SHUPirate1
Topic Author
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:53 pm

RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Sun Aug 08, 2004 5:49 pm

OK...let me get this straight...AA has an ERJ-145 and 11 ERJ-135's (all Eagle) on the route, DL has 5 CRJ-200's (Comair), and US has 6 ERJ-145's (Chautauqua)...in addition, on RDU-JFK, AA has an ERJ-140 and 4 ERJ-135's (Eagle) and DL has 3 CRJ-200's (Comair), and AA has six ERJ-135's to go with CO's two 737-800, a 737-500, a 737-300, and 3 ERJ-145's (ExpressJet) from RDU-EWR...why the madness? RDU-NYC can't be that busy of a route to justify 44 flights (all flights researched RDU-NYC, on Wednesday, August 11, 2004)...and the majors blame the LCC's about yields being depressed? Maybe they ought to look in the mirror every so often...
Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24522
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:15 pm

It is a busy route, though the reason for all the flights is frequency. It is a huge route for business travelers, so the airlines offer plenty of frequency to the business travelers. The flight don't all go out full. I'd be surprised if the average load factor was higher than 65% during most of the year.
a.
 
FlyPNS1
Posts: 5260
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 7:12 am

RE: RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Mon Aug 09, 2004 2:14 am

Keep in mind too that not all the traffic is heading to NYC. Some of it is connecting onward to Europe (since EWR and JFK are both major gateways to Europe). And in CO's case at EWR, there's likely some domestic connecting traffic as well.

 
jerion
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 12:59 am

RE: RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:06 am

Research Triangle Park might have something to do with it. I know RTI, (Research Triangle Institute) works with other firms in the NE. We had some contract work with RTI at one point and they were always shuttling employees from RDU.

Jerion
L10/D9S/D10/M80/M88/732/733/734/735/73G/738/72S/757/762/763/320/319/318/ERJ
 
SHUPirate1
Topic Author
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:53 pm

RE: RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:24 am

OK, but still...the 27th largest O&D market from NYC (according to faremeasure.com) has 44 flights per day from NYC, including two airlines competing from each of the three NYC-area airports...yields can't possibly be THAT strong...
Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17058
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:30 am

As Jerion says, Research Triangle Park is a big part of it. 15000 IBM personnel if nothing else.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
Womack17
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 6:49 pm

RE: RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:41 am

Whether or not it makes sense - It is obvious that RDU-NYC has always been a busy route. Midway had six dailies on the RDU-LGA and/or RDU-EWR and at one point they were all on mainliners
Oh how I miss Midway Airlines. A class act right to then end.
 
dutchjet
Posts: 7714
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2000 6:13 am

RE: RDU-LGA: Is There Really That Much Traffic?

Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:07 am

What is wild is that there are so many flights each day, and except for a very few, they are all flown with Regional Jets seating 50 passengers or less - and we wonder why airports are crowded and flights are delayed?

I really do understand the logic behind regional jets, the lower operating costs for crew flying regional operations due to union rules and regs, and that the business traveller appreciates the luxury of frequency on routes so he or she can come and go at their convenience, but does any of this make sense? Its gotta be more economical for AA to fly 6 or 7 mainline flights between LGA and RDU for example than scheduling 12 Eagle departures per day. With 6 or 7 mainline flights per day, there is still a flight every 2 hours or so departing during key flying hours, more seats available on the route (possibly for discount fare passengers or connections) and it reduces arrivals and departures at busy airports - especially at a slot controlled airport like LGA, doesnt it seem wasteful to use 12 arrival slots and 12 departure slots per day on one route operated exclusively with smaller aircraft? Have the airlines gone a bit overboard with regional jets on routes such as these?