for me to provide you with some informations on LH.

Yes, transatlantic flights ex TXL failed again. Therefore i don´t see another chance for Berlin-USA flights in the coming years. First of all, DUS should see at least one more service again, when demand is back to normal and growing again, probably in one / one and a half year from now. Perhaps STR (see rumours about UA being interested in STR) or HAM can attract another airline for the US market?
 
EWRFFVS
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2001 11:58 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 10:31 pm

Very nice job indeed DAIFB! Appreciate all the good info.

I used to work for LH at EWR, so I feel a tinge of sadness knowing that the MUC and DUS birds are no more to be had there. Shame really, because EWR really is a more convenient airport for many in the NY metro area, especially now with the Airtrain link up and running.
 
9V-SPF
Posts: 1340
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2001 6:42 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 10:51 pm

LH will get two new 744´s early next year, won´t they?
So perhaps some routes will be upgraded again when those birds are ready to enter service.
By the way, congratulations for a great post, D-AIFB.

Regards,
Daniel
 
Guest

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sat Dec 15, 2001 11:08 pm

D-AIFB could you please tell me where you have heard the rumours about STR and United ?
That would be so cool to have UA here but I doubt it with their current financiel situation.
I was always hoping for a CO 757 or 762 but we'll see. Delta is doing good here.

Rgds,
B737-700
 
flyguy1
Posts: 1660
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 1999 9:45 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 3:09 am

So, does this mean LH wil have 4 daily pax flights into JFK in summer 2002?
727, L1011, MD80, A300, 777-200, 737-300, 737-700, 747-400, 757-200, 737-800, A320. E190, E135, 767-200, CRJ9
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24521
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 4:16 am

Thanks for the info D-AIFB. Still hoping for MIA-MUC. I think one reason nothing is known yet is because they still might be waiting to hear Lauda/Austrians decision on the MIA-MUC situation. Loads on MIA-FRA have been good. Tomorrow's flight from FRA is sold out in 1st and Biz (some Y still left).
a.
 
johnnybgoode
Posts: 2144
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 4:38 am

well, if there´s currently no market for TXL-usa then, imho, i don´t see where there could be a chance for STR- or HAM-usa services, except for charter flights.

that´s rather strange regarding the MUC-LAX service.
to my knowledge, this service was very succesful and really seems strange why they´re re-allocating it to FRA again. the slot securing thing sounds very likely, though.

afaik, LH is the only airline operating direct flights between LAX and FRA, is this correct?
so maybe with just one daily FRA-LAX was underserved?
i´ve always been waiting for UA to commence a LAX-FRA service, together with LH providing two dailies to FRA and one daily to MUC. seems like i´ve got wait a little long for that to happen...

additionally, it seems odd that the MUC-SIN is not working. given the fact the SIN is SQ´s hub and serves as transit point for many points beyond SIN i´m curious why this service is being dropped.

and then, i do understand that there are destinations such as JNB to which demand is higher in winter time(northern winter), however, if LH serves MUC-JNB almost daily this winter it seems odd to me there´s no service in summer.
i know they must re-allocate some aircraft which were withdrawn from some US-services and putting them on the JNB run seems the right thing, but if it´s so popular why don´t they sustain it in summer (of course, if aircraft are available)?

yes, LH will receive two additional 747-400s, one this December and the next one in March, or both in December, i´m not sure.

cheers
daniel
If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
 
manni
Posts: 4049
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2001 1:48 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 4:39 am

D-AIFB,

I see in your post that you mention that the daily SEL flight is operated by a 747-400. It used to be a A340-300. Did they recently change equipment on this route, or is the equipment still a A340-300 and will the 747-400 only start flying this route from next summer?

Thanks,
SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
 
gkirk
Posts: 23345
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2000 3:29 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 4:42 am

Any news of Lufthansa Short-haul????? I hear NCL-DUS is going to a CRJ-700 but when...???  Confused
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
 
Guest

Daniel

Sun Dec 16, 2001 4:45 am


Daniel, I also can't really imagine another US airline to come to STR especially not at this time.
But I don't think you can compare TXL with STR.
The Delta flight is doing pretty good as I said before and when DL had it's second daily until last year on the JFK run it was also around 75 % which was ok.
This should prove that there's demand to the US out of STR.
Service out of TXL has never really worked out during the last couple of years. So that's another story in my opinion. Don't know about HAM though.

Rgds,
B737-700
 
LufthansaUSA
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2001 10:12 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 5:22 am

What a shame that EWR will be losing its MUC flights, I've taken that flight and will miss it.
 
Skystar
Posts: 1339
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2000 3:58 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 8:48 am

Why is it that Berlin flights don't work? Isn't Berlin the largest city?

You'll have to forgive me, I'm an "Ausländer"  Smile

Cheers,

Justin
 
HUYfan
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 9:38 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 9:00 am

i suspect that the Berlin flights have not worked because the wrong airline, equipment and destination has been chosen. I appreciate the political relevance of a link with IAD, but, the A340 is too big. Surely a CO 762 to EWR or a UA 762 to ORD would be more appropriate.
 
sdate747
Posts: 259
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2000 4:55 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 12:56 pm

That's one less A340 serving IAD
I think the only A340 left now is Air France
Sabena operates a 767, Austrian operates a 330 so does BMI. Spanair has an A330 also? Also, no US Airways international flights. And Northwest and US, the only other domestic carriers out of IAD operate McDonell Douglas and Boeing aircrafts.
IAD needs more Airbus!
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24521
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 1:05 pm

Sdate, Sabena is dead, Austrian uses A340s (I don't think have A330s), and Spanair used 767s, but they no longer fly to IAD.
a.
 
SailorOrion
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 3:47 pm

Having a short look at the above schedule, I'd think it is highly unlikly that anymore longhaul flights are being added.

For the above schedule, LH needs more or less every longhaul plane they have in the fleet except maybe one A342. All the other planes will have air times of at least 16 hours a day, otherwise they LH couldnt fly that schedule with the relatively small number of planes. So I also dont expect a major increase in longhaul flights unless the A346 arrives or LH decided to put the B742s back into service. The problem with TXL and DUS flights is also a logistical one. The planes flew MUC-EWR-DUS-EWR-MUC and FRA-IAD-TXL-IAD-FRA since neither DUS or TXL had A340s based. However, if you have a techincal problem with one of those planes, your entire schedule may get mixed up for 2, maybe even days. No airline is happy with that.

If UA for example would fly IAD-TXL, they would not only be able to start with a smaller plane (B762), they also would operate out of a hub airport reducing the routing Problem mentioned above.

SailorOrion
 
Guest

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 4:10 pm


If UA, CO, DL flew one of the route it'd also be better because they only have 2 classes.
I don't know how well first was booked out of TXL but I assume it wasn't to full, was it ? Anyone knows about that one ?
But 2 classes should work out better on flights to destinations that aren't any kind of hub.

B737-700
 
AFa340-300E
Posts: 2115
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 3:49 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 5:06 pm

Hello,

Anyone would have some information about the following topic please?

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/676138/

Thanks,

Best regards,
Alain Mengus
 
johnnybgoode
Posts: 2144
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Sun Dec 16, 2001 8:20 pm

SailorOrion has a very good point about the aircraft schedulung (re TXL, DUS).

although it might be unlikely, i personally would not suppose that LH is not able to introduce additional longhaul flights.
it is right that LH is poised not have any 747-200s in service next summer, however, with two new 747-400s delivered soon (probably operating some routes formerly served by 742s) and with quite some A340s (LH has currently 33 A340-200/300s and five more to come) i´d say the might have the capacity to introduce new flights (perhaps MUC-BOS or MUC-MIA which was speculated by fellow board members).
well, even last summer LH had one and for some time even two A340s grounded due to lack of cockpit crews so i´d suggest they have sufficient aircraft capacity.

but who knows.
personally i´d be surprised if the next summer schedule would be increased even more massively.

the only thing i´d wish would be LH going for an additional, but smaller longhaul type, f.e. the A330-200? which was already rumoured.
like many of you have pointed out the A340 seems to be too big for the introduction of some routes (f.e. ex TXL).

cheers
daniel
If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24521
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 12:45 am

LH did "un-retire" a pair of 742s recently. 742s are currently running the YYZ-FRA route.
a.
 
donder10
Posts: 6944
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 5:29 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 2:41 am

MAH do you know how many 742's they have unretired?Thanks,Alex
 
D-AIFB
Topic Author
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2001 6:35 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 5:19 am

JFK/EWR
Yes, LH will operate 4 daily flights into JFK next summer, while EWR is reduced from 3 to 1 daily, at least they currently plan to do so. A gap in EWR for CO stepping in (to MUC) perhaps 2003 or 2004!  Wink/being sarcastic


SEL
The above infos are for summer 2002. In winter SEL is served daily with


MIA
That´s also my opinion. I guess, LH and OS aren´t sure, who should operate this route. However, i fear, finally none of them will fly it during next summer.
FRA-MIA usually has a very high load factor (not sure about the yield). This is still a very popular route, thus i really don´t understand, why NG/OS has pulled out MUC-MIA.
If not next summer, we´ll see a resumption for winter 02-03 or summer 03, at the latest.


SIN
The flights did work as well, but i think, we have to look at the whole range of LH/SQ flights from Germany to Singapore: They´ve currently 3 daily B744 on FRA-SIN. So, if they aren´t able to sell enough seats there to reasonable fares, it makes no sence to provide extra capacity with 3 weekly flights ex MUC.

It´s actually the same situation, we´ve had with LAX, SFO and GRU ex MUC this winter (all should operate thrice weekly ex MUC, while FRA services are daily). For operational and economical reasons, LH would be crazy to cancel some of the FRA flights (e.g. down to 4/7 from 7/7) in order to keep up service from MUC thrice weekly. So, consequently they suspended MUC.

But these flights will resume as soon as possible: SIN perhaps in winter, GRU more likely not before 2003 (my guesses!). GRU was the only new route, which didn´t perform that good, even after RG suspended their own flights to MUC. Demand to South America is significantly lower these days.


JNB
At the moment the flight (MUC-JNB) will stay two weeks into the summer timetable (until April 13th). Nearly daily flights in winter going to zero in summer, that´s somehow strange, but LH had a big yield problem in recent years there. They probably won´t risk any adventures during the low season there - and they still have a daily B744 to JNB-CPT and there´s also SA with their daily flights!? But perhaps things change until April. But we can be quite optimistic about a resume in fall from MUC.


LAX
Pre 9/11, LH did quite well with MUC-LAX. I registered a good O&D traffic share (like SFO), which is important for the yield. Perhaps this is only moving a flight within the dual hub system between FRA and MUC.
It´s also possible, they need the tons of connecting pax to feed the FRA hub. FRAs shorthaul network depends much more on longhaul flights with huge pax/cargo load than the MUC network, mainly due to the bigger a/c, which are used ex FRA on the shorthaul runs. MUCs established european hub network is running well, even without much longhaul traffic.
Hence LH can´t cut too much l/h capacity in FRA, otherwise they can´t fill the huge number of seats there. This might be ONE reason they shifted back LAX. I´m quite sure, LH will be back on MUC-LAX route soon (2003 hopefully), possibly with the 3rd daily LH flight into LAX.


STR/United
I´ve read about this rumour on "airliners.de/forum" (german only). A member there posted an article of the "Stuttgarter Zeitung". According to this, the local Chamber of Industry and Commerce (of Baden-Würtemberg) reported about talks between United Airlines and airport officials, but this was pre-9/11! They mentioned a possible STR-ORD route. My impression is, the possible new route is more a wish than something near reality, although i would welcome a second daily STR-USA connection. So, only talks between airline and airport, nothing more and nothing less.


Unlucky Berlin and longhaul flights ex german non-hub-airports
TXL-IAD sometimes had a reasonable load factor, but as this often doesn´t tell the truth, the yield was very bad, hardly any not-discounted premium fax in F and C. Furthermore in July and August some flights left even with many Economy class being not occupied.

Berlin is indeed the largest city and the capital in Germany (pop 3,4 mio.). But it´s far, far away from being a major economic powerful region. Germany´s leading economic centers are Frankfurt/Rhein-Main region and Munich, along with Köln-Düsseldorf-region, Hamburg and Stuttgart. Frankfurt and especially the Munich area (beside city of Hamburg and Stuttgart-area) are rather rich parts of the country, hence people having much money to travel. And last but not least Munich and southern Bavaria is the most popular destination (followed by Berlin) for foreign travelers in Germany with the Alps, Austria, Switzerland and Italy not far away.

FRA is an established LH hub and since centuries the most important intercontinental airport, located in the center of Germany and located at some very important traffic axis (motorway and railway). Recently it got excellent connections to many parts in Germany with the ICE highspeed railway system.

MUC is now developing to Germany´s intercont gateway no. 2, accelerated by Lufthansa´s hub growth. These are only the first steps, with much more to come especially in the next years, when FRAs capacity reaches the end (until opening of runway no. 4 sometime in 2006-2008). As written several times before, Terminal 2 (exclusively for LH and the Star Alliance partners) will open in spring 2003, enable LH (and the Star partners, of course) to grow above the average.

In my opinion, the future growth of longhaul flights will take place mainly in FRA and MUC.
STR, DUS or even perhaps HAM should be able to catch the one or the other longhaul flight (esp. to US), when traffic picks up again clearly (2003,2004??). The future for aviation in Berlin should be brighter in some years, when the city is able to attract new investors, which have to create jobs, jobs and once again jobs there. But this will last for a while. The new single airport BBI (expected to start with capacity max. 20 Mio. and two runways) will not open before 2007, more likely later in 2008, 2009 or 2010.


LH longhaul fleet 2002
As i stated above, the overall capacity won´t be increased next summer, according to the current obvious "framework" of the summer l/h schedule. Due to the retirement of the whole B742-fleet (8 a/c) there should be a slight decrease in seats (roundabout 6-9% ??). Altogether perhaps 2 or 3 a/c won´t be necessary due to schedule cuts (ex FRA: e.g. BOG, TAS, GIG). So, not more than 5 longhaul a/c have to be substituted for the above schedule.
--> Now, LH will receive 3 new l/h a/c this winter (1 A343 D-AIFF and the already mentioned 2 B744 D-ABTK/L). LH won´t serve TXL and DUS anymore (former daily res. 6weekly service), means, another 2 a/c are "free". Here we are! Altogehter, we´ve the 5 a/c.

Given the fact, as Daniel already mentioned, that LH had some (at least one) A343 grounded because of the crew shortage, the airline should be able to add, let´s say, 1 or 2 additional daily US-eastcoast flights without problems, but that´s it.

I also think, we won´t see many additional longhaul flights. The above schedule may stay unchanged or even slightly reduced, when demand doesn´t pick up in certain markets. But who knows, perhaps they decide for a additional daily MUC-MIA (BOS - i guess not in 2002).

2003, when about 10 new longhaul a/c (A343/346) will arrive, we´ll see the next major expansion phase. Hopefully LH will finally order the 4 B744 (B742 substitution), for 2003.

 
D-AIFB
Topic Author
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2001 6:35 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 6:08 am

Forgot something:
FRA-SEL is served with A343 during this winter. Will change to B744 in spring (summer schedule).

Sorry.
 
flyguy1
Posts: 1660
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 1999 9:45 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 6:58 am

DL will also reinstate MUC-JFK service, in 3/02.
727, L1011, MD80, A300, 777-200, 737-300, 737-700, 747-400, 757-200, 737-800, A320. E190, E135, 767-200, CRJ9
 
usairways85
Posts: 3534
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2001 11:59 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 10:56 am

will they convert their 742's to freighters or just get rid of them?
 
D-AIFB
Topic Author
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2001 6:35 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 6:14 pm

They´ll get rid of the 8 B742 (some in storage and some will be sold, they at least try to do so).

LH Cargo even stored some B742 freighters recently.
 
SailorOrion
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 6:25 pm

LH Cargo is replacing their B742F by MD-11F, since the MDs are supposed to have way lower operational cost and also have a longer range at max payload (of course, they have about 25% less payload).

SailorOrion
 
airblue
Posts: 1785
Joined: Sat May 19, 2001 9:16 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 6:27 pm

LH seem to keep a strong long-haul network even if they cut TXL, DUS and some MUC flights, but we haven't to forget that LH was the European carrier who took more advantage after the September crisis, cause two close competitor died SR and SN, and some others competitors hubs had a large reduction in number of flights.
 
hkgspotter1
Posts: 5750
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:43 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 7:24 pm

No change for Hong Kong then, we already get a daily 744 and A343.
 
Flying-Tiger
Posts: 3923
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 1999 5:35 am

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Mon Dec 17, 2001 9:25 pm

LH Cargo has stored one B742 to date, a second one will follow in January or February. If they are able to obtain some more MD-11F will be put into service.

Regards
Flying-Tiger
http://fly.to/rorders
Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
 
johnnybgoode
Posts: 2144
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: LH-News: Longhaul Schedule Summer 2002

Tue Dec 18, 2001 4:05 am

MAH, it is correct that LH has currently deployed some 742s on its north american route network, YYZ in particular, however, it is LH´s current plan to have no 742s in service next summer.
i may suggest that these two 742s you are referring to might be replaced by the two 744s LH will receive the next months?

and about Lufthansa Cargo, they´re gonna receive three additional MD-11s until 2003, albeit 2nd hand!

rgds
daniel
If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.