bistro1200
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 7:13 am

Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 10:20 am

Reference this article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11498-2003Nov7.html

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon says it's cracking down on military and defense officials who fly in first class or business class instead of the coach seats where they belong.

Why is there such a stigma by accountants of First Class travel? Let's look at a typical business trip: Fly to a destination, stay at a business hotel (Westin, Hilton, Marriott), Rent a car (full-size, from a name brand), dine or entertain clients at a nice restaurant (Spago, Ruth Chris, McCormick and Schmidt) and play golf at a club.

Turn this trip into your accountant, and the first item glaring at him would be FC air travel. Why is there such a stigma? Even Biz class garners more than a cursory look. It is obvious by the above example that all aspects of this hypothetical trip are premium products, yet the ride to and fro is in 32E on a 757.

The ability for businesses and government to begin accepting premium cabins as an approved practice for their business trips is important for airlines to push their yields upward. Is it the cost? Why is it that FC is not allowed, but staying at a $200-per night hotel is ok? There's probably a motel somewhere that is a quarter of that cost. My point is that premium products are regularly consumed by business travellers, but unfortunately FC is not one of them.

Why not?
Measure to the millimeter, mark with a crayon, cut with an axe.
 
transswede
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2001 9:30 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 10:34 am

Because it *IS* a waste.

How does $200 for a day's hotel room even compare with several $1000's for a few hours? I fail to see your points, really. Have you looked at first-class prices?

Besides, most companies are now forcing people to fly economy on business trips. (except for the big-wigs, of course)  Big grin
 
subzero
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 7:22 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 10:44 am

Besides, most companies are now forcing people to fly economy on business trips. (except for the big-wigs, of course)

of course, the big-wigs take the company's bizjet.
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13501
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 10:50 am

Turn this trip into your accountant, and the first item glaring at him would be FC air travel.

This is why airlines have been trying to enable business travelers to "hide" First Class purchases from the company accountant by creating "YUP" or "YF" type fares that are technically coach, but permit First Class travel if space is available in that cabin.

This was a practice started (nearly simultaneously!) by Eastern Air Lines and Continental Airlines in late 1989; CO permitted full -Y- fare passengers to ride in First Class. EA took it a step further, doubling the size of their First Class cabins on their B-757 aircraft to accomodate full -Y- fare passengers up front.

Since then, most U.S. majors that offer a First Class product have either First Class fares masquerading as coach tickets, or permit full fare coach passengers to ride up front, space permitting.
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
aa757first
Posts: 3140
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 11:40 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 11:08 am

Let's say Acme Insurance purchases four round-trip tickets per month from HQ in Cleveland to their satellite offices in Houston.

To make this as realistic as possible, they tickets will be departing on a Wednesday and returning on a Friday in January.

A flight on CO from CLE to IAH will run you $366.50 in Coach.
The cheapest flight in First is backed by Delta, and involves a connection in ATL (duh). That flight will run you $1,134.50.

1134.50 x 4 x 12 = $54,456.00
366.50 x 4 x 12 = $17,592.00
54456 - 17592 = $36,864.00

$36,000 a year is about what a claims adjuster is paid, right?

As for the deluxe hotel, I someone told you could fly First but had to stay in a Motel 6, or told you if you could take Economy and stay in the Mandarian Oriental, which would you choose? Two hours of being pampered, or a three days of it? I know which I would pick.

I think that $750 extra for seven inches more legroom, a powerport, a wide armrest and a free glass of wine in just stupid.

Just my two cents.
 
jeffrey1970
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2001 1:41 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 11:21 am

If you ran a company, and you had to lay off workers because the company was not doing so good, how would you explain it to people that your executives were flying first class on flights paid for by the company? First class is nice, but it is not a necessity.
God bless through Jesus, Jeff
 
goingboeing
Posts: 4727
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 1999 1:58 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 11:46 am

Fortunately for most companies, those running them couldn't begin to tell you what the inside of a commercial airliner looks like...they are on the Gulfstream V, surrounded with REAL first class amenities.
 
Goose
Posts: 1771
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 3:40 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 12:17 pm

Maybe companies should try the travel-allowance with a certain "cap" amount; the company will pay for a coach ticket price on a certain airline, or a certain amount based on a median price. If the individual flying on the company bill wants to go first-class, they pay the difference. Same with the hotel. A few friends of mine run their business expenses that way.....
"Talk to me, Goose..."
 
sccutler
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2000 12:16 pm

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 12:21 pm

No, for most companies, those running them are flying in coach. There are few businesses (as a whole) which can justify F class travel for any purpose whatsoever. Most business owners are not rich; if they are successful, it is because they have effectively conserved capital by (for example) not flying FC.

When I travel, I can rarely justify flying F and billing my clients for it.
...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
 
AA777MIA
Posts: 671
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 10:30 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 12:28 pm

Im sorry, ANY government official that does not qualify to travel on government aircraft SHOULD be in coach. That is MY money they are spending. Should they stay at the RITZ in a suite, I don't think so! Talk to the worker on the street that has lost their job. They are spending tax dollars, which is MY money and every US Citizens money.
 
Moolies
Posts: 476
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 2:59 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 9:43 pm

First class is not a waste.
There is a difference when you pay for it and some one else does.

There is also a huge difference when you are 50+ and have worked very hard your entire life and can afford the luxuries in life, such as first class travel.

Sure it may be a lot more money but ask yourself this?
You arrive refreshed, well rested and in style.
 
cadet93
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:56 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sat Nov 08, 2003 10:09 pm

My experience with corporate first/business class tickets works on the premise that if you are going the night before the meeting, you go first class. NY to London is over night and you have no time to go to the hotel and prep your self for the meeting. So, to be at your best, you were flown first class, (sleeper seat) so that you were ready to go to the meetings. If you went early, then you paid the difference of the ticket from business to first if you wanted to go first. But they always allowed you to go business. They realized that the employee needed to be rested and ready for presentations. Coach just doesn't cut it for that.
 
bistro1200
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 7:13 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sun Nov 09, 2003 12:42 am

Good replies. I suppose the burning question in my mind is that premium hotels, restaurants, and car rentals are OK, but premium airline seats are not. Why the Westin, when there's a Super8 down the road? Why a full-size car when a Neon is availible at less cost? If cost is such an overriding driver of what is consumed, why are hotel and restaurant selection not driven solely by cost too?
Measure to the millimeter, mark with a crayon, cut with an axe.
 
Guest

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sun Nov 09, 2003 12:48 am

If I ran a company and was turning big profits I would encourage First and Business Classes. Travel is write off.

A Government Agency doesn't receive that benefit, but typically, if it's Domestic, you go coach. If you go red-eye to make a meeting the next day or if you're going overseas you get Business or First depending on availability.

Obviously, if your company is in the tank, then coach is it. Right now a lot of businesses down have the cash to outlay for First and Business. When the economy gets into full swing in about a year, then that should change assuming First and Business are still around.
 
joleb
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:01 pm

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sun Nov 09, 2003 3:36 am

why? because many people think its a waste and overpriced.

let me give you a reason why it is good to pay an overpriced First or Business Class ticket and especially on long haul flights.

>Because of the people you meet > they mostly are from a higher social class

everytime i fly first class i meet new people with succesful lives and i keep in contact with most of them.

for exemple on a long haul flight in First or Concorde transatlantically you are not gonna tell me that the people that pay sometimes up to 14000 dollars are not from a different sort of class than people in economy and flying subsonic.

Like they mention in the movie " Jerry Maguire" First Class thats whats wrong > It used to be a better meal now its a better life!
 
SNBA319
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 6:12 pm

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:23 am

sorry Joleb, but your suggestion seems a bit over the top. Even though i have not flown First, i have flown Business many times recently and i do know many people who have flown First before on longhaul business trips; the main argument was to get proper rest in order to be able to work upon arival, and even fly back straught after the meeting. Get on board, get some food in and get some rest. Or work for that matter.

And rest they did. On business i seldom see people who are as you like 'higher social class'. Some people are plainly self-interested; getting social has not been such a desire for those people.

This is quite an outdated thing; people without class but with money fly very expensively, whilst people with class but for their company's sake without money travel non-business.

So if you have the means to fly like that, fine go ahead and enjoy. But please don't say it has social-class implications. Cos that is outdated.
 
jcs17
Posts: 7376
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2001 11:13 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:44 am

The company I worked for this summer has a pretty good policy, IMO.

-A Business class ticket can be purchased if the flight is overseas or to South America. However, the flight must be on the cheapest airline. For example, the company is based in Dallas, therefore people probably want to fly AA, but if the cheapest business fare to London is on BA must be taken. Otherwise, the employee must reimburse the difference between the cheapest airline and their preffered airline. The exception to this rule is flights to China (after much bitching about poor customer service), where you can fly the cheapest non-Chinese airline if you choose.

-Lowest-fare coach is purchased on all domestic/trans-border segments. Unless the difference is "significant," the ticket can be purchased on the airline of your choice.

-Upgrade stickers and certificates will be reimbursed by the company.

[Edited 2003-11-08 23:46:13]
America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
 
joleb
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:01 pm

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Tue Nov 11, 2003 5:15 am

SNBA319

i say that is one of the better reasons to do so...
isnt it true to say that many (i dont say all people( who do fly business or first are more wealthy than others
but thats my point of view
offcorse its also to work, rest and eat.
 
GSPSPOT
Posts: 2246
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 1:44 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Tue Nov 11, 2003 5:41 am

Having flown Business Class transatlantic just once, I can say the difference in how the trip feels is "night and day". In Coach, you can't wait for the flight to be over, but in Business (or First), it's over before you know it. You've had room to stretch and relax, great food and pampering service.

It's such a revelation to arrive refreshed rather than exhausted and sore....
Finally made it to an airline mecca!
 
Tango-Bravo
Posts: 2887
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 1:04 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Tue Nov 11, 2003 6:30 am

At some point, when "someone else" is paying the bill, accountability will be demanded by someone, at some level. Whether it is the company itself absorbing the costs of travel or whether it is a client onto whom travel expenses are passed, there will be a point at which the one who controls the purse strings will say "enough is enough is too much." The airlines have priced first class at a level that has caused most who control spending to summarily reject first class travel, at least on U.S. domestic routes, as a grossly overpriced amenity -- a waste, if you prefer. There is simply no way the difference in pricing between F and Y/B/M unrestricted fares comes close to being justified (to those who are ultimately accountable for expenses) on flights of any length within the U.S.

Once again, it is the airlines who have, in their typical manner, "shot themselves in the foot." Had they maintained any semblance of rational pricing, their first class cabins on flights of more that 2 hours duration would have nearly 100% occupancy by paying, profitable first class customers. Instead, first class load factors on U.S. domestic flights are virtually 100% with about 80-90% comprised of non-profit freeloader elites (whom the airlines themselves have created) upgrading from "trash" fares.

Therefore, I would maintain that it is the airlines who should be looking at first class the way it plays in the real world on U.S. domestic flights as a waste on their part. Evidence seems to be surfacing that even the myopic U.S. "legacy" airlines are beginning to wake up and recognize this reality.
 
BeltwayBandit
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 4:25 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Tue Nov 11, 2003 8:07 am

I doubt that any organization (govt or private) would have a vastly different policy for hotels versus air fare. Even so, a good hotel may cost $75 more per night than a cheap hotel. First class fare may cost hundreds more. Of course there are exceptions, where first class costs less, or hotels cost more; but accounting departments set rules that are easy to administer.

"Traditional" first class travel is extraordinarily overpriced, for a good reason. It is there for the people who have open budgets and can pay a lot to get a couple of inches of space and hot towels. Budget first class (e.g. Spirit Airlines $40 upgrade) is a different animal.

In an industry where a first class seat allows the person to open a laptop and bill their time (generate revenue) you can often get approval for first class.
 
hmmmm...
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 8:32 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:21 am

There is a very good answer to why First Class airfare is a waste while a first class hotel is not. Business people often meet, hold seminars, or in some way conduct business in those very hotels. It is part of their business product to the customer. But first class airfare is simply an extravagance - a treat to the employee and nothing more.
An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
 
Greg
Posts: 5539
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 1:11 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:38 pm

We're expected to work..hence billable hours...while travelling. So they put us up front so we can use our laptops, etc. Of course, we have a coupon/voucher agreement with our travel partner (AA and BA) which allow us very favorable rates to travel in the premium cabins (F/C on AA, C on BA).

It makes all the difference when travelling.
 
VectorVictor
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:31 am

RE: Why Is First Class Still Looked At As A Waste?

Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:09 am

If I ran a company and was turning big profits I would encourage First and Business Classes. Travel is write off.

Ask the shareholders if they agree with this lunacy.

When the economy gets into full swing in about a year, then that should change assuming First and Business are still around.

The days of companies willing to spend big bucks on employee air travel are OVER except for a select few. Hopefully the airlines will be smarter the next time around and adopt ideas like the one proposed by Tango-Bravo (above).

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 767333ER, An767, AS512, badseed, Baidu [Spider], Balerit, baqnav, BI777, Bing [Bot], blink182, Bluebird191, carljanderson, cvgComair, Dutchy, eta unknown, FAST Enterprise [Crawler], Gemuser, itisi, lhpdx, lijnden, OB1504, par13del, shamrock350, styles9002, SurfandSnow, Sydscott, thekorean, Thorkel, ty97, Viscount724, yashk, youpitof and 308 guests