Posts: 478
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:28 pm

Re: SQ resumes direct SIN-LAX on A359ULR from Nov 2, adds 3 weekly SIN-SFO A359ULR

Fri Jul 13, 2018 7:33 am

RJMAZ wrote:
jagraham wrote:
If the A359 has such margins, why did SQ take out 50+ seats?
There are no more seats on the A359 than on the 789 United is using ... 50-900.php

The A359 doesnt really seat more people. The cabin is the same length, the economy seats will simply be half an inch wider on the A350. The extra weight over the 789 mostly goes to the extra 500nm range advantage.

UA will still be removing freight and blocking a row or two in winter on the SFO-SIN route. On the LAX route it was a regular occurance with the 789 and often multiple rows of seats blocked in winter. Thats a huge hit in profit.

Singapore airlines with their A359 even on the worst winters day will not have to block rows, even on the LAX route. They can fit all passenger baggage and simply add or reduce any extra freight depending on weather. As they will be using the same aircraft to do LAX and SFO they have the cabin set up to do the longer route. SFO route could more extra freight than the LAX route.

We have to be mindful that when we talk about the LAX route - SQ is not going to use a standard config A359 on the LAX route. Unless SQ or even UA starts using a standard config A359 on the LAX route, how it will cope in the winter versus the 789 is all theory for now. Separately, for PER-LHR, QF ran a simulation model for 2 years prior to launching the route on the 789, and according to them whatever challenges they are facing flying westbound is under control.
User avatar
Posts: 11129
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 11:06 pm

Re: SQ resumes direct SIN-LAX on A359ULR from Nov 2, adds 3 weekly SIN-SFO A359ULR

Mon Jul 30, 2018 6:05 am

airbazar wrote:
Irehdna wrote:
Why 24 weekly fights out of SFO? There is no way this city has that much demand to SIN. Additionally, SIN is geographically a very poor place to connect from anywhere in NA. myth on both counts.

That's no myth, what he said is 100% correct.

Geographically, SIN is about the worst place on the planet for N.American-originating pax to connect to anywhere, because essentially any destination involves a (rather hefty) backtrack, relative to alternate options.

No one said people don't use it as a transfer point... they clearly do.
Pax will put up with anything if given sufficient incentive, which SIN/SQ (to their credit) can provide in many different regards.

But that doesn't change the fact that there are farrrrrrr more efficient options; most of which handle considerably more N.American service, for that reason.
I myself, suspect a more prosaic motive... ~Thranduil

Popular Searches On

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos