QANTASpower
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:07 pm

Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 9:27 am

There has been alot of speculation lately that the Australian Government is going to be stupid enough to enter into an "open skies" agreement with Singapore. This will allow Singaopre Airlines to come in here and "cherry pick" two of QF's most profitable routes being SYD to LA and SYD to Tokyo.

What will QF get in return? By the sounds of it not much. Why would our Govt be so foolish as to do this. Is it really in our interests to donate hundreds of millions of $$$$ to the Singapore Govt.

If UAL goes under our govt should do all it can to get another US carrier in here. If UAL fails and Singapore starts up it may shut out a US operator for good.

It will be grossly unfair to QF if they allow this.

Another thing that really gets to me is the fact that QF cannot operate from Hong Kong to London / Europe yet Cathay operates into all major capitals taking people to Hong Kong and beyond.

Any opinions on this?

 
User avatar
VirginFlyer
Posts: 3947
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2000 12:27 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" -

Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:20 am

Qantaspower, I don't understand your second point. What does QF not being able to operate from HKG to beyond have to do with Cathay flying to all major capitals. I don't see how these equate. You could equate Qantas not being able to operate from HKG to Cathay not being able to fly from Sydney to, say, LAX. If you are in favour of Qantas operating from HKG to Europe, then surely Hong Kong should get some reciprocation - i.e. being able to operate from Australia to the US. But the first part of your post says you don't want Singapore doing this, and I really don't see how having Cathay doing it would be any better for Australia.

Going to your first issue, I haven't kept abreast of the developments for Australian-Singaporean open skies, however if Qantas has the right to carry passengers SIN-LHR (do they currently?), then surely Singapore Airlines should be able to carry pax SYD-LAX. Now if the proposed agreement allows SQ to do this, but not QF, then yes, I would agree with you, it is unfair. But if it is a matter that SQ can sell tickets from Australia to beyond, and QF can sell tickets from Singapore to beyond, then it seems pretty fair to me.

Perhaps you could explain a bit more what the details of the proposed open skies are at the moment, so we could know exactly what we are discussing (perhaps some links to articles, government papers, etc would be helpful)

Cheers,

V/F
"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
 
rupertvander82
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 10:19 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:34 am

Wow, Qantaspower, do you know how many destinations to Europe and Asia does Qantas operate from SIN? Namely Frankfurt, Rome, Paris, London, Hong Kong and Denpasar.

So do I think it is fair that the Singapore government allows QF to operate out of Changi to these lucrative destinations? Absolutely. It is all about competition.

I don't know if SQ will want to operate flights out of SYD and MEL to USA, but if they are allowed to, I think it is fair to both parties. QF gets rights out of SIN, maybe SQ should get rights out of SYD and MEL.

It is much easier and convenient for QF to operate from SYD/MEL to Europe via SIN/BKK, rather than to go through HKG which is a little further up north, hence a little out of the way.

Maybe if you look at it that way, you should urge the Australian government to allow only Qantas to operate into and out of Australia, restricting SQ, MH, TG etc from flying into Australia, yeah? Wouldn't it be 'more fair' to your darling airline, Qantas?
 
travelin man
Posts: 3198
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2000 10:04 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:42 am

I do not understand either. Air New Zealand currently operates SYD-LAX (for a little while longer anyway). And Qantas operates AKL-LAX. How would that be any different from allowing Singapore to operate SYD-LAX, while QF flies SIN-LHR?
 
aussie_
Posts: 1600
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2000 10:39 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:43 am

What will QF get in return??? A nice fat market for Australian airlines. AO has already canvassed Australia-Kota Kinabulu-Singapore and have discussed making Singapore into a major hub. I'd expect a couple of years down the track to see services to India and possibly as far as Rome/Athens from Singapore. Might create a little headache for SQ.
 
Air Taiwan
Posts: 1498
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 3:06 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am

Qantaspower,

It is obvious that you're (like most Aussies) proud of our national airline. But I'm not sure why you're so anti-Singapore! It is a market that Qantas cannot do without! I'm sure there are much to gain for Qantas in an open skies with Singapore. Yes SIA will have the chance to open Australian-originating international routes but Qantas will have the Singapore-Asia and Singapore-Europe market! Surely Singapore as a city has much more potential as a transport hub than Sydney or Melbourne! You can't say that our government is "stupid" in opening such a huge market (Singapore) to Qantas/ Australian!

true?

Jimmy
 
rupertvander82
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 10:19 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:54 am

QF already get flies to Rome from SIN.

Yes, it might create a little headache for SQ, but then again, it is all fair and square eh?
 
rmm
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2001 10:34 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:07 am

Sounds like someones a little scared of some competition.

 
QANTASpower
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:07 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:16 am

VirginFlyer and others my point is this:-

Firstly in regard to Cathay Pacific. Cathay Pacific is a big competitor on the Australia to Europe routes. Qantas can only compete with Cathay to Hong Kong. Whereas for example Cathay can offer me a ticket to London Qantas cannot offer a Hong Kong resident the same. They are banned from flying Hong Kong to London. If Cathay is able to pick up say Syd to London revenue QF should be allowed to have a piece of the Hong Kong to London action. Surely you see where I am coming from.

Now with Singapore it is different as it is evenly balanced between SQ & QF. Singapore can offer us Aussies a flight to all the European ports it flies to (alot more than QF) not to mention Asia and beyond and South Africa because of its hub location.

At the same time Qantas can fly out of Singapore to Europe, Japan, Hong Kong. ie this is a fair arrangment with both parties benefiting.

Allowing SQ to fly to the USA from Australia is another matter. That is a totally one sided arrangement benefiting Singapore. There is no market for QF to fly from Singapore to the USA. SQ flies to the USA via Hong Kong and Seoul from what I understand. Qantas will not get the third country rights (out of Hong Kong for example ) to do the same.

So as you can see it is totally one sided.

 
Businessflyer
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 4:23 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:23 am

BA / Qantas is already the second largest operator of airline services out of Changi. I can buy a Qantas ticket to any of its European destinations or to any other destination served by the BA / Qantas combination. What is the issue with allowing SQ to offer direct services from Australia? The only problem I can see is that of bilateral rights, i.e. would a country accept a SQ flight originating in Australia and not transiting through Singapore? Not sure what the answer is...

In addition, I understand that BA / Qantas (and many other airlines) were offered these rights out of Singapore in order to attract them to Singapore rather than any other regional hub since they had to land somewhere on the Europe - Australia route...
 
Businessflyer
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 4:23 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:32 am

Qantaspower... you first argument is also applicable to any country where by connecting you can travel between Europe and Australia! For example, Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, UAE, Korea, Indonesia... just to name a few. According to you, all of these markets and their operators have an unfair advantage...! Or have I completely mis-understood your argument....?

Anyway, QF benefits from CX's routes through code-sharing for which it receives revenues....
 
Ex_SQer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 5:43 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:45 am

Qantaspower, you obviously have some very strong opinions on this issue. We do need to clarify a few things, though....

When QF operates from SIN to LHR, FRA, HKG, DPS and other points in Europe and Asia, it uses fifth freedom rights to carry passengers/cargo between these points.

When SQ carries paxs/cargo from Oz to SIN and beyond to other points in Europe and Asia, it uses sixth freedom rights.

When countries negotiate air services agreements, they typically negotiate fourth and fifth freedoms. Sixth freedoms are rarely negotiated because they are difficult to define and enforce. I don't think any bilateral has ever successfully incorporated the issue of sixth freedoms.

If you look at the situation strictly from what is officially negotiated, then SQ is currently at a major disadvantage because QF operates so many fifth freedoms ex-SIN. SQ, in comparison, can only operate fourth freedoms between SIN and Oz.

If you look at the situation from the viewpoint of all (ie negotiated and non-negotiated) freedoms, then the two carriers are pretty evenly matched.

Hopefully I am clear so far and I haven't lost anyone....


ANYWAY... IF there was open skies between SIN and Oz, and if you only looked at the officially negotiated freedoms, then the bilateral would only be considered to be a fair one if SQ had the same amount of fifth freedoms out of Oz as QF has out of SIN.

If you considered the sixth freedoms that SQ enjoys, then yes, open skies between the two countries could be seen as being one-sided in favor of SQ because SQ can now enjoy BOTH fifth and sixth freedoms from Oz.

Sixth freedoms are a sticky issue. No countries have successfuly negotiated these as they are hard to enforce and restrict. In the case of SQ and QF, SQ is geographically suited to enjoy sixth freedoms (but not fifth), and QF is geographically advantaged to enjoy fifth -but not sixth - freedoms out of SIN. Right now, I would say the two countries have a rather equitable arrangement, but yes, you are not wrong is stating that this balance would be shaken up with open skies should SQ choose to use fifth freedoms beyond Oz.

In reality, though, I don't see SQ making too much of a dent for several reasons: (1) they are more interested in domestic traffic within Australia/NZ in order to compete more effectively on the Asia/Europe-Oz market (2) traffic to/from Oz is pretty low yield (face it, if SYD-USA was THAT lucrative we would see many more US carriers in Oz, and we wouldn't have BA and NG as the only European carriers in Oz). The only reason why SQ has been as successful as it has been in Oz is because it carries high volumes and channels them therough its SIN hub using sixth freedoms. QF's modus operandi is much the same, although in their case they take advantage of fifth freedoms to boost profits.

As with other carriers, SQ has limited resources. If the UK or Japan were to offer open skies to SQ (and bear in mind SIN already has open skies with the US) I think you'd see SQ channel their resources to either market in a heartbeat.

 
QANTASpower
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:07 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:47 am

Thats exactly right Business flyer ... just goes to show you how much competition Qantas faces on the Australia to Europe market.

While Qantas is allowed to fly Bangkok - London and do so they are barred by the Hong Kong Govt from flying Hong Kong to London.

In a bizarre move though the Hong Kong Govt has given Air New Zealand the right to fly Hong Kong - London but not Qantas.

The crazy world of international air rights!

 
Ex_SQer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 5:43 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:54 am

Oh, just thought I'd clarify the issue of fourth, fifth, and sixth freedoms.

When SQ flies a passenger to/from SIN and Oz, they use fourth freedoms.

When QF flies a passenger to/from Oz and Europe, they also use fourth freedoms, even if the flight stops in SIN. As long as the passenger carries on and does not make a stopover in SIN, that passenger is carried under the fourth freedom.

When QF flies a passenger to/from SIN to Europe, they use fifth freedoms.

When SQ flies a passenger to/from Europe to SIN and if the passenger does not stay in SIN but instead gets onto another flight to Oz, then SQ is utilizing sixth freedoms.

As you can see, although both carriers carry passengers to the same cities through SIN, they utilize different freedoms - one of these freedoms is official, one isn't. In this case, QF uses official freedoms, SQ does not.

The same issues crop up when you discuss CX and QF, except in this case it is one-sided because CX takes advantage of sixth freedoms while QF cannot enjoy fifth freedoms to LHR under their current bilateral.
 
QANTASpower
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:07 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:55 am

Thanks so much for the response Ex_Sqer but you have lost me with the sixth freedom rights.

All the Asian carriers operating from Australia can sell tickets to Europe? So they all have sixth freedom right?
 
Businessflyer
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 4:23 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:56 am

But isn't the HK decision to all ANZ to fly to London from HK based on competitive concerns since CX is already part of OneWorld, like BA and QF. I am pretty sure that HK's decision is based on competition concerns, not anything else. If ANZ is acquired by QF you might see the situation change.

Ex-SQer... as a matter of idle curiousity... what are the definitions of all these different rights...? i.e., third, fourth, fifth, sixth, etc.? Since you had completely lost me by half way through your commentary Smile!
 
Businessflyer
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 4:23 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:56 am

ex-SQer... you beat me to it!
 
aviasian
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2001 8:11 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:00 pm

Qantaspower: Talk about wanting your cake and eating it . . . you probably wanted much more.

Do you know how long has Qantas been milking the Singapore-Europe run? Since the very dawn of the Kangaroo Route in the 1930s!!!!! Not enough??? Sure, you cannot expect QF to operate SIN-USA . . . but that's not because you are not permitted, but because QF may not wish to take up the challenge! It is a lucrative route that other airlines such as CI, CX, JL, NH, TG, KE, OZ are all milking through their homebase. Have we forgotten that QF Cargo through very creative arrangements is operating Australia / SIN / BKK / USA cargo flights . . . and this may soon include Shanghai? You could argue that these use the MD11F of Gemini Cargo, but don't forget where the revenue goes to. Qantas passengers enjoy a level of connectivity in SIN that perhaps rival that in any Australian city . . . all these benefit Qantas primarily!

What's to say that Qantas cannot market South America / Southwest Pacific / New Zealand from Singapore and SE Asia?

Look Qantaspower, the Australian government is not stupid as you have feared . . . neither is Qantas' management. It is not a zero-sum game for you folks down-under . . .

KC Sim
Bangkok

 
Ex_SQer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 5:43 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:01 pm

Businessflyer ... I am quick on the draw, you know!

Qantaspower: Yes, technically any Asian carrier (or US, for that matter) flying to Oz and with connecting flights to Europe can carry sixth freedom traffic between Oz and Europe. By the same token, QF can carry sixth freedom traffic between Asia/Europe and NZ.

It's an unfortunate quirk of geography (on QF's part). But, again, sixth freedoms cannot be negotiated satisfactorily, and I don't foresee any day in the near future when countries wil be able to work around these thorny issues.
 
Ex_SQer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 5:43 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:06 pm

Qantaspower - when thinking about Open Skies, you should also think beyond immediate cost/benefits to QF. Allowing other carriers into the market may hurt QF, but it may benefit Oz as a whole in terms of more (and quite possibly cheaper) transport of people and cargo to/from Oz. This may in fact represent a net benefit that outweighs any harm done to QF. In any case, competition tends to make efficient companies stronger, not weaker.
 
Businessflyer
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 4:23 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:10 pm

ex-SQer... very true! Btw, do you ever come back to sunny Singapore?

Anyway, so basically, the fact that Australia is geographically peripheral it could be argued that QF is more constrained. However, don't forget that compared to most other operators QF is doing very very well at the moment due to a decline in the level of competition in its domestic market. Furthermore, most people do not like transiting and BA / Qantas are very strong on the Australia / Europe routes, especially to the UK. I mean, who honestly wants to fly from Oz to the UK via HK or Japan?! Sometimes it is not even that much cheaper...
 
User avatar
VirginFlyer
Posts: 3947
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2000 12:27 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" -

Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:19 pm

Qantaspower - I still think you are missing the point. Lets use the route SYD-HKG-LHR as an example. Cathay Pacific are based in Hong Kong. So they are bringing passengers into their base, then sending them out of it again. Qantas are based in Australia. They are sending passengers out of their base, and for HKG-LHR would be sending them from one foreign point to another. As I said before, a better equivalent would be that Qantas doing SYD-HKG-LHR, and selling tickets on the HKG-LHR leg only, would be Cathay doing HKG-SYD-LAX, and selling tickets on the SYD-LAX leg only. It is this latter circumstance which you are arguing against in your original post.

CX flying HKG-LHR is a case of airline from country C flying from country C to country B. QF flying HKG-LHR is a case of airline from country A flying from country C to country B. As you can see, they are two different things. It is not a matter of competing on SYD-HKG-LHR, because QF and CX are not based in the same place, or the same country.

If you want to say that Qantas should be allowed to sell tickets HKG-LHR, then you are going to have to admit that CX or SQ should be allowed to sell tickets SYD-LAX. Otherwise, you are making a very hypocritical argument, as both cases are on the same basis - that is, a carrier from country X selling tickets between country Y and country Z.

Do you understand where my argument is coming from?

Also, can you please supply details on the open-skies porposal as it stands now, so we know what the issue we are discussing is exactly.

V/F
"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
 
Businessflyer
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 4:23 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:27 pm

Isn't this still at discussion stages, I don't think anything has been confirmed or even a draft proposal issued...?



 
QANTASpower
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:07 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:58 pm

VirginFlyer,

Apparently discussions are taking place now between both Goverments who are finalising the details of the proposal. There has been alot of articles in the Australian Financial Review. No formal proposal as yet. An open skies agreement was proposed by Singapore a few years back and was rejected due to the benefits being too much in SIA's favour. What has changed now is the proposed tie up between QF & ANZ.

These current talks were initiated by the Australian Govt from what I understand. If an agreement is entered into the 2 carriers will have unlimited rights to fly wherever they choose from either Australia or Singapore. However this will only work of course if the "third country" eg USA allows it. In this case Singapore already has an open skies with the USA and from what I undersatnd if they get an agreement with Australia thay can start up between Sydney / MEL and LA straight away. Who knows they could end up replacing United as the Star carrier over the Pacific.

Singapore Airlines have come out very strongly in favour of an open skies with Australia. Qantas are totally opposed as there is little in it for them.


 
travel
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 4:28 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 1:36 pm

Should SQ go ahead with establishing Australia's third airline, I wonder whether SQ has intentions to have this so called third Aussie airline to establish routes to USA and Europe via Hong Kong?

 
QantasAirways
Posts: 1242
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 2:55 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 2:28 pm

I do agree to your argument, in a certain perspective.
While Qantas is my favourite airline, I still feel that a lot of competition could shape them up a little bit. If QF start to realize that they are losing competition to the SQ product, (which they undoubtedly will) then QF will try to improve their product to prevent a negative impact on their market.

Even Geoff Dixon (Qantas CEO) knows that SQ is a better airline in terms of product. He was quoted saying (on the topic of Singapore open skies agreement) "Singapore Airlines is a great airline, but I don't want the agreement to go ahead." Something like that.

Well, hopefully this could be for the better of Qantas. Qantas has the potential to emerge from this as a better carrier or die trying.

Regards
QantasAirways
The spirit of Australia
Spirit of Australia
 
Ex_SQer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 5:43 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 2:33 pm

Businessflyer, I was back in SIN Christmas and NY. Met Ryanair!!! (speaking of which... he has been very quiet lately) and SQ772. I don't get back much, though, for various reasons.
 
Air Taiwan
Posts: 1498
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 3:06 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 3:31 pm

I can't understand why Qantas would oppose it. I mean, basically, with an openskies agreement, Qantas can fly anywhere they want from Singapore! Singapore is in such a good geographical position that it would be stupid not to take this opportunity! I mean, where can you fly to from Australia as an extension of a flight from Singapore? NZ? yeah maybe. USA? maybe just LAX. I mean, if you're the passenger on a "SIN-LAX flight that goes through SYD"!

Anyways I just think QF has lots more to gain from Singapore then what SIA's getting from Australia!

Jimmy
 
Ejazz
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 10:26 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 4:01 pm

I tend to agree with you QantasPower although I suppose I shouldn't as SIA pays my mortgage.

Forgetting about 4th, 5th and 6th freedom flights just look at it logically.

Of course SIA wants open skies with just about every country in the world. Lets take Australia for example they want complete unlimited access to all Australian cities and beyond and can offer what in return, just one airport and beyond. Look at the market base, SYD alone has a larger population than Singapore and you haven't even considered MEL, PER, BNE, ADL and others yet. So for any beyond services such as SYD-LAX it would be fair to say that the Australian revenue for SIA would be a lot more than the Singapore revenue for Qantas.

Qantas does indeed have 5th freedom from Singapore but how many of its passengers are Singapore originating, a small percentage, quite the opposite for SIA in Australia. Most Qantas passengers bound for Singapore are transiting so revenue generated by Singapore is minor. Qantas cannot operate non-stop to its main market in the UK and has to stop somewhere after all.

SIA has to rely on generous air services agreements to survive. With a very small market base and one international airport it has to depend on other markets and high revenue routes to survive. It has been extremely lucky so far.
Etihad Girl, You're a great way to fly.
 
Al
Posts: 584
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 1999 10:28 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:55 pm

SIN already is an open port, (the same as DXB,) so "in return" QF are already getting a good deal with their full traffic rights flights over SIN to Europe and Asia. If Singapore (Inc., not the airport) decided to suddenly deny QF and other Oz carriers those rights and limit their metal to through/transit traffic only, then damn straight SQ would be allowed beyond rights from here as well as the traffic proctocol allowing O&D pax!! I can't really see more than minimal beyond flights by SQ being operated - most would still funnel northwest through the hub in SIN for logical and economical reasons. QF under Dixon is big enough, ugly enough and has shown the nouse and guts to rough it up good with the best of them. He's probably the first QF head honcho I've ever had some sort of respect for. If allowing SQ access to beyond rights meant something back for QF (increasing foreign ownership caps which they dearly want as an example) then I wouldn't be surprised if QF thought that a small price to pay in the QF grand scheme of things and didn't make an issue of it with the Oz Govt.

As a sidenote, the Japan market fell into the proverbial a couple of years ago and is nothing like it was. There is a reason why QF dropped so much Japan service in lieu of code on JAL.
Cheers.
 
flyinghighboy
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2001 8:06 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:58 pm

Even though I love my national airline, i hope they get an open skies agreement, Why? it should lower airfares from Australia to USA routes if SQ starts flying on them.
 
QantasAirways
Posts: 1242
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 2:55 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:23 pm

I agree with you Air Taiwan, QF has a lot more to gain most definately.
The competition issue will be a great benefit for consumers and as I mentioned before, Qantas itself.

QF
Spirit of Australia
 
QANTASpower
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:07 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:41 pm

Air Taiwan / QantasAirways

Qantas cannot fly anywhere they want from Singapore. They have to have the third country rights to do so.

Regards
 
krisworldB777
Posts: 556
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2000 10:28 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:50 pm

From the outset, I’m of the mentality that the agreement will be far more useful and welcome to Singapore Airlines than Qantas, and that is understandable. However, and to quote Mr. Sim, you can’t have your cake and eat it too. For decades, Qantas has been privileged to have the rights of fifth freedom rights ex Singapore and it is undoubtable that such opportunities to Qantas have been utterly indispensable thus far.

However, the geography of aviation is changing as aircraft manufacturers bring out their longer-range aircraft variants which will eventually supersede Asia as a hub on Australia-Europe flights. Qantas and SIA are well aware of this and both are taking steps to ensure they are best placed to enjoy the best of both worlds. On one hand you have Singapore Airlines, facing the prospects of a shrinking market on their Australia-Europe traffic – one of their most significant and lucrative routes. On the other hand, however, you have Qantas who have been given the advantage of using Singapore as a hub for decades in order to make their European operations possible. For SIA, they are fully aware of the lucrative nature of Pacific operations and want a slice of it. This would all be good and well for Qantas 10-15 years ago, as SIN was far more valuable to them. However, the future points us in other directions. Therefore, Qantas is in the situation of seeing Singapore as a far less important destination than it is currently. So why would they support it? Instead, they will be disadvantaged by having their single most lucrative market “invaded” by SIA.

Personally, I’m of the feeling that competition is healthy and Qantas needs it. The world needs it and Qantas should not be immune. Plus, Qantas, given their strength and the prospect of possible equity stakes in American Airlines, will be an exceptionally robust force that SIA will find difficult to crumple across the Pacific. Instead, SIA will add an extremely attractive option and give some very healthy competition.
 
QantasAirways
Posts: 1242
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 2:55 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 8:19 pm

Qantaspower,
QF already have many rights to fly through Singapore (that have been accepted by the third country). Why shouldn't SQ be allowed to fly from Australia?

In no ways hoping to hurt Qantas (my favourite airline) I do still think it would shape the airline up to better compete with airlines like SQ in the future.
If QF can adopt and pick up some practices (good influences) from SQ then it would be for the benefit of both QF in the long run and Australian travellers.
What better way for QF to pick this up even quicker than to be in the line of fire where they must take action or lose to SQ.

Just my opinion on the situation.
Regards
QantasAirways
Spirit of Australia
 
SInGAPORE_AIR
Posts: 11619
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2000 4:06 am

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:25 pm

Well.

Even Qantas has admitted that there is a 'virtual open skies agreement between Singapore and Australia' (quote from Geoff Dixon) and he said that there is no point in making it official.

This will allow Singaopre Airlines to come in here and "cherry pick" two of QF's most profitable routes being SYD to LA and SYD to Tokyo.

What about Air New Zealand? What about United Airlines? With the 'demise' so to speak of ANZ on the SYD - LAX route, why not have someone replace it? Surely there would still be the same number of airlines running the route before ANZ pulled out wouldn't there?

If UAL fails and Singapore starts up it may shut out a US operator for good.

And how does that affect things then? What makes you sure that if Singapore Airlines starts such a routing between SYD - LAX for example, a United States airline from running the route? Isn't health competition and oligopolies what the airline industry generally is all about?

Anyway, I must add that I do declare; a stunning performance by Anzett, or maybe three?

Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
 
Air Taiwan
Posts: 1498
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 3:06 pm

RE: Singapore / Australia "open Skies" - I Hope Not

Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:26 pm

Well said QantasAirways!

I do think Qantas need competition since now it holds more than 80% of the Australian domestic market! What could happen to Qantas if there's open skies? Qantas is the biggest airline in the South Pacific for god sakes!

Jimmy