User avatar
Posts: 1264
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 1:58 pm

Why 764's?

Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:38 am

A question was asked why UA and AA didn't buy any 764's, I wonder why any airline would buy 764's over 772's. Don't get me wrong, I love the 767 series. The 2-3-2 seating is in my opinion the best seating arrangement.
But DL, for exampe, has 763's and 772's, so why the 764? Seems to me to make more sense to buy the somewhat larger, newer ground-up designed, longer range and not that much more expensive 777.
Any thoughts?
Heia Norge!
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: Why 764's?

Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:49 am

Boeing tried to pitch the 772 to Delta as a replacement for their old Tritanics.

Delta felt it was too much plane.... in a high-density 2class domestic config, they'd be pushing 320-350 pax
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2000 3:35 am

RE: Why 764's?

Thu Aug 21, 2003 10:59 am

The 764 is cheaper than the 772.

Price in million dollars.

767-400ER $126.5 - $138.5

777-200 $153.5 - $171.0
Posts: 5561
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2001 8:27 pm

RE: Why 764's?

Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:43 pm

Delta basically told Boeing what it wanted in a replacement for it's L-1011s, and that's what Boeing built for them. It has relatively low development costs, and was a great economical replacement for it's high density domestic markets. (ATL-MCO, ATL-LAX). Delta's 764s seat more than their 772s.
Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
Posts: 3314
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2002 1:57 pm

RE: Why 764's?

Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:55 pm

The 764 is also far, far lighter and fits into DL's domestic useage on fairly short routes quite well. There's no need to lift an airframe that can handle enough fuel for 8000 miles if you're only going 2,000 or 2,500! Not to mention it had a capacity in line with the old L1011's.

Posts: 4516
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2001 12:35 pm

RE: Why 764's?

Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:01 pm

Despite what many will tell you on here, the 764 is a fantastic plane. It is efficient, it is comfortable and it is a perfect niche plane for CO/DL. I love flying on it, and the pilots seem to like flying it. It has some deficiences compared to the A330, but all planes have some deficiences to their immediate counterparts. I believe the A330 is too much plane for what DL/CO use the 764 for.

The main drawbacks for the 764 is it's cargo space and it's inability to take the large LD containers, its range is fine for what CO/DL use it for, although I have heard a few pilots say that it is just a little too much plane for the wing


Popular Searches On

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos