AA767400
Topic Author
Posts: 1892
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2001 2:04 am

777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 1:45 am

Hello all!

I know that UA before pulling out of AKL had 772 service from AKL to LAX. Now, I know that the 777 has the range but is it allowed to fly LAX-SYD? Or is there a ETOPS problem? I also know that NZ will add their 777s to the Americas from New Zealand, but what about other airlines?

Can it work? And will any airline ever even consider such a route for the 777? Not that I am planning the death of UA, but if they are gone I would think that AA,CO, and/or DL, would like to jump on the chance.

Any thoughts, and answers are appreciated.  Smile
"The low fares airline."
 
B742
Posts: 3562
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:48 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 1:52 am

Yes it could work!

The only airline that would maybe consider the route would be AA as CO and DL do not have west coast hubs!

AA could maybe fly LAX-SYD, but I don't think it would happen anytime soon!

NZ are planning to fly their 777's to SFO from AKL!

Rob!
 
airxliban
Posts: 4285
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:14 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 2:12 am

I thought that UA flew 744s to AKL at the time?

Anyway, LAX-SYD is possible with ETOPS 180 which is what the 772 is certified for, isn't it?
PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
 
DfwRevolution
Posts: 8577
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:31 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 2:12 am

Quoting AA767400 (Thread starter):
Or is there a ETOPS problem? I also know that NZ will add their 777s to the Americas from New Zealand, but what about other airlines?

Not a major issue.... LAX-SYD can be flown with ETOPS 180
 
dutchjet
Posts: 7714
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2000 6:13 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 2:19 am

Quoting AirxLiban (Reply 2):
I thought that UA flew 744s to AKL at the time?


UA "downgraded" LAX-AKL from a 744 to a 772 for about 6 months before UA dropped the route entirely.

Quoting B742 (Reply 1):
Yes it could work!


AA could maybe fly LAX-SYD, but I don't think it would happen anytime soon!


Rob!

I agree, AA is just fine with the code-share arrangement with QF.


LAX-SYD is a high demand route, it seems that QF multiple 744s from LAX to SYD and other Australian destinations go out to capacity nearly everyday....thus, while there would not be a problem operating the 777 on the route, flights between the US and Australia are flown by the 744 for capacity reasons. Look for QF to use its A380s on the LAX-SYD/MEL routes for this reason.

Its been a long time since we heard about the proposed DFW-SYD route that was to be launched by either QF or AA (on a code-share basis) with 777-200LRs. Will it ever happen?
 
777STL
Posts: 2770
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:22 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 3:14 am

AA would never encroach on QF's turf with the LAX-Australia flights. AA is doing quite well feeding QF's routes anyway.

DL and CO don't have west coast hubs and neither could spare the 777s for Australian routes anyway. Though I guess CO could conceivably run something out of HNL but then again they'd also be in competition with HA on that route.
PHX based
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 4:14 am

It would be hard to compete on a fare basis by only flying a 777-200ER.

N
 
texdravid
Posts: 1397
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 3:21 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 4:25 am

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 4):
Its been a long time since we heard about the proposed DFW-SYD route that was to be launched by either QF or AA (on a code-share basis) with 777-200LRs. Will it ever happen?

I wouldn't lose sleep over it, as it has been discussed in this forum before and QF and/or AA would probably go to ORD anyway.
Tort reform now. Throw lawyers in jail later.
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 5:15 am

The B777-200ER cannot operate LAX-SYD with a commercially viable payload. The B777-200LR and B777-300ER can. It's not terribly difficult for an airline to get ETOPS 180 certification for the B777 which is all that's needed.

Note that SQ are expected to start this route soon, which will reduce or eliminate UA's profitability on this route. Since UA doesn't have the option of buying B777-300ER or any other aircraft while they are in Chapter 11, UA's only options are to either continue operating the B747-400 on this route or drop it entirely.
 
aa777jr
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:03 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 5:16 am

Quoting B742 (Reply 1):
AA could maybe fly LAX-SYD, but I don't think it would happen anytime soon!

AA is in bed with QF and their codeshares. No need to use their 772 on that route.

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 4):

UA "downgraded" LAX-AKL from a 744 to a 772 for about 6 months before UA dropped the route entirely.

Agreed.

Send QF to DFW!!!  Smile

Regards.
A liberal is a man who is right most of the time, but he's right too soon.
 
daron4000
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:17 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 5:24 am

When is SQ starting the service?
 
DfwRevolution
Posts: 8577
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:31 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 5:27 am

Quoting Daron4000 (Reply 10):
When is SQ starting the service?

To DFW? There are no plans for such service
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 5:30 am

Quoting Daron4000 (Reply 10):
When is SQ starting the service?

SQ are awaiting final permission from the Australian government to begin SYD-LAX. Since SQ won't have B777-300ERs yet, I expect the route will be operated using the B747-400.
 
ConcordeBoy
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 9:57 am

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 8):
The B777-200ER cannot operate LAX-SYD with a commercially viable payload.

That's not true, a 656K 772ER would be able to op the route just fine on a typical basis, so far as profit-potential payload goes.

In the case of UA, on the other hand:
doing the route with 648K PW4090s wasn't exactly their optimum choice.
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
 
aussie747
Posts: 1005
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 11:15 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 11:53 am

More than likely when SQ get permission to operate it will be initially from Secondary cities (MEL/BNE etc). The Australian government is very protective giving SQ rights to operate SYD to USA, and will most likely be part of a second tranche of rights down the track IMHO. SQ obviously are dissapointed at this and will exercise full force to get rights to SYD.

This hasn't been mentioned, if QF order the 773ER/772LR later this year, what would be the chances of QF performing the hub buster philosophy that GEoff Dixon was talking about last month and using it for new city pairs.
 
jacobin777
Posts: 12262
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 1:02 pm

how about SFO-LAX...besides UA..there aren't any direct flights to SYD/MEL from the Bay Area...........one would need to fly down to LAX from SFO/SJC/OAK to fly a competing carrier (or fly NZ from SFO to New Zealand) .......looks like UA has a monopoly on this direct flight from SFO..
"Up the Irons!"
 
Ozair
Posts: 1367
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 3:35 pm

Quoting ConcordeBoy (Reply 13):
In the case of UA, on the other hand:
doing the route with 648K PW4090s wasn't exactly their optimum choice.

Agree, they used to fly out of LAX heavily weight restricted, not only due to distance but weather as well. The storms that would occur in the South pacific were often a cause for concern.

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 12):
Since SQ won't have B777-300ERs yet, I expect the route will be operated using the B747-400.

I would imagine SQ would use their 744s at the earliest opportunity even if they had spare 773ERs. They have a greater seat capacity which on SYD-LAX would benefit them greatly! I cannot see them requiring too long to gain the customer base required for the 744, and the SQ CEO has previously mentioned the route as an A380 option if rights are granted.

Quoting Aussie747 (Reply 14):
This hasn't been mentioned, if QF order the 773ER/772LR later this year, what would be the chances of QF performing the hub buster philosophy that GEoff Dixon was talking about last month and using it for new city pairs.

What city pairs really offer anything better than LAX. SFO is a possibility but JFK would only ever see a premium service similar to SQ's A345 services. I don't think this would effect their LAX runs in a significant manner. Can't see DFW, just not enough demand for a long run like that.
 
monteycarlos
Posts: 2018
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:16 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Mon May 16, 2005 4:16 pm

Just out of curiosity, how many airlines in the world are ETOPS 207 approved and who are they?
It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
 
aa777jr
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:03 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 1:02 am

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 17):
Just out of curiosity, how many airlines in the world are ETOPS 207 approved and who are they?

FAA gave a 15% increase from ETOPS 180 to ETOPS 207 to UA in 2001 for their T7 service across the Pacific.

Regards.
A liberal is a man who is right most of the time, but he's right too soon.
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 1:39 am

Quoting ConcordeBoy (Reply 13):
That's not true, a 656K 772ER would be able to op the route just fine on a typical basis, so far as profit-potential payload goes.

In the case of UA, on the other hand:
doing the route with 648K PW4090s wasn't exactly their optimum choice.

Thanks for the correction. I was thinking of UA's B777-200ERs.
 
ConcordeBoy
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 3:09 am

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 17):
Just out of curiosity, how many airlines in the world are ETOPS 207 approved and who are they?

Tough to say, considering that ETOPS207 is only granted on a case-by-case individual basis.
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
 
AussieItaliano
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 12:27 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 6:19 am

IIRC, SQ also stated the desire to operate from SYD to other US citiesbesides LAX. I could see SFO, HNL, ORD, or NYC as possibilities if SQ orders the 772LR as anticipated.
Third Runway - LHR, Second Runway - LGW, Build Them Both!!!
 
6thfreedom
Posts: 2617
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:09 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 9:21 am

Quoting AussieItaliano (Reply 21):
IIRC, SQ also stated the desire to operate from SYD to other US citiesbesides LAX. I could see SFO, HNL, ORD, or NYC as possibilities if SQ orders the 772LR as anticipated.

HNL??? probably the most unlikely, as I don't think there's enough front of plane travel to justify it.

I would think SQ's wishlist looks a little like this;
1. SYD-LAX
2. SYD-SFO
3. MEL/BNE-LAX
4.MEL/BNE-SFO
5. SYD-NYC
6.SYD-ORD

Anyone care to comment?
The above list takes into consideration possible flying distances with SQ's current fleet, as well as possible domestic link with UA over LAX and SFO.
 
jupiter2
Posts: 956
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2001 11:30 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 9:38 am

6th Freedom, you have given me a good laugh with that SQ wish list !!!

They will be lucky to get the rights to do US flights from Australia. Far more likely will be Virgin Blue operating the route under whatever guise they come up with long before SQ will ever get the rights. In fact I would go on to say that SQ 744's will fly the route, but they will be wearing Pacific Blue colours or whatever they end up calling themselves.
RL
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 9:40 am

I can't see SQ operating BNE-USA for the same reason that I can't see SQ operating SYD-HNL: these are low-yield markets. If SIN-HNL is not interesting for SQ, it's difficult to imagine that SYD-HNL would be interesting.

The only routes I can see interesting SQ are:
SYD-LAX
MEL-LAX
SYD-SFO
SYD-JFK
Given the need for daily service, I'm not sure any of the latter three would support the addition of more than B777-200 capacity.
 
6thfreedom
Posts: 2617
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:09 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 9:52 am

Quoting Jupiter2 (Reply 23):
6th Freedom, you have given me a good laugh with that SQ wish list !!!

They will be lucky to get the rights to do US flights from Australia. Far more likely will be Virgin Blue operating the route under whatever guise they come up with long before SQ will ever get the rights.

Really?
And what are your thoughts on a possible SQ purchase of QF shares within say... two years? Beyond all possibility?

I would like to know your views on this before I can judge your comments above.
 
krisyyz
Posts: 1266
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:04 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 10:43 am

AC is planning YVR-SYD when its B772LR's arrive.

Krisyyz
 
aussie747
Posts: 1005
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 11:15 pm

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 11:53 am

Quoting Krisyyz (Reply 26):
AC is planning YVR-SYD when its B772LR's arrive.

Krisyyz

According to my Coporate Sales Manager at AC in Australia just this morning. YVR-SYD will be the first route for the 772LR
 
jupiter2
Posts: 956
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2001 11:30 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 12:00 pm

6thFreedom,

SQ buying into QF is a lot more realsitic than some of those routes you proposed for SQ. If they do buy into QF that will be the last you hear of SQ wanting Australia/US rights.

Although having said that, they appear to have strained the somewhat cosy arrangement they seemed to be developing over recent years.

AC 777 LR's to SYD....... sensational !!!

RL
 
6thfreedom
Posts: 2617
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:09 am

RE: 777 LAX-SYD?

Tue May 17, 2005 12:12 pm

Quoting Aussie747 (Reply 27):
According to my Coporate Sales Manager at AC in Australia just this morning. YVR-SYD will be the first route for the 772LR

When is this due to happen?
And does this mean that MEL services will recommence via HNL with a B763???

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexdk, Ammad, Andy33, drew777, flyguy89, fraspotter, gstpa, JJV, LAX772LR, pdx, ra132914, robsaw, SCQ83, StTim, Yahoo [Bot] and 251 guests