Posts: 3874
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 10:43 pm

Low-Cost Airlines Dangerous?

Tue Jun 18, 2002 12:19 pm

It is apparent that low-cost airlines' urge for quick turnarounds at airports are sacrificing safety.

What do you think?
Phil Derner Jr.
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 1:11 pm

RE: Low-Cost Airlines Dangerous?

Tue Jun 18, 2002 12:34 pm

I don't think any captain wants to be unsafe with his life and the lives of others on the line, so, I highly doubt it. I may be wrong though.
Posts: 2658
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2001 8:45 am

RE: Low-Cost Airlines Dangerous?

Tue Jun 18, 2002 12:43 pm

That is stupid in general Low cost airlines are just as safe. Southwest has never had a fatality due to a crash is 30 years old and is one of the largest Low-Cost Airlines in the world. Maybe in the UK but here in North America Low-Cost Airlines are just as safe as any other airline.
Posts: 2312
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 11:22 am

RE: Low-Cost Airlines Dangerous?

Tue Jun 18, 2002 5:11 pm

This ties in with Mary Schavio and her "a 25 year old aircraft is unsafe" garbage! Just because "Fly By Night Airlines" operates a 25 year old (or older) DC-9-30 (according to "Queen Mary - The Self-Appointed High Priestess of the Airline Industry") it is unsafe because they are a low-cost airline, doesn't mean that the same DC-9-30, operated by Northwest, IS safe because they're a major. That's a load of crap. It sold a lot of books for Ms. Schavio but lacks substance.

Just like old cars, it isn't the age that's on them, its how well they are maintained (and have been maintained in the past).

MxCtrlr  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
DAMN! This SUCKS! I just had to go to the next higher age bracket in my profile! :-(