roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:45 am

Here is the update to the post that I made last December about my mother being removed from a United Airlines Flight in Chicago without an explanation. Many of you asked for an update, so this is all that has happened as of now. The original thread is archived and includes a full explanation fo the events:

Hardball With The TSA-Passenger Removed From Plane (by RoseFlyer Dec 19 2004 in Civil Aviation) The synopsis is that she was seated in first class in an A320 on an ORD-SEA flight with the plane still at the gate last december when a nonuniformed man in a suit demanded that she get out of her seat and leave the plane. She told him he was being rude and asked for an explanation. He then said that he will get the police to remove her if she does not get off immediately. She then goes up to a gate agent requiring an explanation. UA said they would put her on a later flight, but she said no. Her carry on luggage was still on that plane, and she was going to remove her luggage unless she was in Seattle. Finally after arguing for a while, the captain resolved the situation and she was given a pair of seats (unfortunately taken away fron non rev passengers) in economy.

The United Airlines office in Seattle sent her a very apologetic letter. In a move of compensation for the discomfort she faced. She requested that I do not post the letter here, but the synopsis is that UA values their 1K members highly and do not see any justifiable reason for a passenger to be forced off a plane with no given reason. However UA still did not offer any adequate explanation for what happened in the letter. The Seattle office said that the office in Chicago will need to respond with an explanation. They included a number of Global Service coupons in a move of compensation that are highly valued.

The response from the lady was that she was not happy with this response. Someone at UA did write a nice apologetic letter, but she felt like UA tried to buy her off with the coupons. She is returning the Global Service coupons and does not want any discounts or monetary compensation. She can easily afford to fly and pay as she is a 1K member and has been for a number of years along with her husband who has just reached 1 million miles. The only thing she wants is an explanation from the people who did it. She needs an explanation of why she was embarrassed in front of a large crowd of people, and subsequently delayed a flight 30 minutes and finally had the problem resolved by the captain. She doesn't know if she was removed by a stranger, UA personnel or the TSA. She wants an explanation and for them to take responsibility for their actions because many people were inconvenience in this situation. No one knows if this is a problem with a UA person or an Air Marshal. No one knows. It is possible that no explanation is being given because it was the TSA's fault and they wanted to be secretive for obvious reasons, but this still is no excuse for the Chicago office to not write a letter after 3 months and multiple UA representatives saying that the UA office in Chicago would provide an explanation. Let them at least write a letter.

Any civil comments are welcome. She is currrently writing a letter requesting a formal explanation from Chicago and has asked her travel agent to try for formal explanations as well.

[Edited 2005-03-20 19:52:12]
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
avek00
Posts: 3160
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 5:56 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:51 am

IMHO, let the matter go if she's satisfied with the compensation - what's the use in playing hardball with a bankrupt airline? Both your mother and the airline likely have bigger fish to fry in life - why not simply drop the matter unless she's seeking additional compensation from United?
Live life to the fullest.
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 am

Avek00 she is demanding an explanation. She felt insulted as she was accused of being a terrorist in front of a plane with over 100 people on it. She is fighting for an explanation and trying to stand up for her rights. It doesn't matter who is bankrupt or not, they should care about people and provide good service to their highest level elites. She doesn't care about monetary compensation or free upgrades. She is still flying with UA though, but prefers an explanation because this is America and not a land of bullies.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
avek00
Posts: 3160
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 5:56 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:24 am

"trying to stand up for her rights"

What legal RIGHTS are you referring to? Looking at the original thread and this story, I can find no instances where your mom's *rights* were likely violated. She was treated crappy as hell, but she was ultimately allowed to travel on the flight.
Live life to the fullest.
 
aa777jr
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:03 pm

RE: Hardball With UA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:26 am

Quoting RoseFlyer (Thread starter):
hey included a number of Global Service coupons in a move of compensation that are highly valued.

Dollar amount?

Sorry to hear this happened to your mother.

Regards.
A liberal is a man who is right most of the time, but he's right too soon.
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:48 am

As said by UALPHLCS in a past thread, Global Service basically a level above 1K iand is by invitation only. It provides automatic RCC membership, and a special GS desk that proactivly monitors GS reservations and alters them to any potential problems. There is supposedly only around 500 flying on any given day through out the system so keeping an eye on these folks isn't tough. Finally they are listed on the UG list first.

GS is not a whole lot better then 1K, but correct me if I am wrong (as I don't live with my mother and did not see the coupons), but they entitle a passenger to complimentary upgrades. It is a nice feature that is supposed to be reserved for the highest privelaged UA members and is separate from from Mileage Plus.

Avek00, it isn't about legal rights in terms of the law and suing. It is about customer service and the courtesy that paying customers deserve. You may not agree, but if you are in Macy's and someone acting like an undercover police officer threatens you and makes a scene and demands that you leave the mall immediately in front of a hundred people or else you will be thrown in jail, then you deserve an explanation from Macy's and whomever was responsible for the commontion. That is what she wants, and I think it is a social right for her to get one, otherwise UA should not be flying and should be liquidated. Insulting a customer that gives them $50,000 in revenue a year is something that should not happen in any business that is orientated about customer service.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
avek00
Posts: 3160
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 5:56 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:43 am

I agree that your mother's EXPECTATIONS were not met - and frankly, I have yet to have United meet my expectations of a consistent and reliable operation on any trip I've taken with them since 2000. That said, you have to understand that your mom's only recourse, other than seeking a CASH refund for the downgrade she experienced, will be to choose another airline for future travels if United chooses to not entertain her request for an explanation.
Live life to the fullest.
 
m404
Posts: 1875
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 4:43 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:16 am

Thanks for the update, I've been wondering.

I'm guessing, as did you and your mother, it was an Air Marshall that, as we've seen here before, can be quite full of themselves when inconvenienced by the realities of air travel and reserved seating. Since we do not know if he was placed on the flight or not we cannot even guess whether he in fact was even "supposed" to be on it. It's my assumption that UA was, in his mind, to have that seat available but he was late to the gate or had seat cancelled through a missed connection earlier. Either he or UA dropped the ball is of no doubt but probably not both.

If she in fact only wants an apology and has turned down monetary (coupon) compensation then most certainly ORD needs to do their share with an explanation. Your Mom must however realize she may be working with a huge corporate operation who in turn is trying to satisfy a hastily prepared government organization. In other words, UA may simply not know what happened due to several layers of employees and secretive agencies trying to cover their collective butts and the individual supervisors questioned simply DO NOT KNOW.

As I said then someone has to have made a detailed Gate Delay report on that flight and that is most likely the only piece of evidence combined with anything that UA may have told DOT about a delay reason. The likelihood of either of those being made available to you without a court order is nil. Therefore it would seem that any further information would seem dependent on whether she wants to appear just as headstrong and self important as this man did and push for more than a non specific apology. If you are asking for UA to say that TSA is wrong I'd say don't waste your time. They perceive that they cannot and will not. Chicago may be up against this same wall but covering up for a UA employee who found themselves pushed around by this man/agency as well.

Keep us up on it but as she has said she does not want you to pursue this publicly here for her own reasons whatever they are.
Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
 
jetdeltamsy
Posts: 2688
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2000 11:51 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:55 am

i remember the original post on this matter.

this woman did not follow instructions given to her by the government authorities and the flight crew to get her things off the aircraft. this is the united states and it is federal law that you follow the instructions of government authorities AND flight crews. she didn't and should have been dealt with accordingly.

don't get me wrong, it is entirely possible that a mistake had been made. but cooperation in regards to security is essential...it's the law. her "don't mess with me" mentality serves nobody.

imho.

no offense intended to anyone.
Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
 
m404
Posts: 1875
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 4:43 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:42 am

Jetdeltamsy

Who was this government authority you speak of? Was it an identified Air Marshall? Was it an airport or civil authority police person?
Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
 
ltbewr
Posts: 12429
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 1:24 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 12:20 pm

Other possibilities as to the 'mystery pax' is that they could have been:
Someone from the Secret Service (protects the President, other top US officials and also deals with certain money/Tresuary Dept. crimes)
A person whom was involved with a terror investigation for the FBI, CIA or related agencies
A person with the Military or another US Government agency whom had to get to Seattle due to a security issue with a vendor there (Boeing, Microsoft, etc).
Any of the above scenarios could explain why the bump and the lack of explaination of it, as don't want the person to be identified. The agency may not want to disclose information that could be used to harm them, a government agency or of terror investigion.
Of course, the question still stands why this person was bumped rather than someone else.
 
jetdeltamsy
Posts: 2688
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2000 11:51 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 12:31 pm

Quoting RoseFlyer (Thread starter):
Who was this government authority you speak of? Was it an identified Air Marshall? Was it an airport or civil authority police person?

i am assuming the agent was a TSA or Air Marshall.
Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
 
hawk44
Posts: 733
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:54 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:10 pm

If she has a problem with a possible Federal Air Marshal then she needs to file a complaint with Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE). I doubt UA can give you an explanation since they have no authority over the FAMS or any other government agency and I doubt you will ever get one to be honest.

Hawk44
Never under estimate the power of US
 
johnboy
Posts: 2560
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 9:09 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:23 pm

I, for one, am glad your mother is taking the high road and asking for an explanation without being "paid off" by the airline.

Perhaps the above poster would rather everyone meekly fall in line with the other sheep, but I'm glad there are people out there willing to speak out when they feel they are owed an explanation.

Your mother sounds like a real pistol, and thank God we've got a few of those left in this country.
 
CTHEWORLD
Posts: 463
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 5:27 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Updat

Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:29 pm

His mother sounds like Gladys Kravitz and probably has cost UAL thousands of dollars by now responding to her pissing and moaning! His mother personifies what is wrong with America, a bunch of self serving, little picture people. Now, before all of you go off on me America bashing, CORK IT, my family has been here since 1790. The TRUE American way is to be long suffering, community and the better of man focused...not ME ME ME, like RoseFlyer's demanding mutha.

[Edited 2005-03-21 05:39:25]
 
mandala499
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:36 pm

Before we jump to conclusions... based on the data we have...

Did the person asking for her to leave the aircraft identified himself? Answer No...

Who does she turn to for an explanation? The airline.

Now, was she right in not taking the coupons? Right. It wasn't the airline's fault. To take the coupons would imply that she think it's the airlines' fault.

Should there be an explanation? Yes.

If a government agent require you to be removed from an aircraft, there has to be an authority that can identify himself/herself before that can be done. This is why FAMS don't remove pax from planes... TSA or other law enforcement agency do.

A UA pax felt that she should get an explanation of what happened to her on a UA aircraft. She can ask UA for an explanation, if UA don't know, then UA should simply tell her to ask the govt. That simple. Whether she'll get an explanation? That's a different matter altogether.

Mandala499
When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
 
UnitedStarGold
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:51 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 2:15 pm

Quoting RoseFlyer (Thread starter):
They included a number of Global Service coupons in a move of compensation that are highly valued.

Global Services is an actual status issued to a flyer and is not connected to Mileage Plus, although it does carry numerous MP benefits. United was not offering your mother multiple GS memberships; more likely, these were upgrade coupons good for either Region 1 or Region 2. Unless your mother usually buys full-fare F and C tickets, those are still quite valuable and she should have put them to good use. The situation was perhaps not handled in the best of ways, but United has done her more than right.

I suppose the "begum sahib" wishes she could experience servile treatment from every UA employee she encounters. True, one should expect courteous, polite, and consistent treatment from airline employees, but UA has gone above and beyond, in my opinion.

This is a public forum, and it's already quite possible for those with access to United's computers to deduce your mother's identity (particularly since you list your full name in your profile). I would remove identifying details like routing, your name, etc. if only to preserve your mother's anonymity.

I'm also a 1K and I am glad that I haven't had to go through something like this. I certainly hope I don't have to either, but if I do, I hope that United treats me just as well.
"The education of a man is never completed until he dies." - Gen. R.E. Lee
 
DeltaMIA
Posts: 1622
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 11:53 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 2:34 pm

Quoting M404 (Reply 7):
As I said then someone has to have made a detailed Gate Delay report on that flight and that is most likely the only piece of evidence combined with anything that UA may have told DOT about a delay reason

It wouldn't be the only piece. I doubt the agent faulted the delay to Customer Service. It likely would be a Security related delay and both the air carrier and TSA each write up a delay report so there are two sides to the story. UA would at the very least have a copy created by the supervisor with the testament of the gate agent. It is up to the them if they choose to relay that information to the passenger.
It is almost every company's policy though not to relay information to individuals or media in relation to security related occurrences. Bottom line she isn't going to get the reason for the occurrence and it is obvious UA is willing to lose her business for it. They are trying to keep it, but they can't give her what she wants. You could replace UA with DL, AA, WN, HP, B6, AS, CO, NW and it wouldn't matter. If she wants an explanation for a security issue she isn't getting it. She can accept UA's compensation and still fly them or choose not to and fly another airline that would have done the same thing if in UA's shoes.
It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now.
 
jc2354
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 9:56 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 2:46 pm

I can understand his mother's reaction, I would probably react the same way, in the same situation.

You can ask me to do anything, tell me do anything, and, as long as you will tell me "why", I'm the most agreeable person in the world. If someone came up to me on a flight, told me to get off, didn't identify themselves, I might demand explanations too! Who wouldn't?

Someone from United could have come to her and said, "I'm very sorry, Mrs. XXX, but for security reasons, we are not able to honor your upgrade this evening. I can either offer you two seats in coach, or we can book you first class on the next available flight. Which would you prefer?"

A simple 30 second act of courtesy and RESPECT, could have greatly helped this situation.

OK, time for another lithium drip!
If not now, then when?
 
hawk44
Posts: 733
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:54 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:16 pm

Quoting DeltaMIA (Reply 18):
Bottom line she isn't going to get the reason for the occurrence and it is obvious UA is willing to lose her business for it. They are trying to keep it, but they can't give her what she wants. You could replace UA with DL, AA, WN, HP, B6, AS, CO, NW and it wouldn't matter. If she wants an explanation for a security issue she isn't getting it. She can accept UA's compensation and still fly them or choose not to and fly another airline that would have done the same thing if in UA's shoes.

Agreed  yes 
Never under estimate the power of US
 
m404
Posts: 1875
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 4:43 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:31 pm

DeltaMIA
We agree completly

Jetdeltamsy
That was the problem. You assumed it to but he never identified himself if you recall the original post. Government authorities never told her to do anything if I remember. A UA rep asked her to get her carryon. What about her checked baggage? Would she have to sign an unvoluntary separation form?

Most here seem to agree that if UA has not told her anything by now and if she has been as persistant as she sounds it only seems to prove that UA cannot say anything. She will only get her knickers in a knot.
Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:44 pm

Glad to hear UA has attempted to make this right. Still, a few thoughts. If I were your Mother, I would want to know, also, who put me off the plane. All the coupons and freebies, etc, etc, would not satisfy me until I had an answer to the question.

Further, I'd keep the Global Service coupons, etc. Can't ever tell when they come in handy.

Hope you Mom gets an answer. That said - once she has an answer to the basic question - that being I believe - "Who put me off the plane and why" then let it go at that. Mission accomplished.
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
7LBAC111
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:17 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:48 pm

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 6):
That said, you have to understand that your mom's only recourse, other than seeking a CASH refund for the downgrade she experienced, will be to choose another airline for future travels if United chooses to not entertain her request for an explanation.

I fully agree. The biggest protest she can make is to take her FF status to another airline.

Quoting CTHEWORLD (Reply 13):
Oh jeez...the saga of your idiotic self centered mother continues?

LMAOF. Welcome to my RR list!

&LBAC111
Debate is what you put on de hook when you want to catch de fish.
 
supa7E7
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 2:05 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:22 pm

The problem with this debate is conflating SECURITY with WEALTH / UA STATUS.

They are unrelated!

The TSA treats everybody the same. Dressed in Prada or dressed in rags, the TSA will treat you exactly the same.

UA can feed you yummy food, but they do not handle security. So this whole debate is pointless. Mentions of her FF status / social status are irrelevant and crass at best.

This is mainly referring to the original post.
"Who's to say spaceships aren't fine art?" - Phil Lesh
 
Spike
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:08 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:26 pm

This is not a problem with your mother, it's a problem with you. Please don't fly again. Go blubb on wetnose.com/airplanes
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:28 pm

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 24):
The TSA treats everybody the same. Dressed in Prada or dressed in rags, the TSA will treat you exactly the same.

That's almost the silliest statement on this thread. If you think the TSA doesn't think different of someone in a suit and ties vice a set of nasty, holey jeans a Grateful Dead T-Shirt and Fuck You hat, I have news . . .

Don't even get me started on the Useless, Worthless TSA . . . .

[Edited 2005-03-21 15:35:15]
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
aa777jr
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:03 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:35 pm

Quoting M404 (Reply 9):
Who was this government authority you speak of? Was it an identified Air Marshall? Was it an airport or civil authority police person?

Regardless of the fact or not of a TSA agent or FFDO being present, flight attendants have authority to do whatever on their plane. It's the law. If they felt the need to remove a passenger regardless of "how much business" they give the respected carrier, the passenger should listen up, or pay the consequences. Enough whining will get you something.
A liberal is a man who is right most of the time, but he's right too soon.
 
Spike
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:08 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:40 pm

Superb! The American revolution is going to start soon.
 
JGPH1A
Posts: 15080
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:36 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:42 pm

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 26):
and Fuck You hat

Where can I get one of those ? Just to wear in the security line, you understand  Smile
Young and beautiful and thin and gorgeous AND BANNED ! Cya at airspaceonline.com, losers
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:44 pm

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 29):
Where can I get one of those ? Just to wear in the security line, you understand

I can loan you mine, but I want it back!  tongue 
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
nwaca
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:39 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:02 am

Wow! A lot of snarly people putting posts in today. I don't think that there should be an issue with telling this woman something in the line of "interest of aviation security" or security of the aircraft. Some reason needs to be given--perhaps a reason as to why a non uniformed person is telling her she had to give up her seat. I can tell you I would be resistant if I was sitting in first or even coach and someone in a suit tells me I have to get off or move and isn't an airline employee without ID. I somehow doubt that any of you would look at this person and say oh, ok I'm sorry to be here and I will get up and leave right away. Whatever this turns out to be--UA should have been the ones to approach this woman and explained something to her. If it was a gate agent or flight attendant that approached her and moved her, I doubt there would have been a major issue. The way this came off--whether or not it was TSA/Secret Service or FAM, I somehow doubt after this scene on board, that anyone would have thought this was just a regular pax traveling. Isn't the whole purpose to be discreet?
 
lincoln
Posts: 3133
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:22 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:08 am

I went back and looked at the original post and, if the unidentified gentleman did indeed walk up to her and say

Quote:
"You need to get off this plane immediately, you are not allowed to be here"

without providing any additional information (showing a badge or ID card, or telling exactly why she wasn't "allowed to be here", for example), I can understand why she would be pissed--even if she wasn't a frequent traveler-and she deserves an explanation from United as to what that gentleman meant by "you are not allowed to be here" even if United is not able to say who that gentleman was for Security reasons. There certainly would have been a better way to handle it on the part of the gentleman, and perhaps the airline employees at the scene.

[Also note that while I am 100% aware of the fact that "federal law requires compliance with [...] crew member's instructions" in this case--as far as we know--United employees, let alone crew, weren't involved until after she had left the aircraft. Had a uniformed crew member or police officer--or even had the gentleman in question after producing ID--requested she leave the aircraft I would assume (or at least hope) that there wouldn't have been a problem]

I have a feeling if a FA, Gate Agent, or this gentleman (with ID) had approached her with something along the lines of "Excuse me, ma'am, there seems to be a problem with your reservation, and we'd appreciate it if you could come with me for a moment" the reaction would have been different.

That being said, I think her response once off of the aircraft --

Quote:
[S]he said that if she was not going to go to SEA on that plane, then no one would since she was not going to remove her carry-on suitcase from the plane. They demanded that she go BACK on the plane to remove her bag [...]. She said no, and that they could not make her get on that plane and get ridiculed by all of the passengers while removing her bag. [...] The UA gate agents continued to request that she go remove her bag or at least point it out to an agent so they could remove it for her. She said NO. She was not going to get that bag off the plane, unless it was in Seattle. At this point, she had already delayed the flight and the Captain came out to the gate area and requested that she remove the bag. Her response was that if she couldn't go, no one could go

-- was extreme, and uncalled for. I can understand being embarrassed and festered but being this hostile and holding the 100+ other people on the flight hostage went at least as far beyond the point of being "unreasonable" as the original action by the original gentleman. Tell the agent what your bag looks like so they can get it, take the later flight (even if its not on UA), and make sure that you get the Involuntary Denied Boarding Compensation that DOT requires.

If I were an agent caught in the middle, and got that kind of response from a pax, I probably would have said something like "I'm sorry, ma'am, you won't be flying anywhere on United today. I've refunded your ticket, and you may wish to try [American/Southwest/Alaska/Greyhound]. Have a nice day". There is a reason why I'm not in customer service.

Longwinded way of saying: From the evidence presented, all were in the wrong here, but United certainly should provide as much detail as they possibly can. Global Service coupons in addition to a sincere apology would also be nice, but by themselves or with a "form" apology just smacks of "just pay off the pax and make the problem go away".

Hope that makes sense,

Lincoln
CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
 
prosa
Posts: 5389
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2001 3:24 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:17 am

Quoting CTHEWORLD (Reply 15):
His mother sounds like Gladys Kravitz and probably has cost UAL thousands of dollars by now responding to her pissing and moaning! His mother personifies what is wrong with America, a bunch of self serving, little picture people. Now, before all of you go off on me America bashing, CORK IT, my family has been here since 1790. The TRUE American way is to be long suffering, community and the better of man focused...not ME ME ME, like RoseFlyer's demanding mutha.

Maybe you think there's something noble about being a human door mat, but I do not agree, and neither does Rose Flyer's mother. Good for her.
"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:22 am

Quoting Nwaca (Reply 31):
Wow! A lot of snarly people putting posts in today. I don't think that there should be an issue with telling this woman something in the line of "interest of aviation security" or security of the aircraft. Some reason needs to be given--perhaps a reason as to why a non uniformed person is telling her she had to give up her seat. I can tell you I would be resistant if I was sitting in first or even coach and someone in a suit tells me I have to get off or move and isn't an airline employee without ID. I somehow doubt that any of you would look at this person and say oh, ok I'm sorry to be here and I will get up and leave right away. Whatever this turns out to be--UA should have been the ones to approach this woman and explained something to her. If it was a gate agent or flight attendant that approached her and moved her, I doubt there would have been a major issue. The way this came off--whether or not it was TSA/Secret Service or FAM, I somehow doubt after this scene on board, that anyone would have thought this was just a regular pax traveling. Isn't the whole purpose to be discreet?

I remember reading this thread when it first came out. I still think UA dropped the ball on this and handled it wrong from the get go and still is not owning up to its handling of this problem.
You can cut the irony with a knife
 
9844
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2001 12:36 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:31 am

"trying to stand up for her rights"

Hey her American rights. The to every thing right now.To have everything in excess & for free.

The right to bitch and moan.When inconvienced.The right not to do as she is asked.

The right to sue anyone and everyone. God bless her and America.
 
Spike
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:08 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:43 am

Hey, I thought it was illegal to be pissed on a plane in the US?
 
User avatar
PA110
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 1:30 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:02 am

Quoting CTHEWORLD (Reply 13):
Oh jeez...the saga of your idiotic self centered mother continues? Tell her to let it go and get a life already. There are bigger issues at hand than whether or not she felt hard done!

There is absolutely no reason for this unwarranted personal attack. I've asked that this post be deleted.

That said... folks, this is still the United States, not the Soviet Union. 9/11 notwithstanding, all Americans have the right to know who and what is being done to them by any government official. It's what separates us from the thugs running most middle eastern countries. This person's mother has the right to know what legal entity was asking her to leave the aircraft and for what reason. United really dropped the ball on this as well, and should have been able to explain what happened right there on the spot.

My own personal theory is that an Air Marshall needed the seat and they didn't want to tell her. Security would not have been compromised, and she might have let the whole thing drop if they had just come clean with the true story.
It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
 
Spike
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:08 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:08 am

I really hope you and your Mum don't fly again soon. Awful experience. Vote with your feet mate,
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13503
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:13 am

That is what she wants, and I think it is a social right for her to get one, otherwise UA should not be flying and should be liquidated.

Are you listening to yourself? I hate to pile-on here, but it seems like this isn't about your mom being inconvenienced anymore - it's about power and control. You two are attempting to exert power and control over UA by getting them to give in to your demands for an explanation, even though they've already apologized ad nauseam and given up ample compensation.

This has turned into a pissing match and while you've been very good about doing this angelic "All I want is an explanation" act, this comes down to a battle of ego.

Pretty sad, if you ask me. Fly UA or don't fly UA, fine - but let it go already.
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
access-air
Posts: 1576
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 5:30 pm

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Updat

Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:50 am

Guys Guys Guys,

Sometimes a simple apology or explanation, even if it was all a misunderstand ing is sufficient enuff. The offer that UAL made by trying to "buy off" the passenger with vouchers, whatever type they were, only made the matetrs worse.
Think about it, someone on the street comes up to you and for no explanation slaps you across the face and hard. You did nothing to deserve it that you know of and you have never seen this person before in your life. Dont you think that you would be due an explanation?
Certainly, and would you trust just anyone demanding that you let them in your house without any expalantion or showing you any Identififcation?? Ill bet not. So what is so bad with this lady asking for a an explanation of why (Security realted or not) she was treated as she was??? We dont know if it was security related, becasue you all assumed it was.
UAL might have sent her coupns ( Big whoopee) but didnt I read that she sent them back??? Or did you all miss that tidbit? Sometimes money doesnt soften the hurt put on others more than a simple apology and explanation. Think about it the next time any of you all find yourself in a similar sitaution. Its very easy to criticise how you think others should act until you find yourself in the same predicament.

Access-Air
Remember, Wherever you go, there you are!!!!
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13503
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:49 am

Think about it, someone on the street comes up to you and for no explanation slaps you across the face and hard. You did nothing to deserve it that you know of and you have never seen this person before in your life. Dont you think that you would be due an explanation?


Certainly - but if the person is unwilling to give me an explanation, there's not a damn thing I can do about it.

That's what needs to be understood here; while UA has elected to try the compensation route, they've been unwilling to give an explanation - and this person and his mom need to understand that there's not a damn thing they can do to compel UA to provide one.

Can they take their business elsewhere as a result? Sure! And they probably should, for that matter - but this "By God, you WILL give me an explanation!" crap is getting VERY old VERY fast.
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Hardball With UA/TSA, Passenger Removed, Update!

Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:05 am

Just to clarify since I don't want to ignite any more wars and really don't appreciate any negative comments that are just inflamatory. The reason why she is actively pursuing an explanation from Chicago is that she was told by two other offices that Chicago would given an explanation. The Seattle office said in their letter that she would be contacted by the UA representatives from the ORD station. But this hasn't happened and we want to know why.

For all of you that strongly disagree with me posting this, then I am sorry. The original post was a vent and request for information. I am not trying to be malicious and still fly United myself (and am Premier Exec, so I do fly a lot). This fortunately was an isolated experience. She only wants an explanation. It isn't necessarily about egos, but rather she works as a psychiatrist and wants an explanation because that is the way she leads her life. I apologize to anyone that I have offended.

Please disregard this post if you feel that way rather then inciting more hatred, because that gets us no where. But I am impressed by the number of knowledgable people here. I didn't realize what an airline would have to do if a gate delay like this happens, and it has been partially explained above. I appreciate that, and others are welcome to share any information or thoughts they have on why this is being so difficult. No body is in the right or wrong here. Of course the situation could have been handled differently, and I don't necessarily support all of her actions, but I at least understand them, but as of now I don't understand why United has sent two letters saying that someone else within the company would respond, yet nothing has happened. It seems like fingers are being pointed within UA as well and that no one truly wants to deal with the customer service issue here. I agree that she had no right to delay 100 passengers by 30 minutes and she did intentionally ignite the situation further but that is because she felt it was an appropriate form of action, so there is no reason to try and point that out again.

Thanks.

[Edited 2005-03-21 20:07:25]
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 2175301, 910A, a380787, aerlingus747, ANA787, Armodeen, AVENSAB727, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], dfwking, EIDL, ericm2031, garpd, Google Adsense [Bot], GSPFlyer, Guillaume787, JeremyB, jetmatt777, KLDC10, kzba, LHRFlyer, luisjumper, Moosfliege, Mst4k, msycajun, okay, piedmont762, RJBingham, SJOFlyer, tcaeyx, thekorean, vandut, Vctony, wn676, Yahoo [Bot], zmatt1 and 243 guests