I'm not trying to engage you in a debate.
nevertheless you dodged my question faster than President Clinton dodged ethics questions.
You stated that you HAVE a position. Now what is the basis for it?
First rule of a position paper and soliciting information:
Clarify to us your stance.
If you FEEL that the pax would be better off, then tell us why and we'll go from there. That opinion couldn't have been formed in a vaccuum.
On the other hand if you were "forced" (for lack of a better term) to take the pro side of this issue, then that's an altogether different matter.
In which case, it would behoove you to ask the question from the "How would passengers be better off if the airlines were re-regulated" angle.