AA737-823
Topic Author
Posts: 4906
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 11:10 am

Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:04 am

I have been in the market for tickets to and from Anchorage this summer.
I bought a ticket from DAL to ANC a few weeks ago, and was excited to fly on the 757-324 with a stop in Seattle, and on the way home, a 757-224 nonstop ANC-IAH.

But now, a friend is getting married, so I am checking flights again, and I come across flight 407, which is nonstop ANC-IAH on a 737-800! Dang... Flight block time is 7 hours 20 minutes.

Will an -800 fly for 7:20??? I sure wouldn't have thought so.
Clearly, Continental thinks so. Will they have to do weight restrictions?

This wasn't scheduled in February... why have they made this change?
My guess is that they're going to use the 757 that WAS scheduled for 407 on a Transatlantic run. Also I note that my flight, 1786, is still scheduled for a 757-200.

This post kinda wondered around... but I can assure you, it was only following the thoughts in my head! Anyone want to take a 737 for 7.5 hours? I bet the engineers in the 1960s never foresaw their airplane flying that kind of mission. What a versatile machine.

Comments?
 
AA737-823
Topic Author
Posts: 4906
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 11:10 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:06 am

Just an afterthought... how much do you wanna bet that this route REQUIRES winglets?

R
 
BR715-A1-30
Posts: 6525
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 9:30 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:09 am

I couldn't stand a 737 for 2 hours... God knows I'd never sit in one for 7 hours
Puhdiddle
 
ScottB
Posts: 5456
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 1:25 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:12 am

Well, Air Pacific was flying the 737-800 on HNL-NAN, which is only about 100 miles shorter, and the winglets should extend the range of the CO 738 by a few percent. Given that you'd probably have a tailwind from ANC to IAH, this flight probably has no problems.

And the CO-configured 737-800 is very comfortable for medium-range flights, what with the mid-cabin lavatory, audio, and flip-down screens.
 
777STL
Posts: 2770
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:22 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:21 am

Ehh you're so enamored with 757s but the 738 with the same cabin profile bothers you?

I did three hours on a 738 EWR-RSW-IAH and it wasn't bad at all. They have a pretty decent Y product for sure.

-faast
PHX based
 
AA737-823
Topic Author
Posts: 4906
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 11:10 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:28 am

Whoa whoa whoa!
I never said that I was enamored by the 757... simply that I was excited to fly a -300. I haven't been on one before, I mean.
I like Conti's Y product, and find their seats to be comfortable... but 3 hours EWR-RSW-IAH does not 7.5 hours make.

Come to think of it, I haven't been on ANY 757 since I was about 11. I didn't know much about planes then, anyway.

And actually, BR-715, I like 737s. NGs and -200s, anyway... the -3/4/5s are just boring. Nothing pretty. No audio or anything. The epitome of average.

Any ideas about the likelihood of finding winglets on this route?
 
SHUPirate1
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:53 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:29 am

The 738 on these routes? I would think the 73G would be MUCH better-suited...
Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
 
A340600
Posts: 3893
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 10:24 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:30 am

CO config them very comfortably indeed with the middle galley. In either class it will be nice, and might be nicer than a 757 for a passenger, a more private and personal cabin space,

Sam
Despite the name I am a Boeing man through and through!
 
Chugach
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:18 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:46 am

Quoting AA737-823 (Thread starter):
I have been in the market for tickets to and from Anchorage this summer.
I bought a ticket from DAL to ANC a few weeks ago, and was excited to fly on the 757-324 with a stop in Seattle, and on the way home, a 757-224 nonstop ANC-IAH.

But now, a friend is getting married, so I am checking flights again, and I come across flight 407, which is nonstop ANC-IAH on a 737-800! Dang... Flight block time is 7 hours 20 minutes.

Will an -800 fly for 7:20??? I sure wouldn't have thought so.
Clearly, Continental thinks so. Will they have to do weight restrictions?

This wasn't scheduled in February... why have they made this change?
My guess is that they're going to use the 757 that WAS scheduled for 407 on a Transatlantic run. Also I note that my flight, 1786, is still scheduled for a 757-200.

This post kinda wondered around... but I can assure you, it was only following the thoughts in my head! Anyone want to take a 737 for 7.5 hours? I bet the engineers in the 1960s never foresaw their airplane flying that kind of mission. What a versatile machine.

Looking through the CO timetables, IAH-ANC is going double daily this summer, one flight with a 752 and the other with the 738. This is in addition to the direct flight with a stop in SEA. Good news for Anchorage as far as I'm concerned. I'd be curious if CO has ever thought of keeping IAH-ANC nonstops year-round with a 738. There's probably enough business traffic between Anchorage and Houston that it might work.
GO ROCKETS
 
ahlfors
Posts: 1281
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2000 1:44 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:01 am

And I already thought Continental was doing the inevitable: 737s to Europe. Seriously though, Ireland is closer to EWR than ANC is to IAH, so it could happen.
 
moose1226
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 6:54 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:16 am

Does CO run EWR - ANC? Are there even any nonstop passenger flights between NY and ANC?
 
stlgph
Posts: 9058
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:19 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:28 am

Quoting Solnabo (Reply 10):
How can anyone stand 7 hr20min i a narrowminded a/c.....oops, sorry mean a narrowbody a/c!

A plane is a plane. What's it matter if its got one aisle or two?
if assumptions could fly, airliners.net would be the world's busiest airport
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17117
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:32 am

Quoting STLGph (Reply 12):

A plane is a plane. What's it matter if its got one aisle or two

Many of us feel less enclosed in a widebody.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
AA737-823
Topic Author
Posts: 4906
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 11:10 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:56 am

A plane is NOT a plane. Each is different, with strengths and weaknesses.
I would, by far, prefer a widebody for ANY flight. I like big planes- you gotta problem with that???  Smile Who DOESN'T like big planes? Nobody, that's who- the average Joe/Josephine passenger likes big planes, too.
Unfortunately, Conti is just a bit short on big planes right now.
I like all planes, generally speaking, even Airbusses.  Smile But for long flights, I like biger ones.
Yes, Moose, CO has a EWR-ANC flight, but it stops in Seattle.
 
jcs17
Posts: 7376
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2001 11:13 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:58 am

Ehhh, not really a big deal. They've been running EWR-SFO/SEA/LAX flights for a while now with the 738, all have flight times of over 6hrs.
America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
 
User avatar
malaysia
Posts: 2616
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 1999 3:26 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:05 pm

Try flying a Boeing 737-400 PR from MNL-BKK with no movies and all coach layout, isnt that some fun 3 hours? all over the China Sea. also recently flown a 737-800 CI a few times from BKK-TPE though. Id be glad to fly the cool CO winglet 737-800 to ANC, it must be cool, but last CO 738 I was on did not have a midcabin lav.
There Are Those Who Believe That There May Yet Be Other Airlines Who Even Now Fight To Survive Beyond The Heavens
 
goCOgo
Posts: 680
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:24 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:10 pm

Quoting Solnabo (Reply 10):
How can anyone stand 7 hr20min i a narrowminded a/c.....oops, sorry mean a narrowbody a/c!



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 13):
Many of us feel less enclosed in a widebody.

No offence intended, but aren't you on this website because you enjoy flying. I can understand those who hate flying particularly to dislike narrowboadies, or those who are claustrophobic, but if you come here to post about aviation, don't moan about flying. Want to say the seats, or the overhead space on a particular type is bad, fine. But don't condemn a jet just because it is narrow. I never have found any plane trip to be entrapping, but rather an enjoying experience.

Sorry for the bit of a rant, but these "narrowbodies are torture" stuff is getting old to me.

To the subject at hand, I hope the routes do well for CO. I just wonder why there are no EWR and/or CLE nonstops planned. I can see CLE, like always, not getting the route, but there has to be demand for NYC service.
"Why you fly is your business, how you fly is ours"
 
co7772wuh
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 7:13 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:10 pm

Then size does matter !  devil 
 
FlyTheFlag
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:12 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:15 pm

Quoting GoCOgo (Reply 17):
No offence intended, but aren't you on this website because you enjoy flying.

Not necessarily. I don't particularly like spending long amounts of time on aircraft. Shorter the flight, the better. Many of us are more enamored with the industry, the act of flying, and how it all ties together into a system.
 
StevenUhl777
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 11:02 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:16 pm

Wow...7h 20m...IAD-FRA is 7h 10m by comparison, and several midwest/east-coast to Europe are about that as well.

Imagine if this plane somehow got ETOPS certified (maybe it is already?) they'd dominate the skies to Europe with low fare passengers. Yikes. I don't want to think about that...
And the winner for best actress is....REESE WITHERSPOON for 'Walk the Line'!!!!!!!!
 
alexinwa
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2000 2:08 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:26 pm

My two cents.....

I've flown 737's and 320's trans-con. The 738 on AA (SEA-BOS) was the best due to "more room in coach".

The UA 320 was pure hell. Thanks to the way UA configures them.

The AS 737-700 was wonderful SEA-DCA. Thanks to some little known info that the last 5 rows have a 33+ inch pitch.

NOW.....

I flew a DL 763 SEA-ATL and hated it. Talk about tight. The fact that is was a wide-body only helped due to the fact that I could get out of my seat and have a little room to walk around the gallery area in back.

I feel the UA 320 would of been just as bad as a UA 744 due to UA making them so tight. Not the planes fault. Blame UA.

I love the 340's SEA-CPH, but I also loved the 763's and the DC10's on the route. If it's full, it's not a fun no matter what A/C.

I havent had the pleasure of CO is many years, back when DEN was a hub. however I judge all my comfort based on the AA 738 with more room in coach.
You mad Bro???
 
alexinwa
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2000 2:08 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:27 pm

Wonder how the AQ -700's feel on a packed LAS-HNL run???
You mad Bro???
 
njdevilsin03
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:03 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:04 pm

There have been EWR-ANC flights I believe it's seasonal. I flew a 752 from FLL-EWR and I looked at where the flight was heading after I deplaned and it said ANC.
717, 727, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 752, 753, 762, 763, 777, DC9, MD80, DC10, L1011, ERJ, CRJ, ATR, DH8, A300,
 
Chugach
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:18 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:07 pm

CO doesn't do the EWR-ANC nonstop anymore, as somebody said above they instead added an extra SEA-ANC run with a EWR tag-on.
GO ROCKETS
 
vegas005
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 12:25 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:11 pm

Quoting StevenUhl777 (Reply 20):
magine if this plane somehow got ETOPS certified (maybe it is already?) they'd dominate the skies to Europe with low fare passengers. Yikes. I don't want to think about that...

Privatair flies the 737-800 ZRH-EWR every day. So it is already being done, and soon the low cost guys will get into the business I would guess.
 
CALMSP
Posts: 2895
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:18 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:19 pm

too bad we dont have the EWR-PDX-ANC flight anymore.
 
CALMSP
Posts: 2895
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:18 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:21 pm

i always thought before NW started opening all the Hawaii flights off the coast...we could have added 738s to Hawaii.
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:23 pm

Quoting AA737-823 (Thread starter):
I have been in the market for tickets to and from Anchorage this summer.
I bought a ticket from DAL to ANC a few weeks ago, and was excited to fly on the 757-324 with a stop in Seattle, and on the way home, a 757-224 nonstop ANC-IAH.

But now, a friend is getting married, so I am checking flights again, and I come across flight 407, which is nonstop ANC-IAH on a 737-800! Dang... Flight block time is 7 hours 20 minutes.

CO has been sending 738s up here for a while. My Father arrived on one in 2003 . . . IAH-SEA-ANC. I don't see them non-stopping them from IAH though. Even the 757s they send here from IAH stop in SEA. Would love an ANC-IAH non-stop though . . .

Quoting Chugach (Reply 24):
CO doesn't do the EWR-ANC nonstop anymore

Now THAT was the way to get to DCA from here. ANC-EWR-DCA. Couldn't beat it. Now of course, it's always that stop in SEA. Reminds me of flying DL in the southeast - you WILL go to ATL . . . same coming up here for the most part, you WILL stop at SEA, with few exceptions . . .
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:28 pm

Quoting GoCOgo (Reply 17):
No offence intended, but aren't you on this website because you enjoy flying

No.
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 7487
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:23 pm

Quoting GoCOgo (Reply 17):
But don't condemn a jet just because it is narrow. I never have found any plane trip to be entrapping, but rather an enjoying experience.

the only times I have flown 737s I found them cramped because most are optimised for shorthaul, not medium-longhaul...They tend to be 30"-31" rather than 32", 33" or 34" because they are more often used as shuttles or shorthaul. That is why a lot of people aren't all that keen to fly a 738 on a long transcontinental flight. I love flying, I can't think of anything I would rather do, but that is a long flight in a 737, even if like me you don't get claustrophobic. it's got nothing to do with being a narrowbody, it's just that there are many seasoned travellers here that know what flying on a 737 implies about space/service etc.
Flown to 120 Airports in 44 Countries on 73 Operators. Visited 55 Countries and counting. Wanderlust is like Syphilis, once you have the itch it's too late for treatment.
 
Chugach
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:18 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:26 pm

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 28):
Even the 757s they send here from IAH stop in SEA. Would love an ANC-IAH non-stop though . . .

CO does do it nonstop in the summer, and has been for a while now. My uncle took a nonstop IAH-ANC flight a couple years ago. See reply 8 Big grin
GO ROCKETS
 
Chugach
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:18 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:31 pm

Quoting CALMSP (Reply 26):
too bad we dont have the EWR-PDX-ANC flight anymore.

I fly ANC-PDX at least five times a year, and while I'm loyal to AS, they generally hose you on the airfares on that route since CO (and formerly TW and DL) pulled out on ANC-PDX nonstop. It'd be nice to have some competition back.
GO ROCKETS
 
AA737-823
Topic Author
Posts: 4906
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 11:10 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:37 pm

ANCFlyer, read my post carefully-
Continental ALREADY HAS nonstops form Houston to Anchorage and back.
Yes, they send 738s up there, but not nonstop... until now!
 
tavve
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:24 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:26 pm

Quoting GoCOgo (Reply 17):


Quoting Solnabo,reply=10:

How can anyone stand 7 hr20min i a narrowminded a/c.....oops, sorry mean a narrowbody a/c!



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 13):

Many of us feel less enclosed in a widebody.

No offence intended, but aren't you on this website because you enjoy flying. I can understand those who hate flying particularly to dislike narrowboadies, or those who are claustrophobic, but if you come here to post about aviation, don't moan about flying.

I agree with you GoCOgo!!! But, don't bother too much. Just do what I do, never read what some people write. I check the username to decide if I shall read the post or not. Works pretty well. No point in being upset. You are right though...
GOT, that's where I live
 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:11 pm

Quoting GoCOgo (Reply 17):
No offence intended, but aren't you on this website because you enjoy flying. I can understand those who hate flying particularly to dislike narrowboadies, or those who are claustrophobic, but if you come here to post about aviation, don't moan about flying. Want to say the seats, or the overhead space on a particular type is bad, fine. But don't condemn a jet just because it is narrow. I never have found any plane trip to be entrapping, but rather an enjoying experience.

Sorry for the bit of a rant, but these "narrowbodies are torture" stuff is getting old to me.

Could not agree more with you.....
You can cut the irony with a knife
 
dba4u
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 7:53 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:41 pm

Quoting Vegas005 (Reply 25):
Privatair flies the 737-800 ZRH-EWR every day. So it is already being done, and soon the low cost guys will get into the business I would guess.

doesn't count IMO. It's an all Biz flight with maybe 50-60 people on board and with a special cabin layout and additional fuel capacity, same goes to Privatair Service DUS-EWR and DUS-ORD.

Anyway, would love to fly a 738 on a routing like this. I've recently flown FUE-HAJ (approx 4 1/2 hours) on Condor A320 and it was just fine, wouldn't mind to stay onboard for another 2-3 hours if the IFE is ok...
 
richie87
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:02 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:58 pm

As a few other mentioned.... I have enjoyed a long flight on a 737-700... surprisingly so. I did a run from SEA-MIA non-stop r/t in January and found it just fine... Alaska flies that route. It did NOT feel crowded... not much time getting on and off, never any long lines at the lavs, attentive service.. so it would not bother me at all to fly 5 to 7 hours on one of them... even more, actually. I did reserve aisle seats for that flight, although I'm not a real tall or large person... it was quite comfortable.
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 12:36 am

Quoting Vegas005 (Reply 24):
Privatair flies the 737-800 ZRH-EWR every day.

I believe this flight is a regular BBJ, which is based on the 737-700 rather than the 737-800.

N
 
optionscle
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:08 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:31 am

Guys, let's get back to the original topic here. I have a question though. Does the 738 have the endurance to make a 7:20 minute flight? I was under the impression that it couldn't fly some transcons and that the 73G had to take its place.

-Andrew
 
Dimsum
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:44 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:57 am

I've flown WS 73G YYZ-YVR and it had no problems at all. It was a 5hr flight. But of course, 7:20 is a bit different.
 
777STL
Posts: 2770
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:22 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:04 am

Quoting AA737-823 (Reply 5):
I like Conti's Y product, and find their seats to be comfortable... but 3 hours EWR-RSW-IAH does not 7.5 hours make.


For me it doesn't make that much of a difference, perhaps it's due to age. Three hours, 7.5 hours, it's all the same to me.

And again, I'm asking you why you think a 757 is so much better than a 738? They're both narrowbodies with the same cross section and similar IFE, only difference is one is slightly longer. How is 7.5 hours on a 757 OK, but 7.5 hours on a 738 is torture? On the inside they're nearly identical in Y class.
PHX based
 
Junction
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 2:50 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:28 am

Quoting AA737-823 (Thread starter):
This wasn't scheduled in February... why have they made this change?

I believe this is not a change, but an added frequency. CO has only had one non-stop ANC-IAH with the 757, and this 738 will be a new second daily flight:
15JUL-FRI-
CO1786 ANCIAH 850P 628A 757
CO 286 ANCIAH 1040P 825A 738
P.S. If you want the 753 you need to stop in SEA:
15JUL-FRI-
CO 786 ANC-SEA-IAH 1255A 1220P 753

[Edited 2005-03-24 18:41:46]
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:43 am

Like I've said a million times... people flew DC-8s and 707s far further.

N
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 3:48 am

I could only understand any hubbub over this if the planes were configured for short-haul service. Certainly we all flew 707's and DC-8's much further than Texas to Alaska in the day, but with aircraft outfitted with long-haul seats and provisioned with full meals.. Not on an aircraft designed to run shuttle hops all day.

I've only been on one CO 737NG so far, as part of a NW code-share MSP-EWR and it was okay, but nothing to write home about. The 757's NW used on the 3 other flights on the rest of my ticket had interiors more well-suited to a long-haul than CO's.

I've always flinched when I see a 737 flying any kind of distance, or cross-country (remembering NYAir's -300's flying LAX-IAD nonstop), but I have to say I'm beginning to warm up to the -800's suitability after flying a short distance a few times on this plane with Delta. There will always be travelers skeptical of more than 3-4 hours on a narrow body plane until we're sure of what we'll be up against.
International Homo of Mystery
 
desertjets
Posts: 7575
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 3:12 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:00 am

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 42):
Like I've said a million times... people flew DC-8s and 707s far further.

Not to mention all those poor SOBs who had to endure DC-6s, DC-7s, DC-4s, B377s, and Constellations. With cabins even more cramped and noisy than a 737.
Which makes me think this whole narrowbody on longhauls suck arguement even more hackneyed and played out than it is.

That said, CO offers a generally good product in coach these days. And I would suspect on such a long flight they'd adjust the service accordingly. Plus if you don't like the thought of flying a 737-800 you have many other options on CO and other airlines.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
 
ALB2ATL
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:57 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:03 am

Anyone have a photo of the 738 cabin with mid-galley and/or mid-lav - did not find anything...

Thanks!
 
antonovman
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2001 12:45 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:15 am

imagine over 7 hours in the middle seat with a great big fat person either side of you and the person in front with their seat fully reclined from take off to landing
must be horrific
1 hour on a 737 is more than enough for me
 
dutchjet
Posts: 7714
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2000 6:13 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:46 am

CO does use smaller aircraft on some longer haul routes - its a good strategy that seems to work for them.....using the 757 from EWR to Europe has been a money maker, allows CO to offer routes that other airlines dont consider, and keeps yeilds higher than the norm on some routes. The 738 is a good choice for the CO's "second" flight between ANC and IAH - maybe CO will think about re-launching the seasonal nonstop between ANC and EWR.

As "Wide-Body Comfort" is more illusion than fact, its really not a big deal what type of aircraft one is flying on - most pax do not know or care about the equipment operating a particular flight - pax do prefer low fares and nonstop service however. In general, coach passengers have the same amount of individual space on wide and narrow body airliners. As pointed out above, there is almost no difference between the flight experience on a 737NG and a 757 (I find the 738s to be more comfortable than CO's domestic 752s and all 753s in both F and Y class), a 7 hour segment on a 738 is not a problem. CO's 737NGs have inflight entertainment and are equipped for meal services.

No coach seat is comfortable for long flights, regardless of aircraft type, if the aircraft is configured with seats at a 31 inch or less pitch. As for middle seats, they exist on all types....being stuck in a middle coach seat on a 777 travelling between EWR and Tokyo or being stuck in a non-aisle seat of the 4 abreast center section of an A340 travelling between LAX and London is also no picnic.

I applaud CO for using smaller aircraft on long routes that otherwise would not benefit from nonstop service.
 
brons2
Posts: 2462
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 1:02 pm

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:58 am

IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) ANC (61°10'28"N 149°59'47"W) 2838 nm, 5256 km. Plane's range is 5500km.

Yes, the plane can make it...it is stretching it's legs a bit, but the plane is capable.

I believe this was the original question?
Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
 
Chugach
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:18 am

RE: Conti To Fly 737-824s Long Haul

Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:34 am

Repeating my earlier question...anybody else think CO could make the ANC-IAH nonstop a year-round flight using the 73G/738 in the winter months?
GO ROCKETS