IL76TD
Topic Author
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 1:02 am

Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 4:35 am

Out of curiousity, what are some of the popular turboprop biz'props' out there. I'm familiar with Pilatus, but are there other ones out there with decent ranges. Looking for 4-8 people and pressurized cabin of course.

What is the longest range turboprop biz aircraft?
 
desertjets
Posts: 7570
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 3:12 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 4:49 am

The most popular would be the Beechcraft King Air line. Its been in production in various versions since the mid 1960s. And from what I hear the Super King 350 has some pretty long legs and can carry an impressive load.

Both Cessna and Piper made turboprop twin versions of their large cabin class twins. The C-425/441 Conquest at Cessna and the Cheyenne at Piper. Rockwell (or was it Grumman) had the Turbo Commander series, again some versions were piston powered. They are pretty distinctive looking with their high mounted wings.

But other than the King Air, Pilatus PC-12, the only other business turboprop in production that I know of off hand is the Socota TBM-700, single engined turboprop about the size of a King Air C90.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
 
sanjet
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:58 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 4:49 am

The king air is one of the most popular business turbo props I've heard. Don't know the range but I heard it's really good, specially the king air 350.
Will Fly For Food!
 
EMBQA
Posts: 7797
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:52 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 4:52 am

Yup.... one of the best sellers of all time....


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jerry Search

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
 
legacy135
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:06 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 4:59 am

One of the most popular is the Beech King Air, with it's last version, the King Air 350 still in production and just updated with Collins Proline 21 avionics. Socata is a competitor in the single engine market with it's TBM 700, a small 6 seater they guarantee you 300 knots cruise. I real hot bird is the Piaggio which is a kind of "semi - canard" design, powered by 2 PT6 turbines, driving two push-props. The Piaggio is real fast (395 knots true airspeed) and has a very roomy cabin.
For sure, there are many models which are now more produced like Conquests from Cessna, AC690 ties made by Rockwell or Piper's Cheyenne's.
Manly the smaller Jet's like Ciation's and now lately Citation Jets or also called "CJ's" drove the turboprobs more and more out of market as those jets are normally cheaper to operate. There is still a small market which is basically served by Beech with the King Air. Piaggio is more a competitor to the small jets, as their plane is even faster than a CJ but has a roomier cabin. Pilatus with it's PC12 and Socata with the TBM 700 do actually more serve the people which owned before the big piston twins like "Golden Eagle's" or Navajo's.
But the market keeps interesting as there are many so called "Very Light Jet's" in development. Those aircrafts will be in a price range from 1 to 2,5 Mio $ and offer 4 to 6 seats, mainly designed for the owner pilot, a market also the PC12 and the TBM700 are serving.
 
DLKAPA
Posts: 7962
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:37 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 5:02 am

Either the Pilatus PC-12 or Piaggio Avanti are the fastest turboprops out right now. Can't remember which.
And all at once the crowd begins to sing: Sometimes the hardest thing and the right thing are the same
 
xjramper
Posts: 2318
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:10 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 5:07 am


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kevin Minter - Mint Photography
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Václav Kudela



The Piaggio p-180's are making a comeback as a business aircraft. Quick aircraft and high altitude are a plus in this aircraft.

XJR
Look ma' no hands!
 
legacy135
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:06 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 5:12 am

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 5):
Either the Pilatus PC-12 or Piaggio Avanti are the fastest turboprops out right now. Can't remember which.

Well, the PC12 is not that fast. It does about 260 honest knots, meanwhile the Avanti goes real close to 400 and is probably one of the fastest propeller drivens. The PC12 is more like a "flying SUV" multipurpose plane, offering a comfortable pressurized cabin, taking somewhat up to 11 people as commuter or offering real utility trough it's hugh aft cargo door. The one Pilatus that's real fast is the PC21. This plane is a tandem military trainer just in the last stage of the certification process. It is a single engine tandem plane, equipped by a PT6 turbine that drives a 5 blade prop and giving the plane up to Mach 0.7 cruising speed. But this is plane is not developed for the civil market and so may not really be of your interest.
 
User avatar
c172akula
Posts: 821
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 1:53 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 7:16 am

I'm pretty sure that the TBM-700 is faster than the PC-12 anyday. I had the chance to take one up last week here in YYC and we were making about 280 indicated at 24,000'.
 
legacy135
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:06 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 7:30 am

Quoting C172Akula (Reply 8):
I'm pretty sure that the TBM-700 is faster than the PC-12 anyday. I had the chance to take one up last week here in YYC and we were making about 280 indicated at 24,000'.

This is for sure and you didn't go max speed then, the TBM700 goes even faster. But that's what I've listed above, giving a quick overview. The TBM700 is the BMW, the PC12 the luxury van  Wink
 
OzLAME
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:40 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 12:57 pm

Beech turboprops currently in production are the C90A, B200 and B300 King Airs. Over 5000 of the series have been built. The B300, aka Super King Air 350 is in service with the Royal Australian Air Force here. It can easily fly with a decent load non-stop from East Sale RAAF Base to Darwin, which is around 1800nm. Drawback is the cost, I think it is about $6m USD new. It is far more capable than any of the light jets however.

The TBM700 and the Piper Meridian are single-engine six-seaters aimed at the flying doctors and dentists. The Piper especially is quite small. You could also get yourself a piston-engined Piper Malibu and re-engine it with a PT-6.

The Pilatus PC-12 has the same size cabin as a King Air 200, it has a big side cargo door so is a very useful aeroplane.

Don't know much about the Piaggio other than it's fast and very sexy.

Out-of production a/c include the Piper Cheyenne, the 400LS model with the Garrett TPE331 engines is good for 400MPH and FL400. There is also the Mitsubishi MU-2 series, a very unforgiving aircraft but some models are also very good performers, also reaching FL400 and over 300kts. They can be quite cheap to buy, due both to their reputation and because they are getting a bit old now. You could probably buy two or even three MU-2s for the price of one Cessna 441 Conquest.

Another one is the Swearingen/Fairchild Merlin series, you have a choice of either the original short fuselage a/c or what is pretty much a Metro. Someone showed me an Amway brochure once, with bios of all the Amway success stories. A lot of those guys had Merlin/Metro a/c. There are also the F90 and 100 series King Airs, they are pretty old now as well. Don't forget the Gulfstream G1 either, but that is in a different league altogether.
Monty Python's Flying Circus has nothing to do with aviation, except perhaps for Management personnel.
 
FlapsDown20
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 1:33 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 12:58 pm

The Piaggio 180 Avanti is by far the most attractive biz prop in existence and quite a speed queen at that. The Avanti has been spotted here at MKC several times in the past few years and the last time I got a price quote they were asking 2.1 million for the beauty parked at Executive Beechcraft. Had I 2.1 million, I'd take a bite on that lovely work of art. The King Airs are a dime a dozen, mundane, pedestrian aircraft for the bizman golfer headed to Bay
 
bond007
Posts: 4423
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:07 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 10:18 pm

Did anybody mention the Cessna Caravan??

..and don't forget that the NASCAR teams like those used speedy Saab 2000's

Jimbo

[Edited 2005-05-18 15:21:39]
I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
 
kbfispotter
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Wed May 18, 2005 10:57 pm

I am surprised that no one mentioned the New Piper PA-41-500T Malibu Meridian. It is a six seater based loosely on the Malibu Mirage..... Looks allot like a TBM-700. There are also the occasional corporate Merlin/Metro and Jetstream.


KBFIspotter
Proud to be an A&P!!!
 
NightFlier
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:44 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 12:50 am

The KingAir is the most popular but sucks to fuel. By one self it can take up to 30 minutes if it needs a topoff on all 4 tanks.

The Piaggio is quiet, cool looking, and easy to fuel.  trophy 

The grand Caravan is the worst out of them all, especially the amphibian. I can only imagine trying to fuel that thing when the waves near the dock are splashing up against it. To fuel that plane you need a very tall latter, airstairs, or you can stand on the back of the jet truck if it is tall enough sarcastic 

Most people dont care when they buy one of these planes because they wont be fueling it. But test have shown that an aircraft with a Single point refueling set up is less likely to have contamination of the fuel during the refueling procedure, then an over wing aircraft.

 psst  I would go with the Piaggio
Airplanes are only as good as the people who fly&fix them.
 
kbfispotter
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 1:09 am

Quoting NightFlier (Reply 14):
The grand Caravan is the worst out of them all, especially the amphibian. I can only imagine trying to fuel that thing when the waves near the dock are splashing up against it. To fuel that plane you need a very tall latter, airstairs, or you can stand on the back of the jet truck if it is tall enough

I can testify to that. I had an amphib 208B come in during the middle of the night a few weeks ago and I had to set up a ladder on top of the jet fuel truck to get to the tanks. Those suckers are HIGH!!!!!!!!!!!

I will agree, single point rules! I love the Piaggio.

Long Live the Flying Pickle!!!!!


KBFIspotter
Proud to be an A&P!!!
 
legacy135
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:06 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 2:39 am

Quoting NightFlier (Reply 14):
I would go with the Piaggio

Well, the question here is how much you want to spend and what the use for this aircraft will be.
I absolutely do agree with you that a single point refueling is really cool and the most convenient way to fill it. BUT....... I guess nobody looking fro an Avanti is really going for a Caravan or vice versa. Could you imagine going on floats with an Avanti or landing in front of your farm? A Caravan does it easily. On the other hand if you prefer it real fast with a nice big cabin, enjoying pressurized flying above the weather, well then you should go for the Avanti. The thing is, the Caravan is a competitor for planes like a PC6, the Avanti on the other hand is mostly in competition with the light jets. It's like a van, it does not really compete a luxury limousine either.
 
milesrich
Posts: 1508
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 2:46 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 1:56 pm

You all forget the MU-2. A fast twin turboprop that was quite popular 20 years ago.
 
jeb94
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:19 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 2:34 pm

There is a jetprop conversion available for the Cessna 210. Just about any jetprop airliner serves in the corporate roll such as the Fairchild/Dornier 328, the EMB-110 and 120, the Beech 1900, etc...
 
OzLAME
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:40 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 8:52 pm

Quoting KBFIspotter (Reply 13):
am surprised that no one mentioned the New Piper PA-41-500T Malibu Meridian. It is a six seater based loosely on the Malibu Mirage..... Looks allot like a TBM-700. There are also the occasional corporate Merlin/Metro



Quoting Milesrich (Reply 17):
You all forget the MU-2. A fast twin turboprop that was quite popular 20 years ago.

I mentioned all of those types previously. Hmmm..... no smiley for "blowing my own trumpet". Hmmm..... no smiley for "smartarse" either.  razz  The Meridian is a lot smaller than the TBM 700, it really is a PT-6 Malibu. BTW a guy I know who had his Malibu re-engined with a PT-6 says it performs better than the Meridian due to having a more powerful engine.

Quoting KBFIspotter (Reply 15):
can testify to that. I had an amphib 208B come in during the middle of the night a few weeks ago and I had to set up a ladder on top of the jet fuel truck to get to the tanks. Those suckers are HIGH!!!!!!!!!!!

I will agree, single point rules!

Single point refuelling is available for the Cessna Caravan, IIRC as an S.B. Kit. The refuelling point is located in one of the fuselage strut fairings.
Monty Python's Flying Circus has nothing to do with aviation, except perhaps for Management personnel.
 
User avatar
tjwgrr
Posts: 2002
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2000 4:09 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 9:58 pm

Turbine conversion also available for the Beech Bonanza.

Beech Bonanza w/ turbine conversion:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Markerson



Meridian:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Freight-Dawg



TBM700

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © George Canciani



Pilatus PC-12

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Danny Fritsche

Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
 
bond007
Posts: 4423
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:07 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 10:18 pm

There are also some NEW turboprops out there:

The Czech IBIS Ae270 and the Epic LT - both flying at least prototype versions!


Jimbo
I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
 
diesel1
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 9:11 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Thu May 19, 2005 10:21 pm

My favourite...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bill Sheridan
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ian Robertson



Like OZlame said, a different league altogether, and the forerunner to the G159 sereies of bizjets.
I don't like signatures...
 
kbfispotter
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 1:11 am

Quoting OzLAME (Reply 19):
Quoting KBFIspotter (Reply 13):
am surprised that no one mentioned the New Piper PA-41-500T Malibu Meridian. It is a six seater based loosely on the Malibu Mirage..... Looks allot like a TBM-700. There are also the occasional corporate Merlin/Metro



Quoting Milesrich (Reply 17):
You all forget the MU-2. A fast twin turboprop that was quite popular 20 years ago.

I mentioned all of those types previously. Hmmm..... no smiley for "blowing my own trumpet". Hmmm..... no smiley for "smartarse" either. The Meridian is a lot smaller than the TBM 700, it really is a PT-6 Malibu. BTW a guy I know who had his Malibu re-engined with a PT-6 says it performs better than the Meridian due to having a more powerful engine.

Sorry about that.... I missed your post when I originally read the thread......... banghead 
The Malibu Meridian is not just a Malibu Mirage with a PT-6 bolted on like mentioned above. Piper basically redesigned the wing and tail surface to accomadate the more powerfull turboprop. As a result, you have increased wing area, tail area, and slightly redesigned fuselage.

Quoting OzLAME (Reply 19):
Single point refuelling is available for the Cessna Caravan, IIRC as an S.B. Kit. The refuelling point is located in one of the fuselage strut fairings.

How long has this been offered? I have never heard of it before. It would be a welcome feature to have as standard to the amphibs.  Wow!
Proud to be an A&P!!!
 
legacy135
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:06 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 3:53 am

Quoting OzLAME (Reply 19):
it really is a PT-6 Malibu. BTW a guy I know who had his Malibu re-engined with a PT-6 says it performs better than the Meridian due to having a more powerful engine.

There are actually two versions of PT6 powered Malibus around. The one is the Meridian which is as KBFIspotter correctly say in the previous message a basically new aircraft that was developed on the base of the Malibu Mirage.
The other one is called X-prop conversion. If I remember right it's done in Tacoma or Seattle. What many people do, they take their original Piston Malibu there and let it refit with the PT6 engine.
One of the real strong parts of either version with the turbine on, compared to the piston one is everything related with climb and descend. The Malibu suffers from thermic problems. With it's original 350hp engine it is not so much powered for the weight of the plane. For sure it climbs much better with the turbine. But the real issue is the descend. Imagine, just idling this turbocharged-piston engine will completely shockcool it. Many engines needed to be replaced very early. You also get problems with the pressurization, just going into idle. The compressor won't be able any more to keep the cabin pressurized and it will start to climb. This can be very uncomfortable. Very often it is for that very difficult to comply with ATC's requests in IFR flying as they expect you to descend with 1000' to 2000 feet per minute and you might be able doing 600-700' and will already come close to the speed limit as the plane is very aerodynamic. So Piper gave you the option to lower the gear at 170 knots and then again to increase the speed. But how wants to lower the gear half an hour before landing? All those worries are gone with the PT6 conversion. There is no risk of shockcooling, it perfecly provides bleedair for the cabin and you can descend real steep as a propeller of a turboprop in idle is a great speedbrake.For sure it is expensive to put on but for an aircraft that is flown frequently, I think it pays. Also as you can operate it then by much cheaper jetfuel.
 
kbfispotter
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 6:54 am

Quoting Legacy135 (Reply 24):
The other one is called X-prop conversion. If I remember right it's done in Tacoma or Seattle.

Close. The X-Prop converion is done by JetpropDLX in Spokane.


KBFIspotter
Proud to be an A&P!!!
 
Boeing Nut
Posts: 5078
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 2:42 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 7:43 am

Quoting OzLAME (Reply 10):
The Pilatus PC-12 has the same size cabin as a King Air 200, it has a big side cargo door so is a very useful aeroplane.

Actually, sorry to nit pick, but the PC-12's cabin is actually a little bigger than the King Air 200/300. Not by much, but a little. It's an awesome airplane though, the only thing it lacks is speed. Grass strips, hauling motor cycles, or snow mobiles, up to ten total pax in a "corporate version". It would be the airplane of choice for me............ as if I had a choice!  banghead 

 biggrin 
I'm not a real aeronautical engineer, I just play one on Airliners.net.
 
legacy135
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:06 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 7:49 am

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 26):
Actually, sorry to nit pick, but the PC-12's cabin is actually a little bigger than the King Air 200/300. Not by much, but a little. It's an awesome airplane though, the only thing it lacks is speed. Grass strips, hauling motor cycles, or snow mobiles, up to ten total pax in a "corporate version". It would be the airplane of choice for me............ as if I had a choice

I can tell you that a couple of years ago was a project of putting two Williams Engines (as used on Cessnas CJ's) on top of the PC-12's wings, similar to the VFW614. This plane would have made up a 350 knot King Air, being able to land on grass. Unfortunately Pilatus decided to put first priority of development in the military PC21. Maybe one day they will come back to the this project. I would love it
 
OzLAME
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:40 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 2:48 pm

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 26):
the PC-12's cabin is actually a little bigger than the King Air 200/300.

I'm nitpicking now; one of the primary differences between the B200 and B300 King Air is that the 300 has a significantly longer cabin. I am happy to accept that the PC-12 is a bit bigger than the 200, as the PC-12 was probably designed to supplant it. I'd be very surprised if the PC-12 cabin is bigger than the B300's though.
Monty Python's Flying Circus has nothing to do with aviation, except perhaps for Management personnel.
 
legacy135
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:06 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 3:46 pm

Quoting OzLAME (Reply 28):
I'm nitpicking now; one of the primary differences between the B200 and B300 King Air is that the 300 has a significantly longer cabin. I am happy to accept that the PC-12 is a bit bigger than the 200, as the PC-12 was probably designed to supplant it. I'd be very surprised if the PC-12 cabin is bigger than the B300's though.

The cabin of the B200 and the B300 are identical. The one of the B350 is streched by "one window", let's say maybe 50 cm or 2 feet. The difference between the B200 and the B300 is mainly performance, as the B300 goes with much more powerful engines and became trough this a 300 knots aircraft. The B350 got then in addition also a pair of winglets.
Anyhow, you need to keep in mind, that the King Air's design is based on the Twin Bonanza, the socalled "T-Bone". It went then trough the Queen Air to the King Air 90, before Beech developed out of the King Air 100 (a strech of the 90) the first Super King Air. This was the birth of the B200. But even this plane goes back to the mid-70ties. So the design is the evolution of maybe a 50 years process in total, based on a much smaller plane.
The PC-12 on the other hand was developed exactly how it is yet. From 0 on. This started around 1990. The cabin is optimized exactly for it's use and has a great crossection. This gives you quite some cubic-inches more in room, even when looking similar from the outside.
 
Boeing Nut
Posts: 5078
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 2:42 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Fri May 20, 2005 11:28 pm

Quoting Legacy135 (Reply 27):
I can tell you that a couple of years ago was a project of putting two Williams Engines (as used on Cessnas CJ's) on top of the PC-12's wings, similar to the VFW614. This plane would have made up a 350 knot King Air, being able to land on grass. Unfortunately Pilatus decided to put first priority of development in the military PC21. Maybe one day they will come back to the this project. I would love it

Ooo, sorry, IMO, I think that would look hidious.  vomit  The speed increase would be awesome though.
I'm not a real aeronautical engineer, I just play one on Airliners.net.
 
sacflyer
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 8:19 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Sat May 21, 2005 1:13 am

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 26):
Actually, sorry to nit pick, but the PC-12's cabin is actually a little bigger than the King Air 200/300.

Actually, according to the respective websites, the Pilatus' cabin is 330 cubic feet while the King Air B200's is 388 cubic feet.
I'm just happy that RR ratings can't be in negative numbers!
 
Boeing Nut
Posts: 5078
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 2:42 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Sat May 21, 2005 1:37 am

Quoting Sacflyer (Reply 31):
Actually, according to the respective websites, the Pilatus' cabin is 330 cubic feet while the King Air B200's is 388 cubic feet.

Actually, LOL - just kidding. In reality though, in a brochure for a Pilatus PC-12, they list cabin volume not excluding the cockpit as 330 cu. ft. The King Air 200 also list cabin volume on their website as not including the cockpit as 303 cu. ft. Pilatus doesn't mention what the total volume - including the cockpit - actually is. So, it could be more, it could be less. One thing is for sure, the King Air 200 is a phenomenal aircraft. It's numbers and prestige are proof of that.

I'd still pick the PC-12 over it though. Imagine the goodies you can get in that barn door of a cargo door.  sly 
I'm not a real aeronautical engineer, I just play one on Airliners.net.
 
sacflyer
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 8:19 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Sat May 21, 2005 2:38 am

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 32):
In reality though, in a brochure for a Pilatus PC-12, they list cabin volume not excluding the cockpit as 330 cu. ft. The King Air 200 also list cabin volume on their website as not including the cockpit as 303 cu. ft. Pilatus doesn't mention what the total volume - including the cockpit - actually is. So, it could be more, it could be less.

It seems you are correct. I rechecked the specifications on the Pilatus web-site and it does state that the cabin volume of 330 cu. ft. is from the cockpit/cabin bulkhead to the rear pressure bulkhead.

Here are the interior cabin dimensions for both aircraft:

King Air 200

Length: 16' 8"
Height: 4' 9"
Width: 4' 6"
Cabin Volume including Lav and Baggage Area: 303 cu. ft.
Cockpit Volume: 85 cu. ft.

Pilatus

Length: 16' 11"
Height: 4' 9"
Width: 5' 0"
Cabin Floor Width: 4' 3"
Cabin Volume (Cockpit/Cabin bulkhead to the rear pressure bulkhead): 330 cu. ft.
I had taken the phrase on the website that 330 cu. ft. "with room for 8 passengers" to mean that the cockpit was included because the executive version only has 7-8 seats total. I had forgotten about the airliner version.
I'm just happy that RR ratings can't be in negative numbers!
 
Boeing Nut
Posts: 5078
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 2:42 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Sat May 21, 2005 2:40 am

So which one would you have Sacflyer? Just curious.
I'm not a real aeronautical engineer, I just play one on Airliners.net.
 
OzLAME
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:40 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Tue May 24, 2005 11:05 am

Quoting Legacy135 (Reply 29):
The cabin of the B200 and the B300 are identical. The one of the B350 is streched by "one window", let's say maybe 50 cm or 2 feet. The difference between the B200 and the B300 is mainly performance, as the B300 goes with much more powerful engines and became trough this a 300 knots aircraft. The B350 got then in addition also a pair of winglets.

I think you are confusing Model designations (which I was using) and aircraft names. The various Models of T-tail King Airs are F90 and F90-1; 200 and A100-1; B200/B200C/B200T/B200CT/A200/A200C/A200CT and 1300; 300 and 300LW; and B300 and B300C. The A100-1s are Model 200s for the US Army, the A200 series are US military C-12 series a/c. The 1300 is an airliner version of the B200. The C model suffix is for Cargo Door; the T is for Tip Tank, the Ts also have a camera porthole in the belly.

There is no Model B350, the B300 is marketed as the 350 Super King Air. The 300 and 300LW have the same basic fuselage as the 200 and B200. The B300 has two extra windows each side, for a stretch of almost a metre, and (as you mentioned) winglets on the tips of wings that are significantly longer in span.

Quoting Legacy135 (Reply 29):
Anyhow, you need to keep in mind, that the King Air's design is based on the Twin Bonanza, the socalled "T-Bone". It went then trough the Queen Air to the King Air 90, before Beech developed out of the King Air 100 (a strech of the 90) the first Super King Air.

You can also trace the design of the Fairchild Metro back to the Twin Bonanza. Ed Swearingen designed the Excalibur modification of the Queen Air (with 8-cylinder Lycoming piston engines), then went on to build the Merlin, with a pressurised fuselage based on the Queen Air's, on a Queen Air wing with Twin Bonanza landing gear and Queen Air tail.

Here are a Twin Bonanza and early-build Queen Air:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Barry J Collman
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria


This is an Excalibur conversion of a 65-B80 Queen Air:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Neville Murphy
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Greg Meechan


These are early-build Merlins:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ivan Azzopardi
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Antonio Carrasquilla - Iberian Spotters


Then of course you end up with these:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Oliver Richter
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joachim Lippl

Monty Python's Flying Circus has nothing to do with aviation, except perhaps for Management personnel.
 
texan
Posts: 4059
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 2:23 am

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Tue May 24, 2005 11:38 am

Not that this should have any bearing on which aircraft someone buys, but the line guys and people who work anywhere in the general vicinity of a GA ramp really prefer aircraft that are not Turbo Commanders or MU-2s  Smile Those suckers are louder than all get out!

We routinely have King Air's flying in from SUA, SAV, and Clinton, Iowa, as well as the short flights from ILE, HOU, TYR, TXK, LBB, MAF, and AMA. Very versatile aircraft used for both business and gut runs. Got a pilot here who really knows how to squeeze all the juice out of the King Air's engines and can make the run from HOU to DAL literally 10 minutes faster than the majority of KA pilots! People love flying with him  Smile

Texan
"I have always imagined that Paradise will be a kind of library."
 
MD-90
Posts: 7835
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2000 12:45 pm

RE: Turboprop Business Aircraft

Tue May 24, 2005 12:28 pm

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 26):
Actually, sorry to nit pick, but the PC-12's cabin is actually a little bigger than the King Air 200/300. Not by much, but a little. It's an awesome airplane though, the only thing it lacks is speed. Grass strips,

I'd be hard pressed to call 260 knots in a turboprop slow. And who can forget all those years of Pilatus ads touting the size of the PC-12's cabin.

Personally, my favorites are the Socata TBM 700C2, which is a genuine fill-the-tanks and all of the seats airplane (but it won't do the magic 300 knots when it's heavy), the PC-12 for it's well-designed flexibility, and the Piaggio P-180 for its sheer speed, beauty, and amazingly large cabin.

And no one has yet mentioned the Turbo Commanders by Rockwell. Here's a really nice 690B model.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jorge oppenheimer
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jorge oppenheimer

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abeam79, Alexa [Bot], Andy33, austinairport, DavidByrne, ikolkyo, IslandRob, raylee67, SteinarN and 175 guests