cragley
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:09 pm

American Airlines S80?

Mon Jul 26, 2004 10:17 pm



Why is American Airlines the only carrier (to my knowledge) that has the S80. Or should it be, why did they rename the MD80?
And if they did rename it, then whats so damn SUPER about it?
Why the change?

 
clrd2go
Posts: 976
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 4:43 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Mon Jul 26, 2004 10:25 pm


I don't know that I can answer all of your questions, but I believe that
when the "S80" was first built, it was referred to as the "DC9 Super 80"..
"Super" because it was an improvement over the DC9 and "80" because
of the year of it's introduction (or development) 1980


Jim
What a long strange trip it's been
 
AA7573E
Posts: 468
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 11:34 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Mon Jul 26, 2004 10:43 pm

Cragley - why are you always looking to start a fight over AA. Have you ever flown on an AA MD-80? Have you experienced the comfort of MRTC? What's your complaint about the 80's, other than the fact that they have been the backbone for the world's largest, and one of the most progressive, legacy carriers?

See you up front!
 
SafetyDude
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2001 10:02 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Mon Jul 26, 2004 10:51 pm

Cragley - why are you always looking to start a fight over AA. Have you ever flown on an AA MD-80? Have you experienced the comfort of MRTC? What's your complaint about the 80's, other than the fact that they have been the backbone for the world's largest, and one of the most progressive, legacy carriers?
Hold on, folks. It was just a simple question that I believe had no intentions of starting an argument.

If I remember correctly, AA wanted to distinguish its MD-80s (DC-9s) from other airlines'.

 Smile
-Will
"She Flew For What We Stand For"
 
cragley
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:09 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:43 pm


AA7573E?????

I have been a member 1 week. Always trying to start an argument over american? Its the first time I have mentioned them.
Stand tall ma man.

And yes, I have flown the S80 twice and was greatly dissapointed.
DFW to YVR.

Thanks Will.
But is American the only airline with the MD80? If not, then why didnt other airlines follow suit and rename theirs?
 
LY4XELD
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2000 5:14 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:47 pm

Delta, Continental, Spirit, Alaska all fly the MD80 (although COA is phasing them out) and they are all American operators.
That's why we're here.
 
iowa744fan
Posts: 906
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 1:31 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:12 am

Cragley,
Why did other carriers not name it the Super 80...you got me!  Smile Why don't other carriers call their aircraft Luxury Liners (also an American thing)? As mentioned, the aircraft was originally called the DC-9 Super 80, before getting the new moniker of MD80 series.

As for carriers in your neck of the woods, Alitalia and SAS are the biggest operators with at least 90 and 72 each at one point (this includes different models: the -81, -82, -83, etc.). Some other notable European carriers who operate/operated a decent sized fleet of MD80s are/were Aero Lloyd, AOM, Austrian, Finnair, Iberia, Meridana, Spanair, and many other operators in the area with a couple. Some of these are in the process of replacing them with newer Boeings or Airbuses, but the MD-80 was still a popular model. It also had success with other airlines like Japan Air System (now merged with JAL), Korean Air, and some of the Chinese carriers (mainly with models built under license in China) in Asia and airlines like Avianca, Aviaco, and Aerolineas Arentinas in Latin America.

USAirways and Trans World used to operate large fleets, but have since been disposed in the first case and absorbed into AA in the second case. Needless to say, it was quite a popular and successful aircraft. There were 976 DC-9s built, about 1200 MD-80 series built, close to 100 MD-90s built, and the 717 (formerly the MD-95) is likely in the vicinity of 125-150 aircraft built. Sorry, I will try to find exact figures for the latter three models.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17117
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:23 am

Alitalia also calls it the Super-80. It is even written on the engines. You can see it clearly here:


View Large View Medium

Photo © Aircraftfire




From "Douglas Jetliners" by Guy Norris and Chuck Wagner, page 51:

"... By August 1977, the design was firming up around the Series 55 proposal. It had also become clear that, with a projected time of entry into service around 1980, DAC marketers should take advantage of the timing by calling the new project DC-9 Series 80."

I guess the step to "Super" wasn't long.

Note that American Eagle is also guilty of a similar thing. They call the ATR-72 "Super ATR".



And yes, I have flown the S80 twice and was greatly dissapointed.

You are entitled to your opinion, but I'm just curious as to why. Were you sitting in the ass of the plane, AKA the noise pit?


[Edited 2004-07-26 17:26:04]

[Edited 2004-07-26 17:27:33]
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
flyboyaz
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 11:32 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:36 am

They're a great plane and have served their owners well. I don't mind the noise levels in the rear...and in the front it's super quiet.
Catch a ride on a smile!
 
trnswrld
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat May 22, 1999 2:19 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:37 am

I have flown on countless MD-80 flights with TWA and American. I cant say I have any complaints about the flights. What exactly what so dissappointing about it? I seat on an airplane is a seat on an airplane no matter what type it is. Maybe it was the service onboard that aircraft that you werent happy with?
 
ACAfan
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:25 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:46 am

Next time you are on an AA MD-80, look at the safety card. AA calls it the "Boeing Super 80"
Freddie Laker ... May be at peace with his maker ... But he is a persona non grata ... with IATA
 
SafetyDude
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2001 10:02 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:58 am

Next time you are on an AA MD-80, look at the safety card. AA calls it the "Boeing Super 80"
No, on the safety card it is just called "Super 80".

Their website lists the Super 80 as an MD-80 and also by Boeing, but Boeing never made it. http://www.aa.com/content/aboutUs/ourPlanes/boeingMD80.jhtml

 Smile
-Will
"She Flew For What We Stand For"
 
AA717driver
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 8:27 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:06 am

MDD marketed it as the "super 80" for a short time. AA was one of the first customers and kept the name. Airlines do that. You can call it habit or tradition or whatever. Shortly after its introduction, MDD started calling its airplanes "MD-" as a result of a corporate makeover. I guess they wanted to distance themselves from the Douglas Corporation.

I'm glad they didn't change the DC-10 to MD-10. The "Death Cruiser" nickname was so appropriate...TC

P.S.--DC-10 fans, spare me the outrage. The -10 was a half-assed design because MDD went cheap to undercut the L1011. They were successful and it cost several hundred people their lives.
FL450, M.85
 
September11
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:49 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:00 am

American Airlines

Super 80


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Charin deSilva

Airliners.net of the Future
 
MakeMinesLAX
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 4:22 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:08 am

Note that American Eagle is also guilty of a similar thing. They call the ATR-72 "Super ATR".

"Guilty" is a rather strong term since there's nothing unusual or deceptive in this case - the ATR-72 is a super-sized ATR-42; think of the Super Caravelle, etc. Actually, the DC-9 Super 80 nomenclature isn't so strange in light of its older siblings - the DC-8 Super 60/70.

Now, the Super Guppy is another matter, since there was no plain-ol' "Guppy"
 Wink/being sarcastic
 
bjg231
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 2:30 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:11 am

"seat on an airplane is a seat on an airplane no matter what type it is."


Well that's not exactly true. Would you rather fly on a CRJ with shoulder intrusion and ankle level windows or an MD80, with 2+3 configuration and more room? Or you could compare the comfort of a widebody to a single aisle plane. I suppose you may argue that among similar classes of airplanes the seats are the same, but think of an MD80 with 2+3 seating compared to an A320 with 3+3.
If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving is not for you.
 
aa61hvy
Posts: 13021
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 1999 9:21 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:21 am

Dissapointed? What were you expecting on a domestic (Canada is considered domestic) MD80 on AA. You're not going to get a whole lot. You get a decent seat and a safe ride.

I think AA's S80's kick the crap out of CO M80s and CO 735's.
Go big or go home
 
Ken777
Posts: 9061
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 5:39 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:05 am

I've had a lot of flights on AA's Super 80s and have found them to be as good as any single aisle plane I've flown. When flying on one, however, it's rather important to get as close to the front as possible.

Even more important, I believe that they are a solid performer for AA - and have been over the years.

I seem to recall that AA got a rather good deal when they ordered the planes and that was one of the critical keys to their long term success.

Until AA's financial position changes for the better there will be a lot of opportunities to fly the Super 80.
 
ACAfan
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:25 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:18 am

I stand corrected. It is called the Boeing MD-80.

It was the fleet guide in the magazine, also available on the web:

http://www.aa.com/content/aboutUs/ourPlanes/boeingMD80.jhtml
Freddie Laker ... May be at peace with his maker ... But he is a persona non grata ... with IATA
 
AASTEW
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2001 10:47 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:33 am

People often dislike AA Super 80's because they have no IFE.

US society is very much pleased on a airplane nowadays with TV's and Cheap tickets. That's it! Nobody READS anymore. Typical of our society today! TV and Cheap Tickets is good customer service to them....

By the way, has anyone been on a Jetblue flight without DirectTV working and noticed the difference between the customers boredom point? Just a thought!
 
ckfred
Posts: 4734
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:50 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:43 pm

The reason that McD called the plane the Super 80 was because of its greatly increased payload and range, as well as the uprated version of the JT8-D engines.

By the way, I think FedEx has upgraded some its DC-10s into MD-10s. I think this is when a DC-10 gets MD-11 avionics and instrumentation.

My only complaint about the MD-80 is the lack of IFE. It's not a problem on a 2-hour flight, but a flight over 4 hours gets very boring. The problem is a combination of weight, and the fact that the ceiling is lower than Boeing models, so more people would hit their heads on the monitors.
 
N1120A
Posts: 26468
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:05 pm

The reason they call it the super-80 is because they were the launch customer and marketed it that way. They actually did not change the name until a short time after the plane entered service, so AA kept their launch name
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
cragley
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:09 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 4:59 pm



Thanks heaps for the info guys  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Reason for dissapointment was that I had just flown on an AA777 from gatwick with awesome seating and amazing IFE. Then you get to Dallas and have to cram onto a tiny (and what seemed very flimsy) plane for the next 4 hours with nothing to do. No IFE at all and its the same airline? Maybe it was due to the inconsistency in quality on American's part. You travel on a world class international service, only for them to put you on an MD80 with no IFE.
That totals 1 third of my journey doing nothing.
When the plane went through any turbulence it seemed to rattle and be easily thrown around.
I have flown with Alaska from LAX on a 737 and while there was plenty of turbulance, it seemed fine.

Once again, thanks people for clearing this up
 
cx123
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:51 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:07 pm

"Cragley - why are you always looking to start a fight over AA. Have you ever flown on an AA MD-80? Have you experienced the comfort of MRTC? What's your complaint about the 80's, other than the fact that they have been the backbone for the world's largest, and one of the most progressive, legacy carriers?"



All I can say is that those MD80 are the least favourite plane from AA. Compare to a 777 or 330 or even a 321 I think the MD80 is inferior and there is nothing SUPER about it.
 
LY4XELD
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2000 5:14 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:36 pm

"All I can say is that those MD80 are the least favourite plane from AA. Compare to a 777 or 330..."

How can you possibly compare these a/c? A 777 is certainly not in the same category as an MD-80. Enough with the cheap shots to AA just b/c they fly the MD80. And although not my favorite a/c to fly, I would have to say that AA has made the MD-80's more comfortable than other airlines I've flown, even on the A319/20/21 (F9 and USAirways).
That's why we're here.
 
miamiair
Posts: 4249
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:42 pm

RE: American Airlines S80?

Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:26 pm

I fly MD-80s to Colombia all the time; no gripes. AA's Super 80's have more room and as long as I sit forward of the rear end of the wing, noise is not a problem. No gripes. Who need IFE? I take my own or make it.
Molon Labe - Proud member of SMASH
 
StarCruiser
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:12 am

RE: American Airlines S80?

Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:40 am

I fly AA's Super 80s all the time and love the MRTC especially. I am especially grateful that AA has dropped so many RJs for Super 80s on the ORD - IND run. Even on an hour long trip they are sooooo much more comfortable and I don't have to walk from the "G" concourse all the way to "H" or "K."

No one flies 767s, 777s, A-330s or 340s to IND that I have seen. For my money, I'll take the Super 80. Yes, the A-319/320s are nice too, no argument. I don't hate Airbus, they make fine planes too.