rumorboy
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 1:06 am

AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 2:56 am

American gets in shape for fight with AirTran
By Mitchell Schnurman
Star-Telegram Staff Writer

American Airlines has some of its swagger back, and just in time.

"We're through retreating," Chief Executive Gerard Arpey said last week, after a year marked by deep cost-cutting and threats of bankruptcy.

That's good to hear, because low-cost competitor AirTran Airways is getting rowdy in American's back yard at Dallas/Fort Worth Airport.

This is the reason that American went through the pain of restructuring: So it could compete with the discounters that are gobbling up market share.

Now its new business model -- leaner and supposedly more efficient -- gets a test in its hometown.

Are the cuts deep enough? Is the brand name worth enough?

For years, American has been under assault in most of its network. But its fortress hub at D/FW has been, well, pretty much a fortress. Impenetrable.

Now AirTran, an Orlando, Fla., discounter, has begun an expansion there. AirTran has long flown from D/FW to Atlanta, but it added nonstop service to Orlando last month; it's adding Baltimore next week and Las Vegas in February.

The smart money is betting that Los Angeles will join the itinerary soon.

The competition is already heating up, lowering fares for a region with some of the country's highest ticket prices.

For AirTran, this is a bold move, considering how American vanquished others that ventured onto its home turf.

Remember Vanguard, Legacy, Sun Jet, and Western Pacific? They challenged American in North Texas, and all were driven out of business.

American matched their fares, offered more flights, touted its frequent-flier program and bet on its brand name. That was more than enough then.

But AirTran is much different than the others and won't be easily dislodged. It has strong financials and a management team that has already proved its mettle against Delta, another large legacy carrier.

American may not have the deep pockets of past years. But the stakes are so high at D/FW that it has to take a stand, regardless of the costs.

One airline consultant, Scott Hamilton, called the showdown, "American's battle of the Alamo," with American trying to hold discounters at bay.

Not that anyone expects AirTran to unseat American as the No. 1 carrier. The question is what AirTran will do to American's bottom line.

AirTran usually drives down fares by almost 50 percent, and we've seen that already on tickets to Orlando, Baltimore and Vegas. AirTran could significantly cut into American's profits, as it has with Delta in Atlanta, and as Frontier has done with United in Denver.

American dominates traffic at D/FW, its most profitable hub, and enjoys a big premium on fares. It's vital to match fares and keep its customers, even if some flights lose money.

In some cities, American will walk away from business that's not economical. Not D/FW, where American doesn't want to give competitors any foothold, much less a reason to expand faster.

Delta is countering low-cost carriers with a discount airline within an airline, an upstart called Song. American's plan is to cut costs across the network -- a process that's still under way -- and then use its strengths to generate more revenue.

The strategy was evident in a Tuesday newspaper ad. American emphasized low fares, lots of flights, double the number of frequent-flier miles and the airline's cachet. Then it listed fares to three cities, all served by AirTran.

American has a huge edge on frequency, according to Bestfares.com: twice as many daily nonstops to Atlanta; nine to one to Orlando; seven to one to Baltimore; 10 to two to Las Vegas.

Eventually, AirTran will add flights, after it opens three more gates in January. But American will probably always have the edge in frequency.

That's one reason, said airline consultant Mike Boyd, that American will hold its ground, and he predicts that AirTran will be a minor player here.

Maybe, but in other markets, airfare wars have attracted more passengers, growing the pie. Ultimately, it was the discounters that gained the most ground.

That's a long-term trend that's hard to stop, said consultant Stuart Klaskin, even at an airline's fortress hub.

"A win for American is not too bad a loss," he said.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mitchell Schnurman's column appears Wednesdays and Sundays. (817) 390-7821 schnurman@star-telegram.com
 
727LOVER
Posts: 6679
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 12:22 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 4:38 am

If Airtran was able to take on DL when they were nothing/just starting out, I think the can handle anything AA throws at them. What might AA try to pull?

I hope Lone Star Mike doesn't mind, but here is part of an e-mail response he sent me regarding a question I had about AA's tactics against Braniff:


Regarding your question on airliners.net about the tactics AA used
against Braniff at DFW, these are just things I've read from various
sources, including airliners.net. It was well known in the DFW about AA
requesting to take off on the west runway even though their own terminal
was on the east side of the airport.

As far as not exiting the runway in time, possibly forcing an incoming
Braniff flight to go around, I read that in the book Splash of Colors:
the Destruction of Braniff International by John Nance.

Something else AA used to do was call over to Braniff and say one of
their planes was out of service and ask Braniff if they could take some
passengers. Braniff would order extra meals, etc, then at the last
minute AA's plane would suddenly be fixed.


Bottom line: AA plays dirty, so AirTran better watch their back.
Love Trumps Hate
 
DCA-ROCguy
Posts: 3893
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2000 5:03 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 4:53 am

Very interesting points, 727lover. The fact that AirTran doesn't interline probably will prevent AA from pulling dirty tricks related to that.

Good for AirTran, and good for the overcharged travelers of the Metroplex. AA has held the Metroplex hostage to its high-cost, high-fare planatation at DFW long enough. American will still prosper due to its particular strengths, and AirTran will offer travelers a badly-needed low-fare option. Expect AA to cry lots of crocodile tears, though, (like they always do about DAL and their precious Wright Amendment that protects their fare racket) and pull more dirty tricks.

Jim
Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
 
Guest

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 5:16 am

Very interesting points, 727lover. The fact that AirTran doesn't interline probably will prevent AA from pulling dirty tricks related to that.

This is also a different age of the airline industry with different management and a government that is more likely to get involved than it was in the post-deregulation utter chaos of the early 1980s.


AA has held the Metroplex hostage to its high-cost, high-fare planatation at DFW long enough.

Amazing that many people are already able to find reasonable airfares. Reasonable does not mean fire-sale cheap. Especially on this LAS-DFW route where three carriers already have no problem filling their aircraft. I find it offensive you'd accuse other carriers of pulling such childish stunts today. Oh, and Braniff was no angel either.... they were the first to try and destroy Southwest.


Expect AA to cry lots of crocodile tears, though, (like they always do about DAL and their precious Wright Amendment that protects their fare racket) and pull more dirty tricks.

If Southwest wanted the Wright Amendment gone, it'd be gone. They're content with it in place, as it protects their niche market at Love (and provides a nice PR battle cry).
 
MidnightMike
Posts: 2810
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 10:07 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 5:41 am


Go for it American, you will lose.....
NO URLS in signature
 
AIR757200
Posts: 1466
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2000 8:30 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 5:51 am


I think its time for AA to dump capacity on these routes.

Oh wait! ....AirTran may tell the government that AA is being to competitive.
 
DCA-ROCguy
Posts: 3893
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2000 5:03 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 5:53 am

Amazing that many people are already able to find reasonable airfares. Reasonable does not mean fire-sale cheap. Especially on this LAS-DFW route where three carriers already have no problem filling their aircraft. I find it offensive you'd accuse other carriers of pulling such childish stunts today. Oh, and Braniff was no angel either.... they were the first to try and destroy Southwest.

Good heavens, I wasn't defending Braniff, just criticizing AA. It's certainly true that BN tried to destroy WN too, and that's a point worth noting. You've said elsewhere that $700 on DFW-XNA is a "reasonable" airfare, so your standard is different from the vast majority of the flying public. DOT found in a 1996 study that the Wright Amdt cost Metroplex travelers over $500 million in artificially inflated fares per year.

AA has enjoyed artifical protection from market reality at DFW for years, and they're not likely to be happy about it entering any more than the tiny extent it already has. I don't see anything offensive about noting historical precedent, either. It may not be the chaotic early 1980's, but the stuff 727 noted would be tough to prosecute and AA has lots of motive.

If Southwest wanted the Wright Amendment gone, it'd be gone. They're content with it in place, as it protects their niche market at Love (and provides a nice PR battle cry).

I'm not convinced of that. You're right that if WN wanted the WA gone it would be. But taking out the Wright Amendment would cost WN a lot of political chits--probably at least a couple of stations in markets not on top of their list, like they did for Lott at JAN. DAL has enormous profit potential as a hub with coast to coast flights, and it's highly unlikely that WN is happy about losing out on that.

My own theory: WN has so many profit opportunities that don't require the political cost going after the Wright Amdt, that they've left it on the back burner. WN is more interested in profits than battle cries; when they decide going after the WA is worth it among their opportunities, they will.

Jim
Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
 
Tbird
Posts: 801
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 3:09 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 7:08 am

The article talks allot but only mentioned how they'll protect DFW by cost cuts. The only advantage AA has over AirTran is frequency of flights, and perhaps the Advantage program, but even AirTran has an FF program. Even if AA tries to under cut AirTran, AirTran has the money to fight back. I'm rooting for AirTran in this fight.
 
Guest

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 7:11 am

American does have the intense connecting feed at DFW that AirTran doesn't.... so in actuality local traffic fares may still lower but AA will still have all of those connecting pax, over which AirTran will have no control.
 
Guest

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 7:20 am

Looking here for a random weekend in March on DFW-LAS round trip:

American is showing 8 flights at $221 round trip.
AirTran is showing 2 flights at $221 round trip.
America West is showing 3 flights at $221 round trip.
Delta is showing 2 flights at $434 round trip.

Looks reasonable across the board.

However, American is offering very reasonable fares from smaller markets in Texas as well.
Waco: $285 round trip to Vegas
Tyler: $290

Still, in my opinion, better option to fly out of the smaller towns if they are more convenient and connect rather than drive to Dallas, considering the hassle of driving to DFW and paying $10-16 a day for parking rather than having free parking at a smaller airport.
 
sprxflySWA
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 3:37 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 7:20 am

Maybe they will raise fares in areas where AA has no competition from DFW,to subsidize any action vs. AirTran. But I think FL will be around there for awhile.Got to start those BOI flights!!!! LOL
 
User avatar
BNE
Posts: 2921
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2000 9:37 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 8:29 am

Why didn't Southwest enter the DFW market and fly to all the places that are outside the Wright Amendment. They would have already had brand recognition in Dallas market. I am sure there would be a lot of people that would do their short flights on Southwest but would have to use American for all their longer flight needs. Is DFW to congested for Southwest.





Why fly non stop when you can connect
 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:26 am

I think it will be interesting to say the LEAST. Tho look AirTran is better financially then any of the other start ups... Also I believe AirTran will take the slow and steady growth in DFW.
You can cut the irony with a knife
 
PSU.DTW.SCE
Posts: 6118
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 11:45 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:58 am

Some of you people get all bent out of shape over this.

First of all, AA is so huge in DFW, the flights that AirTran will operate are just a tiny blip in the whole prespective of things. As mentioned AA has much greater frequency, and the FF addicts in the DFW area. This will always attract a loyal following, and the many corporate accounts that AA has aren't suddenly going to be flocking to AirTran's few flights to BWI, LAS, ATL, and MCO. The market is more than big enough, and one thing is that lower fares do stimulate the market. Many of these routes already have competition from other airlines on them in the first place. They tap demand that otherwise wouldn't travel or would drive. I'm sure AirTran will do well in DFW, and AA will be able to hold its own. They are making changes to compete in the new business environment.

Remember people have to go more places than just MCO and LAS in this world. The networks and the LCC each serve a purpose and are equally important to this nation's air transportation system.
 
BR715-A1-30
Posts: 6525
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 9:30 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 10:09 am

Here is my question. When AirTran offers $221.00 fares, they can make a profit from that due to their simple structure, but can AA really turn a profit competing with a LCC. Only time will tell, and this will be an interesting battle to watch. If AirTran starts doubling A+ Credits, and touting their 8 flights=1 One-Way ticket, then AA could very much be in trouble. That would only mean 2 Roundtrips for 1 free one-way ticket. AirTran is like "Bear" Bryant. They will always have a way to trick the big guys. It is like a Big Bulldog trying to detect a small mouse. AirTran (Mouse) will always be able to sneak around AA (Bulldog) in some way.

I can't wait to see the outcome. FL started up with only 3 gates in ATL with DL practically controlling every concourse. Today they have 22 gates and are growing strong. Even the big dogs are having to have puppies to try to compete with FL.

GO AIRTRAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Puhdiddle
 
william
Posts: 1622
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 1999 1:31 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:40 am

You guys are funny,looking at the airline business as if its some kind of sport. PSU post is spot on,the one problem Airtran will run into immediately is room to GROW. The only terminal under contruction is the new international terminal and when that opens,there still will not be enough gates opened the former terminal to start a descent hub operation.

Airtran wants the O/D traffic from the Metroplex,in which there is plenty to go around between Airtran,AA,and DL. But without more gates Airtran hands are tied,but they will stil make money on the few destinations they choose out of DFW.
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:56 am

AirTran does interline. When I worked there, I did on several occassions take bags that were coming off of an AirTran flight and took them over to other airlines (these were not reprotections either). AirTran has interline agreements with a number of carriers, such as US Airways, Delta, British Airways.

LCCs can make a profit with a $221 fare as they don't have the higher salaries to pay out, nor do they have the large number of retirees to pay pensions out to. Why do you think Delta is reporting such a high loss for the past quarter, as they are having to pay out a larger number of pensions than they had the year before (I guess offering early retirement wasn't much of a cost-cutting measure as they thought).
 
727LOVER
Posts: 6679
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 12:22 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:44 pm

the one problem Airtran will run into immediately is room to GROW. The only terminal under contruction is the new international terminal and when that opens,there still will not be enough gates opened in the former terminal to start a descent hub operation.

How many gates will open up?  Confused


Love Trumps Hate
 
HeavyMX1
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:09 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:49 pm

William:
"You guys are funny,looking at the airline business as if its some kind of sport. PSU post is spot on,the one problem Airtran will run into immediately is room to GROW. The only terminal under contruction is the new international terminal and when that opens,there still will not be enough gates opened the former terminal to start a descent hub operation."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for not having enough gates, I'm not sure how many gates they will have so lets say 4 gates. Those 4 gates could run 100 flights for FL. On many occasions management has said that they are shooting to run 20-30 flights out of one gate. That seems to me that they could have a very healthy operation with 4 gates if they wanted to. How many flights does AA have out of a gate in one day? FL may not have as much room as AA but they definitely know how to utilize what the have to the max.

Kevin
I am better than you because I live on an Island
 
Greg
Posts: 5539
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 1:11 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 1:28 am

I'm not sure if anyone has won a battle with AA???...So..bye...bye Airtran in Dallas. You'll exist at DFW only as long as AA allows.

It's a seriously dumb move on their part (AirTran).

Not a huge fan of AA..but you gotta respect the clout and power they have...even in the bad times.
 
AA717driver
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 8:27 am

RE: Best FFB Credit Card

Sun Nov 16, 2003 1:36 am

William--This is a sport, isn't it? I look at this as my issue of "People" or "Sports Illustrated". We are just sharing opinions and stories... It's a good thing.

I agree with you and PSU. AA will take a long time to feel any impact from the realatively slow encroachment from LCC's in DFW. The problem is that AA's costs will never match the LCC's and their only salvation is that AirTran and the others won't be competing for the traffic from ACT-LAS for a long, long time.

AA is now saying they need a 15% cost advantage over the LCC's to make money instead of the 30%(which I thought was wildly optimistic when Carty outlined it last March) they got from the recent concessions. Another 15% will be tough to wring from the employees and even tougher to wring from the entrenched empire-builders in Centerpork.

So, they will lose a few bucks on the DFW-LAS run and soak the connectors who are too far from DFW to drive or live in non-LCC cities. But the sand is running through the hourglass... IMO(but that's what this board is, right? Big grin )TC
FL450, M.85
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15689
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:01 am

The problem is that AA's costs will never match the LCC's

Why not? What if the shareholders demand it? By saying "never" you are effectively relegating AA to being an "also ran". The LCC's will continue to grow & eventually become larger than the legacy carriers unless you guys learn to fight back. A critical component is cost reduction.
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
jmhLUV2fly
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 1999 4:15 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 7:23 am

Don't think for a second that AirTran chose to increase capacity out of DFW over night. The market was researched in detail, AirTran does not make a move without first having stastitical numbers to go by, and the data shows that the demand is there.
For nearly two years, AirTran operated a through flight
DFW-ATL-BWI the numbers showed that an increasing number of pax were staying on board in ATL after traveling from DFW and they were contining on to BWI...it was a test and the same test was made in the MCO market, again many many pax staying on board in ATL and flying on to MCO, so AirTran has done its homework in regards to those two cities and let us all remember the better more economical carrier will prevail, the management team in the AirTran drivers seat are not fools and they were not born yesterday...AirTran has an experienced upper managment staff...while American shall use many tricks most like Delta in ATL, in the end it will come down to economics how much can you XYZ airline charge to make a profit. American, well you have to charge a larger amount for the simple reason its more expensive for you to operate, you have more airplanes, thousands more eomployees, you serve worldwide cites and not to mention the airline is in DEPT and you are going to take in less dollars per seat and per flight to compete...ummm...you cannot survive long without oxygen and American must have cash flow to survive....oh well...I shall hush...it will be interesting however to see how it all plays out...let the fare wars begin!
JMH
 
727LOVER
Posts: 6679
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 12:22 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 8:51 am

I think you mean DEBT

On many occasions management has said that they are shooting to run 20-30 flights out of one gate

Could be wrong, but I think that is IMPOSSIBLE!!
Love Trumps Hate
 
travatl
Posts: 1943
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2001 4:57 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 9:57 am

The fact that AirTran doesn't interline probably will prevent AA from pulling dirty tricks related to that.

Unlike Southwest, AirTran does, in fact, interline.

Travis
 
DCA-ROCguy
Posts: 3893
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2000 5:03 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:02 am

Thanks SRBmod and Travis for the correction. One more benefit AirTran offers its passengers!

Also, 30 dailies from a gate is probably impossible as 727 says. Southwest's rule of thumb is 11 per day. AirTran was running 10 or 11 from their one Boston gate, but got another gate or two there recently.

Don't write off AirTran so quickly, Greg. As noted above they prosper just fine at Fort Widget. AA has had an exceptional situation at Dallas for a long time, and it isn't going to last forever.

Jim
Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
 
Guest

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:39 am

I'm sure AirTran has been wise in keeping operations from their single (soon to be 4?) DFW gate conservative. I wouldn't want to see the schedule back up with 20 flights on one gate and some irregular operations.
 
717-200
Posts: 564
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 1:29 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:49 am

AirTran does not interline with American yet.....
72S 733 734 735 73G 738 742 752 763 E190 M82 M83
 
SHUPirate1
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:53 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:56 am

727Lover-Impossible? Improbable, I'd agree with, but Delta has (about, not sure of the exact numbers in DL's case) 90 daily non-shuttle flights scheduled out of their 6 non-shuttle gates at LGA, and US Airways has exactly 200 daily non-shuttle flights out of their 12 non-shuttle gates at LGA...granted, both are pushing it, and both are part of the reason why LaGuardia is known for their ridiculous delays, but there is no reason why somebody could schedule 20, and then look stupid when delays out of the gates are absolutely insane...
Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
 
Guest

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 11:12 am

Improbable, I'd agree with, but Delta has (about, not sure of the exact numbers in DL's case) 90 daily non-shuttle flights scheduled out of their 6 non-shuttle gates at LGA, and US Airways has exactly 200 daily non-shuttle flights out of their 12 non-shuttle gates at LGA...

I assume you are including the Express/Connection departures... some of which are bussed to remote stands, or multiple aircraft use the same gate at one time. Twenty daily RJ departures from a single gate is nothing when they aren't using a jetway. Twenty daily departures with a B717 from a single jetway isn't likely carried out.
 
SHUPirate1
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:53 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 11:26 am

Proud: At the US Airways gates at LGA, all USX passengers pass through the gate's jetway, then go down steps placed next to the jetway, then back up the airstairs to the Regional Jet or Turboprop...not a single US Airways passenger is bussed to a remote stand at LaGuardia...as far as the Boeing-717's, are they not configured with airstairs? (I'm not sure, never flown in a 717, so I honestly couldn't tell you)
Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
 
Guest

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 11:30 am

At the US Airways gates at LGA, all USX passengers pass through the gate's jetway, then go down steps placed next to the jetway, then back up the airstairs to the Regional Jet or Turboprop...not a single US Airways passenger is bussed to a remote stand at LaGuardia...as far as the Boeing-717's, are they not configured with airstairs? (I'm not sure, never flown in a 717, so I honestly couldn't tell you)

Perhaps it is Delta who does some bussing at LGA then.
Nevertheless, both have more than one aircraft using the same gate at the same time.

So you propose AirTran starts shoving as many 717 as they can in front of one gate and use airstairs? Hmm... Maybe they should do that, then AA would really beat them.
 
AA717driver
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 8:27 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 12:11 pm

Why won't AA reach LCC CASM levels? Because they are sitting on $20-$22 BILLION in debt and they have committments to HUGE facilities they have to honor unless they get into Ch. 11(which USAir has shown to be a financial panacea--NOT!).

AA is saddled with these committments and no way to get out of them. If their current business plan does not work, it is the stated intention of the current management team to continue to shrink. Ask the PanAm, EAL and TWA people about shrinking to profitibility...Oh, yeah, I'm ex-TWA and know YOU CAN'T SHRINK TO PROFITIBILITY.

If there are any AA people who don't believe me, look it up. No one is immune to that rule. With the incredible debt load, it takes a bunch of cash to service it over and above the normal expenses of running a business. That means AA has to generate normal profits PLUS the money to service the debt. And with costs that are higher than the LCC's to begin with, they are automatically at a disadvantage. AND if they don't generate an excess, something has to give. That means cutting corners on service, stiffing vendors and trying to cut wages and staff--AGAIN.

AA is on the verge of a death spiral. They most certainly can avoid it. But if they start shrinking(which it appears they won't right now) they will lose revenue and it will be very difficult to recover from that. IMO.TC
FL450, M.85
 
Midway2AirTran
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 7:34 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 12:45 pm

DFW is just a start. I think AA might be in for a double-take if FL makes a move at ORD; I'm thinking future hub action at ORD for us though AA will have a few years to get ready if it happens. (ORD comment not open to discusion on this thread!) One thing holds true, the days of $1000 fares are quickly becoming a thing of the past!! AA will just have to find its way to deal with it. GO LCC's!!!!
"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
 
william
Posts: 1622
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 1999 1:31 pm

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:24 pm

So Airtran will offer 20 flights a day compared to AA's 500. Hmmm. AA has been dealing with LCCs for the last 30 years. There is this small LCC called SWA that flies out of DAL. AA will be fine,and FL will fly just enough to make the operation profitable.
 
HeavyMX1
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:09 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Mon Nov 17, 2003 1:39 am

The American sided attitude seems a lot like that of what USairways had of SWA in BWI and look how they ended up. You can only say we are just too big to feel any type of impact from some little LCC for so long until one day you wake up and don't know what the hell hit you in your back side.

Kevin
I am better than you because I live on an Island
 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: AMR Gets In Shape To Fight With Airtran

Mon Nov 17, 2003 1:45 am

Heavymx1

I think you said it best. They should and will watch them tooth and nail, because in this day and age who can afford to lose even just one customer. I think at first AirTran will be welcomed and embraced as saving the people from the high fares of AA, and if there service and dependability follows then they most certainly can and will grow the business.
You can cut the irony with a knife