caravelle
Posts: 656
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 4:33 am

SK To Decrease Seat Pitch

Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:45 pm

According to the chairman of a Danish Pilots´Union, SK is to increase seating capacity in their current fleet by 5 - 7 percent, writes nettavisen.no.
The idea is to cram more pax in planes to make room for price cuts.
Is this a good idea, and will any of the other majors follow?

- caravelle
Trains and boats and planes....
 
TR
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 1:28 am

RE: SK To Decrease Seat Pitch

Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:54 pm

Many airlines already operate with an awfull pitch of 31" or less in economy. SAS currently operate with 32". Since SAS only operate with a load factor of 70-75% there should be no need to cram more seats into the aircraft thereby reducing the comfort dramatically. There is a great difference between 31 and 31 inches of pitch though it may not sound of much!
 
airblue
Posts: 1785
Joined: Sat May 19, 2001 9:16 pm

RE: SK To Decrease Seat Pitch

Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:59 pm

In their economy class on narrow body planes like B736, B738, MD81, MD87 and MD90 I think they have a regular seat pitch that's difficult to think they could decrease, maybe they could reduce the number of rows designed for Business class they usually use for Economy due to the low demand.

 
Skystar
Posts: 1339
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2000 3:58 pm

RE: SK To Decrease Seat Pitch

Tue Oct 01, 2002 6:21 pm

TR,

"There is a great difference between 31 and 31 inches of pitch though it may not sound of much!"

Hey, I don't find too much difference between 31" & 31"!  Smile

Typically, 'healthy' airlines operate with 75% load factors - if it's too high, it means that you're leaving pax behind at peak periods, and obviously if it's too low, you're not filling your planes up.

So, when you consider that the increased seating capacity would allow for more pax during peak "full" flights, there is some business sense in it. It's a very easy to way to reduce seat mile costs too.

As a passenger, I'm not going to laud such plans though.
 
artsyman
Posts: 4516
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2001 12:35 pm

RE: SK To Decrease Seat Pitch

Tue Oct 01, 2002 6:24 pm

Since SAS only operate with a load factor of 70-75% there should be no need to cram more seats into the aircraft thereby reducing the comfort dramatically.

People often assume that when a carrier reports a load factor of 70-75% that it means all the planes go out like that. Continental often has a similar load factor, but huge amounts of planes on many routes go out at 100% every single day. There are routes that have low loads and routes that are always full, and then of course there are some at 70-75%. The reason for the capacity increase is so that the flights with the ability to take more pax ...can

Jeremy

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos

GZIP: Off