latinaviation
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 11:25 pm

US 757s Going All Coach

Tue Dec 09, 2003 11:56 pm

Just read a quick newsbite in Aviation Daily that says US Airways is going to reconfigure some of their 757 fleet into an all-economy configuration for use on leisure routes, but not create a separate LCC entity.

In a quote with their CEO David Siegel, he said that US could probably maintain a revenue premium of 5-10% over Southwest, but not much more than that. That is a sure lot more realistic than AA's targeted revenue premium of 30%.
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:00 am

I really think this is the strategy the majors need to be pursuing, rather than a high-quality airline-within-an airline that steals from the mainline.

They need to offer higher quality on all flights, and target this type of configuration where applicable.

N
 
B4REAL
Posts: 2559
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 5:53 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:29 am

This is somewhat disappointing to me.

I had a chance to fly on a DL 738 in the 'Shuttle' or "Q" configuration, all coach, premium-pitch. And was a little disappointed. I would much rather have the first class cabin for upgrade.

A 757 with more legroom would be nice, however. I like the wider seats and better personal service. This will be a trend that will be gaining momentum quite quickly in my opinion, but sad to see.

b4real::keeping it real
B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
 
L1011Fan
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 12:33 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:35 am

Hmm. not a bad idea. The 757 is already an economical airplane and adding more Y-class will probably increase revenue per flight. I enjoy the US 757's...I fly on them a lot. I would also add better IFE on them and increase the seat pitch a tad. Just my $.02.
 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:36 am

I think this idea just further confuses and to some extent pisses off your premium cabin passengers, especially when it is not explained well, before hand or by the poor crew who gets stuck dealing with it. Keep it simple, fix the problem and stop using band aids.........
You can cut the irony with a knife
 
bigb
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 4:30 pm

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:40 am

I don't think its worth a downfal just to better serve premium travellers.
ETSN Baber, USN
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:04 am

Perhaps this is being confused. US's B757's are being reconfigured. But as far as I know, they're being reconfigured to F8/Y185, from the current F24/Y158.
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:15 am

That would make more sense then going all coach
You can cut the irony with a knife
 
latinaviation
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 11:25 pm

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:17 am

Perhaps Aviation Daily misquoted Siegel somehow, but I just re-read it to make certain I got it verbatim from the publication. "[US]...plans to reconfigure some of its Boeing 757s into a single class to stay competitive with low-cost carriers on domestic leisure routes."

Perhaps, they some will get the 8F/185Y configuration while others will go to a full Y configuration? For leisure routes it makes perfect sense given the capacity of the 757.
 
usairways85
Posts: 3564
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2001 11:59 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:34 am

The 757's are not going all coach. On another board it has been confirmed that they will be receiving a 8F/185Y configuration starting December 15th.
 
Mikey711MN
Posts: 1232
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 4:19 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:47 am

Luv2Fly, what's confusing about it? IMHO, doing something like this is the least confusing option to the greatest number of individuals. And it's not like converting all of its 757s and subsequently applying them exclusively to certain routes that would otherwise keep premium customers from sitting in the desired section...it might simply do so on certain flights on certain routes.

I ask only because your last statement, when removed from the rest of your post, seems to describe what US is proposing perfectly.

-Mike
I plan on living forever. So far, so good...
 
PiedmontGirl
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 2:39 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 2:57 am

USAir's 757s are going to an 8F/185Y configuration. The intention is to use them on leisure (read mainly Florida) markets.

This is what I am told by my friends who fly for US.

 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 3:05 am

My point being when it was said they were going all coach, it is confusing to pax who were flying first and now change of planes, all of a sudden to be one an aircraft now coach only. Also to have aircraft in your fleet configured only for a certain market, i.e. the leisure Florida market, even the best laid plans get changed, now all of a sudden you have an aircraft mechanical you switch aircraft and you have to explain to x number of pax who might have actually paid for 1st, hey you are now in coach. It looks good on paper and I am sure the bean counters love it, tho in the real world, no.
You can cut the irony with a knife
 
Mikey711MN
Posts: 1232
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 4:19 am

RE: US 757s Going All Coach

Wed Dec 10, 2003 3:36 am

now all of a sudden you have an aircraft mechanical you switch aircraft and you have to explain to x number of pax who might have actually paid for 1st, hey you are now in coach

ahh, that part makes sense...thanks for clarifying.

I suppose I think that mechanical changes of equipment happen enough that either (1) the exact same configured aircraft is exchanged or (2) one of similar enough configuration is to minimize the net loss of first class or total seats, i.e. to reduce x. According to posts above, this effects anywhere from 16 (if 8F are to remain) to 24 (if all Y) persons per seemingly infrequent situation. I'll defer to your judgment as to how often either situation occurs, but it would appear to me that this simple change best addresses the ratio of demand between F and Y class seats given limited their resources/options.
I plan on living forever. So far, so good...