RCS763AV
Posts: 3654
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 1:22 am

Question On Song.

Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:34 am

This question might be kinda stupid but for me its important.....

Does song have the same or different blankets than delta????

Im a collector and im gonna fly them soon...so I wanted to know. Big grin
 
RCS763AV
Posts: 3654
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 1:22 am

RE: Question On Song.

Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:48 am

Please...this is important if anyone has any info please share it.
 
chepos
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 9:40 am

Question On Song

Tue Jun 15, 2004 5:41 am

Yes they are the same blankets, I flew song back in April and I believe the blankets distributed were the same as DL's .
Chepos
Fly the Flag!!!!
 
ConcordeBoy
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: Question On Song.

Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:05 am

There hasn't been much word on Song lately...

...were the expansion/haitus plans ever further detailed??
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
 
RCS763AV
Posts: 3654
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 1:22 am

RE: Question On Song.

Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:41 am

Ohhhh.what a shame...i was hoping to get sum cool ones.
 
njdevilsin03
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:03 am

RE: Question On Song.

Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:38 am

Same blankets...no pillows.
717, 727, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 752, 753, 762, 763, 777, DC9, MD80, DC10, L1011, ERJ, CRJ, ATR, DH8, A300,
 
sq452
Posts: 994
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 4:49 am

RE: Question On Song.

Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:18 pm

Song is a great great product its just financially not sound and probably wont survive long (with Ted), even though i really want it too. I've said it all along, if song was spun off by Delta with them having a 49% stake in it, the rest by some other form of financiers, had a Delta exec. as CEO, the airline would be fine...but DL is not fiscally sound, and probably thought short term it would be easy....oh well.
SIN > CVG > BOS
 
ualonghaul
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:41 pm

RE: Question On Song.

Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:31 pm

"Song is a great great product its just financially not sound and probably wont survive long (with Ted), even though i really want it too. I've said it all along, if song was spun off by Delta with them having a 49% stake in it, the rest by some other form of financiers, had a Delta exec. as CEO, the airline would be fine...but DL is not fiscally sound, and probably thought short term it would be easy....oh well."

I am not sure where you get your figures from, but TED loads are higher than ever forecasted. In flight food and bev sales are exceeding the expected return.

What do you speak of when you say "financially sound"? Was that something you read on a cereal box? I see no supporting data to suggest that TED cannot sustain itself or that it is not "financially sound". Loads are higher, as a result revenues are higher, despite increased fuel prices. I think you should go back and check some figures before you make ASSumptions like that.

Although TED is new, numbers may be misleading without a longer period of evaluation. This may be required (and would be required by responsible parties) but by no means does it diminish the fact that TED is exceeding management scientists expectations thus far.