B747-4U3
Topic Author
Posts: 617
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2002 8:08 am

Is The 773ER A Good Replacement For The 744?

Sat Apr 05, 2003 5:14 pm

Hi all,

I noticed that as of yet, Boeing have not commited to building an updated version of the 744.

So, will the 777-300ER be a suitable replacement for it?

Will the pax and cargo capacities be similar?

Thanks for any help
 
strickerje
Posts: 706
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2001 1:35 pm

RE: Is The 773ER A Good Replacement For The 744?

Sat Apr 05, 2003 7:43 pm

The 747-400 is still quite new and still in production, so few of them are being phased out unless to be replaced by a smaller aircraft due to decreased traffic. If this is the case, then the 777-300ER would be a possible substitute, as it is slightly smaller. As a replacement for older aircraft, it's most comparable in size to the classic 747's (those without the stretched upper deck) and a significantly cheaper to operate. This was, I believe, initially Boeing's targeted market, as there are still many older 747's in service with many different airlines. But, returning to your original question, I would think it unlikely that an airline that is doing well in terms of loads would consider the 777-300ER as a 747-400 replacement as they are intended for slightly different markets.

-Jeffrey S.
 
hkg82
Posts: 1301
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 4:24 pm

RE: Is The 773ER A Good Replacement For The 744?

Sun Apr 06, 2003 3:59 am

Wow, only 1 reply to this thread? Well, here's mine...

The 773ER will definitely replace some 747s where the route demands the distance, but not the capacity. I think a lot of the 747s (especially the –400 variant) will be converted to freighters or combis, where the airlines want either a large freight capacity or a mix of the two, like how KLM fly (or used to fly) to HKG from AMS with a combi, so they can carry both a substantial number of passengers and a high volume of cargo.

Hkg82.

 
donder10
Posts: 6944
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 5:29 am

RE: Is The 773ER A Good Replacement For The 744?

Sun Apr 06, 2003 4:27 am

Given the excess of supply in the market right now the 773ER is a good 744 replacement IMO.I am interested to see how many MTOW increases the 773ER will get in the next few years.
 
BA
Posts: 10133
Joined: Fri May 19, 2000 11:06 am

RE: Is The 773ER A Good Replacement For The 744?

Sun Apr 06, 2003 4:37 am

The Boeing 777-300ER was designed to be a replacement for the 747-100/200/300 series.

747-400s have not reached the age of being replaced yet. They're still excellent aircraft and they're still in production.

"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
 
na
Posts: 9128
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 1999 3:52 am

RE: Is The 773ER A Good Replacement For The 744?

Sun Apr 06, 2003 7:55 am

The market of any kind of aircraft type is overlapping the market share of others. The 747/744/773 is no exception although the twin is only capable to snap a small part of the Jumbo market. The A380 is certainly a bigger threat to the grand "Queen of the skies". If now some airlines replace older 747s and maybe 744s in a few years with 773s I bet that Boeing will launch a new 747 once the A380 is there. And a vastly more economical version of the 744 with new engines would be able to re-posess lost territory.
The freighter version of the 744 alone makes it almost certain that the 747 will be produced well into the next decade because it got no competitor.

Who is online