Topic Author
Posts: 1729
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 10:03 am

CN-235: What Was Wrong With It?

Thu Apr 22, 2004 2:07 pm

Since only about a dozen of these funny looking machines ever flew commercially, what in particular made this plane inferior to say the ATR-42, Dash 8 and Fokker 50?

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Remi Dallot


How do you say "12 months" in Estonian?
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 6:21 am

RE: CN-235: What Was Wrong With It?

Thu Apr 22, 2004 3:19 pm

The problem ranges from range to speed to purpose. The cn-235 was designed primarily as a military cargo transport with the ability to transport troops. A search of it's history will reveal it is great in this role. If you look at the rear of the aircraft you can see the tell tale signs of this. All the tail feathers are raised to allow a rear cargo door as needed. Because of it's original intention as a military transport certain aspects of performance were considered sacrificeable. Speed was the big hit. It's slow compared to most of the other aircraft in the 40-50 seat range. Looking at Jane's books you loose about 30-40 knots in cruise. Range also seems to be a problem. The more you load it up with weight the shorter it's range. It's because the wing is designed to get good loads out of unprepared (rough)fields for a prescribed distance which was predetermined by a military board. This is somewhat opposite of what airlines seek in a commuter(regional)aircraft. The only exception seems to be the early Dash 8's. Even De havilland had to fail with the Dhc -4 Carribou and, Dhc- 5 Buffalo. Both were good military fourty seaters but fell short on efficiency for paying passenger purposes. In the end, this plane is a success. It has garnered some market share that's not military. It's well suited to hot, short, rough runways. Otherwise there are better choices in this market. Politics helped to but, that's a whole other story!
Posts: 5147
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2000 4:57 am

RE: CN-235: What Was Wrong With It?

Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:33 pm

Does anyone know the reason why Air Namibia doesn't operate them anymore? They used to fly on the WDH-MUB-VFA run three times a week.
Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
Posts: 2099
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:45 pm

RE: CN-235: What Was Wrong With It?

Fri Apr 23, 2004 2:13 am

I seem to remember Binter Canarias operating them during the 1990's on its inter-island network in the Canary Islands.

Unfortunately, these quirky aircraft are no longer used by the airline.
Like a fine wine, one gets better with age.

Popular Searches On

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos