BCAL
Topic Author
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

British Asian Airways

Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:29 am

Searching through the photos forum I found a BA 744 bearing the name British Asian Airways landing at Kai Tak


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.



I searched for further information regarding British Asian Airways and the only information that comes up is the fact that BA designates some flights to Hong Kong as British Asian because of sensitivity in the area and to allow the HKG flight to continue on to Taipai.

Can any a.net members provide further information. Does the HKG/Taipai section still operate?

MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
fbgdavidson
Posts: 3563
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:25 am

RE: British Asian Airways

Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:39 am

BA are not flying to Taipei at present

More info:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=350360
"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
 
uadc8contrail
Posts: 1636
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 1:23 am

RE: British Asian Airways

Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:43 am

bcal,
flew a ba asian 744 in 1992 from lhr-hkg i believe it was ba25(could be wrong)it is the same thing as the af asia planes and the klm asia planes. i dont think ba has any dedicated asian planes around anymore.
bus driver.......move that bus:)
 
OB1504
Posts: 3019
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:10 am

RE: British Asian Airways

Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:47 am

Isn't it British Asia Airways?
 
European
Posts: 1495
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 5:01 am

RE: British Asian Airways

Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:48 am

Hello all,


Last pic was in 2002 - aircraft is same as above - aircraft had asia removed in later 2002


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jason Taperell - AirTeamImages



European
Come on Ryanair! Come on BOH! BASE BASE BASE! Flying high in the skies...........
 
BCAL
Topic Author
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: British Asian Airways

Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:11 am

Isn't it British Asia Airways?

Guilty! It should have been British Asia Airways. Not due for any sentencing or punishment as it should have been "Wasn't it British Asia Airways"!  Innocent
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
User avatar
FlyCaledonian
Posts: 1745
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 6:18 am

RE: British Asian Airways

Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:56 am

British Asia Airways was formed by BA to serve Taiwan. The aircraft were essentially standard BA apart from the changed titles and two Chinese characters (meaning British Asia) on the tail with the Lander aircraft. When the World Tails were launched BA had the aircraft carry the Chelsea Rose and Benyhone Tartan schemes. Two aircraft were in the fleet at any time, so that one was always available to serve TPE. British Asia Airways was wound up when BA dropped its flights to TPE via HKG (Which operated as BA25 outbound and BA26 return).


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Danny C. Y. Chan
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Parker



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ws chan
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brian Wilkes




As well as Air France and KLM having similar Air France Asie/KLM Asia subsidiaries, as mentioned, Swissair also had a Swissair Asia subsidiary. Qantas served Taipei with its two 747SPs which operated under the Australia Asia Airlines banner, while JAL has JAA (Japan Asia Airways) to serve Taiwan.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © M.Oertle
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alan Tsui



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andy Mok
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andy Mok



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brian Wilkes
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alan Tsui




The reason for such subsidiaries existing was due to the sensitivity of the Mainland Chinese who regard Taiwan as a renegade province. I'm unsure why only some carriers who served China and Taiwan had to have separate subsidiary carriers to serve the latter, but think it is related to whether their home nation recognises Taiwan as an independent state.
Let's Go British Caledonian!