bobcat
Posts: 1141
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:28 pm

A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Wed Oct 09, 2002 9:40 am

Does the A380 freighter have a lower operating cost
than the 747F/MD11F? If so, how much lower can be
expected?
 
hkgspotter1
Posts: 5750
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:43 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Wed Oct 09, 2002 9:56 am

I would like to see one of you answer this question in detail !!
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15689
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Wed Oct 09, 2002 9:59 am

This is a tricky question with many possible answers! Generally, all else being equal, larger cargo aircraft have lower per-pound operating costs.

However, the capital cost of a new A380 (as opposed to a new/used 744F/MD11F) combined with GSE, traning etc can tip the balance in favour of the smaller aircraft when you apply a reasonable ownership/depreciation or lease cost to the equation.

Fedex' rationale for the A380 (vs the 744F or addl MD-11F) was based on 3 broad premises:
1. The A380F capacity can replace 2 MD-11F while the 744F cannot. Hence their "true" operating cost comparison is 1 A380 (1 crew, 4 engines) vs 2 MD-11s (2 crew, 6 engines). While this may favour the A380 over the MD-11, it does not readily answer why the 10 ordered A380F's are a better deal than say 15 744F.
2. Extreme congestion and very limited addl slots at CDG, HKG, NRT mean that only the largest aircraft is feasible for long term growth. This argument is not strong (IMO) as Fedex tends to operate into most airports off-peak. HKG/CDG have runway capacity and NRT just opened a 2nd runway. MEM has no slot restrictions.
3. Exceptional discounts as the launch customer for the A380F.

Since the A380F will be much larger than the 744F, overall operating costs will be higher. At high load factors, the per-pound operating cost of the A380F may be higher or lower than the 744F....most likely lower when the loads are above the 744F limit (when operating the 744F would mean another flight).

IMHO
Neil


I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
BlatantEcho
Posts: 1818
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 10:11 am

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Wed Oct 09, 2002 12:28 pm

I thought FedEx was maxing the MD-11s in volume, but not in weight. The 10 foot ceiling in the 747 is nice, but only for large freight, not lots of little packages. In this case, the A380 will twice the volumetric load of an Md-11, all in one trip, and with less weight total. (two MD frames for the same load = more weight overall)

this is what I've heard at least. been wrong before  Smile

George
They're not handing trophies out today
 
Guest

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Wed Oct 09, 2002 5:29 pm

Without a nose door, the A380 is useless as an outsize freighter carrying the sort of long loads that the B747F can - and which get premium rates. Airports are going to have to invest millions in new freight handling infrastructure, and those costs are going to be passed on to A380 operators.

The A380F will carry 150 tonnes of cargo 5,260nm in range mode; and in cargo mode it can carry up to 158 tonnes just over 3,000nm. Airbus plans to offer airlines an optional 42,000 litre fuel tank that will increase range from 8,650nm to 9,650nm with a 66 tonne payload. Total volume is 1,134m3 (40,048ft3) - nearly 54% more than the B744F.

This aircraft has been designed for long range hub-to-hub traffic, and Airbus says that by 2019 50% of all cargo will be carried on such routes.

According to Airbus, the A380F costs more per trip but divided by the payload, costs 20% less on a tonne-kilometre basis.

From a personal viewpoint, having been in the cargo business for nearly 20 years, I am not convinced that cargo airlines need ultra-long range aircraft. Technical stops are not a problem for cargo, and there are very few (if any) ultra urgent shipments that would merit such treatment that are sent as cargo rather than being hand couriered.

Rather, I see an increasing trend towards frequency of service, which calls for smaller rather than larger aircraft. This is all the more evident since 9/11, when much of the world's B747 ACMI capacity has been parked.
 
UPS Pilot
Posts: 829
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 1:17 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Wed Oct 09, 2002 6:52 pm

The correct answer will come in 2008. We'll have to wait and see.
 
Joni
Posts: 2613
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 11:05 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Wed Oct 09, 2002 9:42 pm


SAS23,

In cargo mode at 3000nm range, is the A380F "ultra-long range"?

 
SailorOrion
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD

Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:59 pm

Joni: 3000nm where do you get this figure from? I don't know it, but trash that source.

A380-843F:
Range with maximum payload (150t): 5700nm
Range with maximum fuel: (90t payload): 8200nm
maximum Range (0t payload): 9900nm

A380-863F
Range with max payload (150t): 5600nm
Range with max fuel (90t): 8300nm
maximum Range (0t): 10200nm

MD-11F (PW engines, GE not much different)
88t: 3700nm
48t: 6300nm
0t: 8100nm

747-400
123t: 4300nm
63t: 7300nm
0t: about 8500-9000nm (off the charts)

747-400ER
113t (less than the -400): 5000nm
80t: 6400nm
0t: about 9000nm (off the charts)

747-400QLR
not data available yet

source: Airbus, Boeing
SailorOrion
 
Guest

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Thu Oct 10, 2002 12:04 am

Joni, of course not - but at 66 tonnes and 9,650nm range it is!
 
UPS Pilot
Posts: 829
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 1:17 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Thu Oct 10, 2002 9:39 am

How can you provide these figures when the aircraft hasn't been flight tested yet?????? Can we say MD-11?????????
 
SailorOrion
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD

Thu Oct 10, 2002 3:03 pm

UPS Pilot:
It's preliminary data from the Aircraft Characteristics for Airport Planning Manual, section 3.

SailorOrion
 
Guest

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Thu Oct 10, 2002 4:15 pm

And my data comes from Aircraft Commerce magazine (April/May 2002 issue), originally sourced from Airbus.
 
OO-AOG
Posts: 1395
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2000 1:24 am

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Thu Oct 10, 2002 5:16 pm

Technical stops are not a problem for cargo, and there are very few (if any) ultra urgent shipments that would merit such treatment that are sent as cargo rather than being hand couriered.

It's true but you still save on crew (Flight duty period) when you can avoid a technical stop, you might end up with 1 crew instead of 2 if you flight direct.
Falcon....like a limo but with wings
 
SailorOrion
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD

Thu Oct 10, 2002 6:37 pm

Where does the 158t stuff come from? According to Airbus' manuals, this would exceed MZFW.

SailorOrion
 
N79969
Posts: 6605
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 1:43 am

RE: A380 Freighter, Is Op. Cost Lower Than 747F/MD11F?

Fri Oct 11, 2002 2:28 am

I read somewhere (I cannot recall where) that the efficiency of the 380 is directly proportional to the length of the route. The article cited FedEx which believes that the 380 will be able to replace 2 MD-11 from say MEM-LAX or 4 MD-11 from MEM to Philippines. This efficiency could be achieved by saving on tech stops and ...I will just look for the article.