Guest

Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 1:40 am

Just want to correct all you people on the forum about the aircraft flying CI611 today.

Yes, CI611 is operated by 744 according to the timetable, BUT, CI officials temporarily called their only 742 to fly this route today.

The plane departed at 1508LT from Taipei, and crashed around 10Knots NW of PengHu Island. The plane registered B18255, flew 64810 hours, and was originally going to sold to Oriental thai Airlines around June. The age is 22.8years.

The captain flew 6128 hours, the co-pilot 6244 hours, flight technician 18024 hours.

Today's deadly CI611 was suppose to be the last flight of this 747-200 serving China Airlines.
Peoples from Chuanghua county found these debris fallen from the aircraft.

This is the 14th crash in China Airlines' since 1958, 4th major crash between Taiwan and HK.

Rescue service.

At this stage, rumours are specualting that the 747 exploded in the midair. Before the crash 2 CX jet received an SOS call from CI611.

If all 225 on board confirmed killed, this will be the crash that has the largest number of deaths within Taiwan. In 1994, CI crashed A300 in Nagoya, 265 killed, the largest number of passengers killed outside Taiwan.

Meanwhile, 1 law maker from Taiwan, 2 journalists from UDN News are among the passenger list of the CI611 crash.
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 1:44 am

Also, it seems like CI suffers major crash every 4 years.
 
SQ772
Posts: 1647
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 5:16 pm

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 1:53 am

Saw this exact aircraft last month at Changi in the afternoon. It was a surprise to see a CI 742 (pax) operating out of Changi. May the pax on that fated flight rest in peace.
There's always a better way to fly...
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 2:21 am

Before the crash 2 CX jet received an SOS call from CI611.

Where did you get that from? From what I know, they've heard the emergency pinger go on on either the FDR or the CVR (or both for that matter).

dcy.
 
Sabena 690
Posts: 6065
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2002 12:48 am

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 2:22 am

Thx for this interesting info Jiml1126.

Regards,
Frederic
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 6:14 am

Actually CI timetable didn't show any regular 742 flight this summer.

民航局指出,在失事當時,曾有兩架國泰班機,飛經失事現場,曾接收到失事班機的緊急定位發報機信號;但未收到任何有關求救信號。

I think I made a wrong comment about CX jet receiving SOS call from CI. CX did not receive SOS call, it only receives ordinary emergency reports.

By the way, the crash site is close to the the crash site of China Airlines' 737 crash in 16 years ago. There was a story about that crash. A China Airlines' flight attendant who was killed in the 737 crash 16 years ago survived the 747SP emergency landing in SFO the year before.
 
User avatar
PW100
Posts: 2728
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 9:17 pm

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 6:28 am

What departure time does CI timetable show for flight 611?
I understand that auctual departure time was 15.11 local time.

PW100
Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 6:35 am

CI timetable shows that CI611 is operated by 747-400.

Departing Taipei at 1440LT, arriving HK at 1625LT.

Before the plane depart, one of the former law maker from KMT called his family saying that the 747-200 was having technical problems.

I'm not sure what's wrong with one of their 744 and CI decided to get the 742 to fly it's "VERY LAST FLIGHT" for CI.
 
User avatar
PW100
Posts: 2728
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 9:17 pm

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 6:50 am

How ironic that this should be the last flight [in more than one way...] for B18255...

This is waht I posted on the other thread:
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/829849/

Many people have already stated in previous posts that this particular flight is usually operated by a 744. it may well be that the aircraft initially intended for this flight [a 744] was inop and had been replaced by ill fated 742 as a late call. It could very well have been sitting on a bloody hot ramp all day [as an operational spare], with only vapour in its CFT. The short flight to Hong Kong certainly won't require fuel in the CFT. Not only the temperatures at Taipei create identical characteristics as with TWA800. All indications are that it suffered from a catostrophical in-flight break up as well:
* no distress call;
* aircraft disappearing from radar AT 30000 ft or so, with no apparent secondary radar-signs of loss of altitude;
* cabin pieces like in-flight magazines etc found tens of miles away from what appear to be main wreckage point;
* witness claims to have heard a [violent?] explosion.

I am curious to learn what the active duty of this particular aircraft was the previous 24 hrs. Any Taipei spotters know if this aircraft had been sitting idle for some hours on a ramp at Taipei prior to the crash?

It sure is smelling like another TWA800. Maybe a lot of speculation, but this horrible accident could just shine a completely different light on the conspiracy theories of TWA800...

PW100
Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
 
KL808
Posts: 1534
Joined: Thu May 20, 1999 3:49 am

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 6:57 am

Very sad indeed. I flew on this particular aircraft back in 1991 from Manila to Taipei on my way to AMS. wow I cant believe this.

drew
AMS-LAX-MNL
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 7:09 am



Eyewitness heard big explosion sound, that's true.

Eventhough the plane plunged into the Taiwan Strait, but some farmers on the Taiwan's mainland found inflight magazines and newspapers with China Airlines' title on it.

So I think this might be an explosion that caused the crash, otherwise these magazines and newspapers won't "FLY" on its own to the main island, which is 100 to 200KM away from the crash site.
 
777236ER
Posts: 12213
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2001 7:10 am

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 7:13 am

It sure is smelling like another TWA800. Maybe a lot of speculation, but this horrible accident could just shine a completely different light on the conspiracy theories of TWA800...

Ah, inflight explosion/break up = TWA800? Nope. There are few indications at this time that this is a centre tank explosion. Time will tell. Don't speculate.
Your bone's got a little machine
 
A388
Posts: 7159
Joined: Mon May 21, 2001 3:48 am

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 7:22 am

I didn't even know CI was still operating the 747-200 passenger variant. That's what also surprised me, I thaught they only operated 747-200F Fullfreighters. I hope investigators will find the cause of this crash. I does sound a bit like the TW800 crash. I still find the TW800 crash to be a very suspicious one......
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 7:31 am

742 was flying Taipei-Hong Kong and Ho Chi Minh in 2001/02 winter schedule.
 
B777
Posts: 378
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 9:52 am

CBS's Misinformation

Sun May 26, 2002 8:05 am

Just saw CBS news on TV on the crash. Apparently, they didn't do their research as the picture behind the newsannouncer showed the tail of an Air China jet superimposed on a flag of the People's Republic of China (aka red China)!

James
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 8:41 am

Just want to correct that the CI611 wasn't the last flight of the 747-200. CI was planning to use the 742 for another flight next week.
 
flyingbronco05
Posts: 3484
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 11:43 am

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 9:03 am

Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
 
CXCPA
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 11:14 pm

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 3:07 pm

There have been serveral accident near Penghu. Passing through there is not recommanded. But many flight pass through there, such as TPE-HKG, HKG-KIX, and so on......
 
hkg82
Posts: 1301
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 4:24 pm

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 3:46 pm

I didn't know that CI had a passenger 742 in operation, thought they were all converted to freighters. When CNN made the announcement that it was a 747-200, I was thinking to myself oh great, they stated the wrong aircraft again!! But moments later after reading some of the info posted in the forum, I stood corrected. I'd never seen a CI passenger 742 at CLK when spotting, only their 742Fs.

I won't say what might've happened onboard the 742, but speculation is rife in the media that the crash may have been caused by problems with the wiring or cables due to the plane's old age BUT this is just speculation & not my opinion. I don't like the theory of a plane's old age being the cause of a crash. There's no reason why a 30-year-old properly maintained plane shouldn't be as safe as a 10-year-old one.

Hkg82.




 
BA777
Posts: 2048
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 11:40 pm

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Sun May 26, 2002 4:00 pm

In loving memory  Sad


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Arthur Yu
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ws chan



BA777  Sad
 
Guest

RE: Some Info Related To CI611 And Pics

Mon May 27, 2002 1:42 am

There have been serveral accident near Penghu. Passing through there is not recommanded. But many flight pass through there, such as TPE-HKG, HKG-KIX, and so on......

This is kind of ridiculous.

If a same area suffered major accidents several times, it means its not safe to fly over there? Then what about the path from JFK to Europe? 3 planes crashed on this path, does airline changed its path? no.