User avatar
LN-MOW
Topic Author
Posts: 1688
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2000 12:24 am

Boeing 737-300 With Blended Winglets

Tue Dec 24, 2002 11:16 pm

Yesterday I saw this Aviation Partners B733 when passing Boeing Field:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andreas Mowinckel



It's sporting blended winglets as a part of a program to determine it may be economical to retrofit these older Boeing models (733/734). It is actually not the first 733 with winglets. This was also tested out a couple of years ago.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © JOE G. WALKER



As airlines mostly find it too expensive to retrofit 'old' 737NG's with winglets, one must wonder if this really is a feasable project. Nothing seemed to happen with the same project on 747's either.

- I am LN-MOW, and I approve this message.
 
Greg
Posts: 5539
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 1:11 am

RE: Boeing 737-300 With Blended Winglets

Wed Dec 25, 2002 12:48 am

It all depends on the price, right?
At one million a set....there won't be many takers.
Lower that to one third...and the payback becomes a bit more realistic.
Also, I imagine it was hard to get more performance out the NG wing (being a current design)...the older wing will be easier to improve on. I would expect fuel burn savings in the 5-6% range.
 
BlatantEcho
Posts: 1837
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 10:11 am

RE: Boeing 737-300 With Blended Winglets

Wed Dec 25, 2002 1:57 am

Greg - Your predicted fuel burn savings for the 737 -300/-400/-500 is roughly that achieved on the NG series with blended winglets.

Just curious what data you are basing your above assumptions on.

George
They're not handing trophies out today
 
Greg
Posts: 5539
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 1:11 am

RE: Boeing 737-300 With Blended Winglets

Wed Dec 25, 2002 2:15 am

Boeing's website has/had a link to Aviation Partners website. This was probably around Feb/March this year. Also, you can check the AW&ST archives...there are two articles on retrofitting...one on the 737 Classics (300/400) and the other on the 747 (200/300).

If I'm not mistaken (and I haven't searched), I think the realistic fuel burn savings on the NG series is 'nearly' 4%--but only achieved at less than maximum take off weight. There is a Boeing statment regarding it...you can search the press releases. I've noticed that Boeing is now 'playing up' the range increase instead of the fuel burn savings---a little peculiar since the NG's have fairly healthy legs for mid size jets.

Have you heard differently? I'd be curious to what you've learned.
Thank you for your reply.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos