COAMiG29
Topic Author
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:06 am

The current aircraft that serves the president of the USA is a B742. The B742 has been retired by most airlines because of age. If anyone has any information about when if ever the a/c will be replaced and what will become of the current please feel free to say so.

Thanks in advance for any input

--COAMiG29--
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
SafetyDude
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2001 10:02 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:09 am

The 742s that serve as AF1 are relatively new and are updated versions of the standard-742s. They should be around for quite a bit of time.

 Smile
-Will
"She Flew For What We Stand For"
 
COAMiG29
Topic Author
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:12 am

Thanks for the input I did not know their age but with all the updates they get IM sure they will be flying well into the future. The other presidential plane, a 707 is now in a museum in Tuscan I believe.

--COAMiG29--
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
DfwRevolution
Posts: 8590
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:31 pm

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:13 am

This is a frequent topic so you'll probably here more of the same.

The two 742s were the last to be built, and actually entered presidential service after the 744 had entered service. The AF1 birds have the new engines and several other features of the 744, and all the avionics are USAF customized. The aircraft go through very little flying compared to a commercial counterpart, and are meticiulously maintained. I'd wager they are the best maintained aircraft in the world.

Pleanty of life left.... I'd say 20 years easily unless unforseen circumstances interveen.
 
SafetyDude
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2001 10:02 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:14 am

The other presidential plane, a 707 is now in a museum in Tuscan I believe.
I believe that there is one at the Museum of Flight in Seattle and one at the WPAFB in Dayton, Ohio - but the one in Dayton might not be a 707.

 Smile
-Will
"She Flew For What We Stand For"
 
COAMiG29
Topic Author
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:31 am

Thanks for correcting me, i know they were in Tuscon for a while but did not know if they were there to this date.

--COAMiG29--
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
User avatar
United_fan
Posts: 6374
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 11:11 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:08 am

There is also a VC135 at the Reagan Library in Simi Valley,CA . I saw it last month . There are no wings,tail,engines on it . They are building a hanger for it and 'Marine One ' helo.
The VC135 at BFI is the one that carried Johnson to DAL when JFK was shot.
Champagne For My Real Friends,and Real Pain For My Sham Friends
 
nudelhirsch
Posts: 1371
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 6:20 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:17 am

Those planes are in a service that cannot be compared to airline service. The loads are different, less cycles, and so on. Also, it is easier to keep one special plane maintained perfectly, but it is more difficult to operate a larger fleet of airplanes that has to be maintained thoroughly.
Also, phasing airliners out is mostly a question of economics, not of mx, so maintaining a fleet of 742 and operating them profitably is one thing, maintaining and operating one single plane for special purpose where especially the revenue is no matter is quite different.
Also, imagine the costs of a brand new AF1 (I think they have 2 actually) with all the toys onboard that and compare those costs to maintaining an existing model.
Putana da Seatbeltz!
 
SafetyDude
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2001 10:02 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:49 am

Also, imagine the costs of a brand new AF1 (I think they have 2 actually) with all the toys onboard that and compare those costs to maintaining an existing model.
Correct, there are two. One of them is slightly more advanced than the other.

 Smile
-Will
"She Flew For What We Stand For"
 
COAMiG29
Topic Author
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 9:01 am

I did not say that i wanted the planes replaced i was just wondering how long they have been in service and how much more time they have. I like the 747 in any model reguardless of airline and would not want one to be "retired" for no reason.

--COAMiG29--
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
garnetpalmetto
Posts: 5351
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:38 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:13 am

The current pair of VC-25s (the USAF designation for the Executive Transport 742s) have been in service since the early '90s. The first president to utilize them was George H.W. Bush.
South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
 
texdravid
Posts: 1397
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 3:21 pm

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:25 am

The VC-25's are well maintained, and like many posters have noted have 747-400 engines and wings and highly advanced avionics.

The real question is that when the A380 comes on line, is there going to be a European P.M. or President who uses that plane, a plane bigger than the 747.

I am a frank U.S. patriot, and I would hate to have the U.S. President go to a summit and not arrive in the biggest thing flying. Jingoistic, I know, but who cares!!
Tort reform now. Throw lawyers in jail later.
 
VSIVARIES
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 9:25 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:31 am

The US president is never going to fly aroung in something that the French made no matter how big it is.
He would rather convert a B-52!
For every action there is always an unequal but mostly similar reaction.
 
COAMiG29
Topic Author
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:31 am

maybe we should get the president an Antonov an225, the largest thing ever to take to the sky

you have to admit though not american made (soviet build ukraine maintained) it would be cool if the president had an an225


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Malcolm Clarke

If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
isitsafenow
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 9:22 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:43 am

One of the seven oh's is at the museum at Boeing field in Seattle. One is at Wright-Pat, one in Washington DC and I don't know where the fourth one is.
It may be at Pima(TUS) now. It was not at Pima three years ago.
safe
If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17117
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:53 am

The 4 E-4Bs (NEACP) are also 742s under all the warts.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
SafetyDude
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2001 10:02 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 11:14 am

maybe we should get the president an Antonov an225, the largest thing ever to take to the sky

you have to admit though not american made (soviet build ukraine maintained) it would be cool if the president had an an225

The AN-225s are long out of production, and there was only one made. For those interested, it was designed to shuttle the Soviet spaceship, but with the collapse of the USSR, the space program was scraped and the AN-225 sat around for a few years.

 Smile
-Will
"She Flew For What We Stand For"
 
Bekol
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2001 11:52 pm

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 11:17 am

Why didn't they use the 744 for AF1 but 742 instead? Is the cockpit of AF1 similar to 742 or 744??

Bekol
 
DfwRevolution
Posts: 8590
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:31 pm

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 11:29 am

Why didn't they use the 744 for AF1 but 742 instead?

President Ronald Regan iniated a program in the early 80s to replace the VIP KC-135 that had served as AF1 since the Kennedy administartion. The aircraft considered were the DC-10 and 747-200. At this time, the 744 was still in the very very early stages of development, while the 742 was proven technology. Think how the USAF is ordering 767 tankers rather than ordering 7E7 tankers.

Is the cockpit of AF1 similar to 742 or 744??

The 747-200s used for the AF1 were essentially gutted and rebuilt, they bear little resemblence to their commercial counterparts. All-new wiring shielded to resist jamming and EMP blast, newer CF6 engines, in-flight refueling capability, lower-level entrance door and air-stairs, countermeasures, ect.

I believe the cockpit is based off the 742 cockpit, but with slight modifications. I don't think it has the glass cockpit in the 744.
 
COAMiG29
Topic Author
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:49 pm

maybe we should get the president an Antonov an225, the largest thing ever to take to the sky

you have to admit though not american made (soviet build ukraine maintained) it would be cool if the president had an an225
The AN-225s are long out of production, and there was only one made. For those interested, it was designed to shuttle the Soviet spaceship, but with the collapse of the USSR, the space program was scraped and the AN-225 sat around for a few years.

At the time I posted this it was intended as a joke to texdravid who said "I am a frank U.S. patriot, and I would hate to have the U.S. President go to a summit and not arrive in the biggest thing flying. Jingoistic, I know, but who cares!!

also though this is off topic the an225 is now back in service as a cargo transporter and is rented out when not needed for cargo service at that time. The Antonov company has plans to build 3 more an225s for rent in the near future.
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
COAMiG29
Topic Author
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Sat Aug 07, 2004 2:05 am

All my questions have been answered and i have no more to say. thanks for the input and if you want to say more on the topic feel free.

--COAMiG29--
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
JGPH1A
Posts: 15080
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:36 pm

RE: Air Force One Question

Sat Aug 07, 2004 2:13 am

Not wishing to breach security or anything, but how many hours a year do the VC-25's fly every year ? While I'm pretty sure they're not as busy as airline aircraft, I'm wondering if they get to fly quite a bit or whether they just sit at Andrews a lot of the time, being polished ?
Young and beautiful and thin and gorgeous AND BANNED ! Cya at airspaceonline.com, losers
 
transglobal2
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:30 am

RE: Air Force One Question

Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:21 am

Gang,

The 707s used by Special Air Missions are VC-137s, not KC-135s (or 135 anything). SAM 970, 971, and 972 were all VC-137As (later converted to B's...Boeing customer number 153). The 707-353s we all know and love, at least to first two in the inventory are SAM 26000 (del Oct 1962) and 27000 (del '72...this airplane is headed to the RR library). Until the delivery of 27000, 970 served as the back-up on Presidential trips, and when the VC-137A's were delivered in spring of 1959, they tended to rotate the aircraft for Presidential use.

Hope this helps a little.