JMV
Topic Author
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 4:22 am

Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 2:56 am

Going against a trend, I'd prefer to see the airlines use smaller overhead bins. As I see it, smaller bins would resolve a number of problems...

1) Boarding would be faster because fewer people would carry on bags. No more waiting in the aisle for someone to try to fit an overstuffed rollaboard in the overhead, usually 10 to 20 seats forward of their own assigned seat. You also avoid the delays that come with finally having to check carry-on bags because they are too large or the overheads are full.

2) Deplanning would be faster, and safer. No more getting thumped on the head from either shifting luggage falling from bin when it is first opened, or someone not strong enough to remove the luggage without it falling on you. You also wouldn't have to wait while a fellow passenger tries to pry the same overstuffed rollaboard from the bin.

3) Flight attendants would have better attitudes knowing they wouldn't have to deal with surly passengers who insist on their steamer trunk should fit in the overhead bin. Also, they would be less likely to hurt themselves while trying lift a bag that could weigh half as much as they do.

4) Interiors of planes would be more open, less claustrophobic because the bins wouldn't be inches above your head and extend nearly to the middle of the cabin. Compare the interior of the B-707 with that of the B-757.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ellis M. Chernoff
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Daniel Werner



5) Getting through security would be faster because there would be less bags to scan and search.

Certainly the airlines would have to do a better job of handling checked baggage, but if you ask me, I'd prefer smaller overhead bins.
Google begins where my brain ends! ©
 
petazulu
Posts: 683
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 3:32 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:07 am

Not me!

1. People would still bring the rolly bags as they would not know bins were smaller. Bins would be full even sooner and boarding would take even longer due to this.

2. How often have you actually been thumped on the head with anything heavy in an airplane? Is this a huge epedemic?

3. Bags should not weigh more than then half an FA. Enforce the existing rules. If you are not going to enforce the rules, the steamer trunk will be even LESS likely to fit than in a bigger bin.

4. Refitting aircraft o be mor eopen will be expensive as among other things, you would have to relocate the passenger service units (air masks, vents, tv's, lights, etc. Ouch!

5. You are right about security lines, but the TSA would cut staffing if people had fewer backs- so it is arguable that this would occur.

Overall, airlines should enforce their rules better before people board. You have to allow business pax the ability to bring a generous ammount on board as if I had to check my crap in for a one hour flight on an overnight trip, I would most likely not fly or take the airline with the more generous policy.
 
User avatar
Vasu
Posts: 2943
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:34 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:09 am

That's a really good point JMV...
and as well as this, I think the airlines should have tighter control over what people carry onboard... maybe a "let's see your carry on items" at checkin?
 
ssides
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 12:57 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:10 am

Well, the market has spoken -- and I can guarantee you that larger overhead bins are a money-maker for airlines.

The reasoning is simple: airlines make their money off the road-warrior business traveler who flies 4-5 times a month at close to full fare. For these people, convenience and quickness are paramount. If you're away from your family a considerable amount, every minute counts. You don't want to wait for checked bags to arrive. If you have important business meetings, you want to be certain that your suit arrives and is not damaged. You don't want to risk putting important documents, etc., into the cargo hold. Therefore, you carry on.

If an airline decided to shrink its overhead bins, it would likely lose the business traveler to a competitor. No airline wants to do this. Add that to the fact that it's generally cheaper to have passengers carry their own bags rather than pay handlers, and it just makes sense to have larger bins.
"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
 
andz
Posts: 7626
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:49 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:13 am

Quoting Vasu (Reply 2):
maybe a "let's see your carry on items" at checkin?

They do that here. I have always been astounded when flying in the US at how much crap people bring as "carry on". If it's carry on, try and carry it, not wheel it!
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13760
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:22 am

so you would have someone with a bad back or shoulder not be allowed a carry on because they have to wheel it? In america, we cater to the weak and feable  Wink
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
andz
Posts: 7626
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:49 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:24 am

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 5):
so you would have someone with a bad back or shoulder not be allowed a carry on because they have to wheel it? In america, we cater to the weak and feable

But more to the totally inconsiderate.
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:27 am

I dont think people realize the true reason why airlines invest money in large overhead bins.
Its a very simple business decision.

Large overhead bins and more carry on bags =

Less checked baggage
Less ramp staff
Less ramp equipment
Less employee personal injury / disability claims
Less staff
Less lost baggage
More room for mail/cargo

= Less cost.

One major US airline a couple years refitted their entire fleet with larger bins to encourage passengers to carry on more of their luggage.

After 9/11 a US couple airlines even threatened to sue the TSA over proposed rules limiting carry on luggage size and amounts which were to be screened at the check points.

Larger bins are a relatively inexpensive, and quantifiable way to drive overall cost down at airlines.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
User avatar
PipoA380
Posts: 1537
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 1:36 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:40 am

I think it's really not a so good idea. First of all, when traveling often, it's so much more convenient when people carry their carry-on, or roll-on, as long as you respect the rules of size.

Actually the examples you show there are all Boeing. Airbus has more space even with big overhead bins.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gabriel Savit
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Robert Domandl



Deplaning is long because people stand up before the plane even stops, and wait in the aisle all on top of the other to run out of the plane, the same way than they run into it to stand in line.

Boarding takes long because people don't know that there are 100 people waiting behind them when putting their handbag in the bin, to take out their book. People will still take out their walkman, book, make-up box or whatsoever... Making smaller bins won't change that. It doesn't occur often that it's someone who can't fit the bag up there: It's more because they can't read their seat number on the boarding card....

Flight Attendants should pay attention that people do not carry these over-sized packages all the way to the aircraft. Maybe some size controls at the security check would do the job or stronger controls at the check-in

And if the plane is late, it's not because of a bag, but because the same guy who can't read the number of his seat on the boarding pass was also unable to find the number of his gate in the terminal   

[Edited 2005-05-23 20:44:23]

[Edited 2005-05-23 20:45:08]
It's not about AIRBUS. it's not about BOEING. It's all about the beauty of FLYING.
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 am

Quoting PipoA380 (Reply 8):
Maybe some size controls at the security check would do the job or stronger controls at the check-in

Was tried in 2000 @ IAD by UA, but CO sued on the grounds of anti-competitive practices (Continental had a more traveler friendly carry on policy), as all of the x-ray machines were fitted with these baggage sizers. CO was successful in getting the sizers removed.

http://www.continental.com/vendors/d...234A5C8269802D297A887C&s=&i=PRNews
http://www.continental.com/vendors/d...234A5C8269802D297A887C&s=&i=PRNews

When I fly, I carry a carry on and the one personal bag I am allowed and try not to check any bags (This is because having worked on the ramp, I know what goes on in the bins. Not that this happends all the time, I just prefer to err on the side of caution and avoid overpacking to begin with.). Anything I may need during the flight is in my personal bag, which is put under the seat in front of me, and the carry on remains in the overhead bin for the duration of the flight.
 
User avatar
PipoA380
Posts: 1537
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 1:36 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 4:38 am

Quoting Srbmod (Reply 9):

You link doesn't work Srbmod.

When I travel, I do it the same way than you, but people don't always think about separating what you need and what you don't during the flight... And if ever I have something in the overhead bin... I'll wait till passengers have finished boarding!
It's not about AIRBUS. it's not about BOEING. It's all about the beauty of FLYING.
 
Byrdluvs747
Posts: 2375
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 5:25 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 6:51 am

I believe airports should start using those sizer cutouts they used to have on the xray machines. Those were great days. I could spend hours watching all the a-holes having to walk back to the ticket counter to check their luggage.
The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
 
ScottB
Posts: 5446
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 1:25 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:23 am

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
1) Boarding would be faster because fewer people would carry on bags. No more waiting in the aisle for someone to try to fit an overstuffed rollaboard in the overhead, usually 10 to 20 seats forward of their own assigned seat. You also avoid the delays that come with finally having to check carry-on bags because they are too large or the overheads are full.

Nope, what you'd see instead is people trying to carry aboard the largest possible bag (or larger) which would fit underneath the seat in front and spend two minutes in the aisle trying to wedge it in there. Then the flight attendants would spend half an hour checking all the bags which didn't really fit underneath the seats in front.

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
3) Flight attendants would have better attitudes knowing they wouldn't have to deal with surly passengers who insist on their steamer trunk should fit in the overhead bin.

So they'd be dealing with passengers who are ticked off because their carry-on which used to fit in the bins won't anymore. And they'd still be checking all the oversized bags which obstruct the floor in the rows.

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
4) Interiors of planes would be more open, less claustrophobic because the bins wouldn't be inches above your head and extend nearly to the middle of the cabin.

I prefer claustrophobic interiors to 30-45 minutes spent in claustrophobic baggage claim areas or baggage service offices due to lost/misconnected luggage.

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
5) Getting through security would be faster because there would be less bags to scan and search.

As others have said -- with less demand for screening capacity, there would be less screening capacity instead.

I guess you haven't been without your luggage for three to seven days, eh?
 
LH423
Posts: 5868
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 1999 6:27 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 1:11 pm

Quoting Ssides (Reply 3):
The reasoning is simple: airlines make their money off the road-warrior business traveler who flies 4-5 times a month at close to full fare

Yes, but everywhere else in the world business travellers value their time just as much as their American counterparts. However, the airlines have spoken that safety must be paramount. Imagine if someone's 40 lbs bag falls on your head. That can cause a serious injury. European airlines have limited hand baggage to 6-12 kg. Business travellers work around that. So, the idea that someone as to wait 10 mins extra for their bag doesn't hold water. Their time isn't that important. If it was, they'd be flying their private jet.

LH423
« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
 
ASMD80
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 1:56 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 1:31 pm

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
1) Boarding would be faster because fewer people would carry on bags. No more waiting in the aisle for someone to try to fit an overstuffed rollaboard in the overhead, usually 10 to 20 seats forward of their own assigned seat. You also avoid the delays that come with finally having to check carry-on bags because they are too large or the overheads are full.

Exactly! Multiple times, I have seen the plane slightly delayed (but able to take off on time) becuase there is no more room for rollaboards.

You can still experience smaller overhead bins on most MD80s  Wink
Some things are actually better at 30,000+ feet...
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 1:43 pm

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
Boarding would be faster because fewer people would carry on bags.

Never gonna happen - Tommy Tentpag and My VIP will continue to haul way too big and way too heavy bags onto airplanes with way too small bins and then stand there perplexed because they don't fit . . . oh, did I mention they'd have at least two bags each?

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
You also avoid the delays that come with finally having to check carry-on bags because they are too large or the overheads are full.

Nope, see my response above. In fact, would delay departure because now those idiots have to send their bag back into the jetway to be checked to whereever . . .

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
) Flight attendants would have better attitudes knowing they wouldn't have to deal with surly passengers who insist on their steamer trunk should fit in the overhead bin. Also, they would be less likely to hurt themselves while trying lift a bag that could weigh half as much as they do.

Agree - F/As shouldn't be doing this anyway unless the passenger is unable - by that I mean, old, infirm, a kid, etc . . . . healthy folks should pack and move their own crap.....kitchen sink included.

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
Interiors of planes would be more open, less claustrophobic because the bins wouldn't be inches above your head and extend nearly to the middle of the cabin.

Been on a 777 lately? Pretty open if you ask me . . . the way those bins glide into the ceiling, pretty nice. 767 the same way . . .

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
Getting through security would be faster because there would be less bags to scan and search.

Getting through security will never be faster until we replace the current TSA idiots with some common sense system. . . . shoes off, shoes on, lighters no, matches no, wait, wait, matches yes, lighters (never filled) yes, wait, no, wait . . . .  crazy 

Bottom line - if the carriers would simply enforce the rules they already have in place about what can and cannot be carried aboard, half the problem would be solved.
FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
Type-Rated
Posts: 3901
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 1999 5:18 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 2:14 pm

I have a solution that would cure this problem once and for all.

When the plane is taxiing from the runway to the terminal, the F/A simply makes this announcement:

"When the aircraft comes to a complete stop at the gate, would all passengers who are carrying rolling suitcases, steamer trunks, kitchen sinks, and shower stalls please remain seated until those who have limited carry on luggage have departed the aircraft. This is so that we may provide those who have large carry ons ample manuvering room and time to remove their oversized luggage". Thank you for your cooperation!

That's ONE announcement I would love to hear!
Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
 
flyboy7974
Posts: 1210
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 4:35 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 2:23 pm

how about no overhead bins, if i started an airline, it wouldnt have overhead bins, screw that, do you see what people bring on. and to all you business people, one bag to bring doesnt include your rollaway, your computer bag, your handbag, then your family goods and everything else you are too impatience to wait for at the end of your flight. flying home for my mother's funeral i laughed in march, a b737 from phx to bur in first on hp, i was last to board, so space was taken, my bag was checked and then missed the flight, points against hp as i was the only not in my suit, but when at the gate in burbank upon arrival, everybody else in first had 3/4 bags, computer pouches, rollaways. give me a break. when the f/a heard, she said she would have offered the space behind row 2 to me, but she didnt know. well she shouldnt have to if all other 7 first pax brought on more then 2-3 bags. security lines would also change, hey people, here's a hint, if it doesnt fit into the trunk of your car, hey dummy, dont try to carry it on. if fedex or ups deny you, dont try to carry it on, it's called a carry on, not your whole life moving coast to coast, or your whole business plan for a meeting not only in your seat, but half of mine, check it!!!!
 
Jonathan L
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon May 07, 2001 4:35 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 3:37 pm

The size of the overhead bins are fine, but people just need to use more common sense. Don't put more in your carry-on than you can lift up into the bins. I've given up putting my carry-on knapsack into the overhead bin since I don't feel like having it crushed by a 100lb beast on rollers that always seems to seek out my poor little bag.

I even had an Air Wisconsin employee telling me to bring both of my bags onto the aircraft as carry-ons when I flew with them last week. The last thing I wanted was to be running around ORD for a couple of hours with two bags, let alone trying to find bin space for one of them in a full CRJ. I discarded that advice and, as expected, my checked bag arrived at my final destination with a total wait time at the baggage claim of about 15 minutes. Anybody so important that they can't wait 15-30 minutes for a checked bag should probably be chartering an aircraft.

[Edited 2005-05-24 08:44:40]
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17078
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 4:13 pm

Quoting Jonathan L (Reply 18):
Anybody so important that they can't wait 15-30 minutes for a checked bag should probably be chartering an aircraft.

You don't get it. 15-20 minutes doesn't sound like much, but if you fly an average of twice a week this is quite a sizeable chunk of your time.

I agree that the rules could be enforced better, but I also submit that we road warriors are not the problem. Sure, we bring big carryons, but we stow them fast and efficiently. The worst are the leisure travelers who insist on carrying their Central American Kettle Drums on board. They're slow and take up a lot of space.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
VHXLR8
Posts: 487
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:58 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 4:26 pm

Quoting JMV (Thread starter):
3) Flight attendants would have better attitudes knowing they wouldn't have to deal with surly passengers who insist on their steamer trunk should fit in the overhead bin

Hahahaha... Sorry, couldn't resist! Actually I fear that in your given scenario, flight attendants would have a worse time (and worse attitude) trying to get everyone's crap into smaller overhead lockers.
 
schipholjfk
Posts: 521
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 4:11 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:11 pm

Quoting Andz (Reply 4):
They do that here. I have always been astounded when flying in the US at how much crap people bring as "carry on".

It's not just the U.S.... people do it everywhere in the world now! Samsonite, Delsey, etc sell the same huge roll-on bags everywhere in the world and bins are pretty standard on planes. So it is not just us Americans, but the entire world does it.
The fun of flying... love it !!!
 
isitsafenow
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 9:22 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:21 pm

Try this idea. The airlines are seeking new ways to "enhance revenue".
Rent the overhead space. A buck a bag no matter what it is, limit two. You can reserve the overhead space when you book, but you better use it or lose your buck.
The laptops and purses go UNDER and there is no charge.
Now theres a can of worms you all can sort out.

safe
If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
 
ckfred
Posts: 4709
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:50 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:21 pm

Bins were first installed, because the only items that could go overhead were coats and hats. The idea was that small items, such as briefcases and cosmetic cases could fit overhead.

AA and TW acutally had closets with several shelves for larger cases. These looked like the shelving units that you see on shuttle buses for rental cars and hotels. But as more seats went into cabins, the closets for suitcases came out.

If you reduce the size of overhead bins, then you will cause TSA to buy smaller scanning equipment. Then, every family traveling with a child is going to jam up the line, because the strollers and car seats won't fit.

Trust me on that one, because my son's stroller got jammed in an x-ray machine at the T-gates at ATL.
 
MKEdude
Posts: 951
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:55 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:37 pm

The point that smaller overhead bins would mean fewer carry-ons, and therefore quicker boarding and deplaning times is a valid one. However telling the average passenger (especally in the U.S.) that their carry-ons must be limited even further would go over like a fart in church!

It ain't gonna happen!
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline." Frank Zappa
 
September11
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:49 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:39 pm

Interesting photos of VERY OLD cabin views

707
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike Genovese


727
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike Genovese


DC-8
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Robert L. Bradley


L-10
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike Genovese


A-300
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike Genovese


DC-9
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike Genovese

Airliners.net of the Future
 
airbazar
Posts: 6860
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:39 pm

Quoting Ssides (Reply 3):
Well, the market has spoken -- and I can guarantee you that larger overhead bins are a money-maker for airlines.

The reasoning is simple: airlines make their money off the road-warrior business traveler who flies 4-5 times a month at close to full fare. For these people, convenience and quickness are paramount.

Anyone who's ever travelled with a child will tell you that there is solution to that. It's called checking your bags at the gate, much like what is done with baby strollers. You hand your bag off at the gate as you enter th eplane and the bag will be waiting for you at your destination when you exit the plane.

Another option would be to configure larger bins above the premium seats since those are the ones who are most likely to use them. In this era of economy plus, etc, that shouldn't be too difficult. That way, those of us who don't use, don't need, don't want large overhead bins don't have to deal with it.

I'm all in favor of smaller bins.
 
User avatar
RayChuang
Posts: 8004
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2000 7:43 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 10:46 pm

I think what ICAO and IATA ought to do is to impose a reference standard for maximum-size/weight carry-on luggage. That way, you don't need so big overhead bins and also encourages luggage manufacturers to come up with better-design carry-on bags that can carry more in a smaller physical size.
 
ltbewr
Posts: 12388
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 1:24 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 11:20 pm

With all of the well known 'horror stories' of what happens in checked baggage, it has encouraged more to go all carry on. This has been compounded by more being carried on including personal entertainment equipment, laptop computers (and their accessories), food and beverages (due to cutbacks in food service on today's flights), personal items and some clothes (in case your checked bag gets lost). It is even worse in the winter/cooler weather due to the use of the overhead space for bulky coats. Of course, peak business and holiday times when flights are full anyway are more likely to face space problems.
I am not afraid to check baggage in if I am going for more than a couple of days someplace. My carry on usually is a hike/day pack, soft with enough space and pockets to let me carry on what I need and easy to place under the seat. As I am short, I have no problems for seat room, and the underseat item can be used as a footrest. I usually am on flights that are not full either and that makes it easier as well.
But no, don't make the overheads smaller. I would like to see a return of the 'closets' for last minute oversized and too many bags (or where baby needs are useful on board).
 
dallas74
Posts: 95
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:09 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Tue May 24, 2005 11:48 pm

Instead of creating new rules how about we just enforce the current ones.

1. Two bags. Period. No two bags and a personal item.
2. Overstuffed back packs should be checked luggage.
3. Monitoring of carry ons should start at the ticket counter or e-ticket machine with airline staff.
4. Airlines should be required to put a representative at the TSA line to turn customers back to the ticket counter who try to bring too many items or oversize items on board. Don't even let these people get to the gate or worse on the plane. If they miss their flight - it's their problem.
5. I am a frequent flyer and I do understand the frustration of waiting 20 to 30 minutes for bags, but if you want to bring more - fly First Class where they have a closet for more items on most airlines - otherwise suck it up like I do and check the third bag.

Show some common courtesy and limit yourself to two bags that fit in the overheads.

The problem with air travel in America is that most people think they are the most important person on the plane. Sad truth is we are all in it together.
 
CM767
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:58 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 12:02 am

Curiously, I am convert of this, when I started to travel I hated to have carry on. For me, my passport on my pocket and a book was too much, I really enjoyed the space and the easy boarding.

Unfortunately business trips have changed all that, after too many lost baggage incidents, I had to learn to pack light. Now I have just one carry on that fits on the overhead bins and takes little space up, so other passengers can also store their belongings, I also have to agree that many passengers abuse of the overhead bins and are a royal pain to other passengers. Sometimes I have to take an extra bag for my laptop and documents; the second bag fits under my seat and if on checking in, they insist that I only can take one bag with me, the other gets checked.

I do not know how some people can get away with some huge bags and manage to fill an overhead bin by themselves, I have to agree that carry-on has to be limited but not banned altogether.
But The Best Thing God Has Created Is A New Day
 
User avatar
PipoA380
Posts: 1537
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 1:36 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 1:18 am

Quoting CM767 (Reply 30):
I do not know how some people can get away with some huge bags and manage to fill an overhead bin by themselves, I have to agree that carry-on has to be limited but not banned altogether.

I fully second that. It's once again all because some people have no respect for others and their egocentric behaviour annoys all the other - or maybe it's just ignorants!
It's not about AIRBUS. it's not about BOEING. It's all about the beauty of FLYING.
 
Speedbird2155
Posts: 684
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:44 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 1:57 am

Quoting Dallas74 (Reply 29):
3. Monitoring of carry ons should start at the ticket counter or e-ticket machine with airline staff.
4. Airlines should be required to put a representative at the TSA line to turn customers back to the ticket counter who try to bring too many items or oversize items on board. Don't even let these people get to the gate or worse on the plane. If they miss their flight - it's their problem.

These are things that already happen in much of Europe. In T4 at LHR, there is a scale and BA usually has 2 members of staff to monitor carry-ons, primarily for those you think they can use self-service machines and then avoid checking bags in. Having the scales is a big help in monitoring the weight. These are also used by KL/KQ who have someone to monitor for some of their flights.
 
andz
Posts: 7626
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:49 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 2:18 am

Quoting Dallas74 (Reply 29):
Instead of creating new rules how about we just enforce the current ones

well said.
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
 
PHLBOS
Posts: 6504
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 6:38 am

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 2:21 am

Quoting Dallas74 (Reply 29):
Instead of creating new rules how about we just enforce the current ones.

1. Two bags. Period. No two bags and a personal item.

Since 9/14/01, the carry-on rule (at least in the U.S.) has been one carry-on and one personal item.

Another thing being overlooked here is the carry-on 'test-bin' that (depending on the carrier) are located at the ticket counter and/or at the gate. Pre-9/11 and pre-on-line check-in, that would have been sufficient to monitor the size of carry-ons. However, the Ticketed Passengers Only/Boarding Pass Required beyond the security check-point requirement has rendered the test-bins at the gate absolutely useless in terms of effectiveness. People who do on-line check-ins but are not checking luggage usually bypass the ticket counter and go right to the security check-point.

What the airlines/airports should do is relocate the test-bins presently placed at the gates to the security check-point. Where passengers will know while waiting to go through security whether or not their carry-on will fit.
"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
 
bsu747
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 10:58 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 2:59 am

The Aircraft crew should enforce better the rules on baggage so that if you have made it pass check in and the security checkpoint that if you have too much carry on they insist that it goes in the hold for the duration of the flight like they do with wheelchair's and strollers, that way they can get their items back when they leave the aircraft.
Still think the muppets that insist that they so much carry on should that a long hard look at themselves and wonder why security checkpoints are so long, fellow passengers are annoyed, and flights are delayed all because of the actions of the ignorant few who can't be bothered to wait for a short while to collect checked in luggage.
BSU747
Flying may not be all plain sailing, but the fun of it is worth the price.
 
ha763
Posts: 3168
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 5:36 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 8:53 am

Quoting PHLBOS (Reply 34):
What the airlines/airports should do is relocate the test-bins presently placed at the gates to the security check-point. Where passengers will know while waiting to go through security whether or not their carry-on will fit.

The only problem with those test bins are that they are actually slightly smaller than the actually overhead bins on the aircraft. Anyone remember what happened on the WN version of Airline where the pax was told that her rollaboard was too big because it didn't fit in the test bin? She was still able to stuff it into the overhead bin. Plus, anyone can just bypass the bins and gate agents are usually too busy to notice carryon size unless it is much bigger than usual.

The best solution would be to standardize carryon size and do what UA had at IAD, a template attached to the x-ray machine. That way if it doesn't fit through the template, it doesn't even have a chance to even get to the gate because it cannot be screened by security at the checkpoint. Plus limit hand screening to only secondary screening and bags that fit through the template. Since the larger bags cannot be screened at the checkpoint, the pax will be forced to go back and check them in.
 
SLC1
Posts: 1360
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:13 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 9:04 am

Quoting ScottB (Reply 12):
Nope, what you'd see instead is people trying to carry aboard the largest possible bag (or larger) which would fit underneath the seat in front and spend two minutes in the aisle trying to wedge it in there. Then the flight attendants would spend half an hour checking all the bags which didn't really fit underneath the seats in front.

Exactly, and not only that, but there'd be people searching the plane for a place to put their bag. You should have seen a DL 738 from SEA to SLC where practically every inch of space in the overhead bins were used up. The F/A must have had his hand shut underneath the bin door twice trying to get people to take their bags back to put underneath the seat and was falling over in the aisle with the people going back and forth to find a spot to shove their precious bag. I really felt sorry for the guy. That boarding experience was an absolute mess compared to anything I've ever seen and probably the reason we left a little late. Not good for turnaround time = not good for airline. Plus as was mentioned, less checked baggage = less staff.

Why do airlines waste their money with the little "does it fit" bins if they're not going to use them.
We're gonna do what we like to call a "jetBlue how do you do", which is slang for dumping a bunch of fuel in the ocean
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17078
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Smaller Overhead Bins Please

Wed May 25, 2005 11:17 pm

Quoting Airbazar (Reply 26):
Anyone who's ever travelled with a child will tell you that there is solution to that. It's called checking your bags at the gate, much like what is done with baby strollers. You hand your bag off at the gate as you enter th eplane and the bag will be waiting for you at your destination when you exit the plane.

And this wouldn't make boarding take longer?

Quoting Airbazar (Reply 26):

Another option would be to configure larger bins above the premium seats since those are the ones who are most likely to use them. In this era of economy plus, etc, that shouldn't be too difficult. That way, those of us who don't use, don't need, don't want large overhead bins don't have to deal with it.

It's already de facto this way since the lower seat density means more bin space/pax.

Quoting Dallas74 (Reply 29):

1. Two bags. Period. No two bags and a personal item.

It's actually one bag and a personal item nowadays.


I don't really think the bags are a huge problem. The problem is twofold:
- People bringing bulky fragile items and taking up a lot of space.
- People who put their small briefcase crosswise lying down when it would fit depthwise and standing up. I see so much wasted space in the bins it's insane.
- Finally, I don't really think boardin takes THAT long...
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo