"Oh so you do live in the Eastern Suburbs. Like I thought"
Rushcutters Bay is hardly the same as Double Bay, Rose Bay, Vaucluse etc etc So dont give me that crap.
"Well thats easy for you to say that movements at Sydney Airport should be increased because believe me, you would be one of the last to be affected."
On the contrary I had jets going straight over my head this morning from 7am until about 7:30am
"sure you have some flights over your head everyday but let me asure that it is a lot less than what Coogee, Randwick and Five Dock gets. And its definitely a lot less than what Annandale, Leichardt and Stanmore gets."
Thats because I'm not silly enough to live in a suburb that has a runway pointed straight at me!!!!!!!
"Why is that ?!?!?!?! Because you like in the rich part of town. It must suck if you live in the less affluent part of town because then you GET MORE THAN YOUR FAIR SHARE OF
Your calling Annandale, Leichardt and Stanmore the less affluent part of town!!!!! Just how far West have you been in Sydney??? (Apart from when you've flown over it going to South America etc) They aren't "less affluent" suburbs. Nor would I say Rushcutters Bay/Kings X is part of the affluent part of town. What it does have is cheap rent and a good location for those that dont live at home.
"But unlike what the officials were telling to the public back in 1995, planes can turn after takeoff and they can fly over different suburbs that are just as close to the airport such as . . . . . .Rushcutters Bay!!!!!!"
And they DO
turn after takeoff. But it doesn't really matter if they can or not, its beside the point. If you live close enough to the runway then the plane isn't going to be able to turn anyway!!!! I've already said that they do fly over Rushcutters Bay.
"I believe that it is the people from the neighbourhoods such as yours (i.e. the wealthy ones) that probably use the airport the most, yet most of the noise burden gets placed on others."
So what would you like us to do about it???? Spend a couple of billion re-aligning the runway to point at Double Bay??? The noise burden should be confined to as smaller space as possible and then everyone should be moved out from under it!!!! The less people that suffer, the better.
"I firmly believe that the burden of aircraft noise should be shared equally by all."
No it shouldn't. (See above) Why should everyone suffer because the few are suffering???? Answer is they shouldn't.
"no Im quite sure your tax money has not payed for any insulation because we are a few blocks north of the insulation zone."
Well more fool you for moving there. Under a flight path without insulation.
"And I do believe I have a right to complain"
NO YOU DONT!!!!!!! You knew the airport was there, you knew there were planes flying overhead, you knew where the runways were, you knew the hours of operation for the airport. You have no right to complain if your silly enough to buy a place under a well documented flight path.