BD1959
Topic Author
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 11:43 am

Ash Trays In QF 737-800 Toilets

Sat Oct 05, 2002 2:25 pm

As most (if not all) of the current QF 737-800s were meant to be destined to AA, why are these planes still being manufactered with Ash Trays in the toilets? Do Boeing not offer any sort of option on washroom fittings? Given the current fashion in the motor industry why not cup holders? What would you like to see instead of useless ashtrays?
 
jetdoctor
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2001 2:16 pm

RE: Ash Trays In QF 737-800 Toilets

Sat Oct 05, 2002 3:46 pm

While many aircraft and airlines are non-smoking, there are regulations on designers to put a certain number of ashtrays per passenger on aircraft as a place to put a burning cigarette, should an ignorant passenger decide to light up in flight.

Would putting a burning cigarette in an empty beer can with water in it be better, most probably. But somebody gets paid to make regulations, and we must live by them.

Hope this answers your question.

RT
Break ground, and head into the wind. Don't break wind and head into the ground.
 
Skystar
Posts: 1339
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2000 3:58 pm

RE: Ash Trays In QF 737-800 Toilets

Sat Oct 05, 2002 4:06 pm

Do you really want to be drinking in the toilet anyway?

I doubt you need cupholders for mouth rinsing purposes, and if I were taking medication, I'd rather be using non bathroom water.
 
BD1959
Topic Author
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 11:43 am

RE: Ash Trays In QF 737-800 Toilets

Sat Oct 05, 2002 5:26 pm

Sorry Skystar - it was my idea of satire: buy this -800 cause it comes with a state-of-the-art glass cockpit and two dozen cupholders!! Thanks for the reply Jetdoctor: do the same regs stipulate a certain number of ashtrays and smoke detectors be fitted in all washrooms??
 
QF717
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 7:58 pm

RE: Ash Trays In QF 737-800 Toilets

Sat Oct 05, 2002 8:07 pm

Noticed this in the First lav on a flight in August, couldn't quite figure that out.

The 738 has GOT to have the smallest premium passenger lav flying -- it's terrible! Low ceiling, narrow, ugh! The MD80 is SPACIOUS in comparison! I swear the 734 is slightly larger.



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AirCanada787, Aircellist, B6FA4ever, Bing [Bot], ciarano, COKMCI, coldhoist, DeSpringbokke, Google Adsense [Bot], jpetekyxmd80, Mortyman, PITflier, rafox, Softaero, ZK-NBT and 212 guests