"Sure, we can leave the politics out of this discussion. Because it was not me that added this anti-Bush stuff in it."
No, you called certain security personnel from another country incompetent buffoons. I don't like my countrymen making that kind of a claim without taking a good hard look at the buffoonery in Washington, not just now, but for a long time.
"Contrary to what 5NEOO thinks, Muhammad airport (Murtala or Mumtaz or whatever) was specifically cited by the U.S. not because the area outside the airport was unsafe but because it did not adhere to international standards of security measures. That's plain and simple. I don't have to be a Nigerian or to travel there to know this.
We should be extra cautious post 911. It's common sense, not racism."
So, do you trust the US government to protect us? If so, then why don't you leave it to them to determine if it's safe or not to offer nonstops from EWR
to LOS? If they don't think so, then they won't allow CO
to fly the route. If, however, you don't trust the US government to determine what is necessary to keep us safe from terrorism, then why is that? Could it be because of, dare I say, incompetence (like our intelligence has proven to be). Is it the failure of our own government that prompts you to want us to be extra cautious?
And I am a conservative, not using some sort of tactic. It's not up to you to determine what a conservative is, nor do you or George W. Bitch (since you don't care about the difference between Murtala and Mumtaz, I assume you won't care about the difference between Bush and Bitch) have a Trademark on the term.