Topic Author
Posts: 1620
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 1999 5:41 pm

737/320 Replacement Cabin Width

Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:16 pm

I have been doing a fair bit of travelling on different aircraft lately, and I started thinking about the cabin width, number of aisles, seats across etc of the next generation "narrow bodies" from either camp.

My personal preference is the 2-3-2 seating of Qantas 767, but could a 737/320 replacement aircraft be made economical with two aisles?

Any Thoughts?

Posts: 5134
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 11:10 am

RE: 737/320 Replacement Cabin Width

Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:28 pm

A wider fuselage means more frontal area. More frontal area means more drag. For that reason, I think that they are going to want to stick with narrow fuselages...

That's my initial response...

Posts: 1613
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2002 3:23 pm

RE: 737/320 Replacement Cabin Width

Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:52 pm

The 767-200 is the smallest current twin-aisle, I believe.
The smallest version of the 7E7 has the potential to become the smallest twin aisle, yet the exact size of each variant has yet to be worked out.

It is true that the higher the fuselage cross section, the higher the drag.

One counter factor is that the higher fuselage-cross section area you have per passenger, the more cargo you can carry. You can often more than pay for the extra fuel you burn flying 767's rather than 757's by carrying cargo.
Aircraft less than 150 seats most often fly shorter routes (though this is changing). The shorter the route, the less money you can make on cargo and the more attractive a narrowbody becomes. This is because ground shipment becomes more and more competitive the shorter the distance traveled, below a certain minimum.

Another factor is that an increase fuselage diameter have to be pretty big before it gets noticed and by then its big enough for another seat. That negates the comfort advantage. The 777 has no real comfort advantage (space wise) over the A330 because it is big enough to shove in another seat. The A320 has no advantage over the 737 because the difference is unnoticable except to the trained eye - and Boeing would argue that the 737 has more space where it really matters (at waste level and shoulder level).

And no, it isn't really practical to go with 3-4 or 4-4 seating due to emergency evacuation, comfort and other considerations. You need twin aisles if you want a wider fuselage than the 737/A320.

Popular Searches On

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos