b764
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2001 10:49 am

Loads Of SK @ ORD

Fri Nov 22, 2002 5:48 am

Just wondering how SK does out of ORD. What are the numbers to ARN & CPH. Which is more popular.
 
Marco
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2000 3:41 pm

RE: Loads Of SK @ ORD

Fri Nov 22, 2002 8:34 am

They must be doing very well, as they recently upgraded the CPH flight to a daily A340 from a daily B767!

Don't know much about the ARN flight.
Proud to be an Assyrian!
 
jetskipper
Posts: 321
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2001 1:50 am

RE: Loads Of SK @ ORD

Fri Nov 22, 2002 8:42 am

ARN must be doing well also, because in the press release for CPH, they said that they would be upgrading ARN to a A340 mid-2003.
 
ContinentalEWR
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 2:50 am

RE: Loads Of SK @ ORD

Fri Nov 22, 2002 12:57 pm

I would imagine they are also filling the void left by American Airlines, which dropped its daily ORD-ARN flight last year, after 9/11. That flight operated since the early 1990's and was upgraded from a 767-200ER to a -300ER by 1996.

ContinentalEWR
 
SAS_A330-300
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2000 9:54 pm

RE: Loads Of SK @ ORD

Fri Nov 22, 2002 10:15 pm

All SAS transatlantic-flights are doing well (ARN-EWR/ORD, CPH-EWR/ORD/SEA) , if we are looking at the general loadfactors.
The profit of them is not so great because of low loads in business class.

Simon
You know the gear is up when it takes full power to taxi